Progressive Middle East watchers on Wednesday condemned the Biden administration’s targeting of 15 firms and people in at least five countries allegedly linked to the sale and shipment of Iranian petroleum products in violation of US economic sanctions.
In announcing the new sanctions, the US Treasury Department cites an executive order signed in 2018 by then-President Donald Trump as the basis for penalizing petrochemical companies and individuals based in Iran, China, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam.
Meanwhile, the State Department said in a statement that “the United States has been sincere and steadfast in pursuing a path of meaningful diplomacy to achieve a mutual return to full implementation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA),” commonly called the Iran nuclear deal.
“It is Iran that has, to date, failed to demonstrate a similar commitment to that path,” the statement contended, echoing US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s suggestion that Iran, not the US – which reneged on the agreement under Trump – is to blame for challenges hampering the latest efforts to revive the JCPOA.
Assal Rad, research director at the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), pushed back against an attempt by Blinken to blame Iran for the JCPOA impasse.
This is false: “Absent a commitment from Iran to return to the JCPOA”— Assal Rad (@AssalRad) July 6, 2022
-Iran never quit the JCPOA, the US did
-US under Biden is yet to return to the deal
-The US violated the deal by reimposing sanctions
-Biden has maintained the Trump policies he spent years criticizing https://t.co/jGETpccmok
“The US pulled out of the JCPOA under Trump and rather than acknowledge this and seriously pursue diplomacy, the Biden administration has forced Iran to choose between unreasonable concessions or more sanctions which kill the Iranian people,” the peace group CodePink tweeted. “It’s really that simple.”
Middle East policy expert Sina Toossi tweeted that it was the US, not Iran, that needs to show its willingness to revive the nuclear deal.
“The Biden administration’s ‘commitment’ to returning to the JCPOA can only be demonstrated by taking serious steps to rebuild trust and bring the US back into compliance, not by doubling down on Trump’s failed and self-defeating policies,” he said.
2/ In Tehran, the continued emphasis on "guarantees" seems less a function of specific economic demands than political cover for the fact that any official making a pro-JCPOA case will, if the U.S. leaves the deal in 2025, look like a sucker.— Ali Vaez (@AliVaez) July 6, 2022
Trita Parsi, executive director of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, lamented that President Joe Biden “is continuing and embracing Trump’s max pressure policy, while expecting a different result.”
“All of this could have been avoided if Biden just returned to the JCPOA via executive order, as he did with Paris and the WHO,” he added, referring to the US rejoining the Paris climate agreement and World Health Organization after Trump-era disengagement.
The new sanctions come ahead of Biden’s Middle East trip next week, which will include stops in Israel and Saudi Arabia, two erstwhile foes increasingly united by their common enemy, Iran.
Paul Pillar: #Iran It a mid-level power whose military has been weakened by decades of sanctions. It is not a serious threat that begs for a regional military alliance to confront it. MORE: https://t.co/HD0xvYcIXQ— Responsible Statecraft (@RStatecraft) July 6, 2022
As Paul Pillar of Georgetown University’s Center for Security Studies noted Tuesday, the upcoming trip also comes amid “increasing talk about the United States getting more deeply committed to anti-Iran security arrangements on the side of Arab states of the Persian Gulf, especially Saudi Arabia and Israel.”
NIAC policy director Ryan Costello last week accused the Biden administration of eschewing JCPOA revival in favor of “planning to bend the knee to [Saudi Crown Prince] Mohammed bin Salman in an apparent attempt to lower oil prices.”
“A restored Iran deal can do far more to lower global oil prices, and it would have tangible benefits for US security by removing the twin threats of a nuclear-armed Iran and a devastating war over Iran’s nuclear program,” Costello asserted. “It’s not too late for Biden to make the right call.”
Brett Wilkins is is staff writer for Common Dreams. Based in San Francisco, his work covers issues of social justice, human rights and war and peace. This originally appeared at CommonDreams and is reprinted with the author’s permission.