Late on May 8, 1945 – May 9, Moscow time – remnants of the Nazi regime surrendered to the Soviet forces in the ruins of Berlin. The “Thousand-year Reich” had barely lasted a dozen. A week earlier, Hitler had committed suicide, lacking courage to face defeat and blaming everyone but himself for it. The European nightmare, second in a generation, was officially over.
Almost seventy years hence, however, there are grounds to wonder as to who had really won.
Fetishes and Fantasies
All participants in the war exaggerated their own contribution, while diminishing that of others. The British romanticize North Africa, where it took them two years to finally defeat a handful of under-strength German divisions. Americans play up “D-Day”, the campaign in France, and the Lend-Lease material aid. The Soviets would dismiss the Lend-Lease and glorify Stalin’s alleged strategic genius. The regime of Marshal Tito in Yugoslavia maintained for decades that the brave Communist partisans tied down 25 German divisions and thus somehow turned the tide of the war.
Another fantasy, propagated many years later, was that the Allies fought to stop Hitler’s genocide of Jews. The general public was entirely ignorant of it till the end of the war, while the governments kept whatever information they received under wraps. While modern Western Holocaust narrative makes sure to note the murder of Roma and homosexuals, Slavs – also targeted for mass extermination – are not mentioned at all.
Few in the West today realize that “Nazi” was short for “National Socialist.” The Soviets got around the awkward bit about “socialism” by calling the Nazis “fascist” instead.
At Nuremberg, Nazis were not prosecuted for their genocidal endeavors, but for starting the war – “crime against peace”, as the verdict put it. Today, however, the West believes starting a war not a crime – so long as they do it. Imperial policymakers angrily condemn “appeasement”, then replicate Munich and call it law. Every ruler of a country they wish to invade is compared to Hitler, every ethnic conflict to the Holocaust, and every skirmish to D-Day, to the point where all perspective and meaning are lost.
Specters of 1942
The European Union is an eerie echo of what Nazi slogans described as the “European family of nations” working together for the prosperity of all and against the “scourge of Bolshevism”. It isn’t just the slogans: the whole endeavor has roots in National-Socialism.
Modern managerial state lives up to Mussolini’s definition of fascism: “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.” Yet anyone who opposes the wholesale destruction of national sovereignty or social engineering is dismissed as “fascist”. Meanwhile, unelected EU commissars claim powers to do anything, from bizarre – regulating the circumference of carrots and curvature of cucumbers – to revolting, such as declaring Fascism, Nazism and Communism the same.
“Human rights” groups don’t object when Waffen-SS veterans march in Latvia – now a member of the EU and NATO – but are bothered that Russia, a nation grievously harmed by Communism, refuses to dishonor the banner under which it bore the brunt of the fighting against Hitler.
The map of Europe today looks eerily like the one from 1942. May 9 has been designated “Europe Day”. And all of Hitler’s allies in the Balkans are now members of NATO, allies of the American Empire. Not surprisingly, in the sequel to WW2 fought in the 1990s – and continuing still after a fashion –, the Luftwaffe and the panzers were re-cast as the “good guys”.
Walk in Hell
The first Great War began when Austria-Hungary’s decision to invade and crush Serbia escalated quickly. Four years later, there was no more Austria-Hungary, Germany was on her knees, and the Bolsheviks had overrun Russia. Serbia foolishly invested its victory into a country later called Yugoslavia. Driven by grudges from the previous war, Hitler had first gone after Czechoslovakia – the Czech declaration of independence began the collapse of Austria-Hungary. By 1941, it was Yugoslavia’s turn.
The regency government that had signed the Tripartite Pact under great pressure from Berlin was overthrown on March 27, between massive popular protests and a British-backed military coup. In April 1941, Hitler made it a personal mission to “wipe Yugoslavia off the map.”
Parts of its territory were annexed directly to Germany, others given to Italy, Hungary, Bulgaria, and Albania (an Italian protectorate until 1943, a German ally thereafter). An “independent” Montenegro was set up as an Italian protectorate, while most of today’s Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina became the Independent State of Croatia (NDH). The remainder was dubbed “Serbia” and placed under German occupation.
While the Serbs in the NDH faced wholesale extermination (the visceral brutality of which appalled even the Nazis), the brutality of the occupation forces in “Serbia” rivaled that of the Eastern Front. In June 1941, royalist guerrillas (commonly mislabeled “Chetniks”) launched an uprising. The Germans responded by executing up to 100 civilian hostages for every one of their soldiers killed, and 50 for every wounded. The royalists soon had another problem: a Communist insurrection, launched after Hitler invaded the USSR, and as hostile to the royalists as to the German occupation. Communists and royalists fought each other as well as the Axis forces, waiting for the Allies to arrive and tip the balance.
In the end, the Communists prevailed. By 1944, they had secured British backing and successfully lobbied the Allies for massive air strikes against cities in Serbia, which did little damage to the German war effort but caused great loss of civilian life in royalist strongholds. The British betrayal of the royalists is well chronicled in “The Rape of Serbia” by Michael Lees. In September 1944, Soviet forces – reinforced by Bulgarian troops, who had switched their allegiance from Hitler to Stalin – entered Serbia and drove out the Germans.
Insult to Injury
The territory of Nazi-occupied Serbia thus had to deal with four years of brutal repression, a civil war, tens of thousands of refugees fleeing Croatia’s genocide, heavy bombing by the Allies, and a Bulgarian “liberation”. Then the Communists took over.
Long before the war, the Yugoslav Communists had declared Yugoslavia’s destruction as their objective. To them, it was a “prison of nations,” in which the “Greater Serbian bourgeoisie hegemony” oppressed everyone else. Understandably, once they took over Yugoslavia, they were reluctant to destroy it entirely. So they did the next best thing, and made Hitler’s dismemberment more or less official, dividing Yugoslavia into Soviet-style “republics.”
Official history claimed that the multiethnic Communist partisans were the only real resistance movement, which single-handedly defeated both the Axis and the “domestic traitors”, the worst of which were the bloodthirsty-Greater-Serbian-nationalist “Chetniks”. Any suggestion that the royalists had actually helped the Allied war effort was suppressed – and the West went along with it, because Tito was an asset in the Cold War against Stalin.
But the insult to injury was the imposed moral equivalence between the royalists and the Ustasha, the NDH regime that murdered close to a million Serbs in an effort to “purify” Croatia. As one Croat leader later argued, that made the Croats two-time winners of the war – and the Serbs doubly vanquished.
History Repeated
The only thing that held Yugoslavia together for 35 years was its supreme leader, Marshal Josip Broz “Tito”. After his death, the system set up to be dysfunctional performed as intended. With the end of the Cold War, Yugoslavia lost both Western credits and Eastern markets. The newly reunited Germany, the nascent European Union and the rising American Empire all saw an opportunity to profit from Yugoslavia’s demise.
In a ghastly re-run of the 1940s, Hitler’s former allies now sought sponsors in the West, and succeeded where their Waffen-SS forebears failed. Worse yet, they excused their actions by smearing the Serbs as Nazis (!) reborn. The judgment at Nuremberg was made mockery by “judgments” at The Hague. Fifty years after the Nazi surrender, American bombers, German tanks and Communist propaganda came together in service of one of Hitler’s goals: to crush the Serbs as an example to others.
No wonder, then, that only Russia still celebrates Victory Day. Elsewhere, Hitler’s ghost rejoices.
Read more by Nebojsa Malic
- Consenting to Rape – April 25th, 2013
- An Unexpected Refusal – April 12th, 2013
- Lawless: An Oddly Exceptional Empire – March 28th, 2013
- Illusion of Triumph – March 21st, 2013
- Commanding the Tides – February 28th, 2013





Guest
May 11th, 2013 at 1:03 am
Imagine what would have happened to all of Europe had Hitler not ordered the invasion of the USSR in June 1941, pre-empting Stalin's own plan to invade Western Europe, turning the entire continent into one gigantic gulag and communist utopia. Men from every European nation, including Latvia and Serbia joined the Waffen-SS to fight Soviet communism. But in 1945, the Zionist puppets Roosevelt, Churchill, Eisenhower and company, after defeating the Third Reich went ahead and handed half of Europe over to Stalin and shipped millions of anti-communist Eastern European people to the Soviets for enslavement and extermination.
@Cameron22Reece
May 11th, 2013 at 1:33 am
The royalists supported Hitler. Seems this revisionist rant ignores the crimes of Nazi collaborators.
Guest
May 11th, 2013 at 2:07 am
Like Tito and his Allied-supported communist partisans were some sort of saints?
MichaelKenny
May 11th, 2013 at 7:27 am
When Americans start waving the swastika, you know they see themselves as defeated! The idea that the EU derives from national socialism is quite amusing. In fact, the EU derives from the Congress of Vienna, which met in 1814 to organise Europe’s security and stability at European level after 25 years of war and chaos caused by the French Revolution. The “Congress system”, which had no formal institutions, gave Europe 100 years without a major war and broke down only in 1914. By 1945, the League of Nations and the UN had been set up, so it was logical for European leaders to think of giving the European collective security system formal institutions. From that logic sprang NATO, the Council of Europe and what has now become the European Union. Thus, the EU is merely the logical manifestation in today’s world of the 200-year old European belief that Europe’s security and stability needs to be organised at European level.
conumishu
May 11th, 2013 at 7:29 am
Excellent piece of journalism and brief yet meaningful historical analysis !
Nebojsa Malic
May 11th, 2013 at 7:43 am
This type of Nazi propaganda illustrates the point of my article perfectly.
By the way, there were no Serbian Waffen-SS. None. Zero.
Nebojsa Malic
May 11th, 2013 at 7:50 am
How exactly did the royalists "support Hitler"? They rebelled against German occupation, suffered horrific casualties fighting the Germans, even rescued hundreds of Allied airmen who were BOMBING THEM. But the Communists declared everyone but themselves a villain, and it suited the British and the Soviets alike to turn Yugoslavia over to Tito, so their story became official.
conumishu
May 11th, 2013 at 11:17 am
Council of Europe is a 100% US creation meant to subvert (successfully) communist European countries, subsequently used to subordinate them to western imperial domination.
Vienna Congress was a typical association of potentates set to maintain the status quo and their privileges. Of course there is no connection, per se, with the future EU gang but I like the parallelism between the stale empires of the time and the bankers ruled oligarchies of today. Also, the "peace" argument gathers a lot of strength in such good company, slavery in peace, such a dream!
There's only one empire, the Western empire, with two centers of power, the US one, more important, and the EU one. Since the real power resides with the bankers, the importance of one relative to the other may vary in time, but there's absolutely no conflict between US and EU (and/or it's major players), not even to the degree of the bickering a few years back or close to the tensions between US and France's de Gaulle (when EU wasn't the post-92 political monstrosity).
eric siverson
May 11th, 2013 at 1:35 pm
Malic's history is the same as I saw it ., I think we may differ on the future , but so far Malic has been more correct than me , You see I expect Serbia to riseup anyday .. I don't believe the Serbs will bow down to Germany .and the national socialist E.U. much longer .
Guest
May 11th, 2013 at 6:08 pm
"…The only thing that held Yugoslavia together for 35 years was its supreme leader, Marshal Josip Broz “Tito”…."
This, I think, is both a wrong conclusion and harmful to Mr. Malic's argument itself. It is a convenient myth in the West that Yugoslavia was a low hanging fruit, ready to be picked, after Tito's passing away. That is not so.
West has vested interest in promothing that falacy and thereby absolving itself of the horrendous crimes perpetrated on the people of Yugoslavia and of any responsibility for attacking and dismantling a sovereign state.
A handful people with an ax to grind (Tudjman, Izetbegovic, Jansha,) and other anti-Yugoslav elements were supported by the West and assisted in bringing about what is now where Yugoslavia once was.
I do not understand Mr.Malic gifting these criminals an absolution by repeating the myth created in the West, that Yugoslavia existed only because of Tito. Mr. Malic is a good analyst, but, for some unknown reason, naively promotes this myth.
Articles for Sunday » Scott Lazarowitz's Blog
May 12th, 2013 at 3:12 am
[...] Nebojsa Malic: Victory Day [...]
Nebojsa Malic
May 12th, 2013 at 10:02 am
How does pointing out *facts* about the Communist approach to Yugoslavia, the internal boundaries and ethnic engineering, and the disastrous 1974 Constitution become giving the murderers of Yugoslavia a free pass?
The mainstream Western propaganda never claimed that Yugoslavia was a dysfunctional country that needed to be destroyed – oh no, they sang paeans to its multiethnic diversity, and blamed the "ultranationalist Serbs" for "oppressing" everyone (same as the Communist did from 1928 onward). So they did the same thing Hitler did and backed the "oppressed".
But that doesn't change in the slightest the fact that the second Yugoslavia had the same problem as the first: many of its inhabitants thought themselves superior, not equal, to the Serb majority, and wished a return to a former time of dominance (Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire). And Tito literally buried the evidence of this in order to rebuild Yugoslavia in his image.
Pointing out Yugoslavia's flawed premises doesn't absolve those who destroyed it, be that the West in the 1990s or Hitler fifty years prior.
Guest
May 12th, 2013 at 10:50 pm
I stand corrected about no Serbian Waffen-SS. But what do you think would have happened to Europe had Stalin conquered all of Europe? According to Viktor Suvorov's book, "The Chief Culprit", in June '41, just prior to Operation Barbarossa, the Soviet Army was deployed in offensive echelons near the USSR's western border, not defensive ones to repel a German attack. And T-34 and KV-1 tanks were designed to operate on the superior paved roads of Western Europe, not the USSR, although T-34 proved a good all-terrain fighting vehicle, better than the German tanks of the time. Call it Nazi propaganda if you like, but Allied victory propaganda we've been fed for the past 68 years has been insidious itself.
Nebojsa Malic
May 13th, 2013 at 8:02 am
That's like asking what would have happened had the Japanese conquered the U.S. – though I suppose the Soviets theoretically could have at least tried. Yet there is not a shred of evidence, beyond Suvorov's questionable claim, that Stalin ever intended this.
Victory Day | Pogledi
May 13th, 2013 at 11:21 am
[...] Malic, May 11, 2013 Print This | Share [...]
Nikkolas
May 16th, 2013 at 9:25 am
Well you would be speaking German today..Many years ago in one country in North America ( let guess which one ) ONLY one vote prevailed it would be English or German official language !
The is the part of history not invented ! by CNN or Hollywood!
eric siverson
May 17th, 2013 at 10:04 pm
Believe it or not I think Milosevic would have been elected president of all of Yugoslavia , if a fair and honest election would have been allowed .