Memo to Congressman David Obey
MEMORANDUM FOR: Congressman David Obey
FROM: A Former Admirer
SUBJECT: Ducking the Challenge
"We can sit, frozen in our own indifference, as President Roosevelt once said…" That’s what you said yesterday in connection with saving teachers’ jobs. Sadly, it also applies — in spades — to saving lives in an unnecessary war.
It is amazing how you’ve changed, Dave, in the 25 years since you told then-Secretary George Shultz from your subcommittee chairman seat, "I did not take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States until I got tired." (As you’ll recall, Shultz had made the mistake of saying, in effect, screw the law; the American people are tired of hearing about Iran-Contra.)
Now we are supposed to feel sorry for you because you say you are too "bone tired" to do your duty to defend the Constitution as it continues to be undermined by an illegal and futile war in Afghanistan in which over 1,000 American soldiers have already died.
Have you made your colleagues aware of the unconscionable fact that little thought has been given to the need to appropriate hundreds of billions more to care for those wounded in battle? Even now, most of our veterans are already being treated shabbily. You know that.
You recently told a TV interviewer you thought the war in Afghanistan was a "fool’s errand." But you then added quickly that, if we are to pursue this errand, it must be fully funded. You are smart enough to know there is no logic in that.
Two important things happened yesterday:
1-You made it clear that your "chairman’s mark" on the supplemental that provides for $33 billion more for the war will be augmented by the lipstick of $23 billion for teachers’ jobs in what you plan to send forward from Appropriations.
2-You refused to meet with former Iraq War veteran Josh Stieber to hear how the Pentagon’s "rules of engagement" have brutalized our own soldiers — not to mention countless Iraqis and Afghans. Stieber’s two-week attempt to get a few minutes of your time was given the cold shoulder — even though he spent from 8:15 AM to 6:30 PM yesterday in the Rayburn building.
You owe the Josh Stiebers of our armed forces big time. We all do. You must not have taken the time to view "Collateral Murder," the Army gun-barrel video showing American troops killing Iraqi civilians in a turkey-shoot on July 12, 2007 during the "surge" in Baghdad. In blowing off Josh Stieber (who was in that unit), you also blew off the 100,000 of his former buddies already in, or headed to, Afghanistan. Thousands of those will have their lives destroyed, in one way or another, with the help of $33 billion more for what you, in a candid moment, called a "fool’s errand."
A sad irony here is that when you came to Congress, you helped end the Vietnam War by cutting off funding. Another sad reality is this: I know that you know that Afghanistan is another Vietnam — only more feckless. Sadder still is the fact that you are unwilling to tell your colleague about Joe McCarthy and scare tactics — whether they are about communists or terrorists. And it is both profoundly sad, and highly ironic, that Joe McCarthy’s demagoguery was what prompted you to get involved in politics.
Not all that hard to do, I suppose — I mean, to give President Obama the wherewithal to fund the war rather than wind it down. After all, your sons will not have to go; nor will any of your neighbors in the 22207 zip-code area of Arlington. Neither will the sons of your colleagues in Congress. Our "professional army" is a poverty draft, and you know it. "Preferential option for the poor" be damned.
In my mind’s eye I can see a long line of people, once proud of you, now wondering what has happened. I don’t mean only La Follette, who of course didn’t know you, but after whom you have styled yourself. No, I mean people who did know you and once admired you: people like Sister Margaret, Sister Tecla, John Francis Dearden, Tom Gumbleton. And people like me.
When "heartland progressives," as you call yourself on the cover of your book, get "bone-tired," that is precisely the time when they should stick to their principles and go out fighting. What, in God’s name, have you got to lose?
Call me an "idiot liberal," if you will. I’ll refrain from name-calling — although quite a few come to mind. I just want to register my profound disappointment at, and inability to understand, the Faustian bargain you appear to have struck, as well as my grief over the lives that will be lost and damaged as a result.
Yours truly,
/s/
Ray McGovern
Arlington, Virginia
May 27, 2010
Read more by Ray McGovern
- Obama’s Super-Bowl Fumble on Iran – February 7th, 2012
- Divining the Truth About Iran – February 1st, 2012
- US, Israel Agree: Iran Not Building Nukes – January 25th, 2012
- Pvt. Manning and Imperative of Truth – December 21st, 2011
- Are Americans in Line for Gitmo? – December 4th, 2011





fbover
May 28th, 2010 at 9:43 am
Joe McCarthy was not a demagogue. His detractors were. Time and the Venona papers have proven that he was. almost always right and that the liberal left neocon Smearbundists of the 1950s were were uniformly wrong. It is unlike you, Mr. McGovern to spout such trite, discredited Mommy Professor tommyrot.
bogi666
May 28th, 2010 at 12:03 pm
Joe McCarthy was an alcoholic on the payroll of the Nationalist Chinese to stir up anti-communist hysteria after Mao kicked him to Taiwan which was annexed by Chiang ki Chek into China along with Manchuria and Tibet. These illegal annexations were accepted by the USG which enabled Mao to continue claiming them as China. Joe died of his alcoholism. Why is it that you neocon's gravitate to alcoholics like Beck, Falwell,Bush, McCarthy as leaders. This is mindlessness, the inability to discern thoughts of alcoholics and your own from facts. Construing the thoughts of the deranged like McCarthy into your own facts.
liberal
May 28th, 2010 at 12:05 pm
Completely wrong. Communist influence had waned by the time Joe McCarthy came around.
MvGuy
May 28th, 2010 at 7:05 am
Thank you again for your TIRELESS work trying to keep us ALL honest.. Your memo to David Obey points out how much he has changed, from a hero to those of us who abhorred the false flag triggered Vietnam War…. Another attempt of the empire to quash unapproved independence… And now he is willing to sign on to an equivalent endeavor….if not completely.. ["fools errand"] in the more important way of providing the financing…. taking the country further into crippling debt… Perhaps it would be instructive to follow Obey from firebrand to accomplice… How he was co-opted, compromised… led to believe that THIS TIME it's different… I see reflections of it in the evolution of all our thinking.. 911 is the reason for much of the changes, unlike the Gulf of Tonkin, it WAS up CLOSE ans PERSONAL… But it has been nine years, and we have had only the Zacarias Moussaoui trial.. Did we learn conclusively how 911 happened from that trial?? Some of the exhibits in that trial are STILL secret… With a government that can manufacture or destroy evidence and torture it's captives to SAY what the gov tells them to say, do, will WE ever find the truth of ANYTHING…???
MvGuy
May 28th, 2010 at 3:13 pm
maybe the Chinese influence would explain how Joe missed the forest while uprooting trees.
Joe McCarthy was a bully and a demagogue….and perhaps a far sighted patriot… Certainly he and his detractors employed the rhetoric of patriotism and what America represents.. Aren't we seeing echo's of the McCarthy paranoia with the neocons and AIPAC… Were those that McCarthy sought to out doing the work of our best or worst motivations… Rhetoric and demagoguery aside, what were the dreams of the people he pursued..?? By polarizing the dialog we lose the middle ground.. It becomes no-mans-land… the middle ground between the socialists and the militarists. Now that we have driven out the communists and Goldman Sachs and the neocon heros take us further in debt to support their larcenous ethos of predatory capitalism and he survival of the best armed. Sorry, we can't afford any social compact, we need the money to keep our enemies at bay… and to arrange new false flag provocations.. Wiki says, "He was noted for making claims that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the United States federal government and elsewhere. Ultimately, McCarthy's tactics and his inability to substantiate his claims led him to be censured by the United States Senate." He certainly was one of us in one respect, he WAS a conspiacy theorist… Did Rahm really offer Sestac a job to open the way for Arlen Spector??? ……….http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2010/05… …http://smartgirlpolitics.ning.com/profiles/blogs/october-surprise-rahm-emanuel” target=”_blank”>.http://smartgirlpolitics.ning.com/profiles/blogs/october-surprise-rahm-emanuel Didn't Specture help Gerald Ford move the neck bullet wound to whitewash the JFK assassination…?? http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/JFK… … http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/JFK… OO, Joe drank.. Vino Veritas??
felipeb
May 28th, 2010 at 7:37 pm
Typical Smearbund. The first and preferred retort to my defense of Joe McCarthy is to point out his drinking problem. In other words you do not have the facts on your side so throw mud. The list of alcoholics in Congress is very long.
Why only mention Joe? Because he exposed the real connection between the USSR and a media powerful subgroup's lack of loyalty to their fellow citizens. It is no coincidence that it is the same subgroup that gave us the war in Iraq, the same subgroup that is significantly underrepresented in the American military. McCarthy's nickname was Tail Gunner Joe. He got it for serving his country which is something few of his detractors or their successors within the Smearbund subgroup ever do.
Senator Joseph McCarthy was right on the facts. He knew what war was, firsthand. His opponents were liars. There is a clear line between the accuracy, tactics and background of those who libeled him and those chickenhawks who gave us Iraq and Afghanistan.