Among the many half-successes, pretend-successes and outright failures, until this week the Empire could still plausibly claim that it had scored a victory in the Balkans. Nearly two decades of efforts to dismantle Yugoslavia just so, and install pliant governments in its arbitrarily arranged shards, seemed to have been crowned with a triumph last fall, when the quisling regime in Belgrade capitulated at the UN General Assembly.
Last year, leaked cables confirmed the suspicions that the government of President Tadic – an unelected coalition thrown together by Imperial ambassadors and operatives – spoke of defending the integrity of Serbia only for domestic public consumption, while working behind the scenes to recognize in practice the “Independent state of Kosovo” carved out of its occupied southern province. To that end, Belgrade engaged in “negotiations” with the ethnic Albanian regime in Kosovo, under EU supervision. After an agreement earlier this month giving all sorts of concessions to Pristina, the talks were inexplicably adjourned by the EU envoy. Then the Albanians struck.
Banditry on the Border
On July 26, heavily armed Albanian “special police” attempted to take over two checkpoints on the former administrative border between Kosovo and the rest of Serbia. The two posts are located in a sliver of territory in the north of the province, where local Serbs successfully opposed the Albanian takeover in 1999; as a result, Serbs still live there in relative security, while the few that have survived a decade of pogroms in the rest of Kosovo live in ghettos surrounded by barbed wire and NATO tanks.
The “government” of KLA boss Hashim Thaci, now calling himself Prime Minister, is determined to assert authority over the entire province, brazenly accusing the Serbs in the north of smuggling and organized crime. In mid-July, Thaci tried to ban trade with Serbia, seeking to pressure Belgrade into recognizing the customs stamps of the “Republic of Kosovo.” Taking over the checkpoints would enable the Albanians to enforce the ban in the Serb-inhabited north.
At first, everything went according to plan: Belgrade was mewling about international law and pleading to KFOR, EULEX and the UN (which fell on deaf ears), while the habitually hapless Tadic swore Serbia “would not fight” but only negotiate. He did so from Prague, where the Empire was honoring his sycophancy with an award. Meanwhile, the Serbian military was preoccupied with a NATO exercise in western Ukraine, presumably aimed at protecting, uh, something from someone - but not Serbia, in any case.
Yet by July 27, Thaci’s police have been sent packing by the local Serbs and one of the posts had been torched. NATO’s KFOR troops, commanded by German General Erhard Bühler, have stepped in – not to protect the civilians, but to assist Thaci’s “police,” ferrying them in helicopters and declaring the checkpoints “live-fire” zones. Endorsement of Thaci’s actions also came from several NATO governments and the Western media.
Shifting the Blame
In 2004, when Albanian mobs rampaged across the province for days, the Western press described the pogrom as “clashes.” The word was in use once again this week, shifting responsibility from the heavily armed Albanians backed by NATO armor to their Serb targets. Voice of America - an official mouthpiece of the U.S. government – said not a word about the Albanian takeover ploy, instead blaming the “Serb mob” which was “not loyal to Kosovo,” and sought to depict this as a deliberate Serb provocation of NATO, “already stretched by wars in Afghanistan and Libya.”
An example of more sedate reporting was the BBC, which also blamed the violence on “Serbian nationalists” and made much of the torching of the checkpoint, but managed to mention that EU and the US have criticized Thaci’s action as “provocative” – albeit at the very end of the story.
For his part, Thaci claims the takeover attempt was a “law and order” mission, seeking to protect the “sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Kosovo.” He also argues that the ban on goods from Serbia is a response to a Serbian ban – enacted when Thaci declared an independent state in 2008 - and that the Serbs in the north are engaging in smuggling and organized crime. That last bit is particularly facetious, since Thaci himself is accused by European investigators of running a “mafia state”.
Empire’s envoy Peter Feith initially endorsed Thaci’s actions, arguing that “every sovereign and internationally recognized state had the right to control its territory.” Except Serbia, apparently. But by July 28, he was condemning “any act of violence or intimidation from any side.”
Why the sudden change of tone? Perhaps because neither the Albanians nor the Empire expected the local Serbs to offer stiff resistance, and that is precisely what happened. Thaci’s very special police were withdrawn after one of them was shot by a sniper and died. The torching of the Jarinje checkpoint came later, when KFOR attempted to bring in regular Albanian police to man the post. Silent or approving when Thaci’s takeover began, the Empire quickly cried foul when the locals refused to submit. The EU is now calling on both sides to “reduce tensions” and refrain from violence…
Outlaws
It is easy to forget that the original mission of NATO’s troops in Kosovo (KFOR) was to occupy the province on behalf of the Albanian KLA and protect them from the Serbian army and police; much of KFOR’s efforts since June 1999 have been directed at protecting the Serbs in the province from the KLA, with questionable success.
Former U.S. official in Kosovo Gerald Galucci, who has cautioned for years against a military takeover of the north even as he supported an independent Kosovo, did not mince words this week. “EULEX is at the least asleep on the job or perhaps quietly complicit,” he blogged on the 26th. “KFOR is no better. It is supposed to prevent security problems and contain or reverse provocations such as Pristina’s police ploy.”
Both EULEX and KFOR have forgotten that “they are in Kosovo as peacekeepers under UN mandate”, reminded Galucci the following day. By Thursday, he was openly calling for the removal of General Bühler. KFOR, Galucci wrote, “has clearly stepped outside its UN Security Council mandate in deciding to enforce the requirements of the institutions in Pristina.” NATO, he pointed out, had no political role in Kosovo under UNSCR 1244, yet was now “acting politically to support a ‘state’ that not even all NATO countries recognize.”
“When the international peacekeepers act outside international law, they become outlaws,” he concluded.
Losing Serbia
In 2009, military analyst William S. Lind warned that the ongoing Imperial pressure and demands from Belgrade could result in a crisis of legitimacy for the Serbian state, and the rise of elements eager to seek solutions outside the accepted political framework. That crisis of legitimacy has now come.
Between calling for diplomacy and vowing not to resist – while being feted by Americans in Prague – and his police arresting protest marchers and (as was rumored) even volunteers trying to cross into Kosovo to support their kin, Tadic has stirred the already unpleasantly smoldering anger of the Serbian public against his government. In light of Thaci’s brazen challenge and the Empire’s cynical response, Tadic’s policies of appeasement have been exposed as both humiliating and useless.
Stripped of all the external romantic trappings, a state is primarily a protection racket. Its inhabitants consent to being governed and taxed in exchange for a promise of government protection from any other force that could endanger their lives or property. Tadic’s government has not only failed to provide that protection, it has actively abetted the assaults on its citizens’ lives and property – by the KLA, by the Empire, and a variety of oligarchs, tycoons, and regional separatists within Serbia. Since it took power, in July 2008, it has been in a constant state of open warfare against its own people. It is entirely possible this spat over Kosovo might be the proverbial last straw.
What remains puzzling is the why – why risk the overthrow of Tadic, Empire’s loyal sycophant, and Serbia as the linchpin of the region, in order to back the KLA now? Why back Thaci at all, for that matter? Washington insiders have admitted that Serbia was the real prize of the 1999 war – and a way of hurting Russia, no less – while the Albanians were just a convenient means to an end. Could it be that the Empire is still devoted to the project referenced by the late Rep. Lantos, to impress “jihadists of all color and hue” by supporting “another Muslim state” in Europe? If so, it is working out so well…
Read more by Nebojsa Malic
- It’s a Riot! – June 13th, 2013
- Victory Day – May 10th, 2013
- Consenting to Rape – April 25th, 2013
- An Unexpected Refusal – April 12th, 2013
- Lawless: An Oddly Exceptional Empire – March 28th, 2013





hoct
July 29th, 2011 at 10:12 pm
I think the most important aspect of local resistance, which played the biggest role in forcing the withdrawal of the paramilitary police of the KLA government in Priština were neither the shots fired, nor setting fire to one of the control points, but the setting up of makeshift roadblocks and standing vigil to block the roads leading to the occupied control points, thus setting up a counter-blockade of the would-be blockaders.
It was also in relation to these efforts that NATO the most clearly sided against the imperiled Serbs, first by trying to intercept and turn away people flowing in to add to the numbers, then by demanding the roadblocks be dismantled and finally by issuing ultimatums and attempting intimidation by threatening to use force to do so itself once its deadlines expired.
What such roadblocks looked like: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKHBtPZBgPI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77M02Pgbj80
Another thing worth mentioning is that yesterday the international media carried NATO statements about declaring a "military zone" and willingness to use live ammo in the context of NATO personnel defending themselves (while they ferry Kosovo Albanian police northwards to make the crossings with unoccupied Serbia impassable for Serbian goods thus enforcing a stranglehold on the Serbs in the north), but that is not quite what NATO was saying.
The German NATO general spoke of instructions to defend lives as well as "property". It was foremost a further attempt at intimidation. The real meaning of the statement was that NATO would henceforth use live ammo to defend the ugly metal containers that make up the control posts from youths that would hurl a petrol bomb at them or take them to the task with a pipe or a club.
esqueleto
July 30th, 2011 at 1:34 am
Let's hope that when Serbia regains its independence, traitors such as the OTPOR student movement who facilitated the empire taking over Serbia, will be remembered…
Wootie Berster
July 30th, 2011 at 5:18 am
It's clear that the empire is spending itself to death like it's former paper foe, the USSR. When the empire falls, its former satrapies will be alone and undefended.
And the notion that Kosovo is a "mafia state" is grimly amusing; all states are mafia states. The current state of the world is something like Chicago in the 20s.. gangs of gangs vs gangs of other gangs.
Ot so it seems from a distance.
montaigne
July 30th, 2011 at 5:31 am
At a neighboor social meeting with food and drinks, I found out one of the neighboors (I live in Denmark) had been involved in Kosovo as a soldier supporting Kosovo against alleged Serbian cruelties.
I started to verbally engage him, but he explained he found out he had been supporting a very wrong cause. One thing was the killings of Kosovo Albans by themselves to blame Serbia. Another the take over of a part of Serbia from a criminal and quite uncivilised socalled "people". "Imagine a part of Denmark, like Fyn (a Danish island since about 1000 years ago) was to be declared independent if immigrants happened to be a majority there".
The insanity of NATO and UN is unbelievable! And no sort of accountability exists!
Michael Kenny
July 30th, 2011 at 6:41 am
I assume this is an attempt to divert attention from the propaganda disaster in Norway and re-launch the "inherently evil Muslims" propaganda line! However, the fact that the Yugoslav fiasco is still going on after 20 years makes it too a propaganda disaster for those who wanted to "turn NATO around" and make it into an instrument for the defence of Israel.
MvGuy
July 30th, 2011 at 6:52 am
Yes montaigne, It would appear "The insanity of NATO and UN is unbelievable! And no sort of accountability exists!" But there is an animal sort of accountability….. one that werks to divide and marginalize… One that isn't much interested in what the victims think or international law…. It is the cold war extension behavior… It is missile defense for Europe being sold as protection against Iran… Not Russia… The real object is always clear and actually clearly delineated… It is full spectrum dominance, hegemony and having no resistance to any act or action… It is the ongoing project to rule the world and control everything and everyone… It is the NWO with the U.S. as top cop! It is the U.S. taxpayers paying for their own enslavement. Try:
"Engdahl's two previous books include "A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order" explaining that America's post-WW II dominance rests on two pillars and one commodity – unchallengeable military power and the dollar as the world's reserve currency along with the quest to control global oil and other energy resources.
He called Eurasia the "center of world power extending from Germany and Poland in the East through Russia and China to the Pacific and including the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent." He explained that America's urgent task was to assure that "no state or combination of states gains the capacity to expel the United States from Eurasia or even to diminish significantly its decisive arbitration role." Dominating that part of the world is key to controlling the planet, and its the main reason for NATO's existence. From inception, its mission was offense." See: http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/ http://www.rense.com/general86/review.htm
conumishu
July 30th, 2011 at 8:57 am
No, it's an attempt to divert attention while asteroid "Je suis un Brusselois, moi aussi" lands peacefully in the so-called EUropean capital bringing news of multiculturalist hope and we all join hands singing kumbaya.
rosemerry
July 31st, 2011 at 3:22 pm
I have read Engdahl's books, and certainy get a different picture than that of the MSM.
I have just finished Diana Johnstone's "Fools' Crusade" on the breakup of Yugoslavia, which is also an eye-opener. Malic is very helpful in keeping alive a point of view rarely permitted. It is striking that the NATO destruction of a no-longer-needed successful socialist country is now regarded as a success, and a model for the present debacle in Libya. STOP NATO! (also a very good site).
Hrebeljanovic
August 1st, 2011 at 10:55 pm
What a sweet post rosemerry. Hard to believe. I know Diana Johnstone kicks ass, but are you ready for it?
Branimir
August 3rd, 2011 at 10:33 am
Where is Nebojsa Malic? Tomorrow it's 16th anniversary of the Croatian military operation Storm, by which Croats liberated the territories that were under Serb occupation for four years. I am looking forward to see one of those Malic-style whiny articles about the "poor" and "demonized" Serbs, and about how they were "victimized" by the eeevil Croatian ustashas and about what was the alleged role of the "Empire" in that.
Where are you, Nebojsa? Damn it, he isn't going to write anything. I am so sad.
montaigne
August 5th, 2011 at 12:06 am
Nice to meet Engdahl!
Bianca
August 5th, 2011 at 9:09 am
And where are you? Still admiring the biggest crime in Europe since World War II, the violent removal of hundreds of thousand of population from their native land to "liberate" Croatia? So where are you? How long do you think the Big Lie will be maintained? No good will ever come out of such demonic act. Croatia will be forever blighted by what it has done. Enjoy your empirial protection while it lasts. Time may come for a bitter harvest. Every Hubris generates its own Nemesis. Look at the life of ordinary Croatians. Why are they not happy? Why is economy not thriving? Why is it that wth all the trappings of imperial kindness, and all the NATO hardware in the Adriatic Sea, the tourism is still grossly underperforming? Why are ordinary people economically so squashed? You may want to talk about the last week's brutal assault on a young man, a tourist from Serbia. And what a group of "patriotic" Croatians did to him, just for kicks and giggles? After decades of getting the evil Serbs out, they are being missed. Whom to blame for the economic mess? Well, taking it out on a tourist from Serbia will surely make you feel better.
Branimir
August 6th, 2011 at 1:56 pm
Such hateful views that you express, such kind of bloodlust and wish for revenge, feelings plenty of Serbs share, prove that Serbs deserve no compassion and that bombings of 1999 and severing of Kosovo from Serbia were fully justified. One doesn't "negotiate" with a mad dog, it is wrong to have any "understanding" for his "point of view", because he misinterprets that as weakness. The only two things one can make with a mad dog is: 1) to isolate him so he could do no harm; 2) smash him with a bludgeon. And Serbia is a kind of mad dog, something similar to what Nazi Germany once was.
Michael
August 7th, 2011 at 4:46 am
Ironic for a Croat to compare someone to Nazis.
Branimir
August 7th, 2011 at 6:42 am
I am happy. Nebojsa Malic wrote a whiny article on the Operation Storm. Damn it, I was so sad, thinking that he would miss the opportunity offered by the anniversary. Though not here, but on his blog.
http://grayfalcon.blogspot.com/2011/08/storm-koso…
Branimir
August 10th, 2011 at 3:07 am
Regarding its aggressive mentality, Serbia is indeed Nazi Germany in mini-variety, but much less efficient and lazy.
Serbia today is economically the shithole of Europe: it has one of the lowest exports per capita. It seems Serbs are unable to work and to produce anything. Their only export commodity is their "glorious history". But that hasn't much of a market value.
Bianca
August 11th, 2011 at 10:30 pm
"Hatefull", "bloodlust", "wish for revenge", "do not negotiate with a mad dog", "smash him with a bludgeon"…. Your vocabulary is a prime example of what is fundamentally wrong with the ongoing effort to crank out history lessons out of this untennable history factory. Listen to yourself. The need to "bludgeon" Serbs is not a novel idea. It has been practiced by Croatian guards in Jasenovac, as they bludgeoned Serb kids and babies. And took plenty of pictures of it for posterity.
I have merely stated the centuries old and well understood concept of Hubris and Nemesis. These are the laws of history, and they cannot be altered by your violent thoughts. Try not to be blind to the economic difficulties and the pain Croatians feel in everyday life. Most of them cannot be fed by the diet of Serb hate — well, not for ever. Let everyone worry about their own mad dogs — and the world would be a much happier place.
eric siverson
October 5th, 2011 at 10:34 pm
I think both Chinia and Russia and maybe India will back Serbia against NATO , but i don't know if they will send troops to the Balkans ? Russia will if asked . They may just start trouble other places more advantages to thier power base . Just start little conflicts to test NATOs willingness to respond . Someplace expensive and awkward for NATO to defend , yet easy for them . Evreybody in Russia knows exactly what part Germany played in the dismemberment of Yugoslavia . Niether Chinia or Russia will back away from a chance to fight NAZIs again . I believe they may be right now looking for a chance to set the NATZIs back a little . Little arguements not enough to start a full fledged war , but real incovienet for NATZIs . Why not ? thats what NATO would do to you if they were not so buzy doing it other places