On the last day of May, an op-ed signed by Hillary Clinton, Catherine Ashton, and Miguel Angel Moratinos appeared on the website of the UK newspaper The Guardian, promoting the upcoming "summit" meeting in Sarajevo. It was filled with standard platitudes about how EU and NATO membership brings peace, prosperity and progress, and how the EU and the Empire really wanted to see the Balkans join their "democratic and unified Europe"… eventually.
No doubt Sarajevo is indeed a symbol of "opportunities and challenges of European and Euro-Atlantic integration," as the authors put it. After all, without the Bosnian adventure, NATO would have perished from lack of purpose, and the EU would have hardly become the transnational bureaucracy with aspirations of statehood that it is today. But for all their promises to "stand ready to assist the citizens and leaders of the region in building a better future together," Empire’s top diplomat and her EU and Spanish colleagues have managed to say a whole lot of nothing.
The actual summit, held on June 2, accomplished about as much.
High Hopes
For Washington and Brussels, Sarajevo was most of all an image-booster. The Empire was there to lord it over the Europeans with a clear message as to who actually ran the "Atlantic" portion of the "Euro-Atlantic integrations," and make sure the continental vassals were behaving. The EUrocrats, for their part, wanted to present a picture of strength and confidence, shaken in the past months by the Greek financial collapse and its reverberations in the Eurozone.
For a decade now, the prospect of EU membership has been the carrot — and stick — with which the shards of Yugoslavia were goaded to obedience. It would hardly help the cause of European envoys, NGOs, human rights groups, or bankers if the natives got a bit restless after ten years of chasing a dream always out of their reach. Or, Heaven forbid, realizing the dream isn’t all it is cracked up to be.
Certainly, the biggest hopers and dreamers were the local politicians, who came to the Sarajevo meeting convinced it would help them advance their own agendas. For the Albanians of the "Independent state of Kosovo," this was a recognition of their separation from Serbia. For the Serbian government, it was a validation of its proskynesis before Brussels and Washington, and an affirmation of their "European path." Bosnian politicians fished for validation of their agendas before the coming general elections this fall. Likewise, the governments of Bosnia and Albania hoped for a specific announcement that the EU would include their countries in the visa-free travel regime. Brussels had proposed such a course of action in the days prior to the summit, but no dates were mentioned.
Smoke and Mirrors
The summit concluded with a vacuous declaration that the "future of the Western Balkans lies in the European Union," to which was appended a caveat: while EU enlargement will remain a prospect, its achievement will depend on strict conditionality for individual countries. In other words, absolutely nothing has changed from the status quo.
The Sarajevo Summit was smoke and mirrors, a desperate attempt to hoodwink the denizens of the "Western Balkans" that their hopes and dreams of EUtopia will eventually, some day, almost there, just about, any day now, could perhaps, possibly become a (sort of) reality. Maybe.
Mistaking this ephemeral phantasm for any sort of specific plan for the future would be madness.
That aside, however, there is another incongruity worth pointing out. Twenty years ago, there was still a country called Yugoslavia where today exists only the euphemistically called "Western Balkans." The very same governments that fought tooth and nail to destroy Yugoslavia and establish "independent" states in its stead, now pledge undying commitment to surrender that sovereignty to Brussels. For that matter, the EU actually precipitated the Wars of Yugoslav Succession by ruling that the country was "in the process of dissolution." And now it wants to integrate the shards of what it helped disintegrate in the first place? That just makes no sense.
Unless one notes the whole "conditionality" part, that is. Brussels does desire to have the entire continent under its rule, to the point of considering any holdouts to be a threat to its continued existence. However, before it accepts the submission of the new satrapies, they must be remade in its image. Thus the hundreds of thousands of pages of laws, rules and codes, the "reforms," the conditions, all designed to transform the candidate country into something that the EU can digest. It is hardly the candidates’ fault that the Greek financial meltdown is currently giving Brussels a bad case of heartburn.
Soothing the Panic
Even the most fanatical EUrophiles in the Balkans could not fail to notice that the financial crisis diminished their prospects for finding a place at the Brussels trough. Fear of being left out in the cold led Serbian president Boris Tadic to plead last week that halting the EU expansion would be a "giant and irreversible mistake that would leave terrible consequences in the region."
No doubt the Sarajevo Summit and its meaningless declaration of commitment to possibility were, therefore, calculated to soothe the panicking "Westbalkanians." But Tadic should not celebrate prematurely. Not only is EUtopia still at least a decade away, one of the key demands on the road to submission will be Belgrade’s recognition of the "Independent State of Kosovo." How the Serbian public will react when Tadic’s government attempts to obey will demonstrate exactly how far along the EU-engineered "transformation" of Serbia has progressed — or not.
And Another Thing
One of the expectations in the run-up to the Sarajevo Summit was that the EU would appoint a special envoy for the Balkans. There was even a specific name in the running, that of Paddy Ashdown, onetime viceroy of Bosnia. A former leader of the Liberal Democrats — now part of the ruling coalition with the Tories — Ashdown also enjoys the strong support of the new British foreign minister William Hague, and shares his line on Bosnia. Yet the Summit has come and gone, and the rumors of Ashdown’s triumphant return to the Balkans appear to have been greatly exaggerated.
Much like the whole "Euro-Atlantic" pipe dream, really.
Read more by Nebojsa Malic
- Return to the Fold – January 26th, 2012
- Tides of Darkness – January 6th, 2012
- Fallout – December 23rd, 2011
- EUphoria – December 9th, 2011
- Sixteen Candles – November 24th, 2011





E. A. Costa
June 5th, 2010 at 9:32 am
"For that matter, the EU actually precipitated the Wars of Yugoslav Succession by ruling that the country was "in the process of dissolution." And now it wants to integrate the shards of what it helped disintegrate in the first place? That just makes no sense."
Tito's version of Communism did it better. That was the threat that had to be destroyed by the Capitalists.
That also played a role in the second US attack on Iraq–which was in part focused on destroying the Ba'ath.
MichaelKenny
June 5th, 2010 at 2:30 pm
The usual Israel Lobby propaganda line! The EU is, at one and the same time, collapsing and in America's pocket! That preserves Israel's interest in a subjugated Europe without knifing the Wall St crowd that has been attacking it! And I'd love to know what the "Euro-Atlantic" pipe dream is. I assume it's someting American, since I've never heard of anything like that in Europe.
MvGuy
June 5th, 2010 at 4:28 pm
WoW… Your mind opens vast vistas to my narrowed perception of eurotopia…. It all seems like a very dangerous game to me, liable to awaken the "wrong sorts" if you know what I mean……. The Welfare Queen certainly does dream big, for her people and the skating rink of theirs… if it is as you see it… Thanks for your insight!!
Bianca
June 5th, 2010 at 7:12 pm
EU birth had too many midwives, and each of them wished for the creation something entirely different. Atlantic part of the alliance was well defined by Zbignew Brzezinski in his The Grand Chessboard. He bluntly called Europe a protectorate, but had a real apprehensions on its future. On one hand, protectorate was desirable. It took very little on behalf of US to guide the European sheep into the pen following the artfully managed crisis in former Yugoslavia. But while the sheep was too confused in early nineties, by Clinton's 1999, it took a great deal of arm twisting to get them to bomb Serbia, and create Kosovo, Clinton's folly that proved only one thing: I can do whatever I want to do — stop me! Following that in-your-face approach, the protectorate started to wiggle. It has been trying to wiggle out ever since. EU in Brussells are hand picked Bilderburgers. While the national governments are infiltrated — some more then others. The wiggling has brought the stern warning on euro. And if Greece was not enough — here comes Hungary. Is this an attempt to pick off the weak ones, and scare the strong? Time will tell.
dadodudo
June 5th, 2010 at 9:48 pm
This is whole article is a yugo-nostalgic rant without any substance. EU has a very healthy carrot-and-stick approach to ex-yugo states. This approach worked great with Croatia and will eventually yield results with other countries as well. As soon as they are ready to go beyond nationalistic mirage and implement effective democratic institutions. The meeting re-affirmed this approach. Physicists have this system of evaluating idiocy of new theories of physical reality. You get 100 points for claiming that you can prove Einstein wrong. In my book you get 100 idiocy point on historic ignorance and paranoia when you blame EU for dissolution of Yugoslavia.
E. A. Costa
June 6th, 2010 at 12:54 am
"Right", "Wrong", and "Prove" are not aspects of modern physics.
E. A. Costa
June 6th, 2010 at 1:03 am
Yes, the western European financial elite is a little slow.
First, Goldman Sachs uses bailout money to short USD, then other US financial interests turn around and attack the Euro.
E. A. Costa
June 6th, 2010 at 1:34 am
"Weak" and "Strong" defined in terms of a global debt-credit system based on a collpasing and fraudulent USD?
Madame, the Greeks in the street are very strong, and have considerable foresight. They know exactly where it leads and they are not interested.
The revolution has begun.
And there will be no Colonels this time around.
Even some of the former East Germans are beginning to wake up.
Merkel's days are numbered.
paleo
June 6th, 2010 at 6:00 am
Blaming any single factor for something as complex as the dissolution of a country is nonsense. All sides have some role to play in all this. The only issue we have here is that the West (EU, NATO, America, etc.) portrays itself as a disinterested and impartial humanitarian force that was wringing its hands helplessly as these conflicts unfolded. Europe initially got its toe into the mud by allowing Germany (via Maastricht) to pull through its ex-Austrian proxies, the Slovenes and Croats, out of Yugoslavia. Now, could they have done that without the will of the vast majority of Croats and Slovenes and their leaderships? Of course not. But without such quick support from a major player like Germany, the Croats and Slovenes might have been a bit more willing to negotiate, a bit less willing to use war to effect their goals, and Croatia in particular would have been a bit more circumspect when it came to the basic human rights of its Serb minority. Europe dragged the US into supporting these "Western" Balkanians (because Catholic = Western), but then certain factors in the US saw the bright opportunity of supporting Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo and western Macedonia and who knows where else as a means of appeasing enraged Muslims who were and are angry about Israel, the US stooge clients in the Middle East like Kuwait, the Iraq war, etc. That tactic failed, as we can see with this Gaza flotilla fiasco, 9/11, etc.
The point is, the West (i.e. NATO, USA, EU) chose sides. And they consistently chose the side that was anti-Serb, whether it was bombing Serbia and recognizing Kosovo, or encouraging Slovenian secession, assisting the Krajina cleansing, supporting Izetbegovic's rule over all of Bosnia, or supporting Djukanovic's drive to split Montenegro off from Serbia. Not to mention the incredibly ethnically-biased indictments and judgements issued by the Hague ICTY. At least the Muslim world and Russia never made any sort of false pretense of impartiality. They knew, as the West does, that this is a region of some importance, politically unstable, a meeting point of three civilizations, and therefore "soft" enough for them to make inroads. Russia has done so now in Republika Srpska, Montenegro, and Serbia, and Turkey/Saudi Arabia/Iran are doing the same in Bosnia, Kosovo, and Sandzak. Only the West makes this pathetic game of being impartial and humanitarian. Aside from Slovenia (a member currently) and Croatia, which have strong ties to Germany and Austria, their sole interest in "western southeastern Europe" is to blockade Russian and Islamic influence from further penetrating into Europe. That's why they hastily accepted Romania and Bulgaria into the EU, so as to blockade a Black Sea route through that area to the Greek Mediterranean or the Serbian/Montenegrin Adriatic. That's why they pushed for Montenegrin independence to lop it off from historically pro-Russian Serbia (hoping that Montenegro would become a Western client). That's why they are trying to grab these territories "officially" into the EU. They have no concern for improving the lives of the people that live there, of stimulating economic growth, trade, etc. Those countries and peoples are useful to them solely for cheap labor, canon fodder in Afghanistan/Iraq/Iran, and for military bases that will be used to finish the job they set out to do in the Crimean War.
E. A. Costa
June 6th, 2010 at 1:58 pm
Note that the Christian Science Monitor, which is now both Right Wing and reliably Neo-Con, in an editorial today fervently calls for Germany to drop its "old-fashioned" constitutional prohibitio of war and rather spend money that Germans wish to spend on social programs on an expanded, responsible, aggressive military:
"Germany has a unique attitude toward its military, but like other countries in Europe, such as Britain, it needs to cut government spending. The military is a popular candidate. One public opinion survey in Germany shows 76 percent favor defense cuts. The choice with the next highest support for reduced spending is labor subsidies – 36 percent favor those.
In a February speech, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates warned of the 'demilitarization of Europe' where 'large swaths of the general public and political class are averse to military force and the risks that go with it.'
He added: 'Not only can real or perceived weakness be a temptation to miscalculation and aggression, but, on a more basic level, the resulting funding and capability shortfalls make it difficult to operate and fight together to confront shared threats.'
Indeed, just as America’s national security strategy calls for greater reliance on partners, its partners are likely to cut back, as Mr. Gates says America must also do.
Too bad Köhler didn’t stay on to move the military debate further – to a complex world of new threats that require strong national security."
Peace on earth and Third Reich redivivus–by order of the US empire–to all.
ericsiverson
June 6th, 2010 at 11:49 pm
If the United States and Germany would have minded their own buisness Yugoslavia would still be a great country . Yugoslavia did not just tradjectly dissolve . Yugoslavia was sabotaged . United States drpped bombs in Croatia ,Bosnia and finally Serbia . Serbia was bombed more than any country ever in europe for 78 days , to force Milosevic to agree to UN resolution 1244 . But NATO , THE US , and much of The EU have refused to honor resolution 1244 .
ericsiverson
June 7th, 2010 at 1:32 pm
Paleo so now i get more clear picture , all you said seems most logical to me . The world is not just one big happy family .
B..
June 7th, 2010 at 4:01 pm
Eric, not quite. The Resolution 1244 came out as a result of a COMPROMISE by the West to Russia and china in the UN, AFTER the aggression on Yugoslavia in 1999. Prior to that (and as an direct cause of bombing) the fake "negotiations" took place in France, where NATO tried to force Yugoslavia to accept, simply, the terms that meant the de facto occupation of the whole country.
B..
June 7th, 2010 at 4:01 pm
China, of, course, sorry for the typo
E. A. Costa
June 8th, 2010 at 2:42 pm
Indeed, the misused and abused Chateau de Rambouillet is still trying to live it down.
ericsiverson
June 8th, 2010 at 4:28 pm
Resolution 1244 was signed june 10 1999 , Milosevic agreed to pull serb troops out of Kosovo june 16 th . Neither Chinia or Russia commanded Serb troops . I believe milosevic agreed to pull out becuase of this resolution 1244. True the resolution was brokered in the secuity council where Serbia had no voice . United NATIONS should have enforced this resolution . I suspect Russia and Chinia might still insist on this resoluion being enforced , If the Serbian government would join them ? But Russia doesnt feel comfortable being more pro Serb than Serbia .
Dado
October 2nd, 2010 at 5:19 am
The things that Paleo wrote make sense to you because they re-enforce your own misconceptions about the world and the history.
Dado
October 2nd, 2010 at 5:25 am
So would have been the USSR. A great country where big brother took good care of everybody. Again, Serbian nationalism camouflaged by the Yugo-nostalgia. Serbia was bombed because it deserved it. Anybody remembers Srebrenica, or the trains transporting Albanian people from Kosovo to the border of Macedonia? Reminiscent of some other trains some 70 years ago…