In these, the dog days of summer, normal people everywhere are on vacation. They go to a resort: swimming, boating, family photos on the beach – these are the woof and warp of American life. Standing outside – and, in their estimation, above – that life, with its prosaic concerns, the War Party never takes a vacation. They’re always plotting and planning their next move.
Undeterred by the complete failure of the Iraq invasion – described by the late Gen. William E. Odom as the biggest military disaster in the annals of America’s wars – the cultists of the war god are bound and determined to continue their bloody wilding of the Middle East.
The shrill insistence of the campaign to drag us into war with Iran on Israel’s behalf has gone up a few notches, with a Democratic-controlled sanctions-happy Congress joining the chorus, which includes the Republican party (minus Ron Paul).
The US military is staunchly opposed, but President Obama – and/or his more cynical advisers – may welcome the opportunity to change the subject, from unemployment numbers to casualty counts. Remember what Rahm Emanuel said about how every crisis is an opportunity: in the event of war, the oil shock that will pummel the US economy could give him the excuse he needs to not only ram through his energy policy, but also increase government intervention in every sector of the economy.
While Iran gets all the publicity, there are plenty of other battlefronts on which we here at Antiwar.com are keeping watch: Syria and Lebanon are reaching the boiling point, with new evidence from Hezbollah of some degree of Israeli involvement in the Hariri assassination. Israeli spy drones apparently traced the trail of the slain Lebanese leaders’ last car ride, and while the video evidence presented to the international media doesn’t directly tie the Israelis to the murder, it does indeed indicate that they had some foreknowledge of it. All of which sounds eerily familiar…
Speaking of the Israelis, their public image may have seen better days, what with the flotilla fiasco and the ongoing settlements issue, but among certain sectors of the far-right fringe in Europe they have found a whole lot of new friends. The fascist British National Party (BNP), founded by professional anti-Semites and neo-Nazi nutballs, is now officially “pro-Israel”: the British Nutzis admire the militant ethno-centrism of the Zionist militants now in power, and see Israel as a bulwark against the alleged threat of “Islamization.” The latest mobilization of haters calls itself the English Defense League (EDL): as in the case of the BNP, the EDL was founded by football hooligans and outright racists whose “sport” of “Paki-bashing” is now being pursued by broader sectors. The latest EDL innovation: carrying Israeli flags at demonstrations, alongside the Cross of St. George. The message is clear: their program for Muslims in Britain is the same as Israeli plans for Palestinians in the occupied territories – repression, culminating in expulsion.
The neoconservatives – the War Party’s real command center – have been on the decline politically in this country ever since the American people turned against the Iraq war, and with the economic crisis paramount, people have little patience with the neocons’ foreign policy obsession. But the “anti-Islamization” angle, which they’re importing from Europe with some success, may give them a new lease on life.
The Park 51 controversy did not just come out of nowhere: the Israel lobby, quite effective when it comes to lobbying Congress, isn’t above a little street-corner demagogy. All of a sudden, we have a national campaign to stop the building of new mosques anywhere, and a well-funded advertising campaign denigrating Muslims – with ads on buses in the Bay Area! Nancy Pelosi was pilloried for suggesting that the funding for all this ought to be investigated, but if foreign government officials, or non-citizens acting in a private capacity, are doling out cash to impact the American political process, shouldn’t we at least know about it?
So, then, where is all this hatred coming from, this long hot summer? Ron Paul, in his magnificent statement on the mosque issue, had it right:
“In my opinion it has come from the neoconservatives who demand continual war in the Middle East and Central Asia and are compelled to constantly justify it. They never miss a chance to use hatred toward Muslims to rally support for the ill conceived preventative wars.”
They thrive on hate, and live for war: that’s neoconservatism in a nutshell. Pronounced dead on several occasions, the neocons have always come back to life like zombies in a grade-B horror movie. And if you think the Obama administration is neocon-proof, well then, my friend, think again…
The War Party never sleeps, let alone takes vacations. As you while away the fading summer days, relaxing by the pool, remember: they’re out there, and they’re busy.
So, by the way, are we: our summer fundraising campaign is in full swing, and, while we’ve seen some improvement recently, the results are what one might expect in the summertime during a severe recession. We’re slowly inching up that thermometer on the front page, but we need your help to put us over the top – and we’ve still got a ways to go.
Remember: if the War Party never sleeps, and never goes on vacation, we here at Antiwar.com are similarly vacation-less, not to mention sleepless a large part of the time. We’re up late at night, and into the early morning, scanning the horizon for signs of the enemy. We’re your insurance policy against being taken by surprise as the bombs drop on yet another American blowback begins – but we need your help to keep going.
Read more by Justin Raimondo
- Our Civil Liberties, RIP – May 16th, 2013
- Raping the World – May 14th, 2013
- The Price of Peace – May 12th, 2013
- Boycott Israel? – May 9th, 2013
- Carla del Ponte’s Faux Pas – May 7th, 2013





Grateful Reader
August 24th, 2010 at 10:30 pm
Islam did not cause "9/11." American foreign policy caused 9/11.
As Ron Paul has suggested, the controversy over the mosque in the New York City financial district is really a battle in the crucial war (crucial for Israel) over which narrative will prevail in "explaining" America's problems with the Middle East. It is vital for Israel that the explanation remain with allegedly irrational "Muslim extremists" and that it not become what was a rather foreseeable response to American actions in the Middle East, particularly its relationship with Israel.
I'm going to say something that will a lot of Americans don't want to hear:
If the U.S. federal government had done to Christians what it has done to Muslims in the Middle East over the past 60 years, it would have been Christians–not Muslims–who were attempting to bomb this country’s financial and military centers. Would our proper response be to ban all churches in downtown Manhattan? Or rather should we look in the mirror and consider changing our behavior?
indianchief
August 24th, 2010 at 11:02 pm
another great article, by one of my favorite prose writers ( along with Taki).
Wolfgang9
August 24th, 2010 at 11:11 pm
Almost all US interventions in the Middle East ended in a disaster for the people there. Naturally that has to do with the different interest of both.
I would not be surprised if a questionnaire of the 90 % of the common people in Iraq (excluded the 10 % which always profit from one or the other form of government) would say there were better off under Sadam Hussein than under the new rulers of USA clemency.
mickperry
August 25th, 2010 at 12:13 am
Wolfgang I agree. The US/UK Operation Iraqi Freedom has achieved something Saddam was never able to in his lifetime. It has made him a deeply loved leader of his people.
mickperry
August 25th, 2010 at 12:50 am
"Almost intentionally hidden in these statistics is one shocking fact about urban Iraqi populations. For the past few decades, prior to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, the percentage of the urban population living in slums in Iraq hovered just below 20 percent. Today, that percentage has risen to 53 percent: 11 million of the 19 million total urban dwellers. In the past decade, most countries have made progress toward reducing slum dwellers. But Iraq has gone rapidly and dangerously in the opposite direction.
According to the U.S. Census of 2000, 80 percent of the 285 million people living in the United States are urban dwellers. Those living in slums are well below 5 percent. If we translate the Iraqi statistic into the U.S. context, 121 million people in the United States would be living in slums."
Adil E Shamoo. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2…
epppie
August 25th, 2010 at 1:08 am
It's been fascinating, as well as profoundly nauseating, over the three months since Obama's decisive turn towards war against Iran, to watch as neocon/hardline pundits, in concert with alternapundits, putatively antiwar, have managed to scrape feathers off the Dove of Peace that Obama killed in May, gluing them onto Obama, sprinkling them with glitter and sequins, magically turning our Warmonger Par Excellence into the Paragon of Peace, no doubt on his way to an unprecedented second Nobel Prize in the fall. In this mad, mad world, peace is war, as Gates told Europe, and war is peace, as our alternapundits are telling us.
Of course, as we all know, Obama could have a peace deal with Iran by lunch tomorrow if he really wanted one.
Augustus
August 25th, 2010 at 3:28 am
Hi Justin. I was just wondering why you publish Pat Buchanan's columns when they jive with your own opinions (such as your anti-Israel sentiments), but never publish them when he takes a position quite counter to yours (such as his latest columns in which he argues why it's perfectly sensible to oppose an Islamic center at Ground Zero).
Whoops. Looks like I just answered my own question!
I always thought it was state-run media that tightly controlled its message. I would have expected a libertarian-run site to allow independent thinkers to speak their minds. I guess you do, but only to the extent their independent minds happen to be in sync with your own.
GradyWilson
August 25th, 2010 at 4:47 am
Justin, where are your friends Ann Coulter, Michael Steele, Pat Buchanan, and the Tea Baggers on this 'ground zero mosque' issue? For libertarians, like all on the right, hatred of the left is the single biggest issue which unites them. That's why they are anti-war frauds IMHO – praising, adulating, and idolotrizing the capitalist system which profits so greatly from the the military empire which they pretend to abhore. Face it; no US military empire, no 'free market capitalism'.
Patrick
August 25th, 2010 at 7:12 am
Paraphrasing, war is the health of the neocons.
Tony Clifton
August 25th, 2010 at 7:19 am
Just wondering why there's no comment on the rift between daddy Ron Paul and son Rand regarding the controversy surrounding the Ground Zero mosque that is neither at Ground Zero nor a mosque. Why, it seems like just yesterday Justin was extolling the virtues of this libertarian wunderkind and how he was going to help lead us out of the darkness. Perhaps that was just one of my summertime fever dreams, as I sit on the beach taking pictures, boating and swimming, as surely all Americans are this time of year.
Shane
August 25th, 2010 at 9:02 am
Govts start and execute wars, not the free market you dummy.
Private property rights flows out of the concept of self-ownership. Do you support slavery dummy?
See the great champion of the Left sell-out to Democrat elitists:
"Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) Speaks to the DNC" (Here this socialist piece of garbage kisses the ass of corporatist Obama–Dennis will do ANYTHING to get a little attention) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lv0smG7ptcM
"Another Sell Out Democrat: Dennis Kucinich Changes His Vote" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCXca-pVElA
Shane
August 25th, 2010 at 9:06 am
See the great champion of the Left sell-out to Democrat elitists:
"Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) Speaks to the DNC" (Here this socialist piece of garbage kisses the ass of warmongering corporatist Obama–Dennis will do ANYTHING to get a little attention won't he?) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lv0smG7ptcM
"Another Sell Out Democrat: Dennis Kucinich Changes His Vote" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCXca-pVElA
Tony Clifton
August 25th, 2010 at 9:30 am
Sorry, but I'm genuinely confused. What exactly do Ron and Rand Paul have to do with Dennis Kuchinich?
conumishu
August 25th, 2010 at 10:08 am
There is a justified concern in some European countries about the destructuring of their cultural heritage and social fabric due to already large minorities hard, or impossible to assimilate in a harmonious way due to the insurmountable differences. It is a reality, no matter how convenient for not-so-nuts-as-easy-to-use groups to advance dubious agendas.
The American melting pot dogma amd coercion apparatus that comes along, embraced by the Eurocrats (the American elitists' cronies from across the pond), is not working. And how could it work when it's imposed from above?
Shane
August 25th, 2010 at 10:50 am
You obviously have a bone to pick w/libertarians and are acting like an anus.
This leads me to believe you're a self-describe 'progressive' (i.e., socialist/fascist/communist).
I'm simply throwing one of your hero's actions right back in your face.
mickperry
August 25th, 2010 at 12:08 pm
Peace and love to you brother strider.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsPOiflvHX4&fe…!
Shane
August 25th, 2010 at 12:19 pm
What exactly do Ron and Rand Paul have to do w/Obama the warmonger?
Tony Clifton
August 25th, 2010 at 12:45 pm
Sorry, shane, but you seem confused. My original post was about Justin's seeming refusal to acknowledge the rift between Ron and Rand Paul. I said nothing about Obama or Kucinich. Are you just trying to deflect from my point because I hit a nerve?
fedupandsick
August 25th, 2010 at 1:57 pm
I was under the impression that Justin wasn't thrilled with son Rand for some time now.
Wolfgang9
August 26th, 2010 at 1:56 am
Maybe there would be much less (uneducated) Muslm's in Western Europe if the US and israel would not destroy their home lands and the entire base of family and soviety.
Most of the poor and uneducated Muslim's now allover Western Europe have almost no chance to find a job and live only from Welfare and the money they get for raising Children. If Western Europe would make it more difficult for them to get Welfare money they would probably wanti to go back. However, where should they go, when everything is destroyed?
The US and England are in the fortunate location surrounded by oceans and Israel does not permit foreigners to stay there if they don't have a serious reason for it.
That's why they burden the Western European countries with this problem. But this is only for a short time in their interest, in the long run they will loose the support of Europe.
bret
August 26th, 2010 at 5:35 am
Pat has plenty of publishing space for his own opinions. Antiwar.com isn't diminished for not republishing them all, whether Justin agrees with them or not. What a dumb statement. If you want to read Pat's opinions on opposing the Islamic center, go do it.
bret
August 26th, 2010 at 5:38 am
WTF does the "ground zero" "mosque" "issue" have to do with being antiwar? It's a distraction, nothing more. Sure, libertarians favor freedom of religion and property rights. I haven't seen any comments by people I would consider libertarians who think the gubmint ought to stop the construction of the prayer center or whatever it is. If your point is that Coulter et al. aren't libertarians, well gee, that's a controversial statement!
Greg
August 26th, 2010 at 6:06 am
Ron and Rand Paul are not the same person, so what's the problem? I suppose a collectivist mind would be confused by two people from the same family showing differing opinions, but from an individualist perspective, it's nothing surprising. Perhaps that is why Justin does not mention it, because it's irrelevent to the discussion. It's yet another issue that the MSM is jumping on because they can throw out 15 seconds of words and pretend they mean something.
Anyone who has looked into Rand Paul knows that he is not his father, and that his opinions differ in several ways. That they differ on this issue does not surprise me in the least. Why do you think this difference is important or worth discussing? Do you believe that children should all perfectly share their parents' beliefs? Do you think it reflects poorly on one Paul, or both, that they disagree on this issue?
Tony Clifton
August 26th, 2010 at 6:58 am
Well, if asking you to clarify your position makes me an anus, then I guess I'm an anus. Sure, I'm progressive, but I am open to criticisms of those who would advance a progressive agenda, whether you believe that or not. I just don't see how that is germane to the point I raised, or even Justin's article.
And BTW, progressive are not socialists, fascists or communists, again, whether you believe that or not. The fact that you are painting with such a broad brush indicates to me that you aren't really interested in an open dialogue and I suspect there will be no convicing you of anything other than what you already believe, so I suppose this is where our discussion ends.
MichaelKenny
August 26th, 2010 at 7:04 am
A little aside on Europe: I wonder how much of all this is essentially part of the Israel Lobby's "Plan B", i.e a campaign that I've noticed recently to create the impression that Britain is a firm supporter of Israel. Israel wouldn't survive five minutes without its American bully, but the bully is collapsing. So as to prevent those pesky Palestinians thinking that all they have to do is wait for the fruit to fall into their laps, a new bully has to be invented and Britain seems to be the victim! The idea is that once the US collpases, Britain will step into the vacuum and defned Israel, militarily if necessary. The problem is that British public opinion is so fed up with war after the fiascos in Iraq and Afghanistan, so say nothing of ex-Yugoslavia, that it is hard to see them supporting any other wars for the foreseeable future, if ever. Hence the need to create the impression of a "groundswell" of support for Israel in Britain!
Wolfgang9
August 26th, 2010 at 7:15 am
What will be interesting: Statistics says that both, Germany and France will be Muslim counties in about 15 years, due to the birthrate changes. And I think countries like the Netherlands and Spain won't be far from that. Will the US president then (maybe Palin?) send drones to Western Europe to bomb our countries? I guess I won't be around then anymore, but many of my friends will.
Tony Clifton
August 26th, 2010 at 7:24 am
Greg, thanks for your response. Yes, I agree, they are two separate people. One person should not be tarred with the comments of another. Independent thinking is critical, which is exactly, ironically, why I feel this is important to discuss.
I feel the rift is relevant because both Rand and Ron are part of the same libertarian movement that Justin so heartily endorses. They're also part of the Republican establishment that is currently using this non-mosque non-controversy for political advantage, even though it is actively pushing moderate Muslims toward extremism. And the fact that Justin fails to even comment on any of this, yet seems eager to jump on Democrats and liberals, justified though he may be in his critiques, feels hypocritical in light of Justin's self-proclaimed desire to build bridges between all political stripes for the purpose of advancing an anti-war agenda. Maybe he should try looking at these issues from a more politically holistic perspective.
Seriously, though, didn't Justin speak highly of Rand at point point? This isn't a rhetorical question. I'm unsure.
Mike G
August 26th, 2010 at 10:58 am
The short answer is, no. Perhaps at some point in the distant past he has hopes that Rand might be his fathers true heir, but not in the past year, if not longer.
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/05/23/ran…
Greg
August 26th, 2010 at 1:39 pm
I don't recall seeing Justin mention Rand in a very positive light. Definately not in relation to his foreign policy views. I certainly wouldn't consider him part of the "same libertarian movement" as his father. He's a pretty standard neocon with just slightly better economic training than usual, but not by much.
And Ron isn't using the mosque issue to gain political advantage. He's one of the few politicians calling it what it is. A grand distraction from more important issues. A non-issue generated by our mainstream media, who feast upon anything that may divide people.
Finally, I'm not sure how you tie Justin's recent post regarding building bridges in the anti-war community to this situation. Are you saying that by not discussing the Rand/Ron differences, Justin is avoiding a chance to build bridges? By that token, he's avoiding a chance to build bridges everytime he fails to mention soccer, the latest fashion, and the iPad, since all of these things are used by people from all political parties.
the_big_wedding
August 26th, 2010 at 1:47 pm
Despite Agent Raimondo's dodge of the 911 inside job lynchpin, he is right here: whether Republican or Democrat, Tea Party or Coffee party, PNAC or Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) the faces are the same behind the new boiler plate operation.
Tony Clifton
August 30th, 2010 at 11:23 am
I mention the Rand / Ron Muslim community center dust-up because he mentions the pseudo-controversy in his article. He's also a committed libertarian, a supporter of Ron Paul and claims he wants to build bridges between various anti-war parties. I seems to me these have more relevance than items like soccer, the iPad or the latest fashion. Sorry, but this piece of your argument seems disingenuous at best.