Our McMan in Bananastan
Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, our new Bananastan war chief, may be more dangerous and even crazier than his boss, Gen. David Petraeus of Central Command. McChrystal reportedly eats one meal a day and sleeps three hours a night. We can’t know for sure if that’s true, but we can assume McChrystal wants us to think it is because it comes from the New York Times, who almost certainly got it from the press kit McChrystal’s public affairs colonel gave them.
Unconfirmed rumor also has it that McChrystal only drinks rain water to avoid the effects of fluoridation on his precious bodily fluids, and that he takes acai berry purgatives to maintain his purity of essence. However much of this is true or merely legend-crafting, it’s all loony enough to make Petraeus’ one-arm pushup contests with teenage privates look dignified in comparison.
From the sound of McChrystal’s recent confirmation hearing testimony, the insanity is just leaving the station. He told the Senate Armed Services Committee "I believe [the Afghanistan conflict] is winnable, but I don’t think it will be easily winnable.” It won’t be easy to win because it will be impossible to tell when we’ve won. “The measure of effectiveness will not be enemy killed," McChrystal told the SASC, "it will be the number of Afghans shielded from violence." How many shielded Afghans will equate to victory? More importantly, who is going to shield them? Certainly not McChrystal.
As commander of the secretive Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), McChrystal was directly responsible for the assassination strikes that have killed so many innocents in the Bananastans. Paradoxically, those strikes were the reason McChrystal’s predecessor, Gen. Mark McKiernan, got the ax. Compounding the irony is the way McKiernan came to be cast as the fall stooge.
Throughout our post-9/11 missteps, the JSOC has largely operated outside the established chain of command; the only authority it appeared to answer to was Dick Cheney. When the Dark Lord left office in January 2009, the JSOC became a free agent. By mid-February the mounting outrage over the collateral deaths from JSOC strikes forced Vice Adm. William McRaven, who had succeeded McChrystal as head of the JSOC in the summer of 2008, to put a temporary halt to them. McKiernan’s spokes-colonel Gregory Julian confessed that his boss had not ordered the stand-down, and a "senior military official" said Petraeus allowed as how throttling back on the baby killing for a couple of weeks was maybe a good idea. Those statements from the four-stars made it clear that the three-star McRaven was running his own program.
When the stand-down story hit the press in March, Petraeus likely determined someone would have to ride the rap for the collateral deaths the JSOC had caused, and he didn’t want it to be McRaven or McChrystal, whom he still had use for. So Petraeus quietly issued an order that put the JSOC under tactical control of McKiernan, which made McKiernan responsible for the McCluster bombs McRaven and McChrystal and their howling commandos had created. McKiernan’s transfer to Fort Palooka came through in short order, and McChrystal became the new McMan in Bananastan. The McHinations didn’t stop there.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he nominated McChrystal because he wanted "new military leadership" to go along with the "new strategy." The new strategy is the one National Security Adviser James Jones and his White House war wonks wretched together. It is a compendium of platitudes, aphorisms, and non sequiturs, a fusty heap of "realistic and achievable objectives" that are delusional and doomed to failure. We will never establish a "stable constitutional government in Pakistan" or a "capable, accountable, and effective government in Afghanistan." If by some miracle we manage to create "self-reliant Afghan security forces," all we’ll have done is organize another armed mob that doesn’t like us. We’re already "involving the international community" for reasons that are difficult to fathom. Gates has forged a hobby career out of alternately begging NATO for more help in Afghanistan and blaming NATO for everything that goes wrong there.
The strategy’s stated aim to "disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al-Qaeda and its safe havens in Pakistan" is as hallucinatory as it is poorly written. You can’t "defeat" a safe haven any more than you can climb a tennis ball; but even if you could, there would be no point in doing it. Modern evildoers can run their operations from the sanctuary of the pockets that hold their Blackberries. Averting "the possibility of extremists obtaining fissile material" is a snipe hunt. Evildoers are about as likely to convert Pakistani nukes into suitcase bombs as they are to find a cure for herpes.
Yet Stanley McChrystal has sworn to Congress that he can accomplish all these things and more if only he can shield enough Afghans from violence. The House and Senate Armed Services Committees had a golden opportunity to decapitate McChrystal and the Pentagon over their Bananastan plan and torture of detainees and the Pat Tillman cover-up and a host of other mortal sins, but they vaginalized it. Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) made a show of growling at McChrystal for a few minutes before he rolled over and begged for a tummy scratch.
Nobody in the legislature had the baby-makers to oppose McChrystal’s nomination, because he enjoys the aegis of the most powerful man on earth. As military analyst Andrew Bacevich puts it, “McKiernan’s removal confirms that it’s now Petraeus’ army," and King David’s hand-picked "unconventional warriors" like McChrystal and McRaven are "in the saddle." In 2007, Petraeus purposely misled Congress into believing he was seeking a way to bring troops home from Iraq while he was actually using the surge as a stratagem to buy time to sell the "long war" to the public, and he got away with it. Now he and his protégés McChrystal and McRaven are poised to get away with the same shenanigans in the Bananastans.
And where does our commander in chief Barack Obama stand on all of this? He’s the one who blessed the resumption of the errant air strikes and who nominated McChrystal to take over in the Bananastans. Our self-anointed "agent of change" has changed into what his predecessor was: a fawning servant of America’s warlords.
Read more by Jeff Huber
- Overdue Process – November 19th, 2009
- A Crock of COIN – November 18th, 2009
- Our National Cognitive Dissonance – November 17th, 2009
- Bad Apples – November 16th, 2009
- Reading the Af-Pak Tea Leaves – November 15th, 2009





paulBass
June 9th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
"Petraeus purposely misled Congress into believing he was seeking a way to bring troops home from Iraq while he was actually using the surge as a stratagem to buy time to sell the "long war" to the public, and he got away with it."
i have a hard time believing that anyone congress thought the surge was part of an "exit strategy" especially since they won a majority in 2006 and have done nothing but increase funding for those wars, the ones they are trying so hard to stop.
it clear the legislative branch has become nothing more than an exercise in theater were any one gets a cut as long as they help keep the gravy train running.
either that or the american people have elected to the most powerful of positions the dumbest group of double thinkers the world has ever seen.
then again i did see liz cheney on cspan yesterday saying “I think you have to go back and look very signification difference between how the soviets tried to pacify.. to defeat the sovereign afghan government and how the way we operated in trying to liberate the country both in difference of method of operation and in objective"
just imagine what must go on in her torture mongering mind
Duncan__Idaho
June 9th, 2009 at 5:22 pm
Not a SINGLE word about Israhell….that's what poker players call a "tell".
…
JohnnySweden
June 9th, 2009 at 6:54 pm
I was hoping Obama should declare victory and take the trops home from Afgahnistan. It seems so counter productive to keep on shooting lokal people and bomb weddings and just create more terrorists who hates USA.
PJerome
June 9th, 2009 at 6:54 pm
This piece is too cute. What the hell does "vaginalized" mean? And what about "Evildoers are about as likely to convert Pakistani nukes into suitcase bombs as they are to find a cure for herpes. " Mr. Huber, please get some sleep. These jokes are neither funny nor illuminating.
Referring to the resistance in Afghanistan as "evildoers" merely parrots the militarists' action hero war language, and continues to confuse the issue. Resistance in Afghanistan is not about "jihad" or Islamic "extremism." Our government is engaged in a ruthless and brutal war of attrition against a popular resistance, creating comic book enemies to fight there.
And "vaginalized" is probably the most sexist pejorative I have ever encountered.
bink35
June 10th, 2009 at 3:17 am
"McChrystal only drinks rain water to avoid the effects of fluoridation on his precious bodily fluids, and that he takes acai berry purgatives to maintain his purity of essence. However much of this is true or merely legend-crafting…"
No, not legend-crafting. The acai berry and anti-fluoridation angle is to appeal to the so-called progressive Democrat wing (or more accurately, neolibs.)
Obama’s Afghan War, the US Media, and the UN: the New Metric of Civilian Casualties | War On You: Breaking Alternative News
June 13th, 2009 at 3:23 am
[...] Jeff Huber, “Our McMan in Bananastan,” Antiwar.com (June 8, 2009) at http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/06/08/our-mcman-in-bananastan/ [...]
Obama’s Afghan War, the US Media, and the UN: the New Metric of Civilian Casualties | vote tags: Tracking the Vote
June 13th, 2009 at 3:31 am
[...] Jeff Huber, “Our McMan in Bananastan,” Antiwar.com (June 8, 2009) at http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/06/08/our-mcman-in-bananastan/ [...]
La guerra afgana de Obama, los medios estadounidenses y las Naciones Unidas « NaturallyMadNews
June 16th, 2009 at 2:22 pm
[...] [8] Jeff Huber, “ Our McMan in Bananastan ,” Antiwar.com (8 de junio de 2009), en: http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/06/08/our-mcman-in-bananastan/ [...]
Obama’s Afghan War, the US Media, and the UN: the New Metric of Civilian Casualties « C.O.T.O.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:12 am
[...] Jeff Huber, “Our McMan in Bananastan,” Antiwar.com (June 8, 2009) at http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/06/08/our-mcman-in-bananastan/ [...]
Vindskupan » Generalen från den mörka sidan
June 22nd, 2009 at 3:30 pm
[...] “Our McMan in Bananastan” av Jeff Huber, i Antiwar.com, 9 juni [...]