Those who are agonizing over whether Iranian nuclear scientist Shahram Amiri was a double agent or just an agent or whether he was kidnapped or a defector are really missing the point. Amiri was just a small cog in the Greatest Show on Earth, the $100 billion a year US intelligence community. United States intelligence is a huge and expensive bureaucracy and the information it produces must be consumed even when it does not necessarily make Americans safer. More important than that, it is a product that must have enough bells and whistles to impress Congress, the media, and the White House to keep the money flowing. What that all translates to is that every success, no matter how minor or even debatable, must be spun and promoted to the fullest while every failure must be concealed. The tendency to do so is not unique to the intelligence community and one has only to look at the military’s contrived narratives relating to Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch, both of which were completely fictitious but supportive of a tale of heroism and self-sacrifice that the Pentagon was promoting.
CIA Case Officers are the bureaucratic version of used car salesmen. Their goal in life is to make the sale, get promoted and upwardly reassigned, and then walk away. The after sale warranty is somebody else’s problem. If there is a warranty. Amiri walked into that showroom and was told that he could have any car he wanted. The CIA officer, scenting a huge promotion if he were to snag an Iranian scientist, was ready to help him sign on the bottom line. He flew in a "manager" from Washington who was able to confirm that the Iranian was the real thing, someone who was involved in Iranian nuclear technology, albeit it at a real low level and with little access to anything of note. Amiri agreed to cooperate in exchange for eventual resettlement and a fat bank account.
Nothing unusual there. The CIA encounters lots of walk-ins, people who claim to have information valuable to the US government. Many are picked up and run for a while to determine if they have anything useful. Most don’t and the relationship is quietly ended, referred to as termination. Amiri had little to offer but it was a feather in several caps for the agency to say that it had an agent inside the Iranian nuclear program. And there was something that Amiri could contribute that fit in with other information. He knew enough scientists and talked with enough others to have a good idea about the alleged nuclear weapons program, which he was reasonably certain did not actually exist. It was a judgment that had been corroborated by other sources, but it’s always nice to have some extra confirmation. Amiri’s information was used in the ongoing National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iran, which has been languishing for more than two years, caught between the Bush and Obama Administrations’ desire to have a "strong" document justifying the use of force and the insistence of intelligence analysts that the information pass the smell test and not lead to something similar to the 2002 NIE on Iraq, which was a pack of lies.
Then someone somewhere in the Washington bureaucracy determined that it was just possible that the Iranians were on to Amiri who then decided to defect during the annual Hajj to Saudi Arabia. The CIA officers who had been running him and who really didn’t know much about him apart from that he appeared to be genuine agreed. If anyone wondered why he was leaving his family behind, it was immediately assumed that that the Iranians might not let them all out together while others speculated that he didn’t get along with his wife, a logical assessment since most CIA officers don’t get along with theirs. The Saudis helped arrange the disappearance and Amiri resurfaced in the United States under a classified program whereby the CIA has blanket authority to admit into the United States a small group of "persons of interest" every year. Amiri was one of them. They don’t come in on visas or student waivers. After being thoroughly and painfully debriefed, polygraphed, and examined they are eventually given new names, jobs, and a comfortable bank account before being resettled. The CIA becomes responsible for them for the rest of their lives.
When Amiri arrived, the White House and CIA moved quickly to embarrass the Iranians and take credit for an intelligence coup, leaking the defection to the media and then announcing the arrival of a major scientist working on the Iranian nuclear program, even though they knew it was a lie. Everyone involved got promoted. Some even get a nice medal which is kept in a vault at CIA headquarters and can be shown to no one. Score a big one for US intelligence and the White House and everyone is smiling.
Then came the dark side. Amiri missed his son, but more than that, he feared for his safety. He learned that his wife and son were under house arrest with the Revolutionary Guard and that used Buick didn’t look so good anymore. He received a deliberately floated message from friends in the Iranian community that indicated that his family was in real danger. So he went by the Iranian Interests Section in the Pakistani Embassy in Washington and told them that he wanted to go home. It was all a mistake and he had been kidnapped by the Americans. No one believed him but the story had a certain plausibility and could be exploited to embarrass Washington, so the Iranians played along.
But the National Security machine must be triumphant and there were more cards to play. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton admitted that Amiri was a guy who defected but who was now free to leave, just like anyone else living in the US, a lie so big that it has to be described as breathtaking. To get even for Amiri’s perfidy, he was described as having produced great information for a number of years, which ensures that the Iranians will never trust him and will eventually make him disappear. Too bad. The wages of sin. The whole thing was wrapped up by the White House as if it were a great intelligence coup, which it was not. In reality Amiri was let go because he had no more information to provide so why spend a few million dollars resettling him? Intelligence budgets are getting cut so why waste the money? If Amiri had had anything more worth telling he would never have been allowed out of his hotel room without a "minder" and he would never have been able to walk into the Pakistani Embassy.
I have spoken to a number of intelligence officers who claim to have some insights into what went on with Shahram Amiri. My sources all agree that Amiri was not kidnapped. If he had been he would have disappeared down some hole after being "encouraged" to tell everything he knows. He was a volunteer, meaning he contacted the CIA himself, one account being that it was done over the internet and another suggesting that he walked into the US Consulate General in Istanbul. Either way he volunteered his services. He cooperated with the US for a while and there is nothing in what he provided that would suggest that he was a double agent. He did not have information of any real value apart from his secondhand corroboration of the lack of any Iranian nuclear weapons program, which might merit a footnote in the Iran NIE if it ever emerges. If he had been truly doubled one would have expected a long, carefully contrived narrative replete with blind allies and complicated deceptions. Amiri’s greatest impact will come when the Iran NIE report is again revisited in light of the re-defection, a process that has already begun. Poor Amiri was a small fish swimming in a pool full of piranhas and his future is bleak. He meant nothing, did not materially assist the United States, and is now being tossed away after being used to tout the great American intelligence success story. He will be disposed of by the Iranians after he has been similarly used.
Read more by Philip Giraldi
- Boston Becomes Toxic – May 15th, 2013
- Gatekeeping for Zion – May 9th, 2013
- Kristol Clear – May 1st, 2013
- What Has Bibi Been Doing? – April 24th, 2013
- Drones and Death Lists: The New Face of Warfare – April 17th, 2013





E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 5:17 am
Most bureaucracies function in the same way, as do the larger Corporations.
Another example is Banks, which, on the one hand, went fully retail about twenty years ago, and on the other, started talking of themselves as an "industry" that turned out "products".
You have to know banking quite well to grasp the full absurdity.
epppie
July 22nd, 2010 at 5:58 am
Or you can't trust CIA 'insiders' anymore than you can trust Iran, and he might have been kidnapped, or who the hell knows? But yeah, the whole thing is a sordid tale of brutal duplicity and CIA desperation to get the 'goods' on Iran, ie., to lie.
It's a pretty cheap move, by the way, to explain everything on the basis of the way bureaucracies function. Yeah, that's how they function, and that gets used. More than one explanation can apply. Same with incompetence theory. Incompetence is real, AND it's a cover. The reality of incompetence doesn't exclude other explanations.
But yeah, the guy is a pawn in a very dirty game.
Wolfgang9
July 22nd, 2010 at 6:22 am
If Iranian secret service believes your story, Philip, more than what Amiri told publicly when he returned then he has made a very gig mistake. And I don't think he would survive that. But I can't thionk that he would be sooo stupid. The Iranian authorities cannot tolerate such a behavior since it would probably give a bad example to others who would try similar things.
So, I'm sorry, Philip, your story may have just pulled the corner stone in his building,
W.
Shootist66
July 22nd, 2010 at 11:14 am
I doubt it. Defectors seldom survive re-defections between hostile entities unless there's some political advantage to be gained in doing so, and I doubt that the Iranian security apparatus is going to act based solely on opinion reports…even well-placed learned opinions. The intrigues of the Amiri case as ably described in Mr. Giraldi's narrative can all be surmised independently by any security service worth its salt through introspect into what's already on the street in the public venue. And I also believe he was extremely naive (or as you say, stupid) to have faith in the CIA and the State Department when he had so little to offer. He just proved to be another expendable asset of dubious value who got in over his head. Mr. Amiri's ultimate fate at the hands of the Iranians was most likely pre-ordained long before Phillip penned this article.
Johnny in Wi.
July 22nd, 2010 at 12:15 pm
I think this is about the best explanation I have seen about this whole affair.
Wolfgang9
July 22nd, 2010 at 12:35 pm
I think you are right! But he must be completely out of his mind. What did he think, he could return after that?
Maybe it was all staged from the beginning and the Iranian counter intelligence send him over?
W.
Little Paulie
July 22nd, 2010 at 2:14 pm
I completely disagree with Giraldi on this one. It seems to me like this guy was kidnapped and didn't defect. If he were a double agent he would've failed the polygraph test and would've been busted right away, and if he defected he would know what would happen to his family and himself (once he returned to iran). After all this guy is an award winning nuclear scientist (and he's only 32 years-old) so he's obviously smart enough to understand these very simple things. I think he was nabbed because he was smart and would probably have knowledge about the nuclear program if there were one. I think that after his captors pressed him to reveal the details of the nuclear program, and still didn't get anything out of him (because there isn't one), they realized that he really didn't know anything. So all this stuff about him being a double agent or defecting and then changing his mind is just a bunch of moonshine. The guy was kidnapped because they thought he knew something and after he acted like he would cooperate with his captors he was granted some more freedom and made that internet video which led to his release because it was obvious evidence that he was, in fact, in the USA.
Little Paulie
July 22nd, 2010 at 2:36 pm
BTW, why don't you guys check Youtube and watch the interview with him on PtressTV? If he were a defector then why would you need to kidnap him at gunpoint? And if he were a defector why didn't the US acknowledge that he was here of his own free will in response to Iranian claims that he was kidnapped? The story that he recounts in the interview seem perfectly plausible. Why are the Saudis quiet about this whole thing? If Amiri is lying about being kidnapped in Saudi Arabia then why doesn't the Saudi press say that Amiri's claim is a big lie. It's exactly because he was kidnapped and because his story is so obviously plausible that he had to be released after he made his first internet video.
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 3:09 pm
Deleuze and Guattari associate what they call "the flow of stupidity" with Capitalist antiproduction as well.
This does not cover the whole of "incompetence theory", from the Peter Principle to, in the past, selected KGB moles in high positions promoting "incompetents" among inferiors and superiors to "incompetence as an explanation or a cover but it provides the first well-argued and systematic context.
In fact, as Deleuze and Guattari, also argue, incompetence is a necessary part of Capitalism.
This was always obvious, and Marx saw a larger context without using either term.
In a different context, incompetence and antiproduction, are also associated with the development of classes, as Veblen saw in relation to display, also without using either term.
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 3:14 pm
Ah yes–finally a mention of the Saudis.
And when are the Saudis going to initiate a criminal investigation and prosecution of a high profile kidnaping or rendition or whatever you want to call it during a pilgrimage?
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 3:53 pm
Has the US ambassador to Saudi Arabia been summoned by the Saudis yet and asked to explain how this Amiri bloke go from point A, Saudia Arabia, to point B,. the United States, and specifically in the hands of the CIA?
Can Muslims on pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia expect to be fair game to US intelligence?
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 3:55 pm
Imagine a high profile US nuclear scientist disappearing on a visit to the Vatican, and then later winding up in Iran.
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 4:11 pm
" 11/05/2009: A court in Milan has delivered its verdict in the spectacular trial of several CIA agents involved in the 2003 kidnapping of the Islamist Abu Omar. Some 23 American agents received prison terms after being found guilty in absentia. The court's decision is a condemnation of the anti-terror policies of George W. Bush.
The same verdict was repeated 25 times: guilty. But it wasn't just the accused who were being condemned — the court's decision was also an unmistakable verdict on American anti-terrorist practices under former US President George W. Bush.
In the world's first trial involving the CIA's "extraordinary renditions" program since the Sept. 11 terror attacks, a court in the Italian city of Milan delivered a clear verdict. A total of 23 US agents were convicted in abstentia and sentenced to prison terms over their role in the 2003 kidnapping of the Islamist Abu Omar. Twenty-two of the Americans were given five year terms while the former Milan CIA station chief Robert Lady was sentenced to eight years in prison. Three US citizens were acquitted, with reference to their diplomatic immunity. "
spiegel.com
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 4:12 pm
25 guilty verdicts–wow.
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 4:16 pm
Given its "products" perhaps the whole CIA might be usefully replaced by a few Classical philologists, a historian or two, some ethnologists, anthropologists, linguists, a physicist, a few poets and musicians, some artists, a novelist or two, some economists, and such.
That would be a lot cheaper and how could their "product" be worse? Indeed, it might be a whole lot better.
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 4:18 pm
Speaking of which, Signor Giraldi, have you had time to peak into the Venetian Ricordi?
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 4:19 pm
corr: "peek"
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 4:19 pm
"If Columbus had been a Venetian, he would have shut up."
EAC
Wolfgang
July 22nd, 2010 at 4:22 pm
Yes, I don't think it makes any sense: if he was a walkin for the CIA, then he would NEVER return to Iran. I know that from many East German's who went to the West, there was just NO WAY to go back. So, as much as I like Philip (and I cant wait until he writes again), there is something very fishy here.
W
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 4:33 pm
In American college football, which at many universities is essentially professional, with the players receiving a pittance of what they gross for the institution, an unrecruited player who makes the team is a called a "walk on", not a "walk in."
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 4:37 pm
"Walk in" is more US marketing and business usage–as when an unsolicited customer of some substance walks into a Bank and opens a large account or buys a wad of CD's.
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 4:41 pm
In fact, Banks have very few "walk ins" of any substance.
There are many reasons for this, but Paco Underhill has an interesting insight into a preeminently psychological one.
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 4:44 pm
There are also investors who may appear to be "walk ins" but are not.
A real case: a woman walked in with a huge purchase of CD's to Bank A, which for one reason or another completely botched the servicing.
Months passed.
As it turns out, the walk in was a partner in the bank whom the manager had not recognized.
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 5:22 pm
"The Washington Post said that Amiri had been working for the CIA for more than a year. It said he was paid $5 million out of a secret program aimed at inducing scientists and others with information on Iran's nuclear program to defectThe Washington Post said that Amiri had been working for the CIA for more than a year. It said he was paid $5 million out of a secret program aimed at inducing scientists and others with information on Iran's nuclear program to defect"
[HP]
Come again?
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 5:23 pm
"It said he was paid $5 million out of a secret program aimed at inducing scientists and others with information on Iran's nuclear program to defect"
What fund was that again?
And Amiri banked where, mes enfants?
gfbgrbr
July 22nd, 2010 at 5:41 pm
Moderator, could you please do something about E.A. Costa's spam? he does this on every single article.
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 5:48 pm
It would appear that the Iranians penetrated the CIA's "nuclear defector" fund, eh?
Nice going guys.
RogueBuddha
July 22nd, 2010 at 6:49 pm
Wolf, I agree with you on this one. That does seem to be the most probable story/theory. They are also making a movie about this guy for television release.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/07/i…
RogueBuddha
July 22nd, 2010 at 6:51 pm
Grow up.
Phil Giraldi
July 22nd, 2010 at 9:13 pm
Of course, which particular records did you have in mind?
Chris Dowd
July 22nd, 2010 at 10:27 pm
So Giraldi has contacts in the CIA who say things to him like this Iranian would be in hole somewhere after being tortured if he was indeed kidnapped- and he is ok with knowing such people and giving them anonymity? Nice. That's the people Giraldi knows in the CIA? Wow- hobnobs with murderers and torturers? Wonderful. Makes his words real trustworthy here.
E. A. Costa
July 22nd, 2010 at 11:42 pm
Reports from abroad by the Venetian ambassadors naturally. A hilarious story, one might retail, about a certain Queller and an even more certain Wallach.
Phil Giraldi
July 23rd, 2010 at 11:04 am
Calm down Chris, I wasn't endorsing any of this stuff, just describing what would likely have occurred. I do not hobnob with torturers. MY friends from CIA days are as appalled by what has been happening in the national security state as I am.
This Blog Sucks
July 25th, 2010 at 10:43 am
Does Celebrity Advertising Worth Celebrating?…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…
Chris Dowd
July 25th, 2010 at 7:33 pm
Well, I'm sorry- but I just have to wonder what would it take for one of your CIA contacts to resign from such organization that speaks so casually of murdering innocent kidnapped scientists? This is how the CIA defends itself? By telling you that if he had been kidnapped he'd be dead now after being tortured first?
THAT is their defense? That they would have murdered a man after torturing him first- if he had been kidnapped?
Wow- this really gives us an inadvertent look into the moral culture of that organization doesn't it? These sound like people who should be on lists along side child sex abusers that we should be able to look up on the internet so as to avoid living next door to them.
ericsiverson
July 27th, 2010 at 4:56 pm
National security , I thaought nationalists were deemed bad ? many world leaders have been critisized and suspected of being a hated nationalist . Some have even been bombed , the only crime was they were bad nationalists , citizens and presidents that believed they were responsible for their own country . Now we want presidents and citezens to feel more responsible for the whole world . Well isnt national security than something we need to do away with ? Isnt there a fear of us becoming indestinquishable from those hated nationalists ?
seannielson
July 28th, 2010 at 4:56 pm
Useless product, that is all i can say.
Sean