A Middle East Without America?
The fever sweeping the Middle East is now coursing through Libya, Yemen, Iran, and Bahrain, where the U.S. Fifth Fleet is based.
In all four nations, state violence is being used to crush the rebels, and regime survival hangs on whether security forces and the army stand behind the government or stand aside.
A new Middle East is dawning. What will it look like?
Perhaps the nation to study is Turkey, which has already gone through a democratic and dramatic transformation.
In 2000, Turkey was a reliable U.S. ally, a friend to Israel, an aspiring candidate for membership in the EU. Since then, Turkey has set a different course, welcomed by her people, that has measurably enhanced her prestige.
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s regime is far more Islamic than any Turkish government since the caliphate. He and his Justice and Development Party have effected constitutional reforms to curb the power of the judiciary and military, guardians of the secular state established by Kemal Ataturk in 1923. Scores of generals have been indicted for treason.
Turkey refused President George W. Bush permission to use its territory to invade Iraq. Denied a fast track to membership in the EU, Turkey now looks to the south and east. Relations with Syria have been repaired. Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has been welcomed in Istanbul.
To the rage of Hillary Clinton, the Turks and Brazil cut a deal with Iran to transfer half the low-enriched uranium at Natanz out of the country. This was seen as undercutting U.S. policy. When the U.N. imposed the latest sanctions on Iran, Turkey voted no.
"The Turks are out of their lane," said a U.S. diplomat.
Indeed they are. And as Turkey moves out of America’s orbit, she is moving back into a Muslim world, much of which she ruled for centuries. A sure sign is the bristling hostility to Israel, with which Turkey has had close political and military ties.
At Davos in 2009, in a debate with Shimon Peres about the Gaza war, Erdogan shouted at Israel’s president, "You know well how to kill," stormed out and flew home to a hero’s welcome.
Eight of the nine dissidents shot by Israeli commandos in the Gaza Freedom Flotilla trying to run the blockade were Turks. Erdogan’s backing of the flotilla and condemnation of Israel for a "bloody massacre" made him and Turkey more admired in Gaza than are Iran and Ahmadinejad.
After that first week of demonstrations in Cairo, when Hosni Mubarak announced he would not run again for president, America dithered, but Erdogan declared that Mubarak should resign immediately.
"The (Egyptian) people expect a very different decision from Mubarak," Erdogan said. "The current administration does not inspire trust so far as the democratic change wanted by the population is concerned."
Erdogan abruptly canceled his February visit to Egypt.
What, then, are the crucial elements of the new Turkish policy?
First, a new deference and respect for Islam. Second, make Turkey the champion of the causes of the Arab and Muslim masses, foremost among which is the cause of the Palestinian people. Third, defy the United States and denounce Israel.
What the Turks are about has been called "neo-Ottomanism," a 21st century policy to reclaim the position they held for centuries.
As the British elbowed aside the Ottoman Turks and the Americans shouldered aside the British after Suez, now it is America that appears to be the receding power in the Middle East and Turkey the rising power.
Indeed, the American hour seems to be rapidly approaching its end.
In weeks, President Ben Ali, our man in Tunis, was overthrown. Mubarak, our man in Egypt for 30 years, was overthrown. Hezbollah became the real power in the Lebanese government. The king of Jordan dismissed his prime minister and cabinet. For the first time, voices are speaking against the royal family, especially the king’s wife.
The Palestinian Authority has been discredited by leaked documents revealing the concessions it was prepared to make for a tiny rump state on the West Bank. Benjamin Netanyahu forced President Obama to back down completely from his demands that Israel halt new construction in East Jerusalem and all expansion of settlements on the West Bank. The Middle East peace process is dead.
Our ally, the king of Bahrain, is now under siege. President Saleh of Yemen, our ally against al-Qaeda, has been forced to pledge he will not run again in 2013, nor will his son. Pakistan is aflame with anti-Americanism.
By year’s end, all U.S. troops are to be out of Iraq, where the influence of Iran is rising and the man behind the throne is the anti-American Muqtada al-Sadr.
The U.S. press is transfixed by all this, but a question arises: What vital interest of a United States staring at bankruptcy would be imperiled if we got out of the way, stopped fighting these countries’ wars and paying these countries’ bills and let these people determine their own future for good or ill?
COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM
Read more by Patrick J. Buchanan
- A Decade of War – for What? – May 3rd, 2012
- Tomorrow’s Man – or Yesterday’s? – April 26th, 2012
- Bibi’s Dilemma — and Barack’s – April 16th, 2012
- Is the GOP Becoming a War Party? – March 8th, 2012
- Will Bibi Break Obama? – March 1st, 2012





John_Muhammad
February 17th, 2011 at 10:21 pm
It would not surprise me if Turkey invites the US to remove all military forces and close down all its installations in the near future. I can imagine the halls of Bethseda and Walter Reed hospitals being filled with hundreds of cardiac arrests coming from Washington and the Pentagon following such an event.
But, seeing as Turkey is indeed pro-Islam and is getting along relatively well with the West (Israel notwithstanding) maybe that's a sign to Washington that an Islam-oriented (if not sharia-based) state doesn't have to be a bad thing.
andy
February 17th, 2011 at 10:28 pm
The only loser if America got out (or was thrown out) of the middle east would be AIPAC. I could live with that. In fact, I have no problem with that at all.
guest
February 17th, 2011 at 10:35 pm
when the time comes for a power to go nothing will stop it. I was in the USSR when that country fell apart .3 presidents died so the rein was given to the youngest Garbachov & the rest is history.Billions of roubles spent on arms instead of people.USA time is fast approching when the Chinese learn to bite we will then see.
mickperry
February 18th, 2011 at 1:43 am
Where's Pat been? The 'vital interests' are best summed up by the jail-bird Ray McGovern. OIL: Oil, Israel, and Logistics. Meanwhile, a majority of people in the US not only favour bringing the troops home, they would also like their jobs to be bought back to the US as well.
theothercanada
February 18th, 2011 at 5:30 am
God Bless Turkey and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan for standing up to Anglo-Israeli Alliance of Terror and Barbarity!
freshnotbitter
February 18th, 2011 at 6:24 am
For years Greece was used to deny Turkey membership in EU. When Greece dropped its objections suddenly, the EU was forced to admit that they were too scared to admit Turkey into the EU because it would mean that the largest country in the EU would be Islamic.
Turkey then shifted its gaze southward which had always made the most sense anyway.
I believe the Arab masses will do the USA a favor and kick us out of the area when they gain sufficient political power. I look forward to seeing those wasted tax dollars back in the good ol' USA where we can put them to work on something useful.
China and India combined (2.5 billion people or 8 times the population of the US) will need all the oil the mid east can produce and then some. It is just a matter of time. Why we are dawdling about in Arabia is beyond me.
foodoo
February 18th, 2011 at 6:58 am
The US sees the entire ME through its Israel-goggles.
I don't think that Turkey is in any danger of "sharia law".
Turkey is just acting more courageous and more wise than the USA.
Courageous in standing up for what is just, and wise in realizing
that trade with all the peoples of the ME is better than
Israel-myopia.
Face it we get nothing from Israel, except enemies. You may argue
that the USA cannot function without enemies, but USA would be
better suited to exit that mindset.
We need to return to our role as innovators, traders and
industrialists–if we did that we would be following
in Turkey's footsteps
JoaoAlfaiate
February 18th, 2011 at 7:25 am
Our Middle East policy is so absurd and so counter productive that it no longer even serves israeli policy interests.
geo1671
February 18th, 2011 at 8:54 am
Time for Uncle Sam to fess up–Israel is actually a state of America ! How about this instead,United States of Israel. (NATO). The Arabs aren't stupid.
RickR30
February 18th, 2011 at 9:05 am
Looks like the colonies of our empire are finally rebelling. Good for them and good for us, because if it were up to our moronic politicians (most of them ignorant ivy league-educated lawyers anyway) and idiotic neocons we would have more control and influence over the world, which would cost us more money and backfire even more. We are lucky that the people are directing their ire at their puppet rulers and not against US embassies, bases, and tourists. The empire is coming to an end thanks to the people of these nations and no thanks to our political class intoxicated with hubris and ignorance.
charley caruso
February 18th, 2011 at 9:06 am
We cant get out of mideast. we need the damn oil.
scott
February 18th, 2011 at 9:26 am
I almost feel like I need to defend Israel, NOT! It's not often there's so many posts all pro-American and pro-justice!
Dr.Khan
February 18th, 2011 at 9:41 am
I strongly believe Turkey once again has acquired all the tools that's needed to lead the Muslim world.So I would say it is more of the Muslims specially youth wing around the world responsibility to follow the trait how Turkey has earned such RESPECT and now we as Muslim citizens and countries as a whole can follow for better future and for the peace of the world.
Bill
February 18th, 2011 at 9:57 am
The sooner the US dollar ceases to be the world's reserve currency, the sooner the rest of the world can begin to shed itself of US meddling, and get on with their own priorities.
The US has nothing to fear from this, and our nation can also get on with our own priorities.
Mohd
February 18th, 2011 at 10:40 am
Plan B for the USG. Stop being arrogant and submit peacefully. Solve your problems with Iran and the people of the region. Forget about Israel and dictators before it is too late. Weight American people's long term costs and benefits not the politicians short term benefits.
andy
February 18th, 2011 at 12:11 pm
Ridiculous statement.
andy
February 18th, 2011 at 12:12 pm
We won't solve any of our problems by being an empire James.
Jamal
February 18th, 2011 at 1:42 pm
1- Middle East without America….? actually is a very good question, one of the reason for peoples uprising is the wars in middle east created by US and EU, the second is the fact in double moral, language, politics, treachery, cope de Etta’s, support of dictatorial regimes and the list of the wrong doings by US and EU can be very – very long. Here I think I have answered the question why people in Middle East are better off without US or EU militarism present in middle east. In the other hand the US military presence in Middle East is not taken as a peace gesture but rather as upcoming wars with rest of the world. Look the BS by some US security “Experts” who say that these dictatorial regimes providing information about “terrorist” group and therefore they are US allies raises the question: where were these terrorists 30-40 or even 70 years ago when EU and US started supporting these dictators.
Jamal
February 18th, 2011 at 1:44 pm
2- The matter doesn’t stop there, there is a cultural differences, there is a religious differences and above all there is this attitude of supremacy by the US and Europeans which makes the matter more difficult for people to understand the fact that, people around the world having the same social economic problem as they do.., because of a falsified system called “democracy, a falsified system based on supremacy in terms of cultural and militarism arguing that US and EU is civilized and therefore the system needs to implement their “civilizations” on people of middle east. So the people of Middle East want to be independent and demanding it by demanding for these puppets and dictatorial regimes to step down. Then there is the matter for people being hungry while they see the US or EU militarism is feed like kings and treated as such.
Jamal
February 18th, 2011 at 1:45 pm
continues…3- While they see that EU or US educated personnel taking over their country and jobs while live in separated colonies with very best available and best-paid programs, yet the local educated professionals are jobless and live in poverty. Here, countries like Saudi Arabia, Arab Emirates, Jordan, Egypt, Libya, Iran (there is more Russians working in Iran then ever before, so as Italian, Swedish, German and other European national) So the dilemma is not only a political but rather a social economic in one hand and politics dictated by US and EU handpick dictatorial regimes is another.
Jamal
February 18th, 2011 at 1:46 pm
Continue….4- If US or EU and China, India, Russia, Australia or what is called “world power” (another falsified terminology calling few countries a world power) want to see peace in middle east first thing they need to do is enforce the will of the people in Middle East on Israel and boycott the system in all front until Israel accepting the peace.., as it was done against Iraq, here, Israel already have a WMD, but the question about Iraq having WMD or not was falsified for the sake of those who are not for peace but rather wars and more wars.., now if masseur is implemented and enforced then and only then is going to be peace in middle, hence, US and EU needs to understand that as long their military is in Middle East people are not going to trust them. Cultural matter is exchangeable here it is the people who would exchange their culture and have a neutral relations in social economic and political understanding through education based on trust and respect.., not what US or EU sees fit when its in their “interests”.
Terrance&Philip
February 18th, 2011 at 3:13 pm
No, America is an Israeli satrapy.
Terrance&Philip
February 18th, 2011 at 3:14 pm
"(most of them ignorant ivy league-educated lawyers anyway)"
You can always tell a Harvad man. You just can't tell him much.
rosemerry
February 18th, 2011 at 3:43 pm
such as Dershovitz
Jamal
February 18th, 2011 at 4:29 pm
Feb. 18 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. vetoed a draft resolution in the United Nations Security Council that would have declared Israel’s settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem to be illegal and demanded a halt to such activity.
The U.S., while “rejecting in the strongest terms the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlement activity,” voted against the measure out of concern for the impact on the future of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, Ambassador Susan Rice said. Above news is yet another proof in US being paralyzed by those who say they are democrats yet do what Israel tells them to do. These settlements’ are illegal not because we say so, but because is been proven that these lands are Palestinians land and US is helping Israel steal it from the right owners.
Doug_in_Indiana
February 18th, 2011 at 4:48 pm
"What vital interest of a United States staring at bankruptcy would be imperiled if we got out of the way..?" Certainly no vital interest of the United States, but what about the vital interests of the US state? What remains of the US economy is vitally dependent upon the continued manufacture and sale of armaments and the financial Ponzi schemes still being perpetrated upon the world via the "reserve currency" scam. What better way to protect these (or even just hide their results) than a really major war? They could say 'screw the Chinese and other Asian creditors', draw the illiterate American proletariat onside by pointing to a foreign threat, stimulate arms production, and even make the boobs believe that rationing and central planning are the only economic options(same as for all their wars). America has seen plenty of wars started for less compelling reasons. Am I being unreasonably cynical? Well, I don't think the empire and its economy can continue much longer as it is. And I wouldn't discount any potential scheme of our imperial controllers.
Sam
February 18th, 2011 at 4:58 pm
The triangle Turkey, Iran and Egypt will have more to say, not necessary agaisnt american interest. The world was always a complicated place. But digital has become the world.
jeff_davis
February 18th, 2011 at 5:45 pm
So you're saying if we don't feed the military industrial complex with trillions of dollars, the Arabs will refuse to sell us their oil? That stupidity is on top of the fact that we get the majority of our imported oil from Canada, Venezuela, and Mexico, and only around eight percent from the mideast. Since half the oil we use in the US comes from the US, that means only four percent of our total oil usage comes from the mideast.
Try to do some research before you pimp for the military industrial complex.
davidgrayling
February 18th, 2011 at 6:01 pm
I just wrote an article called: Throw The U.S. Out of the Middle East!
In fact, throw the U.S. out of everywhere and push it back to its own borders. The world is sick of America, of its bullying, of it warmongering, of its torturing, of its duplicity, of its forked-tongue, of its support for despots, of its greed, of its arrogance, etc.
If the world could get rid of America and its sidekick Israel, the world would be a better place.
The American Dream? Stick it where the sun don't shine!
http://dangerouscreation.com
Jamal
February 18th, 2011 at 6:53 pm
2- Continue…..yet when they ask for their freedom they have paid the ultimate price for demanding it, so the BS argument in “Terrorism – Terrorist” is a paradox creation by those whom are in the business of preserving capitalism and its interests…, they get paid for it, Paul Wolfowitz, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Rumsfeled, Cheney, Paul Bremer and rest of the gangs are just a few, now if the US government wants to save some money.., consider withdrawing these people pensions and above all withdrew the US militarism from Middle East.
Jamal
February 18th, 2011 at 7:20 pm
UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) – The United States on Friday vetoed a draft U.N. Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlements on Palestinian territory after the Palestinians refused to withdraw the Arab-drafted text.
The other 14 council members voted in favour of the draft resolution. But the United States, as one of the five permanent council members with the power to block any action by the Security Council, voted against it and struck it down.
U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice told council members that the veto "should not be misunderstood to mean we support settlement activity." She added that the U.S. view is that Israeli settlements lack legitimacy.
above is yet another double language by US when it comes to the people of middle east.
jeff_davis
February 19th, 2011 at 10:27 am
James, with all due respect, this makes no sense at all. It's not merely a boilerplate flagged-draped response, but illogical boilerplate.
"We would lose our overseas bases." This is a good thing, not a bad thing. The MIC is a parasite sucking the life out of the country. We NEED to close those bases, muster out the military personnel, send them to work in the private sector, and refund or repurpose those tax dollars.
"Lose… our military stockpiles…" No we wouldn't. Just pack up the "stockpiles" and ship them home.
"Lose our overwhelming dominance.." What planet are you on? Is this the overwhelming dominance that let's the Taliban increase its strength every day , or is it the overwhelming dominance that allows Somali pirates to hijack shipping around the horn of Africa? Be honest, it's really just your mythological 'dream' of US "dominance", isn't it?
"We would have to once again allow the oil companies to negotiate their own agreements for oil development and production." And that's bad because…? Because it's the regular way lawful business is conducted? I'm confused. Is the US a lawful nation or some kind of predatory, criminal state?
"We would need to allow an international network of maritime states to police the shipping lanes for oil transport to Europe, the US, and the Far East."
See comment above about Somali pirates.
"Beyond all of this, we would lose our role as the world's reserve currency."
Now you've got it ass backwards. It's precisely the economic burden of empire which is driving the US bankrupt and threatening the dollar. Dump the bases and then maybe, just maybe the US can be saved from bankruptcy and the collapse of the dollar.
Oh, wait a minute, I get it. Your comment was dry humor, all tongue in cheek. And I fell for it and took you seriously. Ha, ha, the joke's on me.
That, or you work for Lockheed Martin, and are looking to save your paycheck.
musings
February 22nd, 2011 at 4:17 pm
I guess the real question is: don't most of us tend to contribute to antiwar and to post here because we believe in justice, fairness, non-bellicosity? But a few people point out the realpolitik problems and they get negative responses. Why is that? Could we sit here and post in a cold house without food? Isn't oil something we take for granted as ours of right? So our greatest fear in the Mideast (across the board) that something might go wrong to shut off the flow – in other words, even when we think justice would be a good thing there, it's partly self-interested. We who look at things from a capitalist perspective say there is not problem – we can buy our oil from Islamists of any degree of observance as easily as from our puppets (maybe after a transition). Others are not so sure. Others still completely deny there's a problem – we can get it from Venezuela, Brazil, Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico. But under it all, there's a troubling truth. We used to get it from Texas and we used it up there. Everybody else is going to use it up too, even if we go away from the Mideast and make do elsewhere. And then, when China and India have tapped it out, they'll go looking for the last of it in "our" territory. The problem underlying all of this, even the problem that put us in the Mideast in the first place, was the 20th century's use of a finite resource which has peaked in many places. The shady side of the slope is going to be a bear.