Since 1997, the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK), an Iranian opposition group, has been listed
by the State Department as a terrorist organization. The European
Union followed suit and also listed the MEK as such, but as a result
of intense lobbying and a deceptive
campaign by the supporters of the MEK, the EU recently removed
the organization from its list of terrorist entities.
The same tactics are
being used by the MEK in the United States. It has been spending millions
of dollars on lobbyists, public relations agents, and communications firms
in an attempt to pressure the State Department to remove
the organization from the terrorist list. The MEK’s argument is
that it renounced violence and terrorism in 2001. This is a lie. FBI documents indicate that as late as 2004 the MEK was
involved in planning terrorist operations. Removing the MEK from the
terrorist list as a result of its lobbying is akin to allowing al-Qaeda,
the Taliban, and the Pakistani terrorist organization Lashkar-e Taiba to hire lobbyists, spend millions,
and make campaign contributions to members of Congress (as MEK
supporters have done) in order to gain “legitimacy” as an organizations.
The MEK was founded in 1965 by three Islamic leftists with the
goal of toppling the U.S.-supported regime of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
In the 1970s it undertook a campaign of assassinating U.S. advisers
and bombing U.S. corporations in Iran. It supported the 1979 Revolution
in Iran, but in 1981 it turned its guns against the Tehran government
and began a campaign of assassinations and terrorist operations that
resulted in the death of thousands of Iranians, including the executions
of its own supporters by government officials, soldiers,
police officers, and ordinary people. It then moved
its headquarters
to Iraq, made a pact with the regime of Saddam Hussein, which was fighting
a ferocious war with Iran. The MEK spied on Iranian troops for Iraq, attacked Iran at the end of Iran-Iraq war with Hussein’s
support, and helped
Hussein put down the uprisings by the Iraqi Kurds in the north and
Shi’ites in the south after the Persian Gulf War of 1990-91. The MEK
is despised by the vast majority of Iranians for what they consider
to be treason committed against their homeland.
Since the 1980s, Masoud Rajavi, the MEK’s ideological leader, and his wife, Maryam Rajavi, the “president-elect
of the resistance,” have turned the MEK into a Stalinist-style cult.
The MEK has its own calendar filled with special occasions in its history,
dress codes for its members, and a censorship index. All orders
to the members come from the top. Its power structure is exactlylike
that of the Islamic Republic of Iran: It has a supreme leader who
cannot be questioned and a “president-elect” who must be obedient to
the supreme leader. Maryam Rajavi has never won any election; she was
handpicked by her husband. A simple search on the Internet turns up
horror stories told by former members who wanted to leave the
organization before theU.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 but were arrested
by MEK guards and jailed. They were tortured, beaten, kept in solitary
confinement, “reeducated ideologically,” and, if nothing else worked,
turned over to Saddam Hussein’s Special Security
Organization as
Iranian “spies.” For more information, see this report
by Human Rights Watch.
In its campaign in the United
States, the MEK has made an alliance
with the neoconservatives
and the Israel
lobby.
Taking advantage of the atrocities committed by the Iranian government
in the aftermath of the controversial 2009 presidential elections, the
neoconservatives and their allies have sponsored six conferences over
the past several months in Europe and the U.S. to prop up the MEK as
the leading alternative to the Islamic Republic of Iran. Such infamous
figures as John Bolton and former CIA director R. James Woolsey support the MEK. Bolton has said repeatedly that the U.S. must bomb Iran and support
the MEK. The neocons also channel their support for MEK through conservative
groups such as the Iran
Policy Committee
(IPC). An investigation published by Jim
Lobe’s Lobelog in September 2010 revealed that the IPC has shared an address,
accountants, and some staff with multiple organizations that either
fronted for or had direct ties to Iraqi con man Ahmed Chalabi‘s Iraqi
National Congress —
the same organization that fabricated much of the bogus intelligence
that neocons used to garner support for the invasion of Iraq
in 2003.
The MEK has also set up several
front organizations. The National
Council of Resistance
(NCR), its political arm, is not listed as a terrorist organization. Near East Policy
Research and Strategic Policy
Consulting, two
“consulting companies” headed by longtime MEK members and
spokesmen, lobby for the MEK. The Council
for Democratic Change in Iran
provides cover for political figures to support the MEK
without being directly associated with it. It invites politicians to
speak at its gatherings without telling them that they are an MEK front
group, and it pays the speakers honoraria so large that it’s difficult
for them to resist. Conservative academic Raymond
Tanter, who founded the IPC, is an example. In a speech to the CDCI, Tanter said, “To say that the only route
in Iran is the nonviolent route of Gandhi and King is to misunderstand
the nature of the theocratic regime in Tehran.” Former CIA operative and IPC staff member Clare M. Lopez is another MEK supporter.
The MEK lobbying campaign has
also made inroads among mainstream figures who probably know
nothing about its past. Howard Dean, former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, is one. President Obama’s former National
Security Adviser Gen. James L. Jones is another. Others include Bill Richardson, former energy secretary and U.S. ambassador
to the United Nations; Michael Mukasey, attorney general
under President George W. Bush; Tom Ridge, former governor of Pennsylvania
and homeland security secretary under Bush; Gens. Peter Pace and
Hugh Shelton, former vice chair and chairman, respectively, of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff; Louis Freeh, former FBI director; Lee Hamilton, former Democratic
congressman; Michael Hayden, former director of the CIA; Gen. Anthony
Zinni, former commander of the Central Command; Frances Townsend, homeland
security adviser in the Bush White House; and Brad Sherman and Dana Rohrabacher of the House of Representatives.
Such people are not approached
by the MEK directly, but by the NCR, the CDCI, or another affiliated
group. The lobbyists introduce themselves as representatives of Iran’s
Green Movement, as “members
of Iran’s parliament in exile“(there is no such parliament), or as Fox
News analysts,
claiming that they have vast support among the Iranian people who will
rise up in support of the MEK if only the U.S. supports the group. But
the claims are bogus, and if the MEK ever comes to power, the resulting
bloodbath will dwarf anything that has happened in Iran under the
ayatollahs.
If the MEK is removed from the terrorist list, there
is no reason to believe it will not use its lobbying apparatus to obtain
U.S. funding and to promote war with Iran. If it succeeds, the MEK cult
will try to silent the voices of the Iranian-American community, represent
itself as the voice of Iran’s true opposition, and take the U.S. down
the path of another illegal war, all in the name of Iran’s nonviolent
Green Movement. It will be Ahmed Chalabi all over again.
Worst of all, striking the MEK from the terrorist list will surely give Iran’s hardliners another justification for intensifying their repression and discrediting the peaceful Green Movement by claiming that it is linked to the widely despised MEK. The U.S. antiwar community must, therefore, do all it can to oppose the MEK and provide moral support to the Green Movement.
