Expanding Covert Warfare Makes Us Less Safe
Earlier this month we learned that the Obama administration is significantly expanding the number of covert Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) agents overseas. From just a few hundred DIA agents overseas today, the administration intends to eventually deploy some 1,600 covert agents. The nature of their work will also shift, away from intelligence collection and more toward covert actions. This move signals a major change in how the administration intends to conduct military and paramilitary operations overseas. Unfortunately, it is not a shift toward peace, but rather to an even more deadly and disturbing phase in the “war on terror.”
Surely attacks on foreign countries will increase as a result of this move, but more and more the strikes will take place under cover of darkness and outside the knowledge of Congress or the American people. The move also represents a further blurring of the lines between the military and intelligence services, with the CIA becoming more like a secret military unto itself. This is a very troubling development.
In 2010, I said in a speech that there had been a CIA coup in this country. The CIA runs the military and the drone program, and they are in drug trafficking. The CIA is a secretive government all on its own. With this new expanded Defense Intelligence Agency presence overseas it will be even worse. Because the DIA is operationally under control of the Pentagon, direct congressional oversight of the program will be more difficult. Perhaps this is as intended. The CIA will be training the DIA in its facilities to conduct operations overseas. Much of this will include developing targeting data for the president’s expanding drone warfare program.
Already the president has demonstrated his preference for ever more drone attacks overseas. In Pakistan, for example, President Obama has in his first four years authorized six times more drone strikes than under all eight years of the Bush administration. Nearly three thousand individuals have been killed by these drones, many of those non-combatants.
President Obama said recently of Israel’s strikes against the Palestinians in Gaza, “No country on Earth would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its borders.” This announcement by the administration amounts to precisely that: the U.S. intends to rain down ever more missiles on citizens overseas. I believe what the president says about Israel is true everywhere, so what about those overseas who live in fear of our raining missiles? How will they feel about the United States? Is it not possible that we may be inviting more blowback by expanding the covert war overseas? Does that make us safer?
An exhaustive study earlier this year by Stanford and New York University law schools found that U.S. drone strikes on Pakistan are “damaging and counterproductive,” potentially creating more terrorists than they kill. Its recommendations of a radical re-appraisal of the program obviously fell on deaf ears in the administration.
Thousands of new DIA spies are to be hired and placed undercover alongside their CIA counterparts to help foment ever more covert wars and coups in foreign lands. Congress is silent. Where will it all end?
Read more by Rep. Ron Paul
- What No One Wants to Hear About Benghazi – May 13th, 2013
- Liberty Was Also Attacked in Boston – April 28th, 2013
- Congress Exploits Our Fears to Take Our Liberty – April 21st, 2013
- Why Can’t We All Travel To Cuba? – April 15th, 2013
- Neo-Con War Addiction Threatens Our Future – March 24th, 2013





Expanding Covert Warfare Makes Us Less Safe - Unofficial Network
December 10th, 2012 at 10:20 pm
[...] View original article. This entry was posted in World News by admin. Bookmark the permalink. [...]
Oso Politico
December 11th, 2012 at 3:27 am
'Where will it all end?'
Well, there is a rhetorical question if ever there was one.
One, as a politician, can choose to pursue close-ended objectives, i.e., those that are limited in scope, and 'doable' within some limited timeframe. But more often, they chose to pursue open-ended objectives, as typified by the Johnsonian War on Poverty or the Nixonian War on Drugs. These, too, are wars without end.
However, the US is now engaged in the so-called War on Terror, which is not a war with fixed objectives and timeframes, but rather, as we said above, an open-ended objective – a war with no fixed objectives, no fixed timeframes, and no end.
The key to ending it is to identify and eliminate the cui bono element. Unfortunately, the ususal suspects, apart from the military, industrial, and academic/think tank elements are the politicians themselves, who use such wars to justify their own existences, accumulate power and extend their control over civil society.
Where and when will it all end? – sadly, who knows?
Levendiman
December 11th, 2012 at 4:25 am
This tactic is that of a passive aggressive in Obama. It will indeed create more terrorist than it kills. Just stop for a moment and think. For every friend or family member that gets killed with a drone attack what do you think those friends and family members want to do? Well, what would you want to do if your daughter, son, cousin, nephew, father, mother, sister, best friend gets killed by a drone attack? What would want to do? Honestly, what would you want to do?
Bruce Richardson
December 11th, 2012 at 12:35 pm
This piece reflects the why of and for those who voted for Ron Paul for president. There can be no doubt that the drone program is unaccountable and creating more terrorists than it is eradicating. Can anyone really believe that this is the way to win hearts and minds? We are violating sovereignity as we cross borders with our missiles, we are behaving much as the Wermacht during WWII. The Afghan people had NO ROLE in 9/11, and NO AFGHAN played any role whatsoever! So why are we raining missiles down upon the nation, the 5th poorest in the world, when they are innocent? Yes, they did give Osama sanctuary for awhile, but on numerous occassions they also offered to extradite him to the Bush Administration but were ignored. Their Prime Minister Wakil Ahmad Mutawakil told me that Osama was "the guest that is burnbing down the guest house" and therefore he had to go. But the US wanted war not Osama bin Laden.
davidgrayling
December 11th, 2012 at 4:40 pm
It will end with Big Brother (see American Government) running the world. It's not a world I want to live in.
I don't like the thought of being rendered, tortured or disappeared. I don't like the thought of being droned or beaten to a pulp by fascist police. I don't like the thought of a few rich people having all the wealth. I don't like the idea of endless war and surveillance of all citizens by the thought police.
We have to fight against the criminal cabal running America before they enslave us!
Tim
December 11th, 2012 at 6:12 pm
I believe the coup Rep Paul speaks of happened in 1947 with passage of the National Security Act.
Eileen Kuch
December 11th, 2012 at 7:21 pm
How about 1963, when President John F. Kennedy was assassinated? Following his murder, his Vice-President, Lyndon B. Johnson, succeeded him; and, Israel was given the green light to produce nuclear weapons at will, in addition to having greatly expanded the then small conflict in Vietnam with only some 55 advisers/trainers to over 500,000 military forces.
JFK – by 1963 – had realized that the US involvement in Southeast Asia was a huge mistake, and made plans to pull all 55+ military personnel from Vietnam; and, this certainly angered many top brass as well as Intelligence operatives.
justin.mungal
December 12th, 2012 at 8:30 am
we certainly do David and fight we will, death over slavery any day!
Expanding Covert Warfare Makes Us Less Safe by Rep. Ron Paul — Antiwar.com – Antiwar.com | PAULitics.US – Wake Up America
December 13th, 2012 at 4:29 am
[...] Expanding Covert Warfare Makes Us Less Safe by Rep. Ron Paul — Antiwar.com – Antiwar.com [...]
Ron Paul on the NDAA: Just say NO to Camoflage Santa | Purposeful Pruning
December 22nd, 2012 at 9:20 am
[...] Expanding Covert Warfare Makes Us Less Safe – December 10th, 2012 [...]