Bad for America, Bad for Israel, Bad for the World
Mr. Speaker: I rise in opposition to H.R. 4133, the United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act, which unfortunately is another piece of one-sided and counterproductive foreign policy legislation. This bill’s real intent seems to be more saber-rattling against Iran and Syria, and it undermines U.S. diplomatic efforts by making clear that the U.S. is not an honest broker seeking peace for the Middle East.
The bill calls for the United States to significantly increase our provision of sophisticated weaponry to Israel, and states that it is to be U.S. policy to “help Israel preserve its qualitative military edge” in the region.
While I absolutely believe that Israel — and any other nation — should be free to determine for itself what is necessary for its national security, I do not believe that those decisions should be underwritten by U.S. taxpayers and backed up by the U.S. military.
This bill states that it is the policy of the United States to “reaffirm the enduring commitment of the United States to the security of the State of Israel as a Jewish state.” However, according to our Constitution, the policy of the United States government should be to protect the security of the United States, not to guarantee the religious, ethnic, or cultural composition of a foreign country. In fact, our own Constitution prohibits the establishment of any particular religion in the U.S.
More than 20 years after the reason for NATO’s existence — the Warsaw Pact — has disappeared, this legislation seeks to find a new mission for that anachronistic alliance: the defense of Israel. Calling for “an expanded role for Israel within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), including an enhanced presence at NATO headquarters and exercises,” it reads like a dream for interventionists and the military-industrial complex. As I have said many times, NATO should be disbanded, not expanded.
This bill will not help the United States, it will not help Israel, and it will not help the Middle East. It will implicitly authorize much more U.S. interventionism in the region at a time when we cannot afford the foreign commitments we already have. It more likely will lead to war against Syria, Iran, or both. I urge my colleagues to vote against this bill.
Read more by Rep. Ron Paul
- Obama’s Syria Policy Looks a Lot Like Bush’s Iraq Policy – June 16th, 2013
- Government Spying: Should We Be Shocked? – June 9th, 2013
- Iraq Collapse Shows Bankruptcy of Interventionism – June 2nd, 2013
- The Real Meaning of President Obama’s National Security Speeches – May 26th, 2013
- What No One Wants to Hear About Benghazi – May 13th, 2013





dink
May 9th, 2012 at 9:27 pm
Exactly. The Constitution of the United States is paramount.
Duglarri
May 9th, 2012 at 9:34 pm
Reason why there isn't already a treaty of military alliance between Israel and the United States? Because Israel won't say where it's borders actually are. Hard to sign a treaty of mutual defence where you can't be certain what territory you are being called on to defend.
RickR30
May 9th, 2012 at 9:35 pm
Interesting. So first the seek to turn nato into some worldwide military force to intervene anywhere for no good reason. And now israel gets to have greater presence and role in it. How lovely. Next it becomes a full member, and gets to run it. Next time some poor Palestinian kid throws a rock over the wall, the victims of the concentration camps will be wiped out by nato forces who in turn will invade and occupy whatever nation bibi orders them to. And no idf person has to be placed at risk. israel has the US to fight its external and larger wars and nato to take care of problems closer to and at home. Brilliant. All paid for by the disappearing US middle class. Let me guess, all but one of the House "representatives" voted in favor of this abomination. True representatives of bibi's interests that is.
Bob
May 9th, 2012 at 9:58 pm
Doesn't Ron know this is the United States of Israel?
jorgespbr
May 9th, 2012 at 10:47 pm
Zionists are devastating US
june8642
May 9th, 2012 at 11:00 pm
Absolutely correct. It is the policy of Israel not to declare borders. Zionists claim "biblical" Israel and the need for expansion to accommodate future generations of Jews.
Dr.Khan
May 9th, 2012 at 11:27 pm
God speed RON PAUL.whatelse one may say?
WhichWaldenPond
May 10th, 2012 at 1:26 am
It is hard to believe. A politician speaking truthfully and with common sense. I am left-progressive, voting Green Party for the last 3 elections. Next time, I am voting for Ron Paul, as the Republican Party candidate, or the Libertarian Party candidate, or the Constitution Party candidate, or as an independent candidate. If he is not a candidate on my ballot, I will write in his name.
notinmyname
May 10th, 2012 at 2:17 am
Yes you are right. The additional benefits to Israel of keeping its borders vague and undefined are that it makes it impossible for genuine negotiations with Palestinians to take place, and as a corrorolly it makes it impossible for Palestinians to define their borders. The funny thing is that the lack of clear borders does not seem to impede Israel's way in the UN and among western countries. but it acts as an absolute block to Palestinian aspirations to statehood. One thing is clear that the 2-state solution is history. There is only one state – Palestine – and Jews in the country will have to decide whether to be decent citizens or not. Just like Apartheid South Africa, and the result can only be the same.
notinmyname
May 10th, 2012 at 2:18 am
This is an exact replay of what happened in the Book of Esther. When will the US wake up?
greedrulesin dc
May 10th, 2012 at 5:42 am
Any time there is a great concentration of power at the top (NATO, the IMF, the ECB, the Obama/Bush administration, etc.), there is less and less accountability and more and more secrecy, hubris, greed, and sadistic behavior. How did we allow these few people to grant themselves such absolute power?
I have to think the time will come when the people will rise up and rid themselves of these abnormal parasites. I can't be the only one who has envisioned Blankfein, Bibi, Obama, and Jamie Dimon riding in tumbrels through the streets, the crowds jeering and cheering, the final destination a supermax prison.
Harnessing the anger all sides feel and directing it toward the criminals at the top is a gigantic task. Ron Paul could be one of the leaders of such a movement, but I think he's captive to a few people whose loyalties lie with the Republican Party rather than the cause. If he can find the courage to break away and run as an independent, he would have tremendous support.
Nathan
May 10th, 2012 at 7:50 am
I knew this bill had to be introduced by a Zionist, but I wasn’t sure. I checked the Internet; sure enough I saw that Eric Cantor was the only republican Zionist in the House.
We are supposed to elect reps to represent our own security interests, but due to sheer ignorance we end up electing people whose interest lie elsewhere. It’s pathetic, isn’t it?
I wonder if anybody in the Knesset loves the US enough to have the guts to stand up and introduce a bill for protecting the American interests.
Nathan
May 10th, 2012 at 8:03 am
Wasn’t the final destination of tumbrels to the guillotine in France?
Argonne18
May 10th, 2012 at 11:06 am
I hate to see policy discussions framed with "Bad for Israel and Bad for the US". It is all we should concern ourselves with is that it is bad for the US. I care not a wit for what is an undeserving, ungrateful, and sinister Israel. Our decisions must be based on what is good for the US….and supporting Israel is not good for the US…. period!
Roger Lafontaine
May 10th, 2012 at 12:33 pm
Yeah, I'm sure the Knesset could do that. After all, in their case it would never need to be more than mere talk or pretense. I'm sure the Zionist-captured American media would help them carry out this deception.
Tim
May 10th, 2012 at 1:52 pm
Gee whiz, now they're trying to incorporate Israel into NATO. It was inevitable that once NATO went "out of area" to avoid going out of business, the alliance would go out of control.
JJJihad
May 10th, 2012 at 7:22 pm
It's anti-Semitic to criticize pro-Israel litigation.
Why Do People Support a Treasonous Government? (and other news…) » Scott Lazarowitz's Blog
May 11th, 2012 at 10:51 am
[...] Ron Paul: H.R. 4133: Bad for America, Bad for Israel, Bad for the World [...]