Focus on the Policy, Not WikiLeaks
To listen to Rep. Ron Paul deliver this address, click here.
We may never know the whole story behind the recent publication of sensitive U.S. government documents by the WikiLeaks organization, but we certainly can draw some important conclusions from the reaction of so many in government and media.
At its core, the WikiLeaks controversy serves as a diversion from the real issue of what our foreign policy should be. But the mainstream media, along with neoconservatives from both political parties, insists on asking the wrong question. When presented with embarrassing disclosures about U.S. spying and meddling, the policy that requires so much spying and meddling is not questioned. Instead, the media focuses on how so much sensitive information could have been leaked, or how authorities might prosecute the publishers of such information.
No one questions the status quo or suggests a wholesale rethinking of our foreign policy. No one suggests that the White House or the State Department should be embarrassed that the U.S. engages in spying and meddling. The only embarrassment is that it was made public. This allows ordinary people to actually know and talk about what the government does. But state secrecy is anathema to a free society. Why exactly should Americans be prevented from knowing what their government is doing in their name?
In a free society, we are supposed to know the truth. In a society where truth becomes treason, however, we are in big trouble. The truth is that our foreign spying, meddling, and outright military intervention in the post-World War II era has made us less secure, not more. And we have lost countless lives and spent trillions of dollars for our trouble. Too often “official” government lies have provided justification for endless, illegal wars and hundreds of thousands of resulting deaths and casualties.
Take the recent hostilities in Korea as only one example. More than 50 years after the end of the Korean War, American taxpayers continue to spend billions for the U.S. military to defend a modern and wealthy South Korea. The continued presence of the U.S. military places American lives between the two factions. The U.S. presence only serves to prolong the conflict, further drain our empty treasury, and place our military at risk.
The neoconservative ethos, steeped in the teaching of Leo Strauss, cannot abide an America where individuals simply pursue their own happy, peaceful, prosperous lives. It cannot abide an America where society centers around family, religion, or civic and social institutions rather than an all-powerful central state. There is always an enemy to slay, whether communist or terrorist. In the neoconservative vision, a constant state of alarm must be fostered among the people to keep them focused on something greater than themselves – namely their great protector, the state. This is why the neoconservative reaction to the WikiLeaks revelations is so predictable: “See, we told you the world was a dangerous place,” goes the story. They claim we must prosecute – or even assassinate – those responsible for publishing the leaks. And we must redouble our efforts to police the world by spying and meddling better, with no more leaks.
We should view the WikiLeaks controversy in the larger context of American foreign policy. Rather than worry about the disclosure of embarrassing secrets, we should focus on our delusional foreign policy. We are kidding ourselves when we believe spying, intrigue, and outright military intervention can maintain our international status as a superpower while our domestic economy crumbles in an orgy of debt and monetary debasement.
Read more by Rep. Ron Paul
- What No One Wants to Hear About Benghazi – May 13th, 2013
- Liberty Was Also Attacked in Boston – April 28th, 2013
- Congress Exploits Our Fears to Take Our Liberty – April 21st, 2013
- Why Can’t We All Travel To Cuba? – April 15th, 2013
- Neo-Con War Addiction Threatens Our Future – March 24th, 2013





Babel
December 6th, 2010 at 10:10 pm
I know for a fact that Ron Paul will take orders from the C.I.A. just like every other politician in America.
BINSAFI
December 6th, 2010 at 11:22 pm
I like a lot of what Ron Paul has to Say, but I'm still Weary!
"..But state secrecy is anathema to a free society…."
On this, I couldn't Agree More…………..
Peace, Love & Respect.
mickperry
December 7th, 2010 at 2:20 am
Thanks to Ron Paul for this article which surely contains one of the most notable quotes to emerge thus far; “in a society where truth becomes treason, we are in big trouble.”
John Pilger meanwhile asks a damn fine question: “If they can read our emails, why can't we read theirs?”
Democracy and transparency versus secret government and its subversion of the rule of law ought to define the shape of the debate today, and in a healthy society, one in which government was truly by, for, and of the people it would do.
WikiLeaks therefore have provided a salutary lesson for the entire world to learn since they began releasing this trove in June. Sadly the reality is that when war crimes and folly are exposed, the whistle blowers wind up with a lynch mob chasing them down, the perps walk away untroubled and unharmed, and the people roll over and go back to sleep.
It says so much about our enthusiasm for justice and decency, and the values of this 'democracy' that we are so keen to export to the rest of the world. We are in big trouble, and one of the symptoms of our sickness is blatant self delusion.
WotW
December 7th, 2010 at 6:42 am
It seems that the only way Babel could know about the CIA is if he worked for the CIA.
Wotw
Bruce Richardson
December 7th, 2010 at 6:53 am
Why is it that the people of the U.S. cannot understand or appreciate that the national security apparatus is a form of control? And why does the "appartus" continue to feed on the public's treasury disproportionately? Because the national discourse is controlled by the ministry of information, a.k.a. the media who routinely scare the crap out of the public and by so doing control them.
We would not have to fear so-called "terrorist attack" if, as Rep. Ron Paul tirelessly points out, we would stop interferring in the affairs of other countries. One exception might be to settle the plight of the Palestinian people in a just and equitable manner.
I find it rather amazing that everyone seems to be calling for the head of WikiLeaks founder to be relegated to obscurity on the proverbial platter and yet ignore the institutionalized corruption, incompetence and criminality of the governernment…only in America.
finefeatheredfriend
December 7th, 2010 at 7:47 am
As Gordon Thomas stated in his book, "Secrets and Lies" (2007),p.144, the philosophy of the OSS (precursor to the CIA) was "IN TIMES OF WAR, TO REASON IS TREASON".
How convenient to ensure a perpetual state of war in order to support a perpetual state of fascism.
finefeatheredfriend
December 7th, 2010 at 7:51 am
PS
Hey Babel,
Does that jog your memory a bit?
RickR30
December 7th, 2010 at 10:13 am
- you know no such thing
- what does that have to do with the article?
RickR30
December 7th, 2010 at 10:14 am
Excellent, thanks!
RickR30
December 7th, 2010 at 10:22 am
Great article that puts things in perspective of our moronic policy.
The neo-cons' anti-American lifestyle they are trying to force upon us is a part of a larger plan to universalize the israeli experience. Arriving via plane to israel involves every but cavity searches, usually, so in America, too, flying from Burbank to Newark has to be turned into a nightmare. The neo-cons want the world to feel the supposed pain of the israelis, that way they can tell everyone, 'see this is what it's like for us' (neo-cons of course live the grand life in New York, instead of their beloved israel). The goal is that once we live on horror and panic we'll be more inclined so send money and free weapons to israel to destroy innocent Palestinians.
Don
December 7th, 2010 at 3:34 pm
Weary?? Did you mean wary?
Patrick
December 7th, 2010 at 10:43 pm
Excellent!