Introducing the American Traveler Dignity Act
Mr. Speaker, today I introduce legislation to protect Americans from physical and emotional abuse by federal Transportation Security Administration employees conducting screenings at the nation’s airports. We have seen the videos of terrified children being grabbed and probed by airport screeners. We have read the stories of Americans being subjected to humiliating body imaging machines and/or forced to have the most intimate parts of their bodies poked and fondled. We do not know the potentially harmful effects of the radiation emitted by the new millimeter wave machines.
In one recent well-publicized case, a TSA official is recorded during an attempted body search saying, "By buying your ticket you gave up a lot of rights." I strongly disagree and am sure I am not alone in believing that we Americans should never give up our rights in order to travel. As our Declaration of Independence states, our rights are inalienable. This TSA version of our rights looks more like the "rights" granted in the old Soviet Constitutions, where freedoms were granted to Soviet citizens — right up to the moment the state decided to remove those freedoms.
The incident of the so-called "underwear bomber" last Christmas is given as justification for the billions of dollars the federal government is spending on the new full-body imaging machines, but a Government Accountability Office study earlier this year concluded that had these scanners been in use they may not have detected the explosive material that was allegedly brought onto the airplane. Additionally, there have been recent press reports calling into question the accuracy and adequacy of these potentially dangerous machines.
My legislation is simple. It establishes that airport security screeners are not immune from any US law regarding physical contact with another person, making images of another person, or causing physical harm through the use of radiation-emitting machinery on another person. It means they are subject to the same laws as the rest of us.
Imagine if the political elites in our country were forced to endure the same conditions at the airport as business travelers, families, senior citizens, and the rest of us. Perhaps this problem could be quickly resolved if every cabinet secretary, every member of Congress, and every department head in the Obama administration were forced to submit to the same degrading screening process as the people who pay their salaries.
I warned at the time of the creation of the TSA that an unaccountable government entity in control of airport security would provide neither security nor defend our basic freedom to travel. Yet the vast majority of both Republicans and Democrats then in Congress willingly voted to create another unaccountable, bullying agency — in a simple-minded and unprincipled attempt to appease public passion in the wake of 9-11. Sadly, as we see with the steady TSA encroachment on our freedom and dignity, my fears in 2001 were justified.
The solution to the need for security at US airports is not a government bureaucracy. The solution is to allow the private sector, preferably the airlines themselves, to provide for the security of their property. As a recent article in Forbes magazine eloquently stated, "The airlines have enormous sums of money riding on passenger safety, and the notion that a government bureaucracy has better incentives to provide safe travels than airlines with billions of dollars worth of capital and goodwill on the line strains credibility." In the meantime, I hope we can pass this legislation and protect Americans from harm and humiliation when they choose to travel.
Read more by Rep. Ron Paul
- Overspending on National Security Threatens National Security – February 22nd, 2012
- Stop Internet Censorship – January 23rd, 2012
- The NDAA Repeals More Rights – December 27th, 2011
- Mutually Assured Destruction vs Mutually Assured Respect – December 9th, 2011
- The Folly of Sanctions – November 29th, 2011





JLS
November 17th, 2010 at 10:47 pm
"It means they are subject to the same laws as the rest of us. "
But they're not. Just like cops or most other government employees. There are two classes of people in America-those drawing a government (federal, state or local) paycheck and the rest of us. Those drawing a government paycheck are above mere peons.
JLS
November 17th, 2010 at 10:49 pm
Not that I disagree with Dr. Paul's legislation-this is amazing! A member of the political classes working on behalf of a powerless people! God bless Ron Paul!
Loraine
November 17th, 2010 at 10:54 pm
"Agree to the airport policies or not fly—I CHOOSE TO NOT FLY!
One option is to take the train–another is to drive. THERE ARE OPTIONS!
Steve Hogan
November 17th, 2010 at 10:57 pm
Until they start fondling people there as well. Where does it end?
ChrisDowd
November 18th, 2010 at 12:55 am
This is a government that claims the power to murder American citizens for any reason they want- or no reason- by mere executive decree- without any sort of due process whatsoever and they claim this power is wholly unreviewable by courts. No government claims this power- at least openly. Stalin did not claim this power in public- and even he felt he couldn't dispense with the nicities of giving an explantion no matter how absurd. This is tyranny defined. It doesn't get more clear than that. A government that claims this power is EVIL. Period. Not one person has resigned over this- which tells all we need to know about the character and nature of the people who rule this country.
So- it's nice that Ron Paul has introduced a bill to reign in public gropping by TSA personal but the game is over. It is over. And for Ron Paul to still be a member of Congress at this point is simply disheartening. Ron Paul's resignation from Congress would be a far more powerful act than any single piece of legislation he could introduce. Resign Ron Paul- give us some hope.
ChrisDowd
November 18th, 2010 at 1:03 am
I flew today and I saw the dread in the eyes of young woman behind me – about to be oggled by some government agents. I saw a dark skinned woman over 50- pulled aside and frisked and manhandled- she looked at me with fearful eyes and I looked away in shame.
Oh- and by the way- the people in this country who really won't fly because they actually do value personal dignity and would never accept their women or kids being manhandled? Yeah- Muslims. The rest of us are pathetic cowards.
I will be flying back in a week- but that will be the last time I fly anywhere because I will not shame myself again in this manner. The next time I get on a plane- it will be when the TSA is disbanded entirely or I leave this country for good.
theothercanada
November 18th, 2010 at 1:10 am
It is amazing after all the time has past since the Coup d'etat was successfully executed on 9/11 majority refuses to acknowledge that reality. Like JLS I have nothing but respect and admiration for Dr.Ron Paul whose lonely voice of reason doesn't resonate in today's America which is a lot like Germany after Mr.Adolf and brownshirters came to power.
Executioners of the Coup d'etat knew that vast majority of sheeple will prefer "security" over liberty.
bogi666
November 18th, 2010 at 6:41 am
Ron has some reasonable comments but his rational is absurd.
Bruce Richardson
November 18th, 2010 at 7:53 am
Ron Paul, as usual, eloquent, perhaps one of only two or three sane voices in Congress. The government is engaed in selling mass-hysteria. It is to their bureaucratic and expansion-based tendencies to engage in constant fear-mongering. Were there only more like Rep. RonPaul and Rep. Dennis Kucinich in Congress. We are the dopplegangers, we have become that which we fear and that which we loath.
Raashid
November 18th, 2010 at 8:06 am
Terrorists can easily carry bombs on board trains, into crowded shopping malls, supermarkets etc. if they really want to kill. Block off one avenue and they'll find an alternative. Do we really want to be scanned and frisked every time we step out of our front doors?
JLS
November 18th, 2010 at 8:23 am
Amen! Well said!
Pete
November 18th, 2010 at 10:59 am
If I get blown to bits because some redneck is too insecure to get a pat-down, I'll be really pissed!
Mike
November 18th, 2010 at 12:08 pm
Stay asleep little submissive sheep. Daddy government is here to change your diapers after a thorough molestation. That's a good little sheep. *pat pat*
Idiot.
MoT
November 18th, 2010 at 12:56 pm
What I've learned is that there are a great deal of people who simply don't want to be inconvenienced by some old fashioned notions of "liberty" while on the fast track to hell.
Don
November 18th, 2010 at 1:17 pm
Rationale.
Elaborate, please. Until you do, your comment is absurd.
John_Mohammad
November 18th, 2010 at 2:49 pm
Guys, next time you fly wear a tiny speedo swimsuit and flip-flips to go through the line- wear nothing else, regardless of your body size or shape. No need to go through the scanner, so refuse it- and when you are routed for a patdown they should have no reason to touch you anywhere except your package… and make sure you have a memorable package for them to play with all they want. Ladies- it's the tiniest bikini you can be legal with- again, regardless of body size or shape- and flip-flips. When they grab you, fake an orgasm. For everyone, wear your clothes to the line but take them all off except your swimsuit and flippies- put everything in your carry-on bag and get dressed on the plane. See how that plays out in the media and the TSA has to figure out how the patdowns on near-naked people enhance security.
mimi
November 18th, 2010 at 3:12 pm
I can't find a boat to Europe to visit friends and family. Perhaps I should swim.
Montaigne
November 18th, 2010 at 4:20 pm
I am happy to note that Ron Paul also clearly underlines, that NO WAY the president or his companions would be subjected to the same procedures. It is only the worthless ants, that are treated like that.
Steve Hogan
November 18th, 2010 at 4:42 pm
I'll take that chance, Pete. Given that dead people don't get pissed, I think it's a small risk.
JLS
November 18th, 2010 at 4:54 pm
Wouldn't it be awesome if our elected officials passed legislation to reign in local cops and make them once again subject to law? Yea I know that's going a bit too far.
JLS
November 18th, 2010 at 5:12 pm
Yea you're right. We should just drop our drawers and bend over every time the government tells us to. It's what Washington, Jefferson and Madison and them envisioned for us.
Aardvark
November 18th, 2010 at 6:06 pm
rein in
If everyone started wearing (and using) hidden video/audio recorders, local cops would get the message.
Cassandra Moore
November 20th, 2010 at 5:09 pm
CCM
Kudos to Ron Paul for introducing legislation to protect us from physical and emotional abuse by Federal Transportation Security Administration employees. I came back in October from a great family reunion in Hawaii only to be subjected to a “new directive” requiring a groping of my crotch and my breasts because my titanium knee, the gift of a hit and run driver, had set off the alarm. The experience was not only degrading and humiliating but pointless. It encroached on my freedom and dignity but did nothing for national security. It also violated the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. Tell your representative to pass the bill.