World Court Ponders Kosovo "Independence"
In October 2008, the government in Belgrade gloated for one whole day because the UN General Assembly allowed it to request an advisory opinion from the World Court (International Court of Justice) concerning the "independence" of its occupied province of Kosovo. Only Albania and three South Pacific states joined the U.S. in opposing the request. That may have been slightly embarrassing for Washington, but did absolutely nothing to derail its pet project in the Balkans.
Most likely, neither will the World Court’s decision in the proceedings that finally began at The Hague this week. A ruling by the ICJ matters only to those who abide by international law to begin with. It will have zero effect on countries that have already decided they were above such law and demonstrated this by setting up the "Independent state of Kosovo," or invading Iraq.
Law and Politics
Though it is a legitimate international court (unlike the ad hoc "Tribunal" for war crimes in Yugoslavia, also seated at The Hague), the ICJ has not been immune to matters of politics and power. In 1999, it famously refused to hear Yugoslavia’s case against NATO countries, claiming it had no jurisdiction in the matter.
Just a few years later, however, the ICJ decided Yugoslavia had standing to be sued by the "Bosnian" government (a case originally filed in 1993). Those expecting another railroading of Serbia (Yugoslavia having ceased to exist in 2006), were surprised by the verdict in March 2007, which absolved it of any responsibility for the atrocities in Bosnia.
Currently, the ICJ is also preparing to hear Croatia’s claim that Serbia (!?) committed "genocide" during the 1991-95 conflict. Given that Croatia has either exterminated or expelled its Serb inhabitants, the outcome of this trial ought to be interesting, to say the least.
However, the ICJ president, Hisashi Owada, said in an interview last week that the eventual decision might be ambiguous. Though the ICJ officials have backtracked somewhat since, there is no reason to doubt Owada’s surfeit of honesty. Though all the legal arguments are on Serbia’s side, nine of the 15 judges hearing the case come from countries that have already recognized the Albanian claim to the occupied province. And the Empire has already launched a full assault in the court of public opinion.
Full Court Press
"Serbia Assails Kosovo at UN Court" screamed an AFP headline to a story that could have just as well been written by the PR department of the "government of Kosovo." From the choice of adjectives to the placement of factoids, everything in it bolsters the Albanian case and dismissed the Serb arguments out of hand. Yet it is not an isolated phenomenon, but rather an exemplar of coverage that has accompanied the proceedings.
A somewhat more balanced offering by Reuters was nonetheless headlined, "Kosovo tells world court independence ‘irreversible.’"
The AP headlined its report, "Kosovo tells court its independence is permanent" and led with a reminder that "NATO air strikes ended Serbia’s bloody crackdown on its rebellious province."
Nor did any agency choose to present the statement by "Kosovian" envoy Skender Hyseni about the possibility of new conflict as the threat it manifestly was.
Going Through the Motions
It doesn’t help Serbia’s case any that its challenge before the ICJ is a publicity stunt. The current regime in Belgrade, installed through the efforts of Washington and Brussels, doesn’t want to fight for Kosovo. It was President Tadic and his Democratic Party that scuttled the previous government’s efforts to mount a response to Kosovo’s declaration of dependence, bringing down the government in the process. Though its electoral slogan was "Both Kosovo and the EU," it has since done everything to suck up to the EU, and nothing to recover Kosovo.
However, the majority of Serbians remain dead set against surrendering the province. So the government makes a show of fighting – but only through "peaceful, diplomatic means" – in order to dampen popular discontent, until the media can sufficiently anaesthetize the population into "accepting reality."
No, the current Serbian government isn’t serious about recovering the occupied province. Tadic told the BBC as much this week: "This isn’t about reintegrating Kosovo within Serbia." No, it’s about establishing his credentials – to the Empire as a peaceful and obedient vassal, and to his people as a patriot.
No matter how Tadic spins it, however, his actions speak louder than words. Were his regime truly concerned about the integrity of Serbia, it wouldn’t have gone and resurrected the Communist-era abomination that was the "Autonomous Province of Vojvodina," in effect a separate state within Serbia, earlier this week.
A Hidden Challenge
Between its own waffling, Imperial intransigence, and Belgrade’s insincere defense of Serbia’s rights, it is entirely possible the ICJ will end up finding some sort of pretense on which Washington’s pet project will be deemed acceptable. Then again, the ICJ could surprise, just as it did in 2007.
Either way, a decision favoring Serbia will fail to sway Washington. There was never any legal backing for either the 1999 war, the subsequent occupation, or the 2008 declaration of "independence" – but the Empire went ahead and did it anyway. The 2003 Iraq war was blatant aggression if ever there was such, and the world basically shrugged it off. Washington and its allies have known full well and all along that their adventures in Kosovo and Iraq were illegal. They simply didn’t care.
They do care, however, about legitimacy and credibility – to the point where they set up an "Independent International Commission" to whitewash the war in 2000 as "illegal but legitimate."
This is where the current case before the World Court holds a hidden danger for the Empire. It is one thing to flout the law with impunity. It is quite another to call such of behavior legal. As the case proceeds and 29 countries present their arguments – including China, for the very first time – it will be difficult for the rest of the world not to see that the self-appointed "world policeman" doesn’t actually care about the law, only power. And at that point, the Empire’s vaunted "credibility" will be damaged beyond repair.
Read more by Nebojsa Malic
- Victory Day – May 10th, 2013
- Consenting to Rape – April 25th, 2013
- An Unexpected Refusal – April 12th, 2013
- Lawless: An Oddly Exceptional Empire – March 28th, 2013
- Illusion of Triumph – March 21st, 2013





Gru
December 5th, 2009 at 9:02 am
I couldn't agree more. Hope to see more from the author.
Milton
December 5th, 2009 at 11:19 am
It was President Tadic and his Democratic Party that scuttled the previous government’s efforts to mount a response to Kosovo’s declaration of dependence, bringing down the government in the process.
I'm curious as to what the previous government's response to the illegal declaration was going to be. What could the previous Serbian government have done to counter the UDI? I'm not being sarcastic-I'm purely baffled.
Tweets that mention Trial and Error by Nebojsa Malic -- Antiwar.com -- Topsy.com
December 5th, 2009 at 4:29 am
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Antiwar.com and Antiwar.com, InfoFeeder. InfoFeeder said: infofeeder.info Trial and Error [antiwar]: World Court Ponders Kosovo "Independence" In .. http://bit.ly/4V0mLu [...]
Bojan
December 5th, 2009 at 6:16 pm
Mr. Kenny, as an old Latin fellow famously put it, mutato nomine, de te fabula narratur. The greatest deal of contempt (conveniently hidden into a PC-robe) here is being shown by you. Basically, you're saying, "while it's completely OK for Americans at the political websites such as Antiwar.com to laugh at their own politicos and crooks, the juvenile Serbs can't be expected to subscribe to ANY system of political values except the 19th century-kind of romantic nationalism which means an unconditional love and loyalty to ANY agenda currently supported by the majority of voters, 'cause,you see, the poor bastards are still thinking within the box of ethnic loyalty as the only thing that matters, so shame on you, Nebojsa Malic, for daring to maverick your voice out of the herd, and you can't possibly be a Serb since we all know how tribal they are".
If I'm mistaken, then, would you care to explain what could be possibly wrong with criticizing the government which has been elected by the majority? I mean, since WHEN it is illegitimate to question a political agenda only on the basis of its popular support?
Bojan
December 5th, 2009 at 6:29 pm
PS
And yes, both Washington and Brussels played the significant role in every elections' outcome in Serbia, from early 1990s on. Many careers has been made and there must be hundreds of red-tape nerds and second-rate bureaucrats which, since 1990, have been promoted into "Balkan experts" both in Brussels and in Foggy Bottom.
Many of them have even published their memoirs, consisting mostly of boring yet horrendously detailed accounts of their own heroic enterprises on behalf of the First World among Serbian savages
Bojan
December 5th, 2009 at 6:31 pm
Many careers HAVE been made.
Excuse the stupid typo, I never do the spell-checks though I should
Michaelkenny
December 5th, 2009 at 1:59 pm
"The current regime in Belgrade, installed through the efforts of Washington and Brussels …" Nothing could better illustrate the contempt which "Nebojsa Malic" has for the Serbs than the above sentence. Whoever is hiding behind this pseudonym, he is certainly not a Serb, since no Serb would sneer at his brethren in such contemptuous terms!
Trial and Error by Nebojsa Malic — Antiwar.com | alba news
December 5th, 2009 at 2:47 pm
[...] more here: Trial and Error by Nebojsa Malic — Antiwar.com Share and [...]
Andy
December 5th, 2009 at 9:56 pm
America has grievously wronged the Sebian people.
Trial and Error by Nebojsa Malic — Antiwar.com | Croatia today
December 5th, 2009 at 5:20 pm
[...] Excerpt from: Trial and Error by Nebojsa Malic — Antiwar.com [...]
Baba Rampuri
December 6th, 2009 at 2:38 am
Thank you, Nebojsa Malic, for some rare truth regarding the Balkans, and for your courage to speak it against an arsenal of propaganda by imperial scribes! I find it interesting there are so many "character" attacks on Mr. Malic, on the net and even among these comments (Mr. Kenny get real) but very few dare to debate his statements.
uberVU - social comments
December 5th, 2009 at 8:36 pm
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by Antiwarcom: Antiwar.com Trial and Error: World Court Ponders Kosovo “Independence”
In October 2008, the government in Belgrade… http://bit.ly/69ygOo…
Romaniac
December 8th, 2009 at 6:19 am
"And at that point, the Empire’s vaunted "credibility" will be damaged beyond repair. "
We've past that point many years ago. The only credibility left is with the brainwashed, mind you they are a force to be reckoned with, after all they are the majority.
Pablo
December 10th, 2009 at 7:01 pm
The first thing I check when I enter http://www.antiwar.com is whether there is a new article by Malic. However, what I dislike is his use of " " for everything he disagrees. For example why does he say "government of Kosovo" instead of government of Kosovo? Or "Kosovian" instead of Kosovian? Even if Kosovo's "independence" is illegal, wrong, non-existant, or whatever, why speak of Serbs, Croats and "Kosovians" instead of just Serbs, Croats and Kosovians?
Hrebeljanovic
December 12th, 2009 at 9:11 pm
There is no such thing as "Kosovians", Mr Pablo. They are simply Albanian and they already have a country – Albania. Therefore, Albanians have a government in Albania and "government of Kosovo" is a fiction made by Axis Powers.
Nebojsa Malic
December 14th, 2009 at 6:50 am
I've mentioned on my blog a time or five that I often overuse quotations, but I continue to do so because it is necessary. Words on a page cannot convey sarcasm, irony, mockery or a simple sneer that need to accompany many of these terms. The thing is, words have power. "International Community" implies there is such a community, and its members are the world – not that it is a self-proclaimed cabal of lampreys with delusions of power attached to the American Empire. Likewise, by leaving off the quotation marks from "government of Kosovo" I would implicitly recognize it as legitimate, which I have neither the right nor the inclination to do.
As for "Kosovian," it is a word I coined to illustrate the ridiculousness of Western propaganda that speaks of "Kosovars" or "Kosovans" even though the people this refers to are clearly Albanian, think of themselves as Albanian, call themselves Albanian, and have even said quite openly that there is no such thing as "Kosovar" identity.
Pablo
December 17th, 2009 at 6:43 pm
Thanks Mr. Hrebeljanovic and Mr. Malic for your answers. I did not know you had already stated your overuse of quotations. IMHO this weakens your argument because it implies you are ridiculing those who do not think alike you.
I agree on the quotations for "International Community".
I disagree on your last example, however. The people who leave in Kosovo are Kosovian in my opinion, just as the people in California are Californians. Being Kosovians does not imply they are not Albanians (or in some regions, Serbs).
Bojan
December 24th, 2009 at 10:32 am
Pablo, it's hardly a wonder that people outside of Balkans always find it difficult (if not impossible whatsoever!) to translate the local realities into the universally understood set of political parallels.
Simply, the whole "Kosovar" thing is just another example of the Empire-funded Newspeech, that perfectly fit into the whole pattern of 1990s deconstruction. Just like the whole regional cultural distinction of , say, Bosnia, is being simply hijacked by one of its groups (namely, Bosnian Muslims) in order to prove ONLY themselves as "the true Bosnians" and imply somehow inferior status of the country's Serbs and Croats, or the newly-founded Montenegrin identity is being based on a false premise that the Serbs of Montenegro (historically, the ONLY majority of that country, and currently about a half of the country's population) are actually a foreign element in their own land.
To put it even simpler, the old chauvinist tune, concocted by Austria-Hungary and followed by Nazi propaganda from the 1940's, is being revived again and the Serbs are being denied ANY legitimate claim to call ANY stripe of Balkan their own, except the every Serbophobic's ultimate wet dream – a reservation called "Serbia proper" (without Kosovo, Vojvodina, Serb Republic in Bosnia, not to mention the ethnically cleansed Serb Krajina in today's Croatia). Just look up the maps of the Nazi-Fascist carve-up of the Balkans during occupation 1941-1945, and compare it to the present map of the former Yugoslavia.