I thought it might – just might – be a parody, a spoof, a weak attempt at irony. But no, it turns out that Nick Gillespie, the former editor of Reason magazine, and now chief honcho over at something called "ReasonTV," is absolutely and incredibly serious about his contention that We Never Had It So Good. And why, pray tell, are we supposedly so blessed? Well, it seems that nerdy geeky-looking white kids now have some really really cool computer games to play, while their parents make the rounds looking for work during the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. And – hey look! – we have Netflix, not to mention all those hundreds of new television stations: the vast wasteland has assumed continental proportions. Hurrah! And computers are here, they’re inexpensive, and the government can spy on us oh so much more efficiently now than ever before. Isn’t progress wonderful? I’m sure Dr. Pangloss would agree.
There’s something more than just a little off over at Reason magazine, these days, and in the libertarian movement more generally, when a former editor and self-proclaimed "libertarian" can even try to pull off this Pollyanna routine with a straight face. After all, the past few years have seen the worst assault on our civil liberties since the passage of the Alien and Sedition Act. The US government can now "legally" read our emails, spy on our finances, and jail us indefinitely without a trial, without even filing charges and without telling anyone. A veil of secrecy hides what our rulers are up to, and things have gotten worse not better under Obama.
On the home front, the term "big government" seems a redundancy, as Washington centralizes, consolidates, and expands its power over every aspect of our lives. On the overseas front, the reach and destructive energy of the World’s Sole Superpower shows every sign of increasing beyond the dreams of Napoleon and Alexander combined.
To top it all off, we are staring economic collapse in the face, as the world economy reels, the dollar declines, and close to 15 percent of US mortgages are either in foreclosure or well on the way. Meanwhile, the balance of wealth is shifting away from the productive private sector, and towards the tax-eaters, bureaucrats, and lobbyists. Crony capitalism reigns supreme. This is cause for celebration if you fit into any of these three categories, but for the rest of us – especially for libertarians – it’s an unmitigated disaster.
Oh, but our life spans are increasing, according to this Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm video. Which means we have that much longer to watch the world succumb to demagoguery, state-worship, militarism, and perpetual war. Oh, goodie! What a glorious prospect that is!
What world is Señor Gillespie living in?
The short answer is: the wonderful world of Washington, D.C. It’s easy to see how an inhabitant of that city might get such a counterintuitive idea in his head. The place is jumpin’ ever since Obama took office, and no wonder, what with the pay of government "workers" going through the roof even as the real earnings of Americans stay the same or decline. Real estate markets all over the country are unceremoniously collapsing – except those close to the Imperial City and its suburbs, where housing prices are up. Everyone who’s anyone wants to be near the epicenter of power.
The American meritocracy has gone into reverse, and the very worst are rising to the top. While the rest of the American economy is imploding, the armaments industry is booming as never before. Monsters are heroes, and heroes – nonexistent (not counting Ron Paul). America, once a beacon of liberty to the world, is a sinister looming presence, whose machinations are widely distrusted and feared. The old gods are overthrown, and Ares is enthroned on Olympus, where he’s commandeered Zeus’s thunderbolts and taken to hurling them at Washington’s direction any which way, without regard for either morality or the real national interests of the United States.
This country has gone through bad times before, and yet there was always a core of resilience, a solid cultural basis on which to rebuild and revive our flagging fortunes. This time, however, there is a general atmosphere of cultural rottenness that stinks to high heaven and infects the very air with its pustulence. The rot is epitomized by the Gillespie video, in which material things are glorified above all else: life is all about having a better video game. All the better to lose oneself in fantasy while the world descends into a new age of moral barbarism, and culture becomes massified, vulgarized, and narcoticized. The state of our culture reminds me of Alexandre Kojève‘s description of the human condition after "the end of history" comes to pass:
"Men would construct their edifices and works of art as birds build their nests and spiders spin their webs, would perform concerts after the fashion of frogs and cicadas, would play like young animals, and would indulge in love like adult beasts."
Such creatures are easily herded, tyrannized, and turned into "human" cattle. Indeed, Kojève’s prediction that human discourse would soon come to sound like "the buzzing of bees" has already come true, as anyone who pays attention to the emanations of the nation’s leading pundits can attest. Once the modern hive-mind has settled on an idée fixe – say, Iraq’s "weapons of mass destruction," or the inevitability of Hillary Clinton – the "buzz" drowns out all contrarian opinions, along with reason and common sense.
Politically and culturally, we have two classes that are increasingly in conflict: the common ordinary hoi polloi (e.g. you and I), who are increasingly discontent, disoriented, and dissenting from the Panglossian "you never had it so good" propaganda that’s beamed at us day in and day out – and, on the other hand, the elites, who really never did have it so good, living, as they do, in the lap of government-subsidized and bailed-out luxury. The American nomenklatura is every bit as corrupt as was its Soviet equivalent, except that, in our case, the sheer scale of the corruption is much greater, as there’s more wealth to loot, more power to seize.
This combination – a venal, vile ruling class, and a volcanically angry middle and lower class majority – is an explosive one, and it’s only a matter of time before some random spark ignites a firestorm. Our condition represents not only a threat to the US, but to the world at large, because we are, after all, a world-spanning empire. The seismic forces that are rocking our world are already reverberating internationally, playing havoc with the fate of nations. War is the favorite diversion of rulers who seek to draw attention away from troubles at home and re-direct it toward imaginary "enemies" abroad, and this familiar scenario is playing itself out once again – ironically, but unsurprisingly, during the presidency of a man who masqueraded as the "peace" candidate and an agent of "change."
Yes, "change" is surely in the air, but decline, too, is change. So get out those video games, turn on the television, and contemplate the prospect of a long and vacuous existence – because you’re going to need all the diversions you can get.
We are in the midst of – or, really, at the doorstep of – one of the most volatile, and potentially destructive periods in our history as a nation. That anyone can even think of peddling some Panglossian vision of unlimited "progress" and smug complacency at such a moment is proof positive that no idea is so absurd that it cannot inspire adherents.
NOTES IN THE MARGIN
I see that Reason magazine managing editor Jesse Walker has written and posted an interesting piece, "Five Reasons for Optimism," which – unlike Gillespie’s Netflix commercial – actually makes a substantial argument for long-term optimism, while acknowledging that the past decade has been a disaster. Go check it out.
A reminder: I’m still writing daily commentary over at The Hill, Capitol Hill’s newspaper of record. The last one, in response to the question "How would you grade Obama’s presidency?", provoked a lot of comments: go check it out. And here‘s more.
Read more by Justin Raimondo
- The ‘Cairo 19′ Got What They Deserve – February 9th, 2012
- Our Bloodstained Hands – February 7th, 2012
- The Syrian Crucible – February 5th, 2012
- Can Ron Paul Be Tamed? – February 2nd, 2012
- Iraq in Retrospect – January 31st, 2012





thomas schinkel
December 18th, 2009 at 8:27 am
well put! Raimondo's talent with words only exceeds his capacity for spotting societal patterns.
Thomas Schinkel
ObamaKoolAidDrinker
December 18th, 2009 at 8:33 am
Our condition represents not only a threat to the US, but to the world at large, because we are, after all, a world-spanning empire. The seismic forces that are rocking our world are already reverberating internationally, playing havoc with the fate of nations. War is the favorite diversion of rulers who seek to draw attention away from troubles at home and re-direct it toward imaginary "enemies" abroad, and this familiar scenario is playing itself out once again – ironically, but unsurprisingly, during the presidency of a man who masqueraded as the "peace" candidate and an agent of "change."
True enough.
The American Empire will no doubt look to whip up nationalist militarism abroad as a diversion from its economic failings at home.
Just watch all the good Ivory Tower Leftists and Limosine Liberals (tacistly) goosestep behind this propaganda campaign with lots of bullshit "progressive" rationalizations.
DMinor7th
December 18th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
Indeed. Do you hear that strange muted but all pervasive sound, Justin? That's the sounds of the Reds giggling up their sleeves. What we did to them, they've done to us. The oligarchs have scooped everything. I hear 10,000 Russians starved to death in the 90s while we were celebrating the collapse of Soviet communism. We didn't even notice. I hope they are as nonchalant while we are starving to death. That sound of snickering is annoying.. so annoying.
Jane Doe
December 18th, 2009 at 2:15 pm
I think that the Russians are luring us into attacking Iran much as we tried to collapse the USSR in Afghanistan.
I think that they will eventually not agree to sanctions, knowing that would drive Israel further up her psychotic wall and "force" UsRael to attack Iran. *ROLLS EYES* Knowing full well that the US economy would not withstand that war. The collapse of our economy would really hurt China as well, give the vast amount of our treasury bonds China holds.
Those guys play chess, we play marbles.
I also have thought for decades, since the advent of People magazine, that the US was being primed to become a bread & circuses "culture" in order to dumb down and distract the population, and rob them of any critical thinking skills they might have had. A stupid, dirt poor population, with no middle class makes ideal cannon fodder.
Jaime
December 18th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
The huge Nort American mammoth will eventually fall the way a star implodes and will leave an equally huge black hole. Then wide scale violence will be the daily bread Americans and others will feed themselves on. Those so entertaining violent games will have become the ultimate irony. In the meantime those nerdies should better be improving their target practice.
Strider55
December 18th, 2009 at 4:24 pm
One difference: The US did not lure the USSR into invading Afghanistan. Yes, the US gave all sorts of help to the resistance, but only after the invasion. The Soviets' fatal Afghan wound was self-inflicted.
JohnDowser
December 18th, 2009 at 4:29 pm
Nietzsche already detailed the rise of nihilism that became the 20th century:" Our whole [European] culture is moving already for a long time with a torturing suspense, growing from decade to decade, toward a disaster waiting to happen: anxious, forceful, overhasty: like a river, that wants to reach the end, that no longer reflects, that is afraid to reflect" – from his Nachlass, 1887-1888.
Marx detailed the mechanism of class wars but failed to describe the future classes themselves; his "workers" now also include the bourgeois owners and 'borrowers', whose capital is near vaporized by the Great Confusion peddled by the media Whores and their media Beasts, that is: the confusion about where real value lies. The Great Trick: now you see it, now you don't.
We don't want firestorms of violence and militant vigor. This egg-shell-society of ours could not survive that. We need a firestorm of reevaluation of values – new commandments, attack sick and sickening ideology at the core. Ron Paul showed a tip of the mountain of possibilities, how it could be done. But it needs broader, with more visionaries, more connecting: people have to be taught again, some very basic stuff about the fundamentals of what we are and how to deal with each other. The quiet voice of reason can become this firestorm that is needed, working underground and when people in droves, increasingly disillusioned will start looking around for a new outlook, it better be there!
Jane Doe
December 18th, 2009 at 4:55 pm
I live in Arizona, a red state, which used to one of the reddest and is now tinging very slightly purple.
I guarantee that most of the people in this state, despite it being at the forefront of foreclosure rates, have no clue as to how they're being manipulated by the military/ industrial/ terrorism/ Israel Lobby complex.
Common sense, much less critical thinking, does not exist in the majority of Americans, and I really doubt that it will come back. I don't think that we're going to have any kind of populist revolt until we're all truly starving. Even then, most people will never fathom the identity of the true culprits; we're marching towards oblivion and won't know that until we're there, but will ever figure out who put us in hell.
epp
December 18th, 2009 at 9:06 pm
for a witless libertarian, you write what is almost a good, and in some ways eloquent, assessment of where we are at as a community (oh sorry, i know you must hate that word).
A phrase you might consider exploring: fin de siecle.
Doug_in_Indiana
December 18th, 2009 at 11:45 pm
'Community' – "A body of people having common rights, privileges, or interests." A term you might consider exploring. This might include a 'democratic' polity, though that is doubtful.
'Witless' – "Lacking sense or understanding or judgment."
Another term to be considered – By the way the libertarian normally has a well-developed sense of community since his objective is a functioning community. And there is considerable rational thought and literature behind his conclusions.
His community would, he hopes, be free of the stresses of coercion and compulsion more or less legitimized in the minds of the unthinking by the propaganda of government schools and media.
If we feel he is unrealistic, we should address the libertarian tenets and reasoning rather than letting fly with juvenile epithets and slogans.
ObamaKoolAidDrinker
December 19th, 2009 at 5:03 am
Not true.
The USA did lure the Soviets into Afghanistan by covertly sponsoring Islamicists to destabilize the Afghan government. This is before the Soviet intervention, as Zig. Brzezinkski (Carter Nat. Sec Advisor) admits below.
"Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs ["From the Shadows"], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?
Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention."
http://www.counterpunch.org/brzezinski.html
Rich
December 19th, 2009 at 3:37 pm
In the hive, all that matters is the 'fight' between left and right and how much government control and/or interference in life is appropriate. Usually the answer is – whatever gives the other side significant pain, regardless of the merits of the case.
I always had doubts about Gillespie's sanity and so am not harmed by his 'absorption'. 'Resistence is futile'. We are the Borg, or so I am told, whenever I raise an argument against endless and pointless war.
Perhaps we should take Doug's advice and explore the the reasons for Gillespie's regression. On the other hand, there is a point in avoiding argument in situations where addressing the 'argument' can make you appear to be as foolish as the person making the argument. Yeah, that's where it's at.
Resistance is futile. As one district court judge explained: "Arguing for constitutional rights in this court is futile."
mark green
December 19th, 2009 at 11:14 pm
Justin is right on most points, but why–WHY–does he forget about one of the most disturbing trends facing all champions of civil liberties?–namely, the right to revisit official history and challenge convention wisdom. This includes the right–no, necessity–of critically exploring the myths and propaganda surrounding the events that encompass the "good war", otherwise known as WWII.
There are criminal laws in place in no fewer than thirteen 'democracies' around the word that punish people who "question" certain aspects of WWII. Many of these evil "deniers" are now in prison!!! Why does Justin refuse to speak on their behalf? Democracy is a fraud without Free Speech.
stevieb
December 20th, 2009 at 3:32 pm
Yes they did, Strider…
Scott
December 21st, 2009 at 10:02 pm
Dear Author,
You are a smart guy. Smarter than I. I can sense and feel the intelligence and emotion in the way you write. But if you truly believe that there is nothing good to see in our current times, then I truly feel sorry for you.
Change, for better or worse, creates opportunity. The technological advances we are experiencing create opportunity. Yes, some people fail to take advantage of these changes (some play video games, others create online businesses, some do both). Yes, you can be critical of our society, and you are as much entitled as anyone to express your opinions with as much grim and darkness as you wish. But America is still the land of opportunity. We really can do anything. Perhaps it would be better to spend more time reminding Americans of this than to just shit all over everyone else (even some jackass from 'Reason' magazine).
Its easier to sling mud than to build an adobe house.