After Fort Hood: Count All the Dead
Perhaps the most depressing aspect of Thursday’s shoot-out at Fort Hood is that none of the 12 people who died in the melee will be counted as casualties of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. These soldiers – "brave Americans," President Obama called them – will join an unknown number of American soldiers, airmen, sailors and marines, who are not among the 5,267 the Defense Department counts as having died in our most recent wars, but who have perished nonetheless.
It will take days or weeks to learn what really happened at Fort Hood and why, but even at this early moment, we can make one statement for certain. The government’s refusal to accurately count the sacrifice of these young men and women dishonors not only these soldiers’ memories, but also obscures the public’s understanding of the amount of sacrifice required to continue wars in two countries, simultaneously, overseas.
Go on the website, icasualties.org, which regularly publishes the names the Pentagon reports as having died in two wars, and a discerning eye will see a lot of other names are missing.
Missing are the names of service members, like Sgt. Gerald Cassidy, First Warrant Officer Judson E. Mount, or Spc. Franklin D. Barnett who died stateside after receiving substandard medical care for wounds sustained in the war zones. Cassidy sat dead in a chair for three days at Fort Knox before anyone noticed that he had passed away from complications related to a brain injury sustained in Iraq. Mount died in April 2009 at San Antonio’s Brooke Army Medical Center after taking shrapnel from a roadside bomb in November 2008. Barnett died in June 2009 from wounds he sustained in Afghanistan earlier in the year.
Missing, too, are the names of American soldiers and veterans who have killed themselves after serving a tour in Iraq or Afghanistan, people like 19-year-old Spc. John Fish of Paso Robles, California who told his superiors he was thinking of killing himself after his first deployment, but was ordered overseas a second anyway. While he was training for that second deployment to Afghanistan, Fish walked out into the New Mexican desert after a training exercise for his second deployment and blew his brains out with a military issued machine gun. Or Sgt. Brian Jason Rand of North Carolina, who was found under the Cumberland River Center Pavilion near Fort Campbell, Kentucky, in February 2008 with a bullet through his skull and a shotgun by his side.
The Army reports 117 active duty Army soldiers killed themselves in 2007, the year Fish took his life. At the time, it was a 26-year high. But that record was quickly eclipsed by the 2008 Army figure of 128 suicides. In January 2009, more American soldiers committed suicide than died in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan combined, but none of these deaths are listed in the official casualty count.
Neither are the dozens of soldiers who have been killed in altercations with law enforcement brought on by Post Traumatic Stress Disorder incurred during deployments overseas – people like 19-year-old Marine Corps veteran Andres Raya who was shot dead by police in California’s rural Central Valley after returning home from Fallujah; or Minnesota Iraq war veteran Brian William Skold, who got drunk and then lead deputies on a late night chase before stepping out of his pick-up, firing a birdshot into the air, before kneeling on one knee and leveling his shotgun at authorities. Moments later he was fatally shot by two police officers. It’s unknown how many Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans have died this way, but like the 12 soldiers gunned down at Fort Hood this week, their deaths would not have occurred if not for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Regardless of what you think of these wars, it’s absolutely necessary that the American public be fully apprised of their cost. After all, how can we even begin to honor their memories, if we don’t even track their sacrifice.
Read more by Aaron Glantz
- ‘This Is Mental Health, Military-Style’ – May 13th, 2009
- Massacre Puts War Trauma in Spotlight – May 11th, 2009





Bonnie
November 7th, 2009 at 9:36 am
Great point. I was thinking about the shooter and his possible motives. In his place I imagined an American black having lived in the US longer than many of us. Imagine he is this American black seeing for years now the wholesale slaughter of blacks from the US in these different countries. How would he feel? Maybe he would feel insecure as a black in the US! And watching year after year the atrocities committed on people who share his ethnicity! And then the non-blacks he is associated with are making constant associations between him the the ones the US military is being called upon to slaughter year after year! Wow, thinking of it this way, how must Arab Americans feel here? And then he was being deployed for the first time to actually take part in the activities? Isn't that being called upon to consume your own..and knowingly? Sounds like enough to make anyone trip!
John Galt
November 7th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
The American public? – ignorant dolts and buffoons and morons who have NO interest in world events; who are more interested in the latest 'survivor' contestant or what 'Jon and Kate' are doing – the American public are nothing more than 'sheep' who are the most uninformed ignorant population on Earth. Oh yes – and the US is a Christian nation supporting the murder of tens of thousands of Arabs and Muslims. WOW! And as the US we have the right to illegally invade and occupy Muslim nations while killing tens of thousands of their people – right? Remember 9/11 – right? Remember what 'they' did to US – right? And what we are doing to 'them' – they are Muslims – they are suppose to fogive and fgorget – right? Could it be that 'they' hate US because we are over there killing them? – you think?
ccarusoc
November 7th, 2009 at 5:46 pm
Isnt it possible that poor shrink with the gun at Fort Hood was driven batty by all the stories the returning GIs told him about their killing his fellow Muslims – men, women and children – in Iraq and Afghan? The open fire order at checkpoints was 'Light 'em up'. Pure John Wayne.
If he recovers, pack him away and throw away the key – and then ponder about who gave the kill orders in those godforsaken places
andy
November 7th, 2009 at 7:55 pm
That is a bit of a stretch there don't you think? The USA should stop invading AND inviting the world.
andy
November 7th, 2009 at 7:56 pm
HE WASN'T "over there". He WAS OVER HERE.
Gregorio
November 7th, 2009 at 10:18 pm
I see nothing exceptional in this. Just another case of 'friendly fire'. These people are trained to kill. It's their business. And they brag that business is good. Instead what should be studied was how Hasan could have killed so many using handguns only. Surely his technique should be adopted by our troops so they can kill more people with fewer rounds, sort of sneak up on them like you're on their side, like what we do to Afghan army forces before we destroy them in another unfortunate accident…ha, ha. Sure, this will put a crimp in the sales of ammo to the US military, where troops are taught to fire full auto all the time, causing their guns to overheat and fail. But this is to the advantage of American arms manufacturers, and is not opposed by the military industrial complex. If anythinbg Hasan was a bad example of how not to kill people because he did it with so few shots. Choice of tactics for war fighting are often decided by the manufacturers of weaponry, despite what the professional military studies reveal. The Strategic Bombardment Survey at the end of WWII revealed strategic bombardment was a failure, and counterproductve, but very, very expensive. Bam! After WWII the military industrial complex spent hundreds of billions on the Strategic Air Command. These same people are trying to reduce objection to the loss of American life in the attempt to subdue and enslave third world people, and proposing it be done by remote control with expensive drones that surgically take out wedding parties and funerals. I must say I am overjoyed at the recent slaughter at Fort Hood. It once again points out the power of the American rifleman.
geo8rge
November 8th, 2009 at 12:12 am
Sorry but it was a work place shooting. Nothing more.
Gregorio, I like your thinking. We wait for the Taliban to hold their graduation ceremony and …
Steve_Hogan
November 8th, 2009 at 1:46 am
This would have been tragic even had these wars been legitimate, declared, and defensive in nature. They are not. The ongoing slaughter by the outlaw Bush and Obama regimes means these people died for a lie. What a waste.
JJJihad
November 8th, 2009 at 2:45 am
Do as Antony said, not meant. Bury the troops. Don't praise them. The evil they do lives on; the good is interred with their bones.
Geo1671
November 8th, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Wake-up folks,it's another false play from the real 911 attackers. Remember the
5 Dancing M O S S A D agents filming the whole downing of the WTC towers and never did FBI release the videos confiscated. Fort HOOD has thousands of video cameras and at this time–there must have been numerous personnal video cameras rolling. Notice how the media is makingstories up–yaah! bad muslim–terrorists a Palestinian.
I got bad news for you,just like the 5 dancers,they were whisked away back into Israel. The two arrested–any bets–back into Israel?
Susan
November 8th, 2009 at 11:47 pm
I thought when I read "Count All the Dead" that the Iraqis and Afghans and Pakistanis would be included, along with people from countries around the world. I was wrong.
I guess when we "count the dead" only Americans are to be counted.