Defenders of the recently passed National Defense Authorization Act, which declares the entire world to be a “battlefield” against terrorism and authorizes the U.S. military to detain indefinitely anyone suspected of being a terrorism supporter, have claimed that the White House will only use its new power carefully and with due process. Opponents note that the White House has never hesitated to use any new authority, no matter how outrageous, and that the trend of law enforcement and security agencies is to expand on powers granted, not to rein them in or limit them. The track record of the Obama administration on civil liberties is particularly bad, as it has broadened its definition of war powers, reneged on its promise to close Guantanamo Prison, and supported numerous dubious terrorism prosecutions. It has also become adept at silencing critics through the repeated exploitation of the state-secrets privilege, which effectively dismisses any case accusing the government of abuse or malfeasance.
So let us accept that the government now has the power to send a team of military police to anyone’s home in any state in the Union and can demand that that person surrender without any recourse to a lawyer or judicial due process. The military can then detain the individual incommunicado for any length of time and can presumably send him to Guantanamo for special confinement, claiming that the reason for the detention is support of terrorism, which can be almost anything, including a letter to the editor of the local paper complaining about the goonery of the Transportation Security Administration. Once in detention, the suspect only has such options as are granted to him by the military. He cannot see a lawyer, cannot invoke habeas corpus or other constitutional privileges, cannot confront any witnesses against him, and cannot challenge any information prejudicial to him even if it is hearsay or fabricated. In other words, the accused can be arrested for no reason and held indefinitely without any protections that enable him to push back against being detained. Most people would consider a criminal justice system that permits such detention ipso facto a police state.
Now let us accept for a moment that the White House and Justice Department are well-intentioned and will not use their newfound authority to detain anyone in a questionable fashion. The expanded powers will only be used to detain foreign terrorists who are caught in flagrante, more or less. That would be fine, perhaps, but for one small problem. Because the definition of a terrorism supporter has become enormously elastic, it can be stretched to include anything. If the whole world has become a battlefield, speaking out or acting against powerful vested interests can be dangerous because those interests can turn around and exploit the system to label one a terrorist. And once you are labeled a terrorist, your constitutional rights vanish and you might as well sit around and wait for that knock on the door — or, rather, for the door to be kicked in.
That is what House Resolution 3131 is all about. It is titled, in part, “To direct the secretary of state to submit a report on whether any support organization that participated in the planning or execution of the recent Gaza flotilla attempt should be designated as a foreign terrorist organization….” The bill then goes on to assert that the two flotillas in 2010 and 2011 opposing Israel’s blockade of Gaza were terrorist actions. But the only problem is that it relies on information from the Israeli Intelligence and Information Center to do so, meaning that Congress is deferring to a foreign government organization to make a judgment that directly impacts that selfsame government. And the Israelis are not shy about calling someone a terrorist, if it suits the narrative they are trying to present. They describe a Turkish organization involved in the first flotilla in 2010, known by its acronym IHH, as linked to al-Qaeda and Hamas based on evidence that no one else in the world accepts, apart from Congress, that is. The Turkish vessel Mavi Marmara was clearly aiming to take on the Israeli navy, armed to the teeth with “100 metal rods, 200 knives, 50 wooden clubs, and a telescopic sight for a gun.” In reality, the rods were torn from the ships rails when the heavily armed Israeli commandos boarded at night from helicopters. The knives were pocket knives and utility knives from the vessel’s galley, and the clubs were broken from deck chairs to repel the attackers. I will not speculate on the telescopic sight, but there was not a real weapon anywhere on board. The Israelis killed nine Turks, shooting several in the head at close range, including an American citizen. Congress has yet to express its outrage at the Israeli action — quite the contrary — and Hillary Clinton’s State Department has been silent, apart from warning the subsequent 2011 flotilla that the American embassy would do nothing to protect U.S. citizens aboard.
Regarding the second flotilla of July 2011, HR 3131 goes on to state that “Greek authorities boarded ships and took into custody several individuals, including Captain John Klusmire of the ship Audacity of Hope as it violated Greek Coast Guard orders by setting sail without permission.” Klusmire is a U.S. citizen who was not breaking any American law, it should be noted. He was later released by the Greek authorities.
The bill concludes with its “Sense of Congress,” surely an oxymoron if there ever was one: “the secretary of state shall submit … a report on whether any support organization that participated in the planning or execution of the recent Gaza flotilla attempt should be designated as a foreign terrorist organization … [to] include information on … the sources of any logistical, technical, or financial support for the Gaza flotilla ships, including the Audacity of Hope, that were to set sail from Greece on July 1, 2011.”
I personally know a number of organizations that provided material or financial support to one or both of the Gaza flotillas. I also personally know that none of those organizations support violence against the state of Israel and that the people behind them believed then and now that they were exercising their constitutional rights in speaking out and acting nonviolently against what they and most of the world regard as an illegal and immoral blockade of Gaza. But, if the bill passes in Congress, a bureaucrat in the U.S. Department of State will now be able to call those people and their associated groups “terrorists,” and Hillary Clinton will be able to confirm that judgment to Congress. Next step is the MPs at the door.
If people cannot see what a slippery slope all of this is, they not thinking very clearly. HR 3131 is admittedly still sitting in congressional committee, but it has some very powerful sponsors, including Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, who heads the Foreign Affairs Committee and is a rabid supporter of Israel. The bill not only indicts whole groups of people exercising their constitutional rights and labels them “terrorists,” it even names one American who was, at the time, breaking no U.S. law. Klusmire’s only crime was to “set sail without permission” — in Greece. It was clearly a bogus charge manufactured to suit by a vulnerable Greek government desperately needing international loans and under pressure from the United States and Israel.
Klusmire’s real crime was to oppose a powerful interest group, the Israel Lobby. To do so these days is to invite a charge of terrorism support with the option of being arrested by the Pentagon and locked up somewhere at the pleasure of the president of the United States. How low have we sunk, Mr. Obama? You portray yourself as a man of honor and a defender of constitutionalism, but you have opened the gates to lawlessness and authoritarian rule. And even if you are as benign as you depict yourself, you have provided the legal tools for those who might follow you — the Gingriches, the Perrys, the Bachmanns, and the Santorums — to possibly do much, much worse.
Read more by Philip Giraldi
- Don’t Forget Syria – June 12th, 2013
- National Security by the Numbers – June 5th, 2013
- John McCain: War Hero or Something Less? – May 29th, 2013
- The New World Order is Unimpeachable – May 22nd, 2013
- Boston Becomes Toxic – May 15th, 2013





RickR30
January 18th, 2012 at 10:22 pm
Would they consider protests against Russia also terrorism and material supporters terrorists (all them oligarchs self-exiled somewhere)? Didn't think so. So why is protesting against israel defined by and in the US as terrorism?
The groundwork is set for criticism against the policies of israel being reason enough for the USG to make you disappear in those private prisons they built everywhere. Eventually, criticism against neocon foreign policy will also qualify you for a life in jail or a president-approved death sentence. The question is how long before we start seeing Americans living on US soil being dragged away to some jail somewhere, without anyone knowing where, or being killed for making use of their constitutionally granted right of free speech? I fear much sooner than we think.
Johnny in Wi.
January 18th, 2012 at 10:56 pm
This enabling act is for all of us with big mouths and nasty pens. It will stifle criticism of the goverment even if it's onerous powers are never used. the people at the top are getting very nervous. Well they should be. All over the world the people are disgusted with the elites who have ruined their countries.
mickperry
January 18th, 2012 at 11:07 pm
We have mostly forgotten now of how we once recoiled in horror at the idea of a life lived under the totalitarianism of the old Soviet Union, with its secret police, its Gulags, and a phony political system that returned the same corrupt politicians to power election after election. How did we ever allow this to happen to us? The NDAA is the New Dark Ages Act, and nothing less. Thanks to Mr Giraldi for spelling it all out.
Creating American terrorists out of critics of Israel « The Passionate Attachment
January 19th, 2012 at 12:41 am
[...] a piece on the National Defense Authorization Act, “which declares the entire world to be a “battlefield” against terrorism and authorizes [...]
John_Muhammad
January 19th, 2012 at 2:40 am
I remember years ago a radio show hosted by the (in)famous G.Gordon Liddy, and on one of his shows he was on a rant about 2nd Amendment rights (as a felon, he lost his right to own firearms- but it wasn't a problem, as his WIFE owned all the guns in the house…) and in the course of his program he noted that most federal agents don't wear helmets or complete body armor, just standard-issue vests. He noted that when faced with federal agents coming to take their guns, they should "aim where the target is most vulnerable. In the case of federal agents, that means head shots- that's how to take them down" (it's been a very long time, so I may be getting the exact wording wrong).
When the government creates a police state, it automatically creates an opposition- a resistance, freedom fighters, patriots, insurgents or terrorists depending on your point of view- and it might be worthwhile for us all to contemplate which side you're going to line up with in the coming years. If we continue on this slide towards totalitarianism, you will be forced to choose whether you like it or not.
Ginger
January 19th, 2012 at 5:47 am
This Constitutional breakdown did not happen overnight; Benjamin Netanyahu wrote a book in 1996, Fighting Terrorism, arguing we had to reinterpret the Bill of Rights (which were intended to be part of our constitutional system of check and balances). People questioning government were part of the "puddles" that could grow into terrorism, according to Netanyahu. American legal "scholars" like Adrian Vermeule and Eric Posner don't even hide their plagiarizing from Carl Schmitt, the German advocate of dictatorship. First Schmitt worked for a military dictatorship, then accepting the Nazis, the only difference being the Final Solution. In reading The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, by Ilan Pappe, it is clear that Israel was founded on Militarism, clearly the neocon ideal. With the NDAA, just as with the Enabling Act of 1934, the edifice of dictatorship is here in the U.S. right now, and obviously the neocons, with no lack of assistance from just plain old war lovers, will fully exploit this constitutional breakdown to suppress any dissent.
Jim Bovard
January 19th, 2012 at 6:50 am
Excellent piece. Now if only people on Capitol Hill had the attention span of a gnat, some of them might recognize this peril…
Kelley V
January 19th, 2012 at 7:28 am
This is a VERY IMPORTANT story. please people, we need to circulate far and wide. The NDAA — as Phil has so articulately described — carries countless unknown threats to American activism. Just think,almost two years ago the FBI raided the homes of antiwar organizers in Chicago and Minneapolis, seizing their private belongings –including computers and personal files — based only on their alleged "connections" to the FARC and Pro-Palestinian groups.
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/9/27/fbi_raids_h…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/18/antiwar-…
They would be sitting in Gitmo right now, that is if Republican President Santorum had his way ….
Oh, and as of November, no actual charges have been filed against any of the activists.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/1111/F…
It’s All About Freedom » Scott Lazarowitz's Blog
January 19th, 2012 at 7:50 am
[...] Philip Giraldi: NDAA and speaking out against the Gaza blockade [...]
greg
January 19th, 2012 at 8:01 am
Couldn't the NDAA also be applied to those in government ?
The NDAA's wording specifically states "supporters of Al Qaeda and Taliban" , yet there IS evidence that these fighters were used as proxy dupes by persons within "our" government – as examples , the KLA during Clinton's administration or recently the US/NATO support of al Qaeda linked Egyptian rebels .
Hopefully the Texas oil guys courting the Taliban for that pipeline deal back in '99 will not be on the "list"
greg
January 19th, 2012 at 10:06 am
In an ironic twist , the NDAA could be applied to past and present government administrations – examples would be Bill Clinton's administration embrace of the KLA (which was reported to have al Qaeda fighters in its ranks ) during the late 90's and presently the US/NATO support of al Qaeda linked fighters in Libya .
SOPA de Ponzi – Patriot « The Vigilant Lens
January 19th, 2012 at 11:34 am
[...] tire of the forks, the hole filled straws and Wolf Blitzer’s stenography…they do create Obama’s NDAA, the SOPA, and then imprison you for smoking the [...]
ANU News.net Creating American Terrorists
January 19th, 2012 at 11:43 am
[...] Defenders of the recently passed National Defense Authorization Act, which declares the entire world to be a “battlefield” against terrorism and authorizes the U.S. military to detain indefinitely anyone suspected of being a terrorism supporter, have claimed that the White House will only use its new power carefully and with due process. Opponents note that the White House has never hesitated to use any new authority, no matter how outrageous, and that the trend of law enforcement and security agencies is to expand on powers granted, not to rein them in or limit them. The track record of the Obama administration on civil liberties is particularly bad, as it has broadened its definition of war powers, reneged on its promise to close Guantanamo Prison, and supported numerous dubious terrorism prosecutions. It has also become adept at silencing critics through the repeated exploitation of the state-secrets privilege, which effectively dismisses any case accusing the government of abuse or malfeasance. http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2012/01/18/creating-american-terrorists/ [...]
MoT
January 19th, 2012 at 12:10 pm
And it is also disheartening to find so many bodies eager to fill the boots of oppression. The SS or KGB could only wish to have the resources available to Americas "law enforcement officer". Notice it doesn't mean "moral" just doing their pay masters bidding. So you have to wonder just how loyal these mercenaries are once the bullets start to fly.
charles caruso
January 19th, 2012 at 12:11 pm
I just stopped writing comments on piece like this
– and I would advise everyone else to stop too -
or else it's 'See you in Gitmo!'
Margaret
January 19th, 2012 at 1:27 pm
No Charles its the opposite we should enjoin every single person we know to write comments and openly advocate freedom to do so. They cannot imprison ALL of us ! The louder we shout , the more of us shouting will make them back down. I do not doubt it, but enough of us need to do it.
PALESTINE NEWS | Jan 19, 2012 | Occupied Palestine | فلسطين
January 19th, 2012 at 4:59 pm
[...] Creating American Terrorists ~ by Philip Giraldi http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2012/01/18/creating-american-terrorists/ [...]
greg
January 19th, 2012 at 5:15 pm
…should read "Libyan rebels"
Creating American Terrorists
January 19th, 2012 at 5:27 pm
[...] http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2012/01/18/creating-american-terrorists/ [...]
Wie tief sind wir gesunken, Herr Obama? Sie haben der Gesetzlosigkeit und autoritären Herrschaft Tür und Tor geöffnet. « Maria Lourdes Blog – Die Welt wird von ganz anderen Persönlichkeiten regiert, als diejenigen glauben, die nicht hinter
January 20th, 2012 at 4:08 am
[...] Giraldi erschienen bei antiwar.com “Creating American [...]
Friday Roundup « Thicket & Thorp
January 20th, 2012 at 8:20 am
[...] Creating American Terrorists: ‘Defenders of the recently passed National Defense Authorization Act, which declares the entire world to be a “battlefield” against terrorism and authorizes the U.S. military to detain indefinitely anyone suspected of being a terrorism supporter, have claimed that the White House will only use its new power carefully and with due process. Opponents note that the White House has never hesitated to use any new authority, no matter how outrageous, and that the trend of law enforcement and security agencies is to expand on powers granted, not to rein them in or limit them.’ Advertisement LD_AddCustomAttr("AdOpt", "1"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Origin", "other"); LD_AddCustomAttr("theme_bg", "ffffff"); LD_AddCustomAttr("theme_text", "29303b"); LD_AddCustomAttr("theme_link", "909d73"); LD_AddCustomAttr("theme_border", "F3F6ED"); LD_AddCustomAttr("theme_url", "676E04"); LD_AddCustomAttr("LangId", "1"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Autotag", "politics"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Autotag", "technology"); LD_AddSlot("wpcom_below_post"); LD_GetBids(); Rate this: Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]
abrokenwindow
January 22nd, 2012 at 1:30 am
Cantor is Repug…oops
abrokenwindow
January 22nd, 2012 at 1:39 am
oh well, why do I bother, it's all by design, keep looking to future that you cannot see, that is by design too.
Maybe it is time to stop, take a look around and then turn around, and once you see history rushing toward you, step aside and let it pass without you.
Report back on Repeal Death Penalty Lobby Day in Annapolis, Jan 16 | Montgomery County Civil Rights Coalition
January 22nd, 2012 at 11:19 am
[...] and our serious concerns as activists that non-violent activism (and journalism about it) is being labeled as terrorism by the authorities. Our reps indicated that they’d be open to drafting and circulating [...]
Creating American Terrorists
January 22nd, 2012 at 6:46 pm
[...] article was first published at Antiwar.com. Please help spread the word. This entry was posted in Government and tagged civil rights, [...]
eric siverson
January 25th, 2012 at 1:11 pm
Terrorists may also be former military , pro life , anti abortion and all so have bumber stickers on their cars . We have to watch out for these people .
Creating American "Terrorists"
January 25th, 2012 at 7:38 pm
[...] American "Terrorists" Creating American Terrorists Because the definition of a terrorism supporter has become enormously elastic, it can be [...]
DhafirTrial
January 26th, 2012 at 6:26 am
[...] this will always be the case. A bill currently in the first step of the legislative process is titled in part “To direct the secretary of state to submit a report on whether any support organization that [...]
Avoiding a ‘Dumb War’ With Iran
January 26th, 2012 at 3:53 pm
[...] Creating American Terrorists – January 18th, 2012 [...]
Issue No. 55 – January 25, 2012
January 30th, 2012 at 1:15 am
[...] Philip Giraldi in AntiWar.com (1/19): Creating American Terrorists [...]
Another War on the Cheap
February 2nd, 2012 at 6:04 am
[...] Creating American Terrorists – January 18th, 2012 [...]
Creating American Terrorists
March 5th, 2012 at 12:09 am
[...] Source: Antiwar.com [...]
ANATOMY OF A “TERRORISM” PROSECUTION: DR. RAFIL DHAFIR AND THE HELP THE NEEDY MUSLIM CHARITY CASEАвтомобильные перевозки | Автомобильные перевозки
March 14th, 2013 at 9:22 am
[...] this will always be the case. A bill currently in the first step of the legislative process is titled in part “To direct the secretary of state to submit a report on whether any support organization that [...]