Ironically, Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan was traveling to the United States to promote his latest film about post-9/11 racial profiling when he was detained upon entry into the country at Newark’s Liberty (another irony) International Airport. U.S. officials denied that Khan was formally detained, but his interrogation lasted more than an hour. The outraged Khan pledged to cut back on visits to the United States, and his incensed fans held a raucous protest. I feel Khan’s pain – literally.
On Aug. 11, I flew into Canada at Winnipeg International Airport for an outdoor wilderness vacation. Like Khan, I was detained – without the formality – for 35 minutes by Canadian immigration and customs officials.
Why Canadian ICE selected me to be detained remains unclear, but I was not told that it was only a "routine inspection" until about the 30-minute mark. Although I knew that I was not a terrorist or a criminal, the exhaustive questioning of every minor detail about my trip and the lengthy searches through my suitcase, my wallet, and my personal computer files made me begin to worry about mistaken identity or trumped-up violations.
At the 20-minute mark, with my ride still waiting for me, an immigration officer informed me that after all of these intrusive searches, he had to do some "background checks." By then I had had enough and barked at them, "It’s been 20 minutes! How long is this going to take?" After being informed that I had crossed an international border, I informed them that I had crossed many of them around the world, including those of authoritarian countries, and had never experienced a violation of my privacy on this scale. By this time, being on a roll, I went straight for the jugular of shame, declaring, "I am disappointed in Canada."
All three Canadian officers who had by then congregated around me – pretending to be as swaggering, macho, and surly as their American counterparts, but failing miserably – seemed to register a flickering look of embarrassment on their faces. This was an ephemeral victory, because the background checks took another 15 minutes. Yet it was a victory.
Nowadays, being compared to authoritarian regimes would not even get a fleeting reaction of chagrin from U.S. immigration and customs officials. After all, the Canadians seem to have learned everything about border security from the invasive American model. For example, the questions on Canadian customs forms are identical to those on U.S. forms – Have you been on a farm? Are you bringing in agricultural products? Are you bringing more than $10,000 in cash into the country?, etc.
In addition, after 9/11, the small nation of Canada has been pressured by the leviathan superpower to its south to tighten security against terrorists. It has not resisted the pressure very well.
Unlike Khan, I did not have hordes of supporters burning flags in anger about my traumatic experience. However, I did have a friend picking me up at the airport, who was also officially questioned about our trip.
After the ordeal was over, we had a splendid time carrying out all sorts of nefarious activities – swimming, boating, kayaking, and canoeing. Since canoeing usually requires two people, could this be considered a "conspiracy"? Expect a question about it on ICE forms soon.
Read more by Ivan Eland
- Should the Law Governing the War on Terror Be Changed? – May 21st, 2013
- Benghazi: Who Cares? – May 14th, 2013
- Political Decentralization Might Help in Conflict-Ridden Countries – May 7th, 2013
- Avoid Drumbeat to Escalate in Syria – April 30th, 2013
- Government Response to Terrorism Needs to Be Dialed Down – April 23rd, 2013





bogi666
August 26th, 2009 at 1:00 pm
Well I have company as I had the exact same experience re-entering Canada in 2003. I had entered through Victoria, rented a car to go see my mother in Portland and then drove back to Canada when I was had the exact same experience as the author. This included a criminal check which showed up 2 arrests, one for stealing my own car which was dismissed for obvious reasons. The other was a bogus charge by an ex-wife which was dropped. The Canadians had access to records in the U.S. These records were a result of the detention. However, I take a somewhat different view of why the Canadians do this and it's payback for what American Customs does to Canadian when entering the U.S. This is a common payback tactic for a country to do a similar harassment of citizens of another country that harassed it's citizens. More important is that arrests are recorded without the legal outcome included. Another observation about Canadian Customs is that they seem to always ask Americans if they are carrying guns into Canada. They do not ask other Canadians this when they return from the U.S. into Canada.
DMinor7th
August 26th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
Why do they ask Americans if they're carrying guns: obvious. Why do they not ask Canadians if they're carrying guns: also obvious. Ivan points out a very important fact which is always missed by Americans: Canada is a very small country — 33 million people. There's more people in California. There's more people in the city of Tokyo. Canada is a very small country spread out over a huge amount of basically uninhabitable terrain. Expecting Canada to withstand the pressure from the Americans to conform to the current regime of insane political policies is just absurd.
Valerianus
August 26th, 2009 at 10:23 pm
The dissemination of arrest records via the "fusion centers" and other mechanisms devised by the security organs is a huge rollback of due process and presumption of innocence. The only that should matter are validated convictions.
Popsiq
August 27th, 2009 at 12:21 am
It could be that some 'patriot' has tagged you as a possible subject for NatSec attention.
Sovereignty; Canadian-style « MediaScour.ca
August 26th, 2009 at 8:38 pm
[...] Ivan Eland – Antiwar.com [...]
bogi666
August 27th, 2009 at 1:52 pm
Canada cannot flagrantly resist American pressure so they do so subtly. The gun question is tongue in cheek I believe, a chiding of the American government in a way their will be no challenge or repercussions from the U.S. government.