The Unraveling of Obama’s Foreign Policy
Three days after Ambassador Chris Stevens was assassinated, Jay Carney told the White House press corps it had been the work of a flash mob inflamed by an insulting video about the Prophet Muhammad.
As the killers had arrived with rocket-propelled grenades and automatic weapons, this story seemed noncredible on its face.
Yet two days later, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice doubled down. Appearing on five Sunday talk shows, she called the massacre the result of a “spontaneous” riot that was neither “preplanned” nor “premeditated.”
Carney and Rice deceived us. But were they deceived?
It is impossible to believe that Carney would characterize the Benghazi, Libya, massacre as the result of a protest that careened out of control unless he had been told to do so by the national security adviser, the White House chief of staff, or President Barack Obama himself.
Who told Carney to say what he did? Who arranged for Rice to appear on five shows to push this line?
Throwing a rope to Rice and Carney, the director of national intelligence, James Clapper, said last week that only recently had his team concluded that Benghazi was the work of terrorists.
Yet intelligence insiders were leaking to the press the day after Stevens was murdered that it was terrorism.
Now that the cover story — that the murder of Stevens and the other Americans was the result of a spontaneous outburst the Obama administration could not have foreseen or prevented — has collapsed, the truth is tumbling out.
And the truth is more alarming. For it calls into question the credibility and competence of Obama’s security team and the judgment of the president himself.
What do we now know?
Stevens believed he was on an al-Qaeda hit list and so wrote in his diary. He was concerned about a rise in Islamic extremism in the city. “Days before the ambassador arrived from the embassy in Tripoli,” The Washington Post reported Sunday, “Westerners had fled the city, and the British had closed their consulate.”
Rice insisted that the act of barbarism arose out of a protest, but there may not even have been a protest, just a military assault with RPGs, machine guns, and mortars that hit a safe house a mile from the consulate, killing two former Navy SEALs, while other U.S. agents fled to the airport.
So dangerous is Benghazi, The New York Times reported Friday, FBI agents investigating the ambassador’s assassination have yet to venture into the city.
Was U.S. intelligence oblivious to how dangerous Benghazi was when Stevens went in? Was not Benghazi’s reputation as a haven for Islamic jihadists known to us all before we “liberated” Libya?
This is the city U.S. air power saved when Moammar Gadhafi’s forces were closing in. It now appears to be an al-Qaedaville where U.S. diplomats and agents dare not tread.
Late last week, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton conceded that the Benghazi murders were acts of terror perpetrated by extremists associated with al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb. She alluded to Mali, where an al-Qaeda affiliate, the Ansar Dine, has taken over half the country.
How grave is that threat?
On Thursday, the Associated Press reported that Gen. Carter Ham, head of the U.S. Africa command, met with Mauritania’s president to discuss “a possible military intervention … in north Mali against al-Qaeda-linked group members and their allies.”
Yet Vice President Joe Biden still campaigns through the Rust Belt bellowing, “General Motors is alive, and Osama bin Laden is dead,” and Obama still recites his mantra, “Al-Qaeda is on the path to defeat.”
The reality. Al-Qaeda affiliates have taken over a region of Mali the size of France. Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb may have been in on the Benghazi massacre. Al-Qaeda is in Syria fighting for a cause, the overthrow of Bashar Assad, Obama supports. Al-Qaeda has helped reignite sectarian war in Iraq. Al-Qaeda remains in Pakistan. Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula is in Yemen.
We failed to cut out or kill the cancer at Tora Bora in 2001, and it has since metastasized and spread across North Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia.
As for the Arab Spring Obama embraced, that has given us the Muslim Brotherhood in Cairo and jihadists in Sinai. Our departure from Iraq paved the way to a new sectarian war. The surge troops are out of Afghanistan, and the remaining U.S. troops no longer partner with the Afghan soldiers who are to take over the war.
Any doubt about the outcome there when we’re gone?
Within the past month, anti-American riots, flag burnings, and the raising of Islamist banners atop U.S. embassy facilities have occurred in too many countries and capitals to recite.
If this is the fruit of a successful engagement with the Islamic world, what would a debacle look like? Rep. Paul Ryan said Sunday, “The Obama foreign policy is unraveling literally before our eyes on our TV screens.”
Is he wrong?
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM
Read more by Patrick J. Buchanan
- What Should Americans Die For? – May 16th, 2013
- Who Are the War Criminals in Syria? – May 6th, 2013
- Their War, Not Ours – April 29th, 2013
- Is War With North Korea Inevitable? – April 4th, 2013
- Goading Gullible America Into War – March 21st, 2013





Bill Lee
October 1st, 2012 at 9:25 pm
US was lying from the start. US was allied with al-Qaida. So drop the naive act, or get a brain. The US regime is a gang of brutal rapacious scumbags. Stop your wars of imperialist aggression, you monstrous freaks!
Johnny in Wi.
October 1st, 2012 at 9:53 pm
All the above is true. What is Romney going to do about it? He is even more ignorant and incompetent then Obama. He has 5 weeks from today to get his act together. That means backing the immediate leaving of Afganistan and adapting a more peaceful foreign policy. He can't do that with the neocon albatross he has hanging around his neck.
JoaoAlfaiate
October 1st, 2012 at 9:54 pm
I thought Antiwar was a non-interventionist site.
MvGuy
October 1st, 2012 at 10:19 pm
"We failed to cut out or kill the cancer at Tora Bora in 2001, and it has since metastasized and spread across North Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia."
Pass the Kool Aid Pat while I take a dump…………..
Any way, Any One looks at it………. the "cancer" as Pat so eloquently (NOT) puts it, can not be snuffed out with more murder mayhem and theft…. The Muslim, world is NOT OUR ATM………& it isn't O.K. for America's No.1 Welfare Queen to steal ALL the land it wants from the people who have lived there on it for the last two thousand years………. And NO… we will NOT be able to kill (cauterize) every person on the planet who is willing to take action to stop the Is-raeli colonialization, torture and GENOCIDE of the Palestinian People…. Try another topic Pat, Please…..!!!!!!!
Robert Shule
October 1st, 2012 at 11:19 pm
Anyone with half an eye on foreign affairs can see September 11 is fast becoming "International Hate U.S.A. Day." Gee, I wonder why?
Mike Ehling
October 2nd, 2012 at 1:03 am
It is. And Pat's pointing out how a disastrous foreign policy of interventionism has transformed what eleven years ago was a gang of thugs (who should, after the 9-11 bombings, have been dealt with as a police matter) into a multiplicity of thuggish gangs all across the Islamic world. It's interventionism's chickens coming home to roost — or, as Ron Paul would quote the CIA, it's blowback.
In stylistic irony, Pat sometimes leaves out his conclusions and lets the reader draw his own, but this column is definitely anti-interventionist. (My only real quarrel with Pat is on issues of race, where the Old Right needs to have a Sister Souljah moment with him, but that's an issue to be addressed in comment postings to The American Conservative, not here in Antiwar, because Pat's certainly an anti-interventionist.)
I do disagree with this column, though, to the extent that it suggests OBAMA's foreign policy is a debacle. The debacle is the OBOMNEY foreign policy, because there's no difference between Barack da Bomba and Etch-a-Sketch Mittens.
Mike Ehling
October 2nd, 2012 at 1:07 am
Because next year's September 11 will be the fortieth anniversary of the death of Salvador Allende and the murder of Chilean democracy?
mickperry
October 2nd, 2012 at 4:06 am
Pat Buchanan is putting the cart in front of the horse here.
Thanks to his nation's and mine's intervention the country is now flooded with bandits armed with all kinds of military hardware, including surface to air missiles http://defensetech.org/2011/09/07/modern-shoulder…
Even serving members of the local board of school governors probably pack an RPG or two today; they're probably even a fashion accessory by now.
Most sentient people wouldn't call this Obama's creation either; it is official US policy and has been since the days of Carter, and even earlier according to some informed sources.
Whoever the original Dr Frankenstein was though, his monster is now obviously beyond his control.
Smithboy
October 2nd, 2012 at 4:49 am
Our presence in middle eastern countries has only served to have our military industrial complex and wild eyed neocons rip a gash in our treasury, while doing more harm than good.
Outsider
October 2nd, 2012 at 6:40 am
Exactly right, Johnny in Wi. Romney has already said that he will do whatever Bibi wants. Under Romney war with Iran is inevitable and will probably happen quickly. Romney will obey his neocon masters and plunge us into the Syrian conflict and probably ramp up our disastrous losing Afghan campaign. No one can guarantee that Obama in a second term won't attack Iran, but he is our only hope to avoid this disaster.
donna
October 2nd, 2012 at 6:59 am
No, Ron Paul is not wrong, but he should have said: The Obama-Bush-Romney foreign policy is unraveling literally before our eyes on our TV screens
nomange
October 2nd, 2012 at 7:00 am
Al Qaeda and the madrassa training centers were our Plan B in the mid 1990's after the Gladio program had faltered and was revealed. Both took place under President Clinton's watch, and that may be why Hillary has been so comfortable with Al Qaeeda as our "allies" to destabilize and overthrow regimes we are seeking to replace. Unfortunately, this and prior Administrations have had such little understanding of the Middle East, or its history, or core interests, other than from the intelligence they have outsourced to Israel, or have intuited from a State Department that long ago marginalized its Arabists (like what it did years ago to its China Hands), that it will more often than not get it wrong and find itself sandbagged. (The Department to some extent has recognized its deficiencies by instituting the Critical Languages Program, but the program's selection criteria is still to some extent political, which will contribute to the perpetuation of the Department's Middle East myopia.)
MvGuy
October 2nd, 2012 at 7:26 am
"We failed to cut out or kill the cancer at Tora Bora in 2001, and it has since metastasized and spread across North Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia."
Even if one believes in the "official" 911 narrative….. It was ONLY the messenger at Tore Bora…
YES…….. and the arms industry will be ever grateful until our real problems are actually "cauterized"… Our real problem, is that our politicians work for the highest bidders…… Follow the money, not the 'lies… $3,2OO,OOO,OOO,OOO,OO "missing" on 9/10/01….. That's a lot of slush/hush money…..!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU4GdHLUHwU
Generalissimo X
October 2nd, 2012 at 8:45 am
gee, political leaders lying about an attack on 9-11. where have i heard that before? i guess a flash mob always has access to intelligence on where safe houses are located? just like guys with box cutters overwhelmed 16 different security agencies. just like the underwear bomber was put on the plane. it's all a hoax and has been from day 1.
al qaeda IS the cia. created in 79, they've been doing our bidding for a long, long time. they exist to merely pose a "threat" so that all the war pigs can continue to profit on the chaos. it allows the american people to be terrorized, not by a motley group of bearded arabs, but their own gov't. civil rights? civil liberties? constitution? you must have made up words that don't exist.
the entire libya operation and now syria are run by MI6 and the al-ciaeda. pat's absurd assertion that this all somehow organic and unforeseen is beyond naive.
GeriatrikSk8r
October 2nd, 2012 at 9:12 am
"We failed to cut out or kill the cancer at Tora Bora in 2001, and it has since metastasized and spread across North Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia." That cancer, Pat, as I'm sure you know, is not Al Qaeda but US foreign policy, and it started long before 2001. You begin cutting that cancer at home, not thousands of miles from home killing foreigners .
Bianca
October 2nd, 2012 at 9:21 am
This is exactly why this is not Obama thing, even though he, as an obedient servant of the imperial policy is happy to advance it. Buchanan always wants to see the failures as only an abberation, due to poor jugement of individuals. His analysis is therefore sometimes naive. Can he not understand that the initial portrayal od the event in Benghazi as riots was meant to blanket the largest segment of population with a benign story, knowing full well that most people do not follow up anything beyond the first impression. All later revelations only aggitate people that follow things closely, but that is a minute number of population. Why does Buchanan think that Afghanistan is a failure? We are to stay there until 2024, and probably beyond. Modality will change, but garrisons will remain. The death of ambassadors in the future may no longer be news, as we live in "dangerous" world — so the story will go. This is a world where militancy is something we will create, live by it, and die by it. This IS the reality, NOT a mistake.
Lorraine
October 2nd, 2012 at 10:05 am
I think you meant Paul Ryan, but I completely agree with your underlying contention – although I would go even further back in time, so far, in fact that I'd say the "entire U.S. foreign policy is unravelling" – because this disaster has been a hundred years in the making.
omop
October 2nd, 2012 at 10:06 am
Obama's foreign policy has for the past year or so been "sabotaged" by Sarkozy and other French neocons in North Africa. The killing of the US Ambassador in Libya was done by African mercenaries paid for in euros and dollars. Ms. Rice is an extension of Ms. Allbright in her disdain of Arabs and in her autocratic demands to cut Syria into pieces.
In short Mr. Obama's foreign policy is being blackballed by the neocons and their European and Middle Easter ally. Time to wake up to reality. And ask the ultimate question who benefits from killing a "
US " Ambasador in an arab country?
richard vajs
October 2nd, 2012 at 10:15 am
Cancer is a generic term – in the case of the Mid East, properly identify it as Zionism.
nomange
October 2nd, 2012 at 10:56 am
Your first sentence contains the inconsistency of your argument. You are right- it is an imperial policy, and you are also wrong- to the extent it occurs under the watch of any Administration it is their responsibility (their "thing") if they don't correct it. We are have created, and continue to create, carnage in Central Asia and the Middle East because we have wanted certain things- whether it was resources or geopolitical position, or to advance the interest of other allies (e.g., Israel). What we are living with is a profound mistake, not only because it is a moral outrage and war crime, and because we are destroying so many people to acquire these sought after benefits, but also because we are destroying our economy in the process. Since the costs of these externalities have risen to such a level, we must be honest with ourselves and evaluate the viability of the policy from that perspective as well. FInally, the strategy and tools behind the policy itself were flawed from the very beginning. We should always have used diplomacy as our tool of first resort, and sought to trade through accommodation, negotiation and give and take. That would have been the more rational way to proceed, and the most cost effective, especially with the attractiveness and desirability to these nations of our technology. At the same time the energy producers and Cheney/Bush thought it was better to impose a solution if Unocal couldn't nickel and dime the deal it wanted (e.g., with the Taliban over the TAPI pipeline), and so the US went ahead and invaded without just cause- (remember at that time the FBI and CIA refused to certify that Osama bin Laden was responsible for 9/11- so BOTH the Afghan and Iraq wars were initiated under false pretenses).
It may be hard for you to attack Obama, especially if you support him, either affirmatively or because you consider him the lesser of two electable evils in the present campaign. But every public servant, who is responsible must be held accountable to ensure that the right thing is done. Otherwise, our "democracy" will continue to erode.
Jaime
October 2nd, 2012 at 1:16 pm
The cancer is the US and its self-defeating policies. To reach its goals, Washington is willing to go to any lengths, to commit any crime, to break any law. But when things don't turn out the way they expected, then they claim to heaven how unfair the world is
james
October 2nd, 2012 at 1:50 pm
I have been saying that for some time now. Pat is reinforcing all what is wrong with the shit*y BIG state. Anybody who does not connect what is going on on the M.E. now and probably in almost all the world with the shit*y LITTLE state is at least ignorant if not right out disingenuous. Pat seems to be drifting in between the tow adjectives.
Eileen Kuch
October 2nd, 2012 at 3:05 pm
The ultimate problem is ISRAHELL, with the UK running a close second. After all, it was the UK who – like the character Faust who made a pact with Satan – in return for "victory" in WW I, made a pact with the Zionists to hand them Palestine. Before that time, the inhabitants of the region – Jews, Christians, and Muslims – lived in harmony with one another; then, after WW II, a flood of European Jews poured into Palestine; and, the rest is history.
pendulum
October 2nd, 2012 at 4:33 pm
I don't think so, Pat is a resentful repub and likes to tug the tail of those who hoofed him, as a candidate he was pro foreign US policy
ML3
October 2nd, 2012 at 4:45 pm
Shame. Should have left Qaddafi alone. Will the same thing happen in Syria? Of course. That's the plan. Start a fire and then rush in with the extinguishers and the building materials. Sometimes the US gov't makes me sick. No matter who is in charge.
davidgrayling
October 2nd, 2012 at 5:03 pm
Obama, Mr Hopey-Changey, is a fraud and a stooge. Anyone who hopes he will turn into what he promised he would be is either a fool or a dreamer.
Don't elect Obama or Romney unless you want to see the world go up in a nuclear fireball. Elect one of the others, anyone of them, they couldn't be any worse than the two Stooges!