New Footage Depicts Attack on Mavi Marmara
Blasts from a megaphone accompany the sounding of alarms, a woman’s voice repeatedly pleading, "We are civilians, we have no guns…we need help for people…please don’t attack."
Brazilian-American filmmaker Iara Lee, a passenger on board the Mavi Marmara, managed to smuggle an hour of footage taken during the May 31 attack on a six-ship humanitarian flotilla bound for Gaza by the Israeli Defense Forces. An activist from the group Cultures of Resistance, Lee released her footage to the press Thursday at the United Nations. She plans to make it available to the public, to let the images speak for themselves.
The footage starts before the attack, with the sounds of a passenger chanting prayers, while others kneel in observance of prayers. Later, it features gripping images of wounded passengers, along with passengers bearing metal poles and slingshots targeted at the helicopters flying above.
Attempts were made to reroute the ship to avoid confrontation when those aboard realized that Israeli vessels were approaching, Lee said.
"We were not mentally prepared," she said. "We thought we would have had some sort of verbal confrontation, or a shot in the foot."
Both sides charge that video and audio images have been altered or selectively edited to corroborate the clashing accounts of what occurred.
Israeli Attack on the Mavi Marmara, May 31st 2010 // 15 min. from Cultures of Resistance on Vimeo.
The Israeli government released doctored footage to support the accounts of soldiers involved in the raid, which seemed to indicate they had been beaten with metal rods and chairs upon boarding. Meanwhile, Reuters has defended its cropping of images that conceal a knife-wielding passenger and a wounded soldier as inadvertent, an editing error.
Israeli soldiers claim they had acted in defense, while Pro-Palestinian campaigners say they did nothing to provoke the violence that led to nine passenger deaths, and were not in possession of deadly weapons. The footage released by Lee appears to confirm elements of both accounts — that passengers wielded metal poles and slingshots, while the soldiers who stormed the ships used excessive force.
Edward Peck, a former U.S. diplomat and vocal critic of U.S. policy toward Israel, was also a passenger, as a member of the Free Palestine Movement, and witnessed the unfolding of the raid. He told IPS they had planned to offer passive resistance. "I don’t think anyone expected bloodshed," he said.
Asked if it was possible passengers on board were wielding any kind of weapons, he said, "I don’t know if they had them, some people would say they were justified in using them — the Israeli force was overwhelming and unhesitating."
Israeli authorities confiscated most of the audio and visual evidence gathered by the dozens of journalists who had accompanied the activists to report on their stated intention of breaching the blockade imposed since 2007, following the de facto rule of Hamas over the Gaza Strip.
Lee’s footage also captured a passenger on board who was able to get a hold of a document carried by soldiers that she interpreted as a list of high-profile passengers. It contained pictures of a member of parliament from Sweden and Former Jerusalem Archbishop Hilarion Capucci, Lee said. She speculated that perhaps it was a list of people who should not be harmed.
Altogether, the flotilla had about 700 passengers, including 60 journalists.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon has called for a "prompt, credible, impartial and transparent investigation" with an international element. Ban has consulted with his legal counsel to solicit an assessment and advice, but has not made a statement confirming whether the soldiers contravened the Charter on the Law of the Sea.
The Israeli government has yet to accede to these terms, and negotiations continue on the framework for an investigation. The Israeli Defense Forces have reserved the right to be the only ones to question their soldiers — as is the protocol with armies worldwide — and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has issued a statement invoking this right.
(Inter Press Service)





Zia
June 11th, 2010 at 8:26 am
Tut, tut. Knives, metal rods – surely, all weapons of mass destruction. And supplemented by wheelchairs and medication meant to attack the benign regime in Israel. How perverse is that! It's about time you learn to call this blatant criminality against an unarmed aid flotilla attacked in the high seas for it was – a deliberate and premedidated act of war by a rogue regime. Wonder if Obama would have been as supportive of the killing of his compatriot on board the Mavi Marmara if the victim were Michele. Who knows, his administration seems to revel in the resounding slaps Netanyahu has thus far meted out to him and his VP….
liberal
June 11th, 2010 at 11:37 am
"Knives, metal rods – surely, all weapons of mass destruction." Don't laugh. The US Gov classifies some pretty wimpy weapons as WMD. I'm pretty sure fairly small area-effect weapons like grenades are, maybe even some small arms too.
Chris Mallory
June 11th, 2010 at 12:11 pm
Grenades and short barreled shotguns are "destructive devices" not quite the same as WMDs.
john
June 11th, 2010 at 12:42 pm
I think the footage is good.
BUT I think the article is too defensive.
The question is not "who started it" which is the way the Israelis are trying to frame the question. The answer to that is obvious. The Israelis want to frame things this way to distract from the question of Gaza and Israeli violence and Apartheid.
Eve Primm
June 11th, 2010 at 4:45 pm
Both pictures, the cropped and un-cropped versions, are readily available on-line. It is easy to see that the knife in question is being held in a manner completely contrary to the act of "wielding". The use of the word "wielding", in a news story concerning an act of piracy, automatically implies that the knife was being used as a weapon – either offensively or defensively. There is no photographic evidence to support that conclusion.
First, the person in possession of the knife is only letting his fingertips touch it.
This is the manner in which people handle items they are reluctant to be in contact with. Bloody bandages, dead cats, and soiled diapers, are handled in this manner. The person's reluctance is obvious and overwhelmingly decisive, and, therefore, compels a differing conclusion.
Second, this knife is simply hanging from the person's fingertips – point down – and, as such, the use of the word "wielding" is clearly contrary to the definition of the word, as follows:
wield-ed, wield-ing, wields:
1. To handle (a weapon or tool, for example, with skill and ease.
2, To exercise (authority or influence, for example) effectively.
The person in possession of the knife in question certainly is not "wielding" it. Further, this person also appears to be holding the knife as though it is repugnant to him. He is not exhibiting any kind of hostility. Nor is he assuming a defensive posture in which he is relying on the knife as in instrument of such defensive strategy. Even a child would not feel threatened by person in the situation depicted in the photos. Indeed, a woman cutting bread would present a much more decisive and purposeful picture.
In short; the person holding the knife is not holding in a manner consistent with the use of the word "wielding". The more likely conclusion is that this person has found himself in possession of one of the many weapons carried on board by the israeli pirates / murders / kidnappers.
Words are very powerful. Please use them more carefully.
wolvedrive
June 11th, 2010 at 7:06 pm
I don't know about all that media spectacle now turned sound bite,consider this,if ya went down to the zoo and gave the apes and monkeys,maybe some bears & eagles and snakes,hell ya might as well throw some goats,rats & pigs in their too (farm animals are creatures too) and gave say some hand grenades,AK-47's,tear gas,bazookas,tanks,F-29 fox bat strike fighter-bobmbers,whatever else ya just happen to have lying around(wares),oo,would anybody (animals) get hurt,orangatangs,hippos,whales,sharks,sea bass,,,humans-?,state agents,secret military police,career politicians,insects,vermin,swine,jack-asses,pricks,soildering tools,with a warhead pointed at the Great Central collective brainwashed si-kee/psyci(?)wouldn't Mengele be proud, wallowing in pity of self or desperate cause,isn't that something Hitler might say as a last zionistic order,anything goes,at all costs,$$
pendulum
June 11th, 2010 at 10:28 pm
they are not soldiers, they are rabble from rubble, punks gathered the insane so they can masterbate over the news and videos, IDF perverts in a whore house
Oldtimer
June 12th, 2010 at 12:56 am
It's as plain as the nose on your face who started the trouble. It was the IOF. They had no business whatever boarding any of those ships.
Mike Renzulli
June 12th, 2010 at 5:44 am
Here is an article about the aid Hamas refuses to allow into Gaza by the Guardian which is U.K.'s left-wing newspaper: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/03/hamas…
Helsinki Principles on Law of Maritime Neutrality: Par.: 5.2.10:" Blockade,i.e.the interdiction of all or certain maritime traffic coming from or going to a port or coast of a belligerent , is a legitimate method of navan warfare……….Neutral vessels…breaching a blockade may be stopped and captured. If they, after prior warning, clearly resist capture, they may be attacked".
The Mavi Marmara passengers wanted a fight and they got one. When this idea first came public, Israel told the people behind this that they would allow them to bring aid via a land-based convoy. The organizers refused.
What the flotilla organizers and Hamas object to is the fact that Israel screens much of what is imported into Gaza in the first place.
If Israeli border guards find weapons in shipments to Gaza via land or sea they are confiscated. If you and the others who post on these web pages did the research, it's obvious you all would know this and not make the kind of idiotic statements you have here. For the most part, Israel does not refuse aid to Gaza. It is Hamas that does that (see linked article above).
It is ISRAEL not the Palestinians or Gazans who are persecuted since the Israelis have had to fight numerous wars of self defense in order to protect themselves against the theocratic dictatorships that surround her who fund, arm and train groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. Israel either has a right to defend herself or she doesn't.
Which one is it?