Sanctions Give China an Advantage in Iran
LONDON — The European Union’s new sanctions against Iran appear to open a new space for eager Chinese companies to expand their investments in a country viewed as a rogue player by much of the western world.
With China recently coming to light as Iran’s largest trade partner, some Chinese analysts predict a wealth of new geopolitical and business opportunities with Iran. But officialdom may still waver at the idea of Beijing seen as a "free-rider."
An energy-thirsty China has signed agreements with Iran worth tens of billions of dollars to allow it privileged access to Iran’s oil and gas sector. Courting the partnership of Iran, which possesses the world’s fourth largest reserves of oil and second largest of gas, has been a long and arduous process, and Beijing would loathe to jeopardize it.
In recently published memoirs China’s long-time ambassador to Tehran Hua Liming admitted that his diplomacy in Iran after China became an oil importer in the early 1990s had been entirely dictated by energy politics. Last year Iran accounted for 11 percent of China’s oil imports, ranking third among China’s main oil suppliers after Angola and Saudi Arabia.
Spurred by its energy needs, China has undertaken a range of investment projects in Iran, gradually filling in the void left over by Western firms forced out by international sanctions. With more than 100 Chinese companies present in Iran, it has built Tehran’s subway, power stations, ferrous metals smelting factories and petrochemical plants.
As bilateral trade reached 21.2 billion dollars in 2009, China surfaced as Iran’s most important trade partner. On paper the European Union still ranks as Iran’s largest trading partner, but if Chinese goods imported in Iran via the United Arab Emirates are considered, China has already overtaken the EU.
This has led some to believe that Iran’s defiant attitude towards the west derives somewhat from a newfound confidence that China is now supplanting Tehran’s traditional trade partners. "Who can blame Iran for being so ferocious with China behind its back?" says an opinion piece on one of China’s largest Internet portals China.com.
With international pressure on Iran to abandon its nuclear program mounting in the last few years, western companies began reducing their dealings with Tehran further, and Iran turned more to China for investment in its oil and gas sectors, says Dr. Harsh V. Pant, professor in the Department of Defense studies at King’s College, London.
The new round of sanctions agreed by the European Union means that "China will remain Iran’s most significant major power supporter, and there will be little incentive for Tehran to negotiate in good faith," Dr. Pant tells IPS.
The sanctions target the oil and gas industries — the backbone of Iran’s economy, as well as foreign trade and financial services. They ban new EU investments in the energy sector and the export to Iran of key equipment and technology for refining and for the exploration and production of natural gas.
The EU foreign ministers announced the new restrictions a month after the U.S. imposed its own strengthened sanctions on Iran. Last month the UN Security Council passed a fourth round of international sanctions over Iran’s clandestine nuclear program China, a UN Security Council member, inconspicuously lent its support.
"Even though China does not want to be seen as ganging up with the West and hopes to maintain a strategic partnership with Tehran, it does not want to complicate relations with Washington either," says Jonathan Holslag, research fellow with the Brussels Institute of Contemporary China studies.
Holslag believes Beijing has given "subtle but clear signals that it wants Iran to cooperate with the UN." He points to Beijing’s decision to slow down investment in the Yadavaran oil field and delay the disbursement of loans. When Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visited the Shanghai Expo, Chinese leaders reportedly refused to meet him.
With China called upon to become a "responsible stakeholder" in the international system, Beijing has walked a fine line, trying to work in concert with the international community to force Tehran to abandon its nuclear weapons program, while preserving its vital interests in Iran. Beijing supports non-proliferation efforts as part of its broader campaign to gain a higher international profile.
Attempting to water down previous UN sanctions has not only been for the purpose of protecting China’s energy supplies, argues Holslag. He believes the Chinese elite finds the sanctions counterproductive as they are "the grist for the mill of Iranian hardliners" and fuel "nuclear nationalism."
On Sunday China’s top diplomat called for fresh nuclear talks and more diplomatic effort to resolve the standoff over Iran’s nuclear program "China continues on the path of negotiations" regarding Tehran’s nuclear energy program, foreign minister Yang Jiechi said in Vienna.
A recent piece in the Chinese newspaper Global Times claimed that Beijing had secured tacit agreement from western powers that in any follow-on sanctions adopted by the U.S. and the European Union, China’s interests in Iranian energy and trade would be protected.
But "the new EU sanctions mean that the Iranian energy sector will continue to face major constraints in reaching its full potential," says Dr. Pant. "And therefore China will find it difficult to exploit the sector fully."
In his memoirs ex-ambassador Hua Liming recounts the difficulties China and Iran faced with securing the flow of Iranian high sulphur crude oil to China in mid-1990s. Although Iran now exports around 27 million metric tonnes of crude to China every year, the lack of knowhow and technology still impede the progress of several Chinese oil exploration and development projects in Iran.
(Inter Press Service)
Read more by Antoaneta Bezlova
- China Uneasy Over US Nuclear Policies – March 10th, 2006
- Chinese Govt Censors Anti-Japan Protests – April 13th, 2005
- China Blasts Japan for Taiwan Stance – February 23rd, 2005
- Two Nations in a Bind Over Nukes – February 15th, 2005
- China Unfazed by Bush Rhetoric – February 1st, 2005





andy
July 31st, 2010 at 5:49 am
China just surpassed Japan to become the second largest economy in the world. They are doing everything RIGHT and America is doing everything WRONG. But China looks to its own interests and is not controlled by ethnic lobbies.
Andrew
July 31st, 2010 at 7:17 am
So, if (or rather when) the US and Israel bomb Iran back to the Stone Age, they willl be destroying a lot of capital investment financed by China. Hmmm, lets hope the US doesn't need any financial support from China following that.
lucy
July 31st, 2010 at 8:11 am
Very straqnge article.Iranis in legallity in her nuclear program and the demands to stop it is not legally and impose by US and israel and accepted by the Western servant countries.It is nothing immoral in China ties with Iran is all immoral in US-Israel hegemony on the world.But are also Brazil and Turkey and Russia more or less which protest this unfair policy and the permanent threat with war.A very uneven article
bogi666
July 31st, 2010 at 10:28 am
Of course China will back sanctions against Iraq, so they can pick up the slack. Who knows what goes on behind the scenes between China and Iraq, they may have a tacit agreement about China being in the Kabuki Theater, or Peking Opera, sanctions play.
AlfreðGA
July 31st, 2010 at 8:17 am
"to force Tehran to abandon its nuclear weapons program" – That´s bullshit and we all know it. Are we really going to fall for that again? How pathetic are we?
JLS
July 31st, 2010 at 7:10 pm
Maybe I'm naive but I still don't understand why the rest of the world goes along with the US government when it wants to shun some nation they don't like. Why doesn't the rest of the world just tell Washington to go and get stuffed? Seriously why do they allow themselves to go along, often against their own interests, to obey Washington?
andy
July 31st, 2010 at 7:24 pm
Believe me JLS that day will come. Perhaps a lot sooner then most people think.
SammyE
July 31st, 2010 at 9:52 pm
Yes Andy, the boycott of israel is working. One down. And if American consumers don't begin to spend, you can bet many US companies will seek business elsewhere, ending what's left of the American middle class.
E. A. Costa
August 1st, 2010 at 2:59 am
The US is not the largest economy in the world.
The US is the largest economy in the world in terms of USD.
In the distinction between those two statements ls unveiled the utter blindness and incompetence of most western, and especially American, economists. And also the incompetence of the "free market Capitalists", including the Austrians and most "Libertarians."
In fact by obvious economic criteria no longer understood by conventional analysts in the West mainland China is now the largest "economy" in the world.
Only the mainland economists themselves, who are very sophisticated, an honest broker like Paul Craig Roberts, and a few Neo-Marxist economic analysts have a firm grasp of the present situation, and the monumentality the debt credit mess the financial capitalists have wreaked upon the US.
E. A. Costa
August 1st, 2010 at 3:05 am
"The European Union’s new sanctions against Iran appear to open a new space for eager Chinese companies to expand their investments in a country viewed as a rogue player by much of the western world."
Well, yeah.
What else is new?
As a matter of fact, one noted on this very site, before the US sanctions were imposed, that they would accomplish nothing but more damage to the US economy.
Fortunately, one is too "Music Man" cynical to be bothered about being a voice in the wilderness.
It's more entertaining simply to sit back and enjoy the comedy, which is getting closer and closer to the Theater of the Absurd.
E. A. Costa
August 1st, 2010 at 3:08 am
"monumentality of"
Montaigne
August 1st, 2010 at 11:35 am
But they still play at the deck of Titanic. That is proof, that a crash of empire will not happen this time. Though "going to Disneyland" was chosen by Bush instead of music on the deck.
E. A. Costa
August 1st, 2010 at 12:00 pm
Time unfolds for crashing empires and sinking ships in different modes.
But the metaphor holds.
Through sheer incompetence and greed the American, British, and European financial elite blundered into the iceberg of the collapse of infinite global debt credit some while ago. The ship is still afloat, it is true, and they dance above but below deck is already flooded and going under.
E. A. Costa
August 1st, 2010 at 12:09 pm
Many, even accomplished historians and especially conservatives, often confuse the few years of violent bursting asunder of old social and economic forms as "revolution".
That is like confusing the rose with its brief flowering.
E. A. Costa
August 1st, 2010 at 12:15 pm
Mainland China will never again be dominated by European Imperialism, nor American.
To think otherwise is another blunder of the Financial Capitalists, who thought to "capitalize" China and win economically what they could not win on the battlefield after World War II.
cheeseburger
August 1st, 2010 at 3:09 pm
there are many reasons for this. To name a few: US has a lot of leverage through the international system _they_ built, they are still economically and technologically important (more or less). Furthermore, the US has a huge terror network (ie. "military" and "CIA"), which it is still not wise to mess with. Oh, and the US dominance in media makes sure the opinion stays "balanced".
More importantly, while Iran is relevant for many other nations there are many interests which needs to be balanced. Many people probably sympathize with Iran–and keep in mind that they do business with Iran–but Iran also becomes a bargain chip when dealing with the US because the US has the same tact to Iran as a crazy adictive drug abuser has to crack cocaine; if you play your card right you can get a sweet b/j from the old US-skank ;p
PS. guess who the crack-whores pimp and supplier is ;)