Anyone covering Capitol Hill knows that congressional hearings can be deadly — deadly boring and deadly predictable.
But when a reported Iraq war veteran exploded into a House Armed Services Committee hearing this month as Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta was reading his prepared remarks, for a split second it was like a test to see if someone blinked. Better yet, it was a test to see if anyone was human enough to respond.
One person reportedly burst out laughing, right after the veteran, who was screaming “We murdered people! I saw what we did to people!” was dragged from the room by security. But the rest of the chamber was silent, faces turned stoically forward. The vet was followed by two silver-haired antiwar women decrying the war. They were also manhandled out of the room in short order. Seven people altogether that day were arrested for interrupting the proceedings — one charging that the veteran had been laughed at — while a number of others outside in the hallway chanted, “We are the 99 percent, and we don’t support these wars!”
But like something out of a Kevin McCarthy movie, the chamber’s inhabitants impassively waited until the would-be rabble-rousers were silenced. Aside from the reported spark of laughter — probably born out of nervousness or condescension, or likely both — and a couple of stolen sideways glances, the business of war went on.
This is what the current “Occupy” protests are up against. This is what the antiwar protesters have battled since 2001 — a persistent indifference, which in some cases is very real but in other ways is merely used to mask more volatile feelings: disgust and fear of the protesters, confusion about what they stand for, even self-loathing and regret for the passion the indifferent no longer feel about anything outside of themselves.
The good news: According to Kevin Zeese, founder and executive director of Come Home America and organizer behind the October 2011/Stop the Machine demonstrations, which are running parallel to the Occupy D.C. protests in Washington this month, the antiwar movement has gotten more traction than any time in the last 10 years, particularly in Washington, the proverbial belly of the beast.
“There’s no question, when we started working on this [last year] we didn’t know if there would be 50 people out here or anyone joining with us,” he told Antiwar.com. Since Occupy Wall Street began in New York and then the launch of Occupy D.C. corresponded with Zeese’s group’s rally to commemorate the 10-year anniversary of the Afghanistan War on Oct. 6, “we’ve had several thousands of people out here. This is just the beginning.”
The message, Zeese said, is resonating with folks who might have come down to Freedom Plaza for Occupy D.C.’s anti-corporatist agenda but understand how it all fits into the stunning growth of the military-industrial complex over the last half-century. Nowhere is this more explicit than in Washington, D.C.
“The dominant message is economic
insecurity, and it’s bringing people out, and people are recognizing
that the unbridled spending on weapons and on war has a big impact on
why we have this economic insecurity,” he added.
On Oct. 8, the protesters in effect shut down the Smithsonian’s Air and Space Museum. They were rallying against the glorification of drones and warplanes in front of the building when a scuffle with police brought out the pepper spray on the front steps. A right-wing provocateur instigated the situation. More on that later.
But aside from the protests at the Smithsonian and the Armed Services Committee, Zeese said the group has been leading teach-ins on various aspects of war and peace, including the enduring drum beat for war by the city’s hawks against Iran. For obvious reasons, the antiwar theme (which at its core, is really about America’s unrestrained post-9/11 militarism) is much more prevalent in Washington than in New York and the many other cities that are hosting similar Occupy demonstrations. The question is whether Zeese and the others can sustain any sort of focus on it as Occupy becomes more of a political force on the mainstream’s radar.
All Types of Zombies
Everybody knows that zombies eat brains. George Romero set the scene in Night of the Living Dead, and Hollywood never looked back. Before that, zombies in movies typically involved reanimation and mind control through so-called African-Caribbean voodoo. In films like White Zombie and I Walked with a Zombie bad actors with the magic enslaved poor mindless fools to do their bidding.
We see all types of zombies reacting to Occupy and its various manifestations. It’s not much different from how antiwar protesters have been treated throughout the last 10 years of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. But now that the mainstream is actually paying attention to what is going on in Zuccotti Park — in a way it never did for the dozens of major antiwar protests in Washington and New York over the decade — zombiism is rampant and quite easily discernible.
Most prevalent are the zombies talking about and mostly criticizing the protests in language that suggests only mind control could be at work. These zombies include all manner of talking heads, political courtiers and operatives, politicians, status-quo junkies, and haters — but also mindless corporate newspersons who typically just put their heads down and repeat what they’re told.
On a trip last week to the Northeast, I was bombarded almost immediately with the charge that Occupy Wall Street protesters were engaging in anti-Semitic chants, violent behavior, open sex, and flagrant drug use. One man had crapped on a police car. According to a family member, the whole thing had devolved into a dystopian nightmare with shades of Woodstock — Woodstock ’99 that is. At the beginning — according to the evolving meme — these demonstrators might have been well-meaning, but now the whole thing has been taken over by anarchists and criminals. Who, by the way, really hate America.
Surprised that I had heard none of this before, I realized then I hadn’t been listening to the right ZRF (zombie radio frequency), that is, any station carrying Rush Limbaugh, or reading the correct zombie guru texts, coming in over the ether from Andrew “Dr. Caligari” Breitbart (a man so righteous with the limited-government mojo, he sources zombies whose main occupations are to hack into private emails and feed the juice to protest-shadowing FBI and NYPD).
I soon find the so-called “Jew go
home” frenzy was
a concoction, a well-used
sleight-of-hand to turn the movement in and against itself. The rest —
the defecation, the “free love,” the violence, the purple haze, and
the stink — turned out to be hackneyed hippiephobia delivered as
clunkily by its lesser purveyors
as a horde of zombies trying to shuffle across a bumpy country road.
But for a time it seemed to be working. Not only did it successfully
create an impression that the protests are as divisive as the rest of
Washington politics today, keeping things in manageable, us-versus-them encampments (apparently, only the Ron Paul types know better than to be hip
to that jive), but all
the fearmongering has emboldened political leaders never inclined to
support the protest to fling the worst
hate-filled rhetoric while
keeping the potentially sympathetic skittishly at bay.
So now we have the most foolish right-wing pander-zombies spewing Orwellian newspeak as casually as waving the flag on the Fourth of July. Rep. Paul Broun, Republican from Georgia, called the protests an “attack on freedom” in a recent interview from the U.S. Capitol. So he understands a demonstration of free speech to be an “attack on freedom.” Is this not the ultimate voodoo zombification?
Swollen Svengalis like Limbaugh and Breitbart are zombies, too — the aggressive, brain-eating kind. They are victims of their own small single-mindedness, but like the weirdly alert zombies in the 2004 remake of Dawn of the Dead, they sprint for the kill just the same.
And they are clearly more focused and agile than their slow-moving, brain-eating counterparts, those who get disturbed and turned on to their prey by sudden noises, lights, or the scent of blood, like in Romero’s original Night of the Living Dead. These zombies typically shuffle along haplessly, and violence can usually be avoided if they aren’t aroused (see AMC’s The Walking Dead). More on these in a second.
The aggressive ones aren’t hard to spot. They are the most wild and vicious — even gleeful— in their attacks against the protests. For example, Limbaugh called the demonstrators a “parade of human debris” on Oct. 5, not long after Occupy Wall Street started surfacing in the mainstream media. Political egoist Rep. Peter King, Republican of New York, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, had no compunction racing in and calling his own constituents a “ragtag mob.” In recent days, both Breitbart’s Big Government and Tucker Carlson’s Daily Caller have engaged in blatantly McCarthyite tactics, not only whipping up the already berserk voodoo zombie hordes, but getting at least one woman, so far, fired from her job.
Remember that “standoff” between police and protesters at the Air and Space Museum, the one where the museum “was closed Saturday after antiwar demonstrators tried to enter the building to protest a drone exhibit, and at least one person was pepper-sprayed”?
Turns out that Patrick Howley, an assistant editor at the right-wing American Spectator, was the “one” pepper-sprayed. How do we know? He bragged that he “infiltrated” the protest and broke through police lines in an online account his magazine later altered (luckily, the evil liberal media caught a screen grab of the original story). But The American Spectator editors didn’t mess with what is clearly the funniest line in the bit:
I deserved to get a face full of high-grade pepper, and the guards who sprayed me acted with more courage than I saw from any of the protesters. If you’re looking for something to commend these days in America, start with those guards.
Guess we forgot to mention “the passive-aggressive zombie.”
These rapacious zombies look almost virtuous compared to the slow-moving ones, however. Establishment types — those who have “made it” and whose identities and livelihoods depend on the corporate wheel turning in rhythm with the political powers and authority invested in Washington, Hollywood, and New York — are typically slow to bare teeth over such issues, but they smell their own lifeblood at risk now and have responded with sanctimonious lectures and smug, condescending putdowns of the Occupy rallies.
These include people like New York Times editor Bill Keller, who in essence said the protests are boring, and the Washington Post’s Anne Applebaum, who claims they will “hurt democracy.” Even naughty Howard “King of Media” Stern, typically a beacon for the disaffected fringe, has dismissed the demonstrators as “foolish dirty hippies who have no idea what is going on in the world.” But with an estimated $400 million Sirius XM radio contract, he certainly knows where his bread is buttered, and it’s clearly not on the side of the rabble screaming “oligarchy!” at the base of his penthouse tower.
But there’s good news for the non-zombies.
Despite the grim reports, you are not alone. And, according to The
Washington Post on Sunday, there has been an extraordinary collision
in the universe, and Tea Partiers and Occupiers are finally finding common ground, resisting the urge to eat each others’
brains. And don’t forget the
Marines. These guys hate zombies,
too, and they just might
be headed to a city near you. Scarier things have happened.
Happy Halloween.
Follow Kelley Vlahos on Twitter @KelleyBVlahos.
Read more by Kelley B. Vlahos
- Veterans for Ron Paul – February 20th, 2012
- CPAC Devolving on Defense – February 13th, 2012
- Slowly, Toxic Vets Get Recognition – February 6th, 2012
- Meet John Kiriakou – January 30th, 2012
- Jack Murtha and the Ghosts of Haditha – January 23rd, 2012












skulz fontaine
October 24th, 2011 at 9:23 pm
Happy Halloween Ms. V. So if one were to eat the brains of a Wall Street banker, would that make one more or less likely to seek a "government bailout" for being 'hungry'?
Bianca
October 24th, 2011 at 10:15 pm
Scary things ARE happening. All of a sudden, Social Security retirement check will INCREASE next year by 3.6 percent! No studies, no committees, no deficit food fights. Eerie silence accompanied the news, just as if the whole establishment went to sleep, and woke up KNOWING that this needs to be done. There is something about the protests that is SCARY. The protests are REAL, and tap into the thinking of many. Now, of course, the protesters are called all sorts of names. They are anarchists, losers, lazy unemployed, and deadenders. Yet, somehow, pension is going up — just like that. And a new program to help with mortgages announced as well. Much good will it do, as the words are splendid, but the outcomes mostly elusive as ghosts. Revolutions indeed eat their own children, and the voters of 08 are out there looking for their ounce of flesh.
mickperry
October 25th, 2011 at 1:18 am
Zombies indeed. When Obama became President, people were crying out for change. When it became clear that any change was going to be for the worse, the word was that he was waiting for a popular movement to emerge that would 'hold his feet to the fire'.
That popular movement is blatantly with us now, and '99%' has spread like wildfire across the globe. If Obama's toes aren't beginning to feel the heat yet then somebody should check his pulse.
El Tonno
October 25th, 2011 at 2:22 am
> Social Security retirement check will INCREASE next year by 3.6 percent! And a new program to help with mortgages announced as well.
IMHO, that's actually what OWS should *not* be about – having somebody else pick up the bills, in this case by printing even more money. That's called paying off the public with fake prosperity and money printing and thus business as usual.
KVB
October 25th, 2011 at 2:47 am
I get what you are saying, but I've paid into Social Security since I was 16 — that's almost a quarter century ago. If i expect one day for that check to supplement my income or disability, how is that a handout? For millions of workers today it's a savings account.
Smithboy
October 25th, 2011 at 4:44 am
Watching Meet the Press this past sunday you knew what was coming when NBC zombie David Gregory asked Bela Lugosi look alike, David Brooks for a comment about world affiars, Brooks immediately began beating the drum for war with Iran. Almost breathlessly Brooks said, "I've talked to military experts and they all say Iran's nuclear program is a threat to our security."
It's to the point where the warmongering Israeli zealots, such as Gregory and his guest, Brooks and Andrea Mitchell, all of whom can't bear the thought of the "Empire" not being at war, can veer any topic into a discussion about Iran.
David Gregory…"Andrea Mitchell, what do you think about Britney Spears' new album?"
Andrea Mitchell…"Well David, Everyone I've talked to at the record companies have told me…we MUST bomb Iran!"
Phil Giraldi
October 25th, 2011 at 5:57 am
Brooks' "military experts" no doubt consist of his fellow neocons at AEI, FDD, and Heritage and their names are probably Kagan, Bolton, Kaplan and Gerecht. I am at a loss to discover what the intention of the Sunday morning talk shows is. Their guests are essentially all supporters of the status quo. Why have Brooks and Mitchell on the same program? They are two peas from the same pod, as is Gregory.
BTW Kelley, great article as always! The wash post featured a front page article on the Occupy crowd last week including a large photo of a long haired protester "attacking a policeman." It was clearly intended to dredge up seventies era memories of angry freedom hating hippies who rightly (for the post) should be shunned by all true Americans.
Terrance&Philip
October 25th, 2011 at 6:25 am
A "serious" hearing on Capital Hill among our "best" and "brightest" about our military status: Still another example of the banality of evil.
How strange that evil's banalities should be so abundant: A military parade failing to take into account the lives destroyed and the oppurtunities lost; Dick Cheney (or any other investor) smugly reviewing how much his options with Halliburton (or Boeing) have fattened his portfolio; A 20 year old in an armchair, thousands of miles away, firing deadly salvos from a drone, killing innocent men, women and children attending a tribal wedding.
Terrance&Philip
October 25th, 2011 at 6:28 am
Why in the world do we let Canadians like Brookes, Krauthammer, Zuckerman and Frum slither down from the north to dictate American policy? Let these foreignerss crawl back to Ottawa where they belong. America most certainly does NOT need them.
Tim
October 25th, 2011 at 7:31 am
Wonderful article! These protesters may not have all the answers and some of their demands are childish and even kooky but at least they're aware the current corporatist system is rotten. The protesters are easy prey for zombies like Limbaugh and Breitbart but where were they when the government was dolling out trillions in bailout cash to Wall Street? Have they spoken up against the estimated $16 trillion the Fed transferred to the mega banks? Someone like Tucker Carlson may think he got where he is through his own efforts but I suspect somewhere along the way he was the recipient of corporate sponsorship. He's just mouthpiece for the corporatist system which is now collapsing. When he slanders the protesters he's only doing what he's paid to do.
Wootie Berster
October 25th, 2011 at 7:40 am
Interesting that you bring up "zombies". The whole giant zombie phenomenon is basically a gimmick to get ordinary souls used to the idea of slaughtering wholesale their fellow citizens. Well, it's okay, you see.. they're just "zombies". I pointed this out on a so-called "socialist" website in the UK.. mentioning that Jewish people were "zombies" to the nazis, And to expansionists in the US in the 19th century, natives Americans were "zombies".. etc. Now for millions in the west, Muslims are "zombies".
Oddly enough, though, the mod at the so-called "socialist" website mocked me for my remarks. Go figure. I would have thought this fellow would have at least been familiar with the tone of the writings of his fellow socialist Eric Blair, ie "George Orwell" in respect to the role of the media in social conditioning.. but no, it seems not.
Oh, it's just a movie, you see.. hmm.. or a few thousand movies, television shows, comic books, plays, music videos, jokes, cartoons, graphic works, etc., etc. So.. nevermind. Obviously a meme so powerful and compelling as the necessity of mass slaughter of one's fellow citizens is sacrosanct.
Time to move back in the bush with the bears and the snakes.. and other sensible, trustworthy creatures.
Dahoit
October 25th, 2011 at 7:49 am
What liberal media?It's all neolibcon Zionist media.And that bit about sending them back to Ottawa,don't you mean Tel Aviv?
Iraqi War Veteran Interrupts US Armed Services/Panetta Hearing; D.C. 'Zombies'; Happy Hallo'ween!
October 25th, 2011 at 9:33 am
[...] A strange but very interesting piece on the convergence of various groups opposed to ZOG: City of the Living Dead by Kelley B. Vlahos — Antiwar.com D.C.: City of the Living Dead …….. Reply With Quote + Reply [...]
Terrance&Philip
October 25th, 2011 at 9:49 am
They all first slithered down from Canada. Let Canada keep her trash to herself.
dsmith
October 25th, 2011 at 10:10 am
I thought sleight of hand was involved when Brooks said, "Iran's nuclear program", rather than Iran's nuclear weapons program.
To my knowledge, and I would imagine to his, there is no evidence that Iran is creating weapons grade material. Of course, it doesn't matter to Brooks, or any other of the warmongers, if they bends the truth just enough to make something innocent sound dangerous. It's what they neocons call….A noble lie.
Jim Bovard
October 25th, 2011 at 2:21 pm
Dang, sorry I missed that hearing.
Excellent piece – I hope it gets reposted far & wide.
liveload
October 26th, 2011 at 10:37 am
Washington full of Zombies? I see this as scientifically impossible. Zombies require the regular consumption of brains. You place the poor things in Washington and they will all starve to death in short order.
Hexexis
October 28th, 2011 at 6:07 am
Sadly, soldiers & Marines do not fight for their country: if that were the case, they'd've been on the front lines on 9-11. But they were otherwise occupied.
That there are two contractors for each soldier & Marine in Iraq & Afghanistan would imply that they're fighting for something else: as you note, to fatten the portfolios of the nation's premier influence peddlers. This is what the Occupiers & the Tea Partyers should be attacking; mainly, by demanding that the people that have run our so-called wars in Central Asia be tried as war criminals: for abuse of office (Cheney, Cambone) & even treason.
But, no: they are zombies, after all, & is the Occupy Wall Street movement any different, structurally, from the Occupy Central Asia movement of the past 10 years?