Gen. David Petraeus has been gone but a month from his role as commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, yet we’re already seeing the paint on his Potemkin village peel away to reveal an unseemly rot underneath.
That may sound a bit harsh, but there is no better way to describe one of the greatest meme-smashing, not to mention heartrending realities now emerging from embeds and soldiers on the ground in Afghanistan today: coalition soldiers being blown apart by insurgent IEDs more frequently, and with more deadly precision than any other time in the nearly 10-year conflict.
The “rotten” thing is that this has been going on for more than a year and getting worse, yet Congress and the mainstream media have allowed Petraeus and his message machine to not only distort the number, frequency and effectiveness of IED attacks, but de-emphasize the increase in life-altering injuries, particularly amputations, among coalition and Afghan soldiers.
According to the most recent data, there was a 120 percent rise in wounded soldiers undergoing amputations from 2009 to 2010 (75 cases to 171 cases, the steepest increase being in the last four months of the year). There was also a dramatic hike in soldiers suffering amputations of more than one limb and genital injuries, and an overall increase — 40 percent — in IED fatalities year-over-year.
As of Aug. 1, there were 158 IED-related coalition deaths (the vast majority American) in 2011, according to data posted at iCasualties. There were 368 such fatalities in 2010.
Yet Gen. Petraeus told two Wall Street Journal reporters in September 2010 that IED use by the Taliban had “generally flattened.”
I wrote in this space two weeks ago that there seemed to be a vacuum in Afghanistan war coverage, with mainstream media resources stretched and compromised, and the Pentagon forcing its own tired, inexorable PR filter on the situation there. But something is happening. Embeds are starting to write in frank and often gruesome detail how IEDs have been consuming the lives of soldiers and medics in the field — with no respite in sight.
Writes Ben Brody for the GlobalPost:
There are signs on the bases here that instruct soldiers to keep their tourniquets in their right shoulder pocket. Should a soldier need a tourniquet, that is likely to be the only pocket they have left.
The sign explains, “Unfortunately limbs being lost by IEDs are the left arm, and both legs.”
Last week, Brody profiled the medics who save the lives of soldiers who in earlier wars most certainly would have died from their wounds.
“I hate the smell of this helicopter,” said Staff Sgt. Stephon Flynn, a flight medic with Charlie Co., 1/52 Aviation. “When you wash the blood out and you smell all the iron — it gets in your clothes and you smell it while you’re eating.”
Minutes after returning from a Medevac mission and having the blood hosed out of Flynn’s helicopter by the base fire department, another call comes in…
A soldier I remember from the patrol is brought in on a stretcher. He is missing his left foot and his right leg is shattered, his one remaining boot flopped over at a lurid angle. His left arm is gone below the elbow, and he holds the gauze-wrapped stump in the air as the medics slide the stretcher into the roaring helicopter.
On Sunday, Corrine Reilly of the Virginian-Pilot published the first in a series of stories about the NATO hospital “in the heart of Taliban country at Kandahar Airfield, a sprawling, heavily fortified southern NATO base that’s attacked with rockets so routinely that no one bothers to panic anymore when the sirens sound.”
(Ah, Kandahar, the place where Petraeus has insisted we have “arrested the momentum” of the insurgency, though the Mayor, the police chief, the senior cleric and the district’s most influential power broker, President Karzai’s brother, have all been assassinated there within the last month.)
From Reilly:
A few minutes later the soldier is in the operating room. He’s writhing now more than shaking. Through the moans, he’s mumbling three words over and over.
“This is bad. This is bad. This is bad.”
He keeps lifting his head, trying to get a look.
On the end of the bed, the last right boot he ever put on is lying at an angle that’s all wrong, a sweaty foot still inside. The calf above it is a shredded mess of uniform, flesh, dirt and grass. Nothing about it looks real.
Above that there is no discernible knee, just a thin stretch of filthy skin barely hanging onto what’s left of a thigh, which looks a lot like the mangled calf, except for one thing: Among the blood and mud, there is a little white inchworm, scrunching and straightening, slowly making its way across a bit of dying muscle…
A nurse walks in. Next to the boot, she sets down a medical form.
It says the soldier’s name is Eddie Ward.
It says he is 19 years old…
Even staff members who’ve served multiple combat tours say they’ve never seen injuries as devastating — or as numerous — as those they witness here. Nearly three-quarters of their patients come directly from the battlefield, the vast majority of them victims of insurgent-made bombs — what the military calls improvised explosive devices, or IEDs. Their signature wounds are double- and triple- limb amputations with severe injuries to the pelvis and genitals.
Jon Boone, Afghanistan correspondent for the Guardian newspaper, recently broke his leg slipping into a ditch on patrol with American and Afghan soldiers in the Zhari district of Kandahar province. After the Afghan Humvee in which he was being transported crashed in another ditch, America soldiers produced “a stretcher from nowhere” and helped him out of the pit and “over a couple of walls — all in an effort to avoid the improvised explosive devices (IEDs) that could be anywhere,” he wrote on July 25.
Because these homemade bombs have become ever more sophisticated it is now almost impossible to detect them. The insurgents have learned to reduce the amount of metal in the bombs to a minimum, making traditional mine-searching devices — essentially souped-up metal detectors — useless. The only way to avoid IEDs is to take bizarre routes through the lush farmland the Americans and their Afghan colleagues are trying to cleanse of Taliban.
Breaking a leg was “a personal disaster…but my experience pales in comparison to the horrors of what bombs and IEDs do to soldiers almost every day,” Boone continued.
He recalled talking to a medic while he was waiting for the Americans to bring set him off for the hospital in Kabul.
(He) told me about the last casualty he had dealt with a few weeks previously who stepped on an IED. He’d lost both his legs and his genitals. The wounds were so terrible that the medic not only exhausted all his combat gauze — a remarkable material that staunches even the most aggressive pumping of blood — but also the gauze being carried by all the other soldiers in the platoon, as he stuffed the wounded man’s wounds with it.
The man is still alive due to the rapid response. But one wonders at the quality of his life ahead. As David Wood at The Huffington Post reported in May:
In some cases, American military surgeons tell The Huffington Post, these traumatic amputations occur so close to soldiers’ hips that it is difficult to fit prosthetic legs, severely limiting the patients’ future mobility and rehabilitation. In addition, the loss of sexual function for formerly healthy young men in their early 20s causes severe anxiety and depression and can wreck new marriages.
According to the latest figures by the Afghanistan NGO Safety Office (ANSO), insurgent attacks reached an all-time peak of 1,571 this May. Afghan soldiers are clearly taking their own hits. According to Gen. Zahir Azimi of the Afghan Defense Ministry, 109 Afghan troops were killed from June 22 to July 26, “with (the) majority of them in roadside bomb and Improvised Explosive Device (IED) attacks throughout the country,” he told reporters. This was up from a similar period in May where 68 ANA deaths were reported.
According to iCasualties, 65 coalition troops were killed in June and 54 in July. Of them, 80 Americans were killed in that time period. Civilian deaths are also up 15 percent, mostly from roadside and suicide bombings. Last week, the carnage continued, with at least 39 civilians, many of them children under the age of 13 killed by land mines in two separate incidents in southern Afghanistan.
In early July, veteran and military embed Michael Yon wrote about how the enemy is designing explosive devices to elude the coalition’s rudimentary IED detection tools, like the hand-held metal detectors many are using today. The insurgents he said are now using plastic or wood or the carbon rods extricated from regular batteries for explosive triggers.
The enemy sees our people use metal detectors every day. Last time I was with the British, hardly a step was taken without waving the divining rod over the ground. You try to step into the step of the troop in front of you, and there are times when you don’t even take a single step off that hairline, intermittent path unless you are in a firefight. But even on paths that are “cleared,” if only by a metal detector and then only the precise footsteps you are trying to match — which dangerously refocuses your attention — hat is not enough …
The “cleared” path is not cleared. The only part that has been pressure-tested has a boot print as a seal of approval, and that’s only true on ground where you can see a boot print…. Still, the boot print stamp of approval is worth little more than an Afghan promissory note. Oftentimes the first trooper who steps on a trigger does not get blown up. It might be the third or fourth or seventh. Others already have stepped on the trigger but it did not fire. Even that is not the rest of the story. The bomb itself often is not with the trigger. The man who steps on a simple land mine is the man who bears the brunt. But with these IEDs, the trigger might detonate multiple explosives “daisy chained” along the way.
Embed Meg Jones of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel last Friday wrote about the men of Wasau-based 428th Engineer Co., who spend their days IED hunting along the roads outside Forward Operating Base Pasab, 60 kilometers northwest of Kandahar.
The 428th uses unmanned aerial drones to spot anomalies and heat-seeking radar that beams images of what’s underground to computer screens outfitted in a heavily armed tractor called a “Husky.” It leads a convoy of armored vehicles on a 10 to 12-hour daily mission.
Sometimes the troops themselves come up with ways to mitigate the IED threat. In the same platoon, Jones reports, Army Reservist Cpl. Eric DeHart, an engineer by trade, designed a steel contraption that, when welded in a certain way, could be shoved inside any size culvert, denying what has become a convenient spot for planting IEDs. The device seemed to work, so DeHart’s engineering plans were sent to other units in southern Afghanistan.
This is impressive, seeing that the Pentagon has already spent $21 billion through its Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO) to mitigate the threat of IEDs, and couldn’t do any better than the ingenuity of one soldier.
Calling it “the Manhattan Project that bombed,” iWatch News/McClatchy Newspapers said in a sweeping exposé last March that JIEDDO “has not found a high-tech way to detect or defeat these so-called [IEDs] from a safe distance. In fact, the rate at which soldiers are able to find IEDs before they explode has remained mostly steady, at roughly 50 percent, since JIEDDO was formed (in 2006).”
Despite the news investigation, which found JIEDDO to be a “secretive agency” that “has violated its own accounting rules, failed to harness data on what works, and has often seemed to loathe to discuss to Congress just how all that money was spent,” not to mention the official audits that found JIEDDO’s programs mismanaged, poorly chosen and redundant, the House just approved another $2.7 billion for JIEDDO’s FY2012 budget. That’s $5 million more than it got in 2011, according to Corbin Hiar at iWatch News in July.
Sadly, Hiar reports, despite all of the red flags, no elected official wants to be seen cutting funds for IED prevention. So they give JIEDDO what they ask for, and then some.
That is the perversity of Washington for you — where politics are more important than people. While we expect our soldiers and their families to be brave in the face of the unknown, we condone a culture inhabited by pusillanimous politicians who put those same soldiers’ lives at risk in order to avoid casting a brave vote against yet another budgetary sacred cow. Why not take a few of these so-called “leaders” on a new sort of CODEL, one that forces them to spend a few days, not just a few minutes, with a Medevac unit, or requires them to stuff tourniquets in their flak jackets before heading on a real convoy, like this one, recalled by Stars and Stripes writer Neil Shea:
A line of 20 trucks sat grumbling in the darkness, loaded down with dismantled pieces of an American combat outpost and stopped in their tracks by a roadside bomb. It was after 2 a.m.
The trucks had been waiting for hours as bomb techs traveled to the site, not far from a police checkpoint that had been attacked a short while earlier.
They were easy targets. Harder to resist the longer they sat still.
None of the options seemed good. When the explosive ordnance disposal team arrived it looked into a culvert running beneath the road and found two jugs and a propane tank — 75 to 100 pounds of homemade explosive, plus whatever was in the tank. The bomb techs wanted to blow it in place.
The resulting crater would most likely wreck northern Wardak province’s second most important road, possibly disrupting traffic for weeks, and stranding the trucks with their cargo.
It seemed that EOD, with the best intentions, was about to sow the Taliban’s chaos for them. What other options were there?
In this story of the convoy we recognize more than a nighttime logistical dilemma but a metaphor for our present standing in the war: plain stuck. After nearly 10 years of fighting the insurgency in Afghanistan, Western occupying forces — which number some 132,000 and include the most expensive, most advanced weapons and medical and surveillance equipment on earth — cannot seem to get to the goal line, no matter how much it has been moved around to accommodate our lowered expectations.
In fact, seeing these refreshingly candid, but altogether bleak and disturbing IED stories only confirms that are losing ground, farther away from “winning” than ever.
So why the proliferation of reports now, especially when the military has been so good at filtering bad news in the past?
Some suggest that the Pentagon is using the spike in IED violence to once again invoke anti-Iranian paranoia by accusing the government in Tehran of transferring IEDs to the insurgency (see remarks by Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in July).
More likely, the ability of the military to maintain the smoke screen amid the carnage of its ranks has reached saturation. Confidence in the war has plummeted on both sides of the civilian-military divide. Perhaps commanders no longer see the sanctity of the “progress” meme as important as letting the world know how hard their men and women are working to save people’s lives in the face of diminishing odds.
With Petraeus gone, and a withdrawal plan beginning, albeit slowly, we may be seeing the first planks of the Potemkin edifice being torn down in earnest. As a public long starving for the truth, we should welcome it.
Read more by Kelley B. Vlahos
- Veterans for Ron Paul – February 20th, 2012
- CPAC Devolving on Defense – February 13th, 2012
- Slowly, Toxic Vets Get Recognition – February 6th, 2012
- Meet John Kiriakou – January 30th, 2012
- Jack Murtha and the Ghosts of Haditha – January 23rd, 2012








skulz fontaine
August 1st, 2011 at 9:57 pm
Well said Ms. Kelley. I take away this, " pusillanimous politicians ." Who by all rights, should be on the lines with the boots. Jeez, how might Sen. Joe Lieberman hold up with his balls blown off?
John_Muhammad
August 2nd, 2011 at 3:03 am
I wasn't aware Lieberman had any to begin with, except for the ones he sticks on with velcro when he's shilling for Israel.
John_Muhammad
August 2nd, 2011 at 3:17 am
Sadly, I fear we have yet to see even a fraction of the war's horror up close and personal- one day, all those men and women will be coming home and once they hit the streets you can bet their stories are not going to match up with what we've been told all these years. We have yet to come to grips with part of a generation that is the end of the line for their families; the men and women with pelvic and/or genital injuries that will prevent them from ever procreating will rise. Not to mention the social and emotional issues we still face with so many young men and women who are now denied a healthy sex life, or even anything approaching a normal physical relationship. In our culture of near-worship of the 'most beautiful' or the 'most handsome' and the endless parade of perfectly toned and tanned bodies in print and television and movies…. where do the horribly disfigured amputees fit in?
These wars will end one day, insha'Allah they will end soon. Soldiers on both sides will eventually return home and in the end it is they who will have to pick up the pieces of disrupted and shattered lives and broken bodies and try to make sense of it all. For our enemy's part, they may see their wounds as badges of honor won defending their homes and people- for our soldiers, though, I fear the questions won't be so simple and will boil down to thousands of young men and women looking in the mirror at what used to be whole bodies and asking themselves- and us- if our national arrogance was worth it.
Ginger
August 2nd, 2011 at 3:48 am
Fantastic article Kelley. No wonder Al Qaeda wants us to stay in Afghanistan as much or more than our Hawks. They're accomplishing their (Al Qaeda's) objective from the 911 attack, which was to draw us into their battle space where they would bankrupt us in a protracted war of a "thousand cuts." I don't know what our Hawk'sobjectives are in keeping us there (as well as in Iraq, Libya, and ?) but they certainly seem, constructively at least, to be treasonous, when these soldiers are looked at and the harm to our economy is considered.
liveload
August 2nd, 2011 at 4:51 am
Those soldiers volunteered. They asked to be part of an organization which dons costumes and commits mass murder. They made their choice. They have to live, such as it is, with the consequences. Don't want to be a fleshy vegetable that can't even masturbate anymore? Don't walk into that MEPS.
Phil Giraldi
August 2nd, 2011 at 6:08 am
Sure the soldiers volunteered liveload, but as Kipling put it, donning the Queen's uniform was "starvation cheap." Many of today's soldiers can't find jobs in the civilian economy. Which is not to completely excuse the choice they have made, but for some it was the only option they had to find work. Pols in Washington have shaped an economy that revolves around war and it is the common folk who find themselves thrown into the grinder.
MvGuy
August 2nd, 2011 at 6:27 am
"He’d lost both his legs and his genitals." isn't much good for recruiting… But the young are optimistic and unfortunately the carnage will roll on and on… Kelly sure knows how to sniff out a story so good that the main stream media won't even consider… But WHO would want to keep this awful drama going… where: "They asked to be part of an organization which dons costumes and commits mass murder." Ahhh… but thats the rub…. It is all dressed up as patriotic and a high calling…. "Be the best you can be" When in reality, it is people being the WORST they and all their horrific weapons can be as we learned when "they" were busted at Mai lai… invading other peoples lands and killing them for their resources, all based on lies and fabrications…. Bay of Tonkin…911!!
liveload
August 2nd, 2011 at 6:32 am
Indeed Phil, Thanks for pointing that out. I agree 100% and I have two close immediate family members in the military. I've made the point about the war economy issue on a number of occasions here. It's the next bubble in my opinion: The Security Bubble.
Watson
August 2nd, 2011 at 7:14 am
I have also read that many joined the military to get healthcare for their families which they otherwise couldn't afford.
Hacklheber
August 2nd, 2011 at 7:53 am
"There are signs on the bases here that instruct soldiers to keep their tourniquets in their right shoulder pocket. Should a soldier need a tourniquet, that is likely to be the only pocket they have left."
… but how is he gonna use it?
Jim Bovard
August 2nd, 2011 at 8:04 am
Excellent piece!
Thanks for all your hard work, Kelley!
Ira7Epstein
August 2nd, 2011 at 8:20 am
Your article proves the point that the best way to support the troops is to end the wars. Not only in Afghanistan and Iraq, but also in all the other assorted third world hellholes that the evil empire has corrupted and bloodied by its presence. It is very simple. The lives of young soldiers cannot be mangled by horrible IED injuries if there are no young soldiers in Afghanistan. SUPPORT THE TROOPS BY BRINGING THEM HOME!!!!!!!!
Lewis
August 2nd, 2011 at 8:50 am
I say we should just leave and see what happens. Write the whole region off. It's just a landlocked hole in the wall. It wouldn't take long for the locals to start fighting each other. It's hard to fight a war without a frontline.
NOMOREWARFORISRAEL
August 2nd, 2011 at 10:31 am
Keep in mind that US support for Israel (see page 147 of the 9/11 Commission Report) was the primary motivation for 9/11 (and the earlier attack on the World Trade Center in 1993 as one just has to look up ‘Israel as a terrorist’s motivation’ in the index of James Bamford’s ‘A Pretext for War’ book as well) and 9/11 was the motivation for going into the Afghan quagmire to begin with as even General Petraeus conveyed to Congress that US support for Israel is a threat to US troops (see http://tinyurl.com/petraeusinnewstatesman, http://tinyurl.com/israeland911, and http://tinyurl.com/911motivation, http://tinyurl.com/motivation911 and http://tinyurl.com/subserviencetoIsrael too):
Iraq/Afghan wars and UK/US support for Israel motivation for London ’7/7′ bomber:
http://tinyurl.com/IraqAfghanIsraelterrormotive
NOMOREWARFORISRAEL
August 2nd, 2011 at 10:34 am
For some reason some of the tinyurl links (included with the following URL as well) above aren't going through:
Truth Emerges on Afghan quagmire:
http://america-hijacked.com/2011/08/02/truth-emer…
http://tinyurl.com/truthemergesonafghanquagmire
ML3
August 2nd, 2011 at 1:24 pm
War is Hell – and as a youngster I read all about Vietnam and was certain our leaders were smart enough not to make that mistake again. Obviously, WRONG.
That being said – who here would support atrocities such as these committed in and against 3rd World countries were it done by the Russians, Germans, Chinese, etc?
Is it because it's our own doing the plundering and killing that we feel sadness and sympathy for them?
A killer is a killer, no matter what state's uniform he puts on. And if most people weren't so devoid of morality, empathy and honesty – and full of indifference – these cursed wars would not last so many years with so many pointless death all around. I think of those dead children in Afghanistan and Iraq, their crime nothing more than being born, and it makes me sick.
SHAME AMERICA, SHAME
fedupandsick
August 2nd, 2011 at 1:59 pm
So where does one draw the line? Why not get a job with the mob and make as much as our private contractors? I don't know, I'd have to live in my car first.
Aarky
August 2nd, 2011 at 3:00 pm
The techniques for making IED's with almost no metal was also developed in Viet Nam by the Viet Cong. The wild charges that Iran is helping build these IED's is ridiculous. Petraeous was one of the compliant sychophants who was making the same charges about roadside bombs in Iraq. At the same time the Iraqis were finding bomb making shops all over Iraq and the devices were easily made from plans that were available at Global Security .org
These type of weapons are a real morale buster! In the Infantry, you always presume it's going to be the other man who gets hit. When enough men get hit in your platoon, you start to understand that it could be you next.
Aarky
August 2nd, 2011 at 3:04 pm
They probably still have the soldiers paint their names inside the tops of their boots and on their belts, along with the dogtags. I was a little naive in basic training and asked an old time Sergeant why we painted our names inside our boots? You have already figured out the answer.
Jaime
August 2nd, 2011 at 3:27 pm
That may be true, but it's also true that the military is a religion in the US and it has been so for many years. This is not a new phenomenon. You may feel compassion for your soldiers, but at least tehy had a choice. Those innocent in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. haven't had any. Moreover, these "poor" guys sport, in most cases, a brutal and callous view of their victims. If there is such a thing as Divine punishment, then…
MvGuy
August 2nd, 2011 at 8:29 pm
Shame on me, shame on us all, shame on Obama, Shame on Congress…
FLgeezer
August 3rd, 2011 at 8:51 am
I've long believed that GWB's inner circle of neocons persuaded America to attack Iraq so as to permanently quarter our gallant military in Israel's backyard. They were (and are) traitors to our formerly great and prosperous republic.
musings
August 3rd, 2011 at 11:14 am
You really think those dirtbags did 911, don't you.
musings
August 3rd, 2011 at 11:18 am
I don't know why you got negatives (I took one off). We don't have to love the Afghans and Iraqis to leave their stinking hellholes. We just have to go.
musings
August 3rd, 2011 at 11:22 am
If you believe that is who took down three buildings, and barely slid into the Pentagon and created all the miraculous sights of the day, well go ahead. Maybe it amounts to the same thing, maybe not. I figure we are about to be destroyed economically too, and the rats will desert the sinking ship for China, which will then probably succumb to bubonic plague. Whatever. Blood under the bridge. I've heard people touting China as the 21st century equivalent of New York in the 20th and London in the 19th. But that would be oddly naive for opportunists. May it come back to bite them.
musings
August 3rd, 2011 at 11:24 am
Maybe they didn't "make that mistake" and they wanted the war. Maybe people are expendable and sentiment means nothing them. Maybe they play the great game without human sympathy or the desire to better anyone but themselves. Maybe it is not about us, but about what is best for them. Did you ever think about that? They are sociopaths, is my working theory
howardtlewisiii
August 6th, 2011 at 9:23 pm
Al Qaida did not do 9-11. Ignorance is never a survival skill and leads to mistakes. That is the lesson every cop and soldier faces when they wake up.
howardtlewisiii
August 6th, 2011 at 9:36 pm
Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was based on an 'incident' that never occured. I read through the senate hearings in their entirety. The warhawks wanted to start bombing aggressively in North Vietnam and Laos, so they moved a destroyer to with in io miles of Haiphong harbor and pumped a few rounds toward the town. N. Vietnam sent out a patrol boat that fired 2 torpedos way out in front of the destroyer to warn against further encroachment. On orders, the ship's commander rqdioed in that an attack was in progress , which led to the congressional Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. There was no danger to the destroyer or its crew. During the cruise back to their South Vietnamese port, they engaged in battle to scar-up their boat as evidence of hostilities.
With regards to 9-11. Inside job, dude. I have been like stink on a skunk with this for over ten years and known for 42 years about the preset demolition system that was rewired to go off after later placed nanothermate was ignited. There will be peace.
howardtlewisiii
August 6th, 2011 at 9:41 pm
War is hell.
Guest
December 31st, 2011 at 5:07 pm
If they are going to use C4 or Semtex, instead of NH4NO3, in plastic bag with magnetic detonator with 0.2 sec. delay, then the explosion will be 8 times stronger, will happen under the occupants compartment, will be hard to detect, and the name will be changed from IED, to Antitank Mine, very well known since WWII. Till now we are fighting against amateurs, or the real adversaries are not supplying materials to insurgency, because they are buying more time.