Killing America’s Kids
The Web is covered in stink today because of a reporter for the Associated Press, Julie Jacobson, who photographed the death of a Marine whose legs had just been blown off. The kid was Joshua Bernard, a lance corporal of 21 years. When the photo appeared, Robert Gates, the secretary of defense [sic] furiously tried to get the AP to quash the photo. It didn’t, to its everlasting credit. To quote one of many accounts on the Web:
"Gates followed up with a scathing letter to Curley [of AP] yesterday afternoon. The letter says Gates cannot imagine the pain Bernard’s family is feeling right now, and that Curley’s ‘lack of compassion and common sense in choosing to put out this image of their maimed and stricken child on the front page of multiple newspapers is appalling. The issue here is not law, policy, or constitutional right – but judgment and common decency.’"
I thought a long time before writing about this matter and was not pleasant to be around. The photo resonated with me, as we say. You see, long ago, in another pointless war, promoted by another conscienceless secretary, I too was a Marine lance corporal of 21 years. I too got shot, though not nearly as badly as this kid, and spent a year at Bethesda Naval Hospital. At this point I am legally blind following my (I think) 13th trip to eye surgery as a result of an identical foreign policy.
Big f*cking deal. Sh*t happens. At this point I’m comfortable and doing fine. Don’t cry for me, Argentina. The other kid is dead.
But that bothers me. And all of this perhaps gives me a certain insight into the matter that not all reporters have, nor all editors. It also makes me poisonously, bottle-throwing angry to think about another chilly professional bureaucrat, the Second Coming of McNamara, with less combat experience than Tinkerbell, sending kids to croak in weird places having nothing to do with the U.S.
But Gates. The words "decency" and "unconscionable" coming from him are fetid with hypocrisy. Gates was director of the CIA. "Intelligence" agencies are moral dirt, hated the world over for torture, murder, and destabilization of countries leading to hundreds of thousands of deaths. The KGB, Mossad, CIA, Stasi, SAVAK – they’re all the same. A man who presides over torture and murder should not speak of decency. He has none.
Nor is it easy to believe that Gates feels the slightest sympathy for the dead kid or for his family. If you don’t want kids to die in Afghanistan, don’t send them there. He does. How sorry can he be?
It could almost make you turn against the war. Some 6,000 American kids have died like this, the photographs carefully hidden by the press. The Pentagon has killed many, many more Afghan and Iraqi civilians, and the number of permanently disabled Americans is far higher. Today I find a column on Antiwar.com by Joe Galloway, whom I remember from UPI Saigon, entitled "Afghanistan Isn’t Worth One More American Life." I agree. Nor another Afghan life. They did nothing. Another headline notes that the Kondor Legion, the USAF, killed 95 Afghans in another witless air strike. These days, we are the Nazis.
Why then is he so angry at having the war photographed? Easy: Spin control. Spin is so very important in war these days. While America is only barely a democracy, still, if the public, the great sleeping, acquiescent, ignorant beast, ever gets really upset, the war ends. The Pentagon is acutely aware of this. It remembers its disaster in Asia. The generals of today learned nothing military from Vietnam – they are fighting the same kind of war as stupidly as before – but they learned something more important: their most dangerous enemy is the America public. You. Me. Defeating the Taliban isn’t particularly important, or even desirable. (No war means fewer promotions and fewer contracts). But while the Taliban cannot possibly defeat the Pentagon, the American public can.
Photographs are death to a war, boys and girls. They can asphyxiate a war faster than roadside bombs can even dream. Gates does not want the sprawling, somnolent, inattentive beast, the public, to see what his wars really are.
In wars, there are many enlightening things to see. For example, the Marine with a third of his face and half a lung, going ku-kuk-kuk as red gunk rolls out of his mouth and he drowns in his blood. Ruined or dying teenagers whimpering the trinity of the badly wounded: mother, wife, and water. The brain-shot guy jerking like an epileptic as he tries not to die. Ever see brain tissue from gunshot? I have. It makes a pink spew across the ground. Like strawberry chiffon.
Gates does not want you to see this. You would puke, buy a bottle of bourbon, and take to the streets. He knows it. CBS could end these wars in a week if it aired what really happens. Gates cannot afford to let the dam break. PR is all. Thus Bush forbade the photographing of coffins coming home, and the CIA ferociously resists the publication of photographs of torture. Professional sadists do things to people that would make you gag.
Then there are the enlisted men. In these hobbyist wars, and to an extent even in peacetime, it is crucial to keep the enlisteds from thinking. In some three decades of covering the military, I saw this constantly. If I went to Afghanistan today as a correspondent, I could argue in private about the war with the colonel. If I suggested to the troops that they were being suckered, the colonel would go crazy. Next to keeping the public quiescent, keeping the troops (and potential recruits) bamboozled is vital. If a high-school kid saw what awaited, if he saw the cartilage glistening in wrecked joints, he wouldn’t sign.
Do I think that the press should publish such photos? Not yes but hell yes on afterburner. Every time an editor covers for the Pentagon, every time papers refuse to show the charred bodies still… slowly… moving, the dead children, the… never mind. The effect is to ensure that more kids will die the same way. And the press almost always does exactly this. We are a trade of whores and shills. Except that whores give value for money. The press kills our children.
Julie Jacobson sounds like that modern-day rarity, a reporter, as distinguished from a volunteer flack. Bless her. I used to wonder whether women could hack it as combat correspondents. I no longer do. (There are lots of them.) I used to refer to smarmy, over-groomed, bloodthirsty office warts as p*ssies, saying that they lacked balls. The anatomical reference no longer works. I note that Jacobson has more combat time than the aggregate for Bush II, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Obama, Biden, Gonzales, Clinton, Perle, Abrams, Kristol, Feith, Podhoretz, Krauthammer, George Will, Dershowitz, and Gates. These men, if the word is appropriate, killed that kid. Jacobson just caught them in the act.





Tweets that mention Killing America’s Kids by Fred Reed -- Antiwar.com -- Topsy.com
September 7th, 2009 at 9:55 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Grey Champion. Grey Champion said: NewStream ©: Killing America’s Kids http://bit.ly/2uNtmZ [...]
Pattonpaws
September 8th, 2009 at 11:04 am
Fred Reed is a wonderful, poignant writer. But most thinking Americans, those with conscience, live exceedingly private lives, giving over the ruling of our society from Generals to local Sheriff, from President to Alderman, to idiots and mindless jerks.
Henry_Clemens
September 8th, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Fred Reed stated; “Bush II, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Obama, Biden, Gonzales, Clinton, Perle, Abrams, Kristol, Feith, Podhoretz, Krauthammer, George Will, Dershowitz, and Gates. These men, if the word is appropriate, killed that kid. Jacobson just caught them in the act.”
Did you ever wonder what kind of people will compose the population of Hell? The above list is off to a roaring good start. Fred Reed may be “legally blind” but he sees through the bullshit of our offensive, immoral and unjustified wars with the clarity of a highly concentrated laser beam.
End the damned wars now!
September 8, 2009 « Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?
September 8th, 2009 at 10:05 am
[...] http://original.antiwar.com/reed/2009/09/07/killing-americas-kids/ [...]
JeffHuber
September 8th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
That dimwit bureaucratic twit Gates deserves a room in the MacNamara Suite of the LBJ Hilton in hell.
john_manyjars
September 9th, 2009 at 12:32 am
Damn straight…amazing, how our 'liberal' media could end this practically overnight…I guess they know where their meal tickets come from.
chuckwalla
September 9th, 2009 at 2:29 am
Hot damn, Fred Reed. You got it right, bro. Totally right. This is the stuff people need to see. Shit, Americans are already treated like children, yet their own kids are sucked into very grown-up horror like this. This makes me crazy emotional. It should be spread around. Time to knock off the intellectual distancing and get pissed off. These dismal wars with no purpose must end. You referred to Vietnam as the one you were in, right? I'm assuming. I was there. U.S. Army, Infantry. Quang Tri Province.
MacBica
September 9th, 2009 at 3:13 am
This is truly a dilemma. The Right thoughtlessly and callously exploits our young people convincing them that there is some greater good worth fighting and dying for. Once dead, we on the left favor thoughtlessly and callously exploiting our young people and the grief of their families for some greater good – a hope that when the public learns from these photos how awful war is and that people die in war, the public will come to their senses and rally enthusiastically to pressure Obama and our elected officials to end this insanity once and for all.
I certainly understand the reasoning but this argument concerns me for a couple of reasons. First, the practical consideration. Such photos are gruesome and depressing and unless we are going to institute some “Clockwork Orange forced viewing" scenario, most of the “public” will avoid looking at them and pretend they do not exist. Secondly, and most importantly, the moral consideration. To me exploitation is exploitation and the disregard/disrespect for the dignity of a human being – the dead soldier and his loved ones (the means) – is repugnant and unacceptable regardless of the ends to be achieved.
Mark Horne » Blog Archive » Killing America’s Kids by Fred Reed
September 9th, 2009 at 6:31 am
[...] Read the rest. Share and Enjoy: [...]
Henry_Clemens
September 10th, 2009 at 12:07 am
Two points: 1) The government does not a right to censor the news and that includes photographs. The Constitution guaranteed freedom of the press so that the American people would be informed citizens and thus able to make informed decisions on all the actions taken by the their government. 2) I grew up looking at mangled bodies of U.S. soldiers in Vietnam in the 60's and 70's on all the major networks. That, more than anything else, finally turned the American people against the war and the war finally ended, thus potentially saving the lives of yet thousands of more GI's who would have died if the war had gone on.
By allowing the government to censor the news, we allow them to get away with the murder of thousands of American GI's and hundred of thousands of innocent foreign civilians. It is time for the American people to face the truth but they cannot do that when the government controls the press.
McChrystal’s Conundrum « In These New Times
September 24th, 2009 at 3:52 am
[...] Afghan government – the government our troops are fighting and dying to protect – is described by McChrystal as riddled with corruption and “malign.” This [...]