The UN May Have Silenced the Afghan Public
“Today, Afghanistan and the U.S. initialed and locked the text of the strategic partnership agreement,” said President Hamid Karzai’s spokesman, Aimal Faizi. “This means the text is closed….”
Why “lock” or “close” the future of Afghanistan to 30 million ordinary Afghan citizens?
While the world may accept that the U.S. and Afghan governments have some “state” or “noble” considerations for not revealing the contents of the U.S. Afghan Strategic Partnership Agreement, what about the democratic consideration of involving Afghans in their own future?
Even the Afghan parliament was in the dark and uninvolved until it was recently given a peek when Afghanistan’s national security adviser, Rangin Dadfar Spanta, read “portions” of the Agreement to assembled parliamentarians on April 23, saying that the U.S. will defend Afghanistan from any outside interference via “diplomatic means, political means, economic means, and even military means.”
The U.S. has said it expects to keep about 20,000 troops in the country after 2014.
What is the Afghan public’s opinion regarding the U.S. Afghan Strategic Partnership Agreement?
Does anyone know?
In an article dated July 11, 2011, Iman Hasan of The News wrote:
[T]he Afghan public has outright rejected the U.S. plans as the results of a survey conducted by U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) suggest. UNAMA with its 23 offices in Afghanistan conducted the survey across the country some two months back and hasn’t published it. Although, the survey’s findings are widely known. If published, the stark survey results will undermine the U.S.’ future strategic plans.
Out of curiosity, the Afghan Peace Volunteers pursued the question of whether the U.N. had actually conducted such a survey.
We sent emails to friends with the Fellowship of Reconciliation U.S.A. who have correspondence and contact with the U.N. Below was the reply that was forwarded to us.
April 14, 2012
Dear XXX,
I sent an email inquiry to the U.N. coordinator in Afghanistan to ask about the survey.
As I suspected, I did not receive any response. It seems they are not willing to talk about it.
But I will keep watching for any future publications.
Best,
XXX
We also asked a staff member at McClatchy newspapers in Kabul if he could ask some questions at the U.N. office in Kabul. We have not heard any news from the McClatchy staff.
So we still don’t know if there was ever such a survey conducted by the U.N. office in Kabul.
We feel that even if there was no such survey, then a survey should be conducted under the auspices of the U.N. and its results made known before the signing of the agreement, to rebuild trust in the U.N., the U.S., and Afghan governments’ democratic processes.
The contents of the U.S. Afghanistan Strategic Partnership Agreement should be “unlocked” to the American and Afghan publics, and the survey should be conducted among Afghans in every province, particularly in the provinces where the joint military operations of the Strategic Partnership Agreement will continue to be launched beyond 2014.
Has the U.N. silenced the Afghan public?
But perhaps, participation in today’s democracy is designed to be “locked” away.
We, the Afghan Peace Volunteers, respectfully ask for the key.
Read more by Kathy Kelly
- Tales in a Kabul Restaurant – May 21st, 2013
- Afghan Peace Activist: Drones Bury Beautiful Lives – January 13th, 2013
- No One Hears the Poor – May 28th, 2012
- For You, a Thousand Times Over – April 17th, 2012
- The Ghost and the Machine – February 29th, 2012





redwood
April 29th, 2012 at 9:25 pm
The Afghan people should have a say in how things are run in their country. They should vote to have NATO troops leave their country.
MoT
April 29th, 2012 at 9:40 pm
A survey of the slaves? Pray tell what are they to say? "Oh, dear. We're as happy as can be serving our corporatist overlords!"
tomofsnj
April 30th, 2012 at 4:53 am
They will. They still have the arms of many generations. The 20,000 NATO troops will be confined to the major villages/towns. This is the same as Iraq were the US has one major building and a few military post. Very Seldom to the people of that building or military post leave and go into the country.
This is a type of claimed victory but really is a defeat. The same morons want to repeat the Iraq fiasco in Iran. We should require those that push war actually service or their children serve in conflict that they feel is so important. I read someplace that Israel will not accept dual citizenship in several government/military position. That is a little bit of light when even the creeps who created the idea of dual citizens admit that they do not trust them either.
The UN May Have Silenced the Afghan Public by Kathy Kelly — Antiwar.com | My Marketing File
April 30th, 2012 at 5:20 am
[...] The UN May Have Silenced the Afghan Public by Kathy Kelly — Antiwar.com. News:US, Afghanistan Agree to Draft of ’2024′ Deal — News from Antiwar.com After nearly [...]
The UN may have silenced the Afghan public |
May 1st, 2012 at 4:28 am
[...] http://original.antiwar.com/kathy-kelly/2012/04/29/the-un-may-have-silenced-the-afghan-public/ [...]