By the time you read this, I’ll be somewhere between Danbury, Connecticut, and Boston, probably on an Amtrak train wondering if I’ve missed my stop. I’m not a good traveler, as you might imagine: like all writers, I much prefer being in my study, researching my next project, or perhaps hanging out in my garden in relatively sunny California, rather than braving the icy New England winds.
It’s the Antiwar.com
Autumn Winter Tour, and I’m on the road, so this isn’t
really a column, but then again – it is. Because the subject is just
as important as the topics I normally cover in this space: the survival
of this web site.
Yes, I know, we’ve been through this before: it’s another fundraising campaign, right? Wrong. It’s not just another fundraising campaign – it’s the first one since we lost a big chunk of our budget, as explained in the Special Splash Page. I don’t think I’ve ever been this panicked about the future of Antiwar.com – and, frankly, I’ll be really surprised if we make it this time.
Then again, I’m surprised each time we make it. I’m always surprised by the generosity of our readers and supporters, and I’m humbled by it. We can’t run this web site without support from you, our readers. I’m always pessimistic in the short term, but optimistic in the long term, that the battle for a more peaceful world can be won. My chief concern, at the moment, however, is that I hope Antiwar.com can survive in the short term.
Well, I’m out on the road, taking the non-interventionist message from one end of the continent to the other: this is just the beginning, I hope, of a new activist orientation here at Antiwar.com, which I hope I can elaborate on in future columns. Suffice to say here that there is, in the background, a lot of activity going on, with new plans for a broad left-right antiwar coalition, a national conference of both left and right antiwar groups, and a new national anti-interventionist organization, and Antiwar.com will be a big part of it – if we make it that far.
Without Antiwar.com, the hopes for an effective, broad, non-ideological coalition against our foreign policy of perpetual war are greatly reduced. So please, give as much as you can as soon as you can. Your contribution is 100 percent tax-deductible – and what more do I need to say? If you must part with your tax dollars, why not give them to a cause you believe in, a cause that is literally a matter of life and death?
Read more by Justin Raimondo
- Edward Snowden vs. the Sovietization of America – June 18th, 2013
- A Note to My Readers – June 16th, 2013
- Datagate and the Death of American Liberalism – June 13th, 2013
- Smear Brigade Goes After Snowden – June 11th, 2013
- Edward Snowden, American Hero – June 9th, 2013





GradyWilson
November 10th, 2010 at 3:44 am
I sincerely question how much a narrow minded ideologue like Justin is truly committed to a "broad, non-ideological coalition" (especially considering his very partisan pro-GOP, anti-left columns this election season and his constant advancing of the talking point that the GOP needs to 'get back' to some fictitious era of non-intervention) but I also realize how weak and fragmented ant-war voices are right now so I'm going to give.
pwi
November 10th, 2010 at 3:58 am
Not to be critical but it always amazes me how much $ is actually needed to run a web site paper. Those that say $ isn't everything have never run a business…any business. $75,000 every quarter and now its up to $100,000 + .
One of the reasons I no longer join clubs or organizations, even ones that I believe in, was the constant request for more $ over and over again, didn't matter if it was the NRA or the Sierra Club. Money, money, money – is it a wonder why it dominates politics?
As always good luck on the $ drive. I will be planning on giving my little bit, as this site has become a part of my day and is entertaining to say the least.
Stefan Reich
November 10th, 2010 at 4:51 am
@GradyWilson: I don't think Justin Raimondo is narrow-minded. However, I also find his self-proclaimed connection to the GOP quite strange. The GOP is, after all, a party of war.
"Conservatism" is in itself a kind of war: because what they try to conserve is all negative. Conservatism is very closely related to puritanism which is an unbelievably destructive force.
In fact, war and sexual suppression are extremely related. You could say that they are the same thing.
As a closing note, I'd like to repeat my suggestion to Justin Raimondo for the third time:
Justin, you should leave the US.
Maybe the fundraiser will actually fail and that will be another strong hint that your presence in the US is no longer viable.
You should go into exile.
It's ok to do that. Peace workers do that these days. I actually also did it this year, on a slightly smaller scale.
You already moved out of the big city a while ago if I understood that correctly. I think that was a first step in the right direction. Now, take the next step.
You can continue to be a force for peace in another place – in fact, I believe, much more so than in the US. Follow God's voice.
liberal
November 10th, 2010 at 4:57 am
Liberal/left Democrat here.
Justin is pretty committed, because if he wasn't he wouldn't publish liberal/left voices. It's as simple as that.
Justin Raimondo
November 10th, 2010 at 6:32 am
Thanks Grady — we at antiwar.com really appreciate it.
liberal
November 10th, 2010 at 6:34 am
"Justin, you should leave the US. "
Leaving is for wimps. Better thing to do is stay and fight.
"You can continue to be a force for peace in another place – in fact, I believe, much more so than in the US."
That's crazy. The US is currently a major threat to world peace. What better place to be, to fight the good fight?
emsnews
November 10th, 2010 at 7:06 am
Justin, what I see is you traveling about, destroying any attempt at left/right unity against wars. Don't kid yourself: you are just like the Stalinists and Maoist student radicals who wrecked most peace efforts on the part of pacifists in the sixties and seventies. I had to deal with these sorts more than once back then!
If you truly and honestly want money for organizing against the war, you should prove this by making an effort to overcome your own ideological tendencies and concentrate on only what unites us, not attacking leftists who, UNLIKE YOUR SIDE, actually has created mass demonstrations and taken pro-active moves to stop the Pentagon and Congress!
bozh
November 10th, 2010 at 9:04 am
before i donate money to this site or any other, our conditions must be met:
no post is deleted, save the ones that dwell on a person's shortcomings. a warning first wld be ok
a piece must at least postulate one [non] solution and the First Cause.
pieces must contain descriptives statements; which solely can be evaluated as true or false; no other statements can be evaluated as true or false
tnx
bozh
November 10th, 2010 at 9:09 am
i do not know how this site is antiwar, when it approbates four serb aggressions in 90s. tnx
Angela Keaton
November 10th, 2010 at 11:45 am
bozh,
Please provide links to the support for "serb aggressions." We await your further posts with anticipation and delight.
bozh
November 10th, 2010 at 1:31 pm
by late '90 yugoslav army had been much or entirelly serb and commanded by a serb, kadijevic, who after puling troops from slovenia, bragged: we withdrew not because we were weak but because we r strong.
the aggression lasted a week. croatia was next to be attacked and then bosnia in '91. the serb victory had been quick; obtaining ab. 70% of bosnia.
serbs have also slaughtered ab. 6-8 k bosniaks after fall of srebrenica. even, chomsky, and no small mater for a 'jew' to admit, eventually [ ? 06 ] regretted having not protested that massacre.
Of course, these appear as historical facts and as such they do not represent scientific knowledge. we can entirely disregard them, but not the fact that no land even threatened to invade serbia let alone took a military venture against it.
Yugoslav communists lead by tito have granted kosovo an autonomy; later unilaterally, abrogated by serbs; thus, representing a casus belli. and the abrogation led to a police state there.
as i have said before, illyrians settled in the balkans ca 2.5 yrs. slavs arrived there in 7th c. ad.
common sense suggests that it was no more empty than palestina. croats managed to croatianize totally nonslavic people of regions along the adriatic controled by byzantium and the regions on which croats settled
serbs did so only partially, it seems.
this shatters the myth of me being purely croat'n or any serb being purely serb. but chetniks and ustashe do not want the myth to go away.
tnx
bozh
November 10th, 2010 at 3:27 pm
i see my answer to angela had not yet appeared. if the site wants me out of here i'l gladly leave it.
as for links that slovenia, et al attacked serbia, why don't u provide them.
so, prowar people now control also justin column.
and u want my money, too.
bozh
November 10th, 2010 at 3:30 pm
however, angela wld never tell me to leave prowar. precisely because she's pro-serb crimes and wars.
u think u can fool me? not for a second!!!
Johnny in Wi.
November 10th, 2010 at 4:56 pm
The truth is the truth. There is long history of non-intervention leaders in The Republican Party. It goes from the leftwing, progressive Republicans Robert M. La Follette Sr. and George Norris to the rightwing Robert Taft, Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan. Grady why don't you read a little history.
Stefan Reich
November 10th, 2010 at 7:08 pm
"Better thing to do is stay and fight."
Well, it depends on whether there is anything substantial to achieve in that place. What if building a anti-war movement is extremely difficult – or even impossible – in the US at this point? Then Justin would try to do that in vain.
Or, as I mentioned, it might even be worse: He might be in real danger. Are you not aware of the recent raids against antiwar activists? The climate is very bad for peace advocates in the US these days. And it seems to worsen with every day that passes.
"The US is currently a major threat to world peace."
Sure is.
"What better place to be, to fight the good fight?"
A place where you can actually achieve something, rather than being marginalized.
Vojkan Milosavljevic
November 11th, 2010 at 12:30 pm
Bozh, you are a very inventive guy. Since you seem aware of the limits of your vocabulary in English, you compensate by inventing new words all the time. Ever contemplated to have an artistic activity, instead of trying to teach people how to run a site they've been running for fifteen years now? Your logic has flaws, but you are a creative guy indeed.