Those behind the bombing in Moscow’s Metro system, which took 39 lives – and shook the building that houses Russia’s Federal Security Bureau (FSB) – must be "scraped from the bottom of the sewers" and exposed, said Vladimir Putin. But what if that particular sewer leads all the way back to Washington and London?
Russia has accused Chechen rebels of planning and carrying out the suicide bombings, but that may be just the beginning of understanding who and what is behind a long line of terrorist attacks that started in the 1990s and continues to the present day. Last September, Russian-backed Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov told Reuters he had good reason to believe the US and Britain were covertly aiding the Chechen rebels: "We are fighting U.S. and British special services in the mountains,” said Kadyrov:
"There was a terrorist named Chitigov, he worked for the CIA. He had U.S. citizenship. He was a brigadier general under Khattab. When we destroyed him – I led the operation then – we found an American driving license on him, and his other documents were American."
Rizvan Chitigov, the number three man in the Chechen insurgency, with the title of minister of defense and military intelligence in the insurgent "government," was killed in a joint Russian-Chechen government operation when he returned to his native district of Shali in 2005. He was known as "the American," because he had lived in the US for years; "the Chemist," because he specialized in the procurement and deployment of poisons (ricin, poisonous gases, etc.), and "Marine," because he is said to have been trained at a Marine camp during his American sojourn. As a young man, he was quite the macho, according to an account in Kommersant, tearing around town in a fire engine and scaring the bejesus out of the villagers, who moved quickly out of his way:
"At the beginning of perestroika the young Shali fireman left for the USA with the help of some international Moslem foundation which had opened its representative office in Chechnya. What Rizvan Chitigov was actually doing during these four years abroad is unknown, but on his return to Shali in 1994 he explained to his compatriots that he had graduated from an elite subversive and reconnaissance school and had signed on to the marine squad. He said that a career in the US Navy had been awaiting him but in the strange land he had met a co-religionist Amir Hattab who had explained to the young Chechen that he should be in Chechnya in the hard times for his motherland, not in the US. So the two set off for Chechnya."
Chitigov rose quickly to become the Chechen terrorists’ third-in-command, almost on the same level as the top commanders Shamil Basayev and Ibn Al-Khattab. Indeed, he seemed to have an independent source of funding, and the reach of his battalions stretched all the way to Russia’s urban centers – Moscow, Samara, Voronezh , and Rostov-on-Don – which were targets of suicide bombers dispatched at his command. In 1999, he was personally involved with the kidnapping and execution of four OSCE personnel. In 2001, Russian security services obtained information that Commander Chitigov had procured "weapons of mass destruction," in this case the deadly poison ricin. This was reportedly the main topic at a meeting of the Chechen terrorist network in the United Arab Emirates, and the plan to deploy the deadly poison against Russian soldiers would have come to fruition if the FSB hadn’t discovered the ricin cache hidden in an underground bunker in the Gudermes region. Thus Chitigov acquired his nom de guerre "Chemist."
This ruthless terrorist met his end when, according to Ria Novosti, Russian security services "intercepted a mobile telephone conversation and established where Chitigov could be hiding after spending the winter in Baku. A three-room flat was checked three times, but nobody was found. But when the security service officers were leaving the flat the fourth time, they heard a noise. It turned out that Chitigov had spent over three days in a small niche in a wall masked by tiles. The terrorist was in a hurry to leave the flat and dropped a tiled panel on the floor." Chitigov was killed in the subsequent gunfight.
Chitigov’s links to the US include reports that, according to the Moscow News, "Chitigov had a green card — a permanent residence permit in the U.S." The Russian government openly accused him of being a CIA agent. Aleksandr Zdanovich, head of Russia’s Federal Security Service directorate for cooperation programs, told "Russia Today":
"Rezvan Chitigov, who I have named and whose photo I have shown you from the computer, lived in the USA for a long time. There are very serious grounds for suspecting him to be a CIA agent. He leads one of the most cruel group of terrorists. He is virtually [Ibn Al] Khattab’s security service head. I would say, in this respect, that he was a very well-trained person. Khattab would not have appointed a person to such a post if had not undergone some kind of professional training."
Trained – by whom, and for what?
While the Russians are no angels, and the puppet "government" they’ve set up in the breakaway province is hardly a paragon of liberal democracy, "President" Kadyrov may have a point when he says:
"The West is interested in separating the Caucasus from Russia. The Caucasus is a strategic frontier of Russia. Taking the Caucasus away from Russia will mean taking half of the country away from Russia. Now they are sending groups of foreigners to us. We are fighting U.S. and British special services in the mountains. Putin united Russia, took it out of chaos, removed Berezovsky, Gusinsky, Khodorkovsky. He took everything away from them. Did they forgive him? Now a new strike is being delivered against Putin, against Russia. Chechnya and Dagestan are weak, vulnerable links of the Russian state."
America’s new cold war with Russia had its origins in the Bush era: the neoconservatives who then controlled US foreign policy had and still have a grudge against Putin’s Russia. When Putin refused to back the US invasion of Iraq, it was Richard Perle, the "dark prince" of the neocons, who called for their expulsion from the G-8. A list of prominent neocons – along with "liberal" window dressing such as Geraldine Ferraro – as long as your arm are featured as endorsers of the "American Committee for Peace in Chechnya," now the American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (ACPC), which has taken up the Chechen cause against Russian "imperialism" with characteristically neoconnish alacrity.
In addition, the British government has sheltered Chechen terrorists, refusing to extradite them to Russia on the grounds that the charges of terrorism are "politically motivated." The Chechens have teamed up with exiled Russian oligarchs, who – when not spending their ill-gotten gains buying up London real estate – have been financing a Chechen terrorist "support" network that extends throughout Europe and reaches into the very heart of the former Soviet Union.
The propaganda network supportive of Chechen terrorism enjoys the complicity of the virulently anti-Russian British media. One of their major successes has been the legitimization of the laughable fantasies of Boris Berezovsky and his paid shills, who have created an entire corpus of literature devoted to the idea that virtually all of the terrorist attacks carried out inside Russia by Islamist terrorists were instead the work of the Russian FSB – a mirror image of the 9/11 "truther" thesis that 9/11 was an "inside job."
Over on this side of the pond, the apologists for Chechen terrorism are far from idle. On the web site of the ACPC we are treated to an Al Jazeera interview with three alleged experts –including from the neoconservative Hudson Institute – two of whom hand out the "blame Russia" line – that the problem is not terrorism but the policies of the Putin administration. If Al Qaeda blew up the New York City subway, one wonders if the Hudson Institute and the ACPC would take the same tack. The ACPC claims Putin is not interested in promoting "moderate" Chechen leaders, and is only intent on crushing the insurgency by force. In promoting this point of view, they also post a "Radio Free Europe" (i.e. US government propaganda) piece headlined: "In Wake of Metro Bombings, Putin’s War on Terror is Under Fire."
The "moderate" Chechen terrorists the Russian government is supposed to "reach out" to are nonexistent in the ranks of the Islamists who target civilians and yearn to establish an Islamic "Emirate" in the northern Caucasus. Whatever moderates there were in the separatist ranks have long since been absorbed into the present Chechen government: Kadyrov is himself a former separatist fighter. Yet "Freedom House," Radio Free Europe, and the neoconservatives who want to destroy Russia are not interested in whatever concessions Putin has made to local sensitivities, nor do they care one whit about the economic rebuilding that has been a major part of the Russian counterinsurgency effort. Certainly the exiled Russian oligarchs, who are buying up British newspapers as well as real estate, couldn’t care less about the fate of the Chechen people. What they want is the complete breakup of the Russian "empire," and its economic and political subordination to the West. If they have to make "martyrs" to "human rights" out of Islamist terrorists, well then that’s what the program calls for.
No one is saying the CIA and MI6 are behind the Metro bombings: what is likely, however, is that both have been deeply involved at some point in encouraging the Chechens and even providing them with some material aid. Certainly the anti-Russian rhetoric that was a staple of the Bush era did much to bolster the Chechen cause – and surely the British government’s policy of welcoming Chechen terrorists, and giving the pro-terrorist Chechen "government in exile" sanctuary, ought to focus attention on Britain’s possible involvement in the insurgency. Just as Putin turned over the task of stabilizing the region to local Chechen authorities, and closed his eyes to the brutality of their counterinsurgency campaign, so the West may very well have had a hand in creating a blunt instrument that subsequently veered out of their direct control.
Osama bin Laden, you’ll recall, was once a US ally, whose jihad in Afghanistan threw the Russians out and gave birth to Al-Qaeda. No doubt there are other such dubious "allies" roaming the earth, monsters from the American Id unleashed on an unsuspecting world. The Western connection to the Chechen insurgency is, perhaps, what needs to be "scraped from the bottom of the sewer," as Putin put it, and exposed.
Read more by Justin Raimondo
- Edward Snowden vs. the Sovietization of America – June 18th, 2013
- A Note to My Readers – June 16th, 2013
- Datagate and the Death of American Liberalism – June 13th, 2013
- Smear Brigade Goes After Snowden – June 11th, 2013
- Edward Snowden, American Hero – June 9th, 2013





Johnny in Wi.
March 31st, 2010 at 4:25 am
If the neocons are involved, who knows what the final agenda is? I remember when they were backing the Islamists in Yugoslavia against the Orthodox Christians. They may be up to the same thing again. Justin does another great piece of work. What would we do without him?
sherban
March 31st, 2010 at 6:26 am
Excellent article,i'm convinced that US,Britain and Israel have an implication in everything is done against Russia,especially when one like as Bibi stated yesterday "we stand by you"addressjng to Russian govern.
Ozymandias
March 31st, 2010 at 8:15 am
Most interesting article Justin – and besides the evidence you bring to bear on the thesis – the logic and rationale make a great deal of sense. Persnipoles spot on too…..but sadly the US has demonstrated conclusively that it is incapable of learning or indeed drawing any conclusions from overwhelming evidence right in front of its eyes about almost anything – doesn't fit with the ideology of righteous manifest destiny!
I guess no chance of this thoughtful piece being picked up by the mainstream media – but I would be interested to hear of any blog reaction from the Russian side of the equation to Justin's comments
Mark
March 31st, 2010 at 11:39 am
Excellent and thought provoking article. Chillingly, the British "media" don't describe the kamikaze attacks on the Moscow metro as terrorism. The BBC is particularly culpable. It is to Britain's eternal shame that Berezovsky and the rest are allowed leave to remain.
jojo
March 31st, 2010 at 11:55 am
Bravo Justin! Just a little reminder *Osama bin Laden, "I" recall, was "always" a US ally*
In prior to WWII, you'll recall Germany had a big problem with exploding passenger trains.
Guess who?
Could it be Russia/Iran, again Isreal no like ?
Hacklheber
March 31st, 2010 at 12:14 pm
Well, I don't know. What I remember of the second Chechen war is that Russia bombed & raped the place to shits under vague justifications. Place was nasty before that. Place was even nastier after that.
In the article on economic reconstruction that Justin refers to:
"It became clear this year that reconstruction of Chechen settlements, mainly the regional capital Grozny, alone had not achieved the most important goal of Russian economic policy towards the region: despite the construction boom, Chechens did not stop supporting the local rebels."
Maybe there is a reason for that.
What I am saying is: if "blowback" is good for us, I guess it's good for Russia.
DMinor7th
March 31st, 2010 at 12:40 pm
Uh-huh. So.. it's ok to think the military-industrial-CONplex is behind blowing up subways in Russia BUT not ok to think they'd blow up white elephant, asbestos-filled buildings (full of incriminating secrets and evidence of government and corporate wrongdoing) in the U.S. This has to be said re: the "'truther' movement".. according to recent stats something like 100 million Americans question the official conspiracy theory regarding 911. That's about 1/3 of the American population. And growing daily. Those spewing reactionary bile against the "truthers" better pull their careerist heads out of their careerist asses before they find themselves boxed into a "conspiracy theorists nutjobs only" marginal corner of Bizarro World along with the UFO'ers, Shape-Changing-Lizardites, HAARPists, etc., etc.
epppie
March 31st, 2010 at 1:17 pm
It's funny how charges of supporting terror are always ignored when it's the US supporting terror,. eg. against Cuba, and against Iran, and no doubt against Russia …but there's also good reason to suppose that the US and Uk, and perhaps in league with Putin and Medvedev, are behind the Moscow bombings. It's easy, of course, to scoff at 'conspiracy theories', as credulous folks such as Justin continue to do, but Putin's political rise is inseparable from Chechnya. There's no better way to become a problem solver than to help create the problem. As for the recent bombings, the US, UK and Russian leaderships all seem to have a big stake on subjugating Russia to the Anglo Empire. Russia's decision to turn on Iran is a HUGE global sea change. It means that the major powers have united decisively against all minor powers that refuse to kowtow to the global oligarchs. Terror is the key political weapon of the oligarchs. They deploy state terror, but in order to justify doing that, they need what appears to be false flag terror, or the equivalent.
Andy
March 31st, 2010 at 1:54 pm
Justin,
Why do you disparage people who question the official 9/11 Commission Report as "truthers?" You must have investigated 9/11 enough to know that what has been published is not the "truth." You of all people should be searching for answers. 9/11 is a pivotal moment in the history of war.
guest
March 31st, 2010 at 6:54 am
If the Russians really believed that America was behind the attacks,They would supply Iran with the updated missile systems that Iran seeks.The Russians have not done this.America is engaged in subversive movements around the planet but they generally don't try to subvert governments that are capable of dealing serious blows to America.Iraq,weakened after years of sanctions,Afghanistan,Yemen,Somalia.America will attempt to subvert weak countries that can't fight back very well but Russia could waste America if it came right down to it.
MichaelKenny
March 31st, 2010 at 2:36 pm
This could well be an American job. It is well established in Europe since the Madrid train bombings that terrorism does not make Europeans more belligerent, it makes them back off. Hence, whoever is behind the bombings, and today's bombings in Dagestan, wants Russia out of the region. That being said, there is no doubt that, sooner or later, the non-Russian peoples of the Russian Federation are going to want their independence. Thus, for the sames reasons as ex-Yugoslavia, Russia will eventually break up and it will be to Russia's advantage when that happens, since it will further anchor the ethnic European part of the federation in the European mainstream, i.e. EU membership. Thus, if some right-wing American or Israeli group is behind all this, they have shot themselves in the foot! Since the Lobby has been doing precisely that recently, I wouldn't be surprised if they had a hand in it.
Hacklheber
March 31st, 2010 at 3:04 pm
facepalm.jpg
Because the conspiracy consisted in faking three airplane crashes and/or substituting drones, cruise missiles and airplane wreckage in an ultracomplex way instead of convincing a few irate dudes to take over airplanes and do it on the cheap.
Enough of this shit already. It's been 10 years of looking for shit under the wrong lamppost.
Ryanna
March 31st, 2010 at 5:41 pm
I remember Boris Berezhovsky's interview in the Guardian in which he said he would bring down Putin!
peacenik12
March 31st, 2010 at 7:28 pm
Obviously the "separatist" are receiving outside help. Most suspect would be Israel/US and probably even Britain and France. They stand to gain the most . They want to break up Russia and weaken it as they did the USSR and Yugoslavia. It is the old divide and rule theory practised by Britain in India for centuries..
As for 911 there is no doubt that Mossad/CIA were behind that . The evidence is very clear.
ANU News.net Russia’s Metro Bombings
March 31st, 2010 at 12:39 pm
[...] America’s new cold war with Russia had its origins in the Bush era: the neoconservatives who then controlled US foreign policy had and still have a grudge against Putin’s Russia. When Putin refused to back the US invasion of Iraq, it was Richard Perle, the “dark prince” of the neocons, who called for their expulsion from the G-8. A list of prominent neocons – along with “liberal” window dressing such as Geraldine Ferraro – as long as your arm are featured as endorsers of the “American Committee for Peace in Chechnya,” now the American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (ACPC), which has taken up the Chechen cause against Russian “imperialism” with characteristically neoconnish alacrity. http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/03/30/russias-metro-bombings/ [...]
Nelson_2008
March 31st, 2010 at 9:10 pm
What's "shit" is people like you trying to cloud the issues and "poison the well" with hapless disinformation and specious "reasoning". I don't know of any serious 9/11 "truther" claiming that "three airplane crashes were faked".
In any case, as a matter of incontrovertible fact, the buildings were destroyed with pre-planted explosives and/or incendiaries. And that means "inside job", which implies Mossad, with help from high level U.S. government traitors. That much is essentially a settled matter between resonable people.
Most likely, the planes were electronically hijacked and guided to their targets by augmented-GPS-controlled autopilot systems. The "hijackers" that attended flight school were likely Mossad agents who'd stolen Arab identities. These details and others regarding exactly what happened at the Pentagon, for example, are of course speculative, and that's why we need a real investigation.
Nelson_2008
March 31st, 2010 at 9:28 pm
There may be some question as to the degree of "Western" involvement in the latest attacks in Moscow, but there's no question as to who's setting up missiles and radar systems all around Russia, and if that doesn't show hostile intent, nothing does.
The Zionist-controlled "West" is the implacable foe of any independent government anywhere, especially countries like Russia, that wield some power. Are they so stupid and/or blind as to not see this?
In any case, the Russians are disgraceful fools for not delivering the S-300 or S-400 SAM system to Iran after having contracted to do it and promising it and continuing to lead the Iranians on.
If Iran is attacked, some of the blood will be on Russia's hands.
Hacklheber
March 31st, 2010 at 9:38 pm
>>augmented-GPS-controlled autopilot systems
>>Mossad agents who'd stolen Arab identities
>>of course speculative
Yeah well, whatever. You were probably still watching reruns of Star Trek when it happened. The X-Files where big back then too, IIRC.
pokerface
March 31st, 2010 at 3:24 pm
So, an American secret agent keeps his drivers license and documents on his person? Are you kidding?
Get real, millions of foreigners come through the US. There is plenty of ways to obtain all the items described in this article without any official or unofficial secret agency involvment. If you look at todays headlines, a homegrown US militia group was arrested for wanting to do something similar in the USA. There may be conspiracies coming and going, but to think this is anything more than the people of that region vs. the Russians is too much of a stretch of the imagination.
Gimmi Deth
March 31st, 2010 at 4:32 pm
I think it important to take nothing at face value when it comes to terrorist attacks and to consider the involvement of those entities that specialize in such activities. The timing is suspisous. Didn't the Isreali president just visit Russia to lobby for its support of sanctions or a military strike against Iran?
anti_republocrat
April 1st, 2010 at 5:32 am
The Russians, and to some extent the Chinese and Indians, are the true appeasers of this era.
anti_republocrat
April 1st, 2010 at 5:39 am
You imply the US is run by fools incapable of "learning or indeed drawing any conclusions from overwhelming evidence."
US elites are not fools. Whether consciously or unconsciously they have hit upon the perfect strategy to perpetually justify excessive military spending, career advancement for military brass and the elite punditry, and political pork. That strategy is to sow as much instability and chaos around the world as possible. Then use that very instability to justify yet more invasions, interventions and excessive military spending.
Ozymandias
April 1st, 2010 at 12:19 pm
anti – you are right of course! cheers – Ozy
Russia’s Metro Bombings | NO LIES RADIO
April 1st, 2010 at 7:33 am
[...] FIND FULL ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE Share var button = document.getElementById('facebook_share_link_14392') || document.getElementById('facebook_share_icon_14392') || document.getElementById('facebook_share_both_14392') || document.getElementById('facebook_share_button_14392'); if (button) { button.onclick = function(e) { var url = this.href.replace(/share.php/, 'sharer.php'); window.open(url,'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436'); return false; } if (button.id === 'facebook_share_button_14392') { button.onmouseover = function(){ this.style.color='#fff'; this.style.borderColor = '#295582'; this.style.backgroundColor = '#3b5998'; } button.onmouseout = function(){ this.style.color = '#3b5998'; this.style.borderColor = '#d8dfea'; this.style.backgroundColor = '#fff'; } } } [...]
Deadly explosions on Moscow Metro system - Page 14
April 1st, 2010 at 11:53 am
[...] [...]
Russia’s Metro Bombings- Monsters from the American id? « In These New Times
April 2nd, 2010 at 12:31 am
[...] antiwar.com [...]
Attack the System » Blog Archive » Updated News Digest April 2-4, 2010
April 2nd, 2010 at 9:53 am
[...] Russia’s Metro Bombings by Justin Raimondo [...]
America involved with Russian metro bombings? - Religious Education Forum
April 2nd, 2010 at 1:32 pm
[...] [...]
Who Is Iyad Allawi? Nobody you’d want to know. By Justin Raimondo « Kanan48
April 2nd, 2010 at 5:05 pm
[...] Russia’s Metro Bombings – March 30th, 2010 [...]
Economy.az » Взрывы в российском метро.
April 5th, 2010 at 10:19 pm
[...] сознанием – прим. перев. Ссылка на оригинал “Russia’s Metro Bombings. Monsters from the American id?” Источник: [...]
Muhammad
April 6th, 2010 at 3:03 pm
This reads like some propaganda piece from the Kremlin. Shame, really, given that Mr. Raimondo's articles are generally quite good and very informative. This, however, was almost too painful for me to read.
Just Another Atrocityy. By Justin Raimondo « Kanan48
April 6th, 2010 at 10:51 pm
[...] Russia’s Metro Bombings – March 30th, 2010 [...]