Running Against Islam
Every political season has its hot-button issues. There’s race, abortion, lunar colonies. But the hottest hot-button issue these days, judging from comments by Republican presidential hopefuls as well as what happened during the 2010 midterm elections, is Islam.
Islam dominated the headlines during the summer of 2010. Remember Terry Jones and his pledge to burn the Quran? Or those persistent rumors of President Barack Obama’s Muslim faith? Plus, of course, that controversy over Park51, the Islamic cultural center planned for lower Manhattan. Those 2010 elections became a litmus test for how a lot of politicians stood on Islam. An embarrassing number of them are against it.
Although they flirt with racism, sexism, and homophobia at their own risk, politicians indulge in anti-Islamic sentiment with near impunity.
One reason for that is the antipathy that nearly half of Americans feel toward Islam. According to a September 2011 study [.pdf] from the Brookings Institution and the Public Religion Research Institute, 47 percent of Americans believe that Islam doesn’t jibe with American values. Republicans are more likely than Democrats to hold this view.
But the real dividing line runs right through the Republican Party. If you watch Fox News or belong to the Tea Party, according to that study, you’re primed to see Islam as a threat. As a result, the presidential hopefuls have used Islam to mark their political territory and fire up their base.Newt Gingrich, who once compared the Park51 organizers to Nazis, has waged a long campaign against the putative threat of Shariah law in the United States. Yet virtually no one in the small Muslim-American community supports replacing U.S. laws with Islamic law. Rick Santorum, meanwhile, has argued that Islam hasn’t generated a concept of equality and that Muslims don’t worship the Judeo-Christian God, even though equality is central to Islam and “Allah” in the Quran refers to the God of Muslims, Christians, and Jews.
Only Ron Paul has forthrightly rejected Islamophobia. He even connects the anti-Islamic sentiment that’s rife at home with the wars U.S. wages against majority-Muslim countries.
So far, Mitt Romney has largely remained above the fray. He often resorts to carefully couched phrases like “Islam is not an inherently violent faith.” But the man who has changed his position on so many issues may well be laying the groundwork for another flip-flop.
Walid Phares, a right-wing pundit and prominent Islamophobe, is one of Romney’s advisers. And the pro-Romney super PAC Restore Our Future is masterminded by Larry McCarthy, the attack-ad specialist. McCarthy not only designed the Willie Horton spot that swung the 1988 presidential race in George H.W. Bush’s favor, but he also put together an error-laced ad about Park51 that nearly deep-sixed Iowa Democrat Rep. Bruce Braley in his 2010 reelection bid.
It’s not just the Republicans. Despite his effort to reset U.S. relations with the Islamic world, many of Obama’s policies have infuriated Muslims. Whether it’s the wars that generate civilian casualties who are invariably Muslim, the proxy detentions of Muslim-Americans by other countries, or the expansion of the surveillance of Muslim-Americans at home, his administration has worked hard not to appear “weak on Islam.” Add in worsening relations with Iran, and you’ve got a toxic combination.
Certainly, the economy remains the key campaign issue. But as the Republican hopefuls sharpen their attacks on one another and prepare for a showdown with Obama in the fall, don’t be surprised if Islam becomes as defining a political issue as communism was during the Cold War. If politicians push back against this new McCarthyism, we could avoid a repeat of the ugly Islamophobia of 2010. But thanks to no-holds-barred advertising and lots of it, not to mention a pervasive lack of understanding about the world’s second-largest religion, the hot-button issue of Islam might just get a lot hotter.
Distributed via OtherWords.
Read more by John Feffer
- Infantilizing North Korea – May 12th, 2013
- America’s Image Problem – February 29th, 2012
- Closing Overseas Bases Is Good Policy and Good Politics – November 2nd, 2011
- Pyongyang 1, Bush 0 – October 11th, 2006
- Caught in the Muddle: Round Two of Bush vs. North Korea – February 15th, 2005





james
February 29th, 2012 at 12:56 am
Let me see, the last time christians tried to fight Islam did not end well for them. History can be a good teacher if people will read it.
Islam controversies | Averimages
February 29th, 2012 at 6:03 am
[...] Running Against Islam by John Feffer — Antiwar.com Leave a comment « Define mastercard Comments are closed. [...]
Bruce Richardson
February 29th, 2012 at 6:51 am
Only one statesman exists that is running for president…Ron Paul. We castigate others for religious genocide and yet we practice it ourselves. This, like most wars is about profits and resource acquisition. Check out the threats made to Taliban, when for example during negotiations they favored an Argentine concern for the proposed oil-pipeline (TAP) from Turkmenistan to Gwadar port in Pakistan on the Arabial Sea over Unocal, an American/Saudi company. Or that during a conference in Berlin during the summer of 2001, months prior to 9/11, US officials told Pakistan's Foreign Secretary Niaz Niak that "we will attack Afghanistan before the snow flies in October." Islamophobia is bovine skatology or b.s. formulated to frighten the American public and therefore garner support for an illegal war, period!
andy
February 29th, 2012 at 1:54 pm
Actually Islam attacked Christians first. That is a historical fact. They also conquered the Iberian peninsula (Spain and Portugal) for 700 years. Then the Ottomans invaded and conquered the Balkans for 500 years. The Barbary pirates also kidnapped and enslaved about two million Europeans. History suggests we should limit our interactions with Islam.
MoT
February 29th, 2012 at 1:58 pm
The "winning" candidate should be beating the "It's the economy, stupid" drum for all it's worth. Because that's the only thing that directly impacts Americans TODAY. It's the only language they universally understand without going into the usual fear mongering excuses to deflect attention away from it.
masmanz
February 29th, 2012 at 3:42 pm
The Byzantinians attacked first. Muslims were in no position to start a war. The same thing with the Persians. These two super powers of the time attacked Muslims because they were worried about the growing popularity of Islam among their subject tribes. Why the two lost is still a mystry.
Muslims did not believe in racism, to them a white slave was as good as a black or a brown slave. However, as the history has shown, Muslim's treatment of slave was far better than others'. Many slaves rose to become great scholars. There have even been slave dynasties in the Muslim world.
Michael S
February 29th, 2012 at 4:56 pm
Al-Islam is the faith that has the largest number of adherents. I as a Muslim am quite proud to be an American. My appreciation for my country is after my appreciation for my family and my appreciation for my family is second to my faith. The Quran is a Book full guidance for all people. The average American is treated as a force feed duck. In the Quran G-d states you should be a defender of your town and by extension your Nation your country. Any Muslim who does not know this and act accordingly can be lead by their lack of knowledge to do acts unbecoming of a Muslim against their own country. I was once @ a Georgia Black Republican event where then Speaker of the House Newt gave an address acknowledging how excellent the group gather there was sighting the presence of Jews, Christains, and Muslim.
camus10
February 29th, 2012 at 5:57 pm
well noted Paul has the most modest views on war & peace
However, looking at the massive Pentagon spending in afpk, one wonders why the deliberate loser strategy. Why are the pentagon brass unable to discipline the troops. Why the blatant disregard for afghans starving and homeless in the worst winter. And then to top it all, the clincher – the koran burning discovered on a military base. A pattern of costly and monumental failures but NO one is held accountable. Paul has the best lines, but do you seriously think he has the record of confronting pentagon abuses in Congress. I am still waiting for Paul to speak up in any of the superfluous debates and call out the others on selling out to AIPAC
andy
February 29th, 2012 at 7:09 pm
Actually Muslims attacked Christians first. And Jews too. These are historic facts. Slavery was at least as brutal under Islam and lasted far longer then in the west.
masmanz
February 29th, 2012 at 8:49 pm
Past cannot be changed. What I have mentioned above are historical facts.
ummabdulla
February 29th, 2012 at 8:58 pm
"…and 'Allah' in the Quran refers to the God of Muslims, Christians, and Jews."
Just wanted to point out that 'Allah' in the Bible also refers to that God, because that's the name for God in Arabic-language Bibles, too. (Jesus, speaking Aramaic, would have called Him Allaha.)
(Michael, I'm curious why a Muslim uses 'G-d' instead of 'God'?)
james
March 1st, 2012 at 12:49 am
Your statement "Islam attacked christians first" is so revealing, so Islam for you is a person?