The anti-boycott law passed Monday night. Much has been said about what the American administration — blind as always to Middle East realities — tagged “an internal issue.” Let me just add that my readers should remember, from now on, that there are things I am not allowed to say. For example, I expressed my support for the boycott on settlements products several times in the past; I am not allowed to do it anymore. I am not saying I could say whatever I wanted to before now: self-censorship is almost inevitable for critical writers living in Israel. But now you’ve got an official confirmation from the Israeli parliament: Israelis are not allowed to speak out their mind freely. The “only democracy in the Middle East” openly joins the “democracies” around it — when some of these “democracies” try to become democracies. We lag behind. Or better: we are moving backwards. Very rapidly.
The law might be overruled
by Israel’s Supreme Court, but this will only spur the fascist coalition
to curb the court as it has been eager to for years. Meanwhile, Gush
Shalom — which initiated the boycott on settlements products many years
ago — removed the list of those products from its Web site. “We
cannot afford to publish the list anymore,” they say. The much
more mainstream Peace Now, on the other hand, which never endorsed
the boycott before (too “controversial”), now recognizes the
outrage on the Left and tries to capitalize on it.
What is Gush Shalom afraid of? One revealing aspect of the new law is the way it is to be imposed. The State of Israel will not indict anyone for calling for a boycott — that wouldn’t look good abroad. Instead, anyone who feels offended because of a boycott call can sue the one who called for it, and in court — that’s the law — the plaintiff does not have to prove the damage caused to him.
In other words, every Israeli producer based in the occupied territories can sue anyone calling for a boycott. If I call to boycott all settlements products — I am not saying I do, I say “if” — each and every Israeli firm based in the occupied territories can sue me, and there are hundreds of such firms. So not only do they operate on stolen Palestinian land, not only do they enjoy generous state benefits from my tax money (that’s why they moved to the territories in the first place) — now they can sue me and take my money too for calling for a boycott (if I ever do). What started as a dispossession of the Palestinians now moves to the dispossession of any Israeli who dares oppose that dispossession. What started as enslaving the Palestinians may end in enslaving their supporters within Israel.
This may be an innovation,
but using the settlers themselves to promote the occupation is a typical
old Israeli strategy. The state relegates some of its more embarrassing
functions to the settlers. It’s not always the Israeli state that
steals Palestinian land and water. It’s not always Israeli soldiers
who harass Palestinian men, women, children, and cattle, who throw stones
at them, burn their fields, cut down their trees, rob their olives, and
sell the oil. Sometimes it is the state or its soldiers, but
ever more often it is the settlers, the so-called civilians, backed
covertly (or overtly) by the state. The settlers do the dirty work that
the state would rather not do. The state gives them the tools — money,
guns, legislation, turning a blind eye, impunity — while the settlers
do the work. It’s the typical function of a militia in a fascist regime:
so far it has terrorized the Palestinians, now it gets a legal license
to terrorize its Israeli opponents. Remember it next time you hear Shimon
Peres speak about “the extremists on both sides.” The Israeli
extremist has a government behind him.
Racism at the Bottom
Returning to Israel from abroad is always a crucial moment. I always wonder how long will it take before I sigh and say to myself, “Oh, yes, I am in Israel.” Last year, it was when I took the early train from the airport — 5 a.m., confused after a night flight, hesitating for a second whether it was the right train. Suddenly, a young man in uniform yelled at me: “Move on, get inside! Don’t you see we’re already late?!” Oh yes, I am in Israel. I had just spent two weeks in Ethiopia, and no one, young or old, black or white, dared yell at me.
This time, perhaps unconsciously traumatized by that return, perhaps simply because of the backward train service from the airport late at night, I decided to take a taxi home. I took my seat next to an elderly driver, who was polite enough to help me with the luggage. He started driving, took a glimpse at a bystander on the airport’s pavement, and all of a sudden burst out in a series of curses, four-letter words of all kinds, too horrifying even to repeat, extremely rich on the backdrop of his poor Hebrew. I was shocked. I turned my head backward: the innocent bystander was a Muslim, bearded and neatly dressed in a white gown. He was just standing there, perhaps waiting for a taxi.
The driver noticed my shock and immediately began to apologize. Putting his hand on my knee he swore he didn’t mean it. He didn’t mean to offend me or to curse me, just that f*cking dirty lousy Arab standing there; they should not be allowed to be there at all!
I considered getting out, but I was too tired. So I asked the driver whether he knew that man, and what the man had done to him. He said he didn’t know that individual Arab, but all Arabs were the same, so to hell with them.
I told him I was just coming back from Antwerp and no taxi driver there would even dream of speaking that way of the local Jews, who (being mostly Orthodox) also grow beards and dress differently.
He explained that Arabs were liars: he took another Arab to Kfar Saba the other day, and as they arrived, the passenger asked him to continue to nearby Qalqilyah, just a few minutes away.
Wasn’t the driver happy to earn a couple of cents more? Not at all; he does not go to Qalqilyah. It’s in the West Bank. He refused. “We don’t do the Territories.” Too dangerous. A few stories on notorious Palestinian car thieves followed.
I asked the driver what he would do if I asked him to take me to Ariel or Tapuach, illegal Jewish settlements in the West Bank.
“You are most welcome, my friend,” said the driver. “I’d be happy to take you there.”
“So it’s not that you don’t do the Territories; you do the Jewish settlements in the Territories, but you don’t do Arab places, right?”
“We do go to Arab places,” he said. “I can take you to Um-el-Fahm or Nazareth [inside Israel proper] — but not to the Territories. And that dirty Palestinian should have told me from the beginning that he wanted to Qalqilyah.”
“But if he had told you the truth, you would have refused to take him, right?”
The driver admitted that this was true.
“So what would you do in his place? What would you do if you had to get home to Qalqilyah, where no trains and no buses go?”
The driver finally conceded he had no solution for the Palestinian guy, whose only sin was having his domicile in Qalqilyah.
I returned to the other Arab, the bystander: What did he do to the driver? The driver now quoted something I said earlier: “You cannot generalize, every person is different.” And “Please do not misunderstand me, sir; I am not a bad person.”
He then told me he had emigrated 21 years ago from Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Where 90 percent of the population is Muslim, I now add. He goes back every year to visit old friends.
I don’t think the taxi driver is a bad person. He is just a symptom. He has learned from experience that in the Israel of 2011 it’s legitimate to send a person to hell with a backpack full of dirty words just because he is Arab. Or better: that it’s legitimate to share with your passenger a backpack full of dirty words against an innocent Arab, provided your passenger looks Jewish. He didn’t want to be rude with me: on the contrary, it was his way of being friendly, of appealing to our common denominator: hatred toward Arabs.
Historians speak of anti-Semitism in pre-Nazi Germany as a common system of beliefs and utterances shared by the average (non-Jewish) person as normal, acceptable, respectable, even obvious facts of life. Everybody hated Jews, just like everybody hates cockroaches — what’s the big deal? The taxi driver reflects the Israeli mainstream nowadays. With such a government and such a public atmosphere, the old taxi driver is the last person I can blame.
Read more by Ran HaCohen
- Purim and Genocidal Phantasies – March 3rd, 2013
- Israel Between Eritrea and Iran – October 4th, 2012
- Tel Aviv ‘Race Riots’ Reveal Much About Israel – May 27th, 2012
- Was Elliott Abrams Hitler’s Senior Advisor? – September 15th, 2011
- Israelis Sick and Tired – but of What? – August 7th, 2011





Geo1671
July 13th, 2011 at 4:25 am
No Ifs–you are in trouble :^/
Wootie Berster
July 13th, 2011 at 4:34 am
A funny little man once said something like.. we should watch out when we stare into the abyss because the abyss is staring back into us as well. Another man said be careful when hunting for the devil because the devil is hunting for us.. and he knows our methods.. because they are his.
Jamie
July 13th, 2011 at 4:50 am
Antisemitism seems to be something thets true for Arabs antway.Lots of Jews just use it to there advasntage when they have never experienced it in there life.I like people of any race Jews Arabs black it does not matter.Through my life I made friends of almost every race and learnt through my experience its the person not his race.Race has nothing to do with weather a person is good or not.If you think about it many Jews including Rabbis no why Arabs are angry it has nothing to do with the Jewish race if they were not treated like the cab driver treated them and much worse ways I would rather not speak about they would show respect.Most Arabs just want to live in peace without having there land occupied and resorces stolen.They are called terrorists for protecting there land and famillys.Tell me what do myou expect them to do and what would you do.GOD bless.
M. Manasseh
July 13th, 2011 at 7:12 am
I am so happy to live in BRAZIL.
In 40 years since I came over, Never, anybody has asked me what is my religion . Come over people of Israel. You have no democracy where you live..
Mark Thomason
July 13th, 2011 at 9:38 am
Nicely written. But consider the next step. There was only one cure for the Germans, and they kept it up until they got their cure.
Andor
July 13th, 2011 at 10:31 am
Beautiful country, absolutely free from any racial or religious prejudices! Maybe the bigots and haters should be sent to Brazil for "re-education?"
While visiting Israel I befriended an Italian-Israeli girl. Naturally, we could only communicate in English (I am a native Russian,she was born in Italy). Several times we were reprimanded , loudly and rudely, for not speaking Hebrew instead of English )))
And when I complained about the room not being cleaned before I checked in, I was chastised by the hotel workers. The argument went like that, "Our boy was just discharged from the Army. He couldn't find any other job than the room attendant, but he is a very proud boy. Do you expect him to sweep the floors or wash the toilets? Shame on you!" I must add there were pubic hair in the shower stall, and the full of trash wastebasket when I checked in ))))
That's Israel, but it is also a vibrant, young, and optimistic country! Hopefully, children (or grandchildren) of mostly racist and hateful Russian immigrants will be free of their parents' fears and prejudices. I spoke with several young Sabras – they were idealistic, honest, and peace-oriented individuals.
Advocate4Liberty
July 13th, 2011 at 1:26 pm
Why not emigrate? You know that nothing will change for the better, it will only get worse. Until the U.S. folds up and the dollars stop flowing. Why wait for the bloodbath?
gary
July 13th, 2011 at 1:29 pm
at my brothers funeral we had a nice rabbi who had studied in israel..he was very pleasant until the subject of muslims came up..his face changed into an ugly sneer when he claimed that islam was not a real religion..this from a man of the cloth…also..the man who is happy in brazil must not be black…contrary to the myth that there is no racial predudice in that country brazil, is one of the worst places to be black
Avi Gillon
July 13th, 2011 at 1:44 pm
Ran, I don't think you have earned the privilege to criticize the newly-passed law. Harsh as that may sound, as you have pointed out in your article, you have previously supported the boycott of the colonies in the occupied West Bank. As you know, limiting the boycott to the colonies is akin to boycotting the dairy section of a supermarket, while buying in bulk other goods at the same store. It's useless as the two are inseparable. The entire store is run by the same management.
The Israeli government that facilitated and passed this law understood that simple fact. Those politicians understand that the colonies have become an inseparable part of the Israeli economy and vice versa. That is why the law makes it illegal to advocate for the boycott of either colonies or Israel proper.
And yet, it is the so-called liberal Zionists who refuse to accept that simple fact. Those Zionists want to have their cake and eat it, too. On the one hand they want to maintain a Jewish Israel as they advocate for a so-called independent and viable Palestinian state alongside Israel, and on the other hand, they are not willing nor prepared to go the distance, to take the necessary steps to make that a reality. In other words, and more bluntly put, what exactly did you expect would happen when you limited your boycott — and advocacy for said boycott — to the colonies?
Any educated person, especially an Israeli who understands how intertwined the two sides of the Green Line have become due to Israeli expansionist policies, would have reached the wise and inevitable conclusion.
So, here we are. You are complaining that the government essentially revoked your right to criticize the colonial expansion, but at the same time you remain content — prior to the passage of the law — with the status quo, that is with the 1967 'question'. The events of 1948 must not be discussed. That's the rationale. Alas, so long as self-described Israeli 'liberals' continue to focus on 1967 while hiding the skeletons of 1948 in the closet, don't expect to live in a democracy. And don't pretend that you ever did (The non-J.e.w.i.s.h. citizens of Israel have experienced on their own skin an entirely different brand of 'democracy'). After all, the US, too, was a democracy when African-Americans were not allowed to enter certain 'Whites Only' establishments, or hold certain government positions. Let's call an Israeli spade an Israeli spade and stop acting like a surprised virgin.
Avi Gillon
July 13th, 2011 at 1:45 pm
Ran, I don't think you have earned the privilege to criticize the newly-passed law. Harsh as that may sound, as you have pointed out in your article, you have previously supported the boycott of the colonies in the occupied West Bank. As you know, limiting the boycott to the colonies is akin to boycotting the dairy section of a supermarket, while buying in bulk other goods at the same store. It's useless as the two are inseparable. The entire store is run by the same management.
The Israeli government that facilitated and passed this law understood that simple fact. Those politicians understand that the colonies have become an inseparable part of the Israeli economy and vice versa. That is why the law makes it illegal to advocate for the boycott of either colonies or Israel proper.
And yet, it is the so-called liberal Zionists who refuse to accept that simple fact. Those Zionists want to have their cake and eat it, too. On the one hand they want to maintain a J.e.w.i.s.h. Israel as they advocate for a so-called independent and viable Palestinian state alongside Israel, and on the other hand, they are not willing nor prepared to go the distance, to take the necessary steps to make that a reality. In other words, and more bluntly put, what exactly did you expect would happen when you limited your boycott — and advocacy for said boycott — to the colonies?
Any educated person, especially an Israeli who understands how intertwined the two sides of the Green Line have become due to Israeli expansionist policies, would have reached the wise and inevitable conclusion.
So, here we are. You are complaining that the government essentially revoked your right to criticize the colonial expansion, but at the same time you remain content — prior to the passage of the law — with the status quo, that is with the 1967 'question'. The events of 1948 must not be discussed. That's the rationale. Alas, so long as self-described Israeli 'liberals' continue to focus on 1967 while hiding the skeletons of 1948 in the closet, don't expect to live in a democracy. And don't pretend that you ever did (The non-J.e.w.i.s.h. citizens of Israel have experienced on their own skin an entirely different brand of 'democracy'). After all, the US, too, was a democracy when African-Americans were not allowed to enter certain 'Whites Only' establishments, or hold certain government positions. Let's call an Israeli spade an Israeli spade and stop acting like a surprised virgin.
pendulum
July 13th, 2011 at 3:46 pm
filthy place filthy people
trotsky
July 15th, 2011 at 8:54 pm
i lived in israel
there is democracy and i said whatever i wanted whenever i wanted
there are communists in parliament and arabs
just the facts
Avi Gillon
July 15th, 2011 at 10:22 pm
Of course, there are communists in the Knesset, a whole three of them by the way.
Many of Israel's early founders were socialists from Eastern Europe. Therefore, socialism and communism are not foreign or threatening concepts as they were in the US. However, when you parade the "communists" as some kind of yardstick for openness and democracy in Israel on an American forum, you expose yourself as either desperately lacking in knowledge, or intentionally deceptive.
Never in the history of the Knesset, has any government coalition included the few Arabs who are members. Even self-styled Israeli leftist parties have preferred coalitions with religious right wing parties over a coalition with Ay-rabs.
Needless to say, Israel tolerates representatives of its 20% Palestinian minority in the Knesset as mere tokens. They are good decorative ornaments so that someone who claims to have "lived in Israel" can use them to peddle the myth that Israel is a democracy.
Non-J.e.w.s. are marginalized and discriminated against in Israel to the degree that the racism remains institutionalized. That means that the laws, the government and society treat non-J.e.w.s as fourth class citizens.
Leaders of the Palestinian minority in Israel drafted a document they called, "Future Vision". In it, they enumerated in detail the discrimination this minority faces and explained how the state can achieve equality for all its citizens, J.e.ws and non-J.e.ws alike.
Thus far, their call has fallen on deaf ears. Worse yet, Israel has passed laws that would have amounted to H.o.l.o.c.a.u.s.t denial were the target group J.e.w.ish. But, since the target is non-J.e.w.ish, (Christian and Muslim Palestinians), Israel denies the Nakbah, criminalizes its commemoration and as of today, builds a so-called Museum of Tolerance on Muslim graves
PDF link to Future Vision: http://www.mossawacenter.org/files/files/File/Rep…
Any astute reader will realize that the Vision's goals are conditions which are currently missing from the political arena. In other words, for now, Israel remains an Apartheid state on both sides of the Green Line.
Furthermore, anyone who wants to read about the so-called Israeli democracy that the random Zionist from North America visits and then gives his stamp of approval claiming it to be true democracy, ought to read a book by the Israeli journalist Yoram Binur.
Binur assumed the identity of an Arab, his fluency in Arabic helped him pull it off. In his book he shares his experiences in Israel (in 1989) as an "Arab". Ironically, the discrimination and racism have only gotten worse over the last twenty years.
The book is available on Amazon, entitled "Palestinian Like Me: My Enemy, Myself."
Incidentally, Binur later went on to become an ardent Zionist despite what he experienced himself when he assumed the identity of an Arab, a Palestinian citizen of Israel.
PDF Link: http://mofetnet.macam.ac.il/FileFetcher.aspx?id=1…
On a lighter note, I once lived in Madrid, and by "lived" I mean I had a 7 hour layover. So, if anyone wants to read my views on the city's economic success, let me know, and I'll be happy to pontificate on the matter.
Hondo69
July 25th, 2011 at 4:56 am
Bigotry cannot exist unless a person is willing to form generalizations:
I hate Bush. Bush is from Texas. Therefore I hate all Texans.
Sounds good to me. Anyone know where Nancy Pelosi is from?
eric siverson
June 20th, 2012 at 4:53 pm
What position can a palestinian not have in Israel ?