US Lawmakers Call For Supporting Terrorists In Iran
The Obama administration should be doing more to support Iranian resistance groups — including the Mujahadeen-e-Khalq (MEK), a "cult-like" terrorist organization that has engaged in suicide attacks against their own countrymen, according to the U.S. State Department — in an all-out effort to affect regime change in Tehran, two American lawmakers said at a recent press conference in Washington, DC.
The lawmakers’ call for greater U.S. support for self-styled resistance groups opposed to Iran’s government comes as the Islamic regime has accused groups protesting the recent disputed presidential election of receiving Western backing, an allegation that has been used to justify a harsh crackdown on dissent.
At a Capitol Hill press conference on June 26th, Rep. Bob Filner (D-CA), chairman of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, declared that the U.S. government, which has imposed stringent economic sanctions on Iran since the 1979 Islamic revolution and supported Iraq’s invasion of the country in the 1980s, had too often sought "to mollify or appease those in charge" of that country. Instead, Filner argued the U.S. should explicitly side with Iranian "resistance groups", including the MEK, which he described as a "democratic, non-nuclear, secular group fighting for freedom for all the people in Iran."
The U.S. State Department notes that the MEK "advocates the violent overthrow of the Iranian regime and was responsible for the assassination of several U.S. military personnel and civilians in the 1970’s," and that the group maintains "the capacity and will to commit terrorist acts in Europe, the Middle East, the United States, Canada, and beyond."
Following the Iranian revolution the MEK fled Iran for neighboring Iraq, where it received support from Saddam Hussein’s regime to launch "suicidal, mass wave attacks against Iranian forces." The MEK’s fighting on behalf of the Iraqi regime in a war that killed hundreds of thousands of Iranians is generally seen as undermining their credibility among the Iranian public.
Human Rights Watch has also accused the group of perpetrating serious human rights abuses, including torture, at a number of secret prison camps.
Nonetheless, citing the internal unrest in Iran over last month’s disputed presidential election and the fact that an invasion "is not an option today," Filner said the U.S. government should be doing much more to support "one of the biggest resistance groups in Iraq, the so-called MEK.
"They say, ‘Let us do the job; get out of our — just get out of our way,’ because we have not helped the internal resistance movements," Filner said. "We can help internal resistance movements in Iran, and we should not stand in their way of trying to get rid of the present regime."
Joining Filner in the call for greater U.S. support for the MEK was Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), who briefly fought alongside the Afghan mujahideen in their war against the Soviet Union. Though declared "freedom fighters" by the Reagan administration, the mujahideen proved to be fertile recruiting grounds for the Taliban and al-Qaeda.
Conceding that, like the Afghan mujahideen, the MEK is not "perfect," Rohrabacher said that "during the American revolution there were a lot of imperfect organizations around too. But the fact is, the mullahs are what now — they are the ones who are murdering their people. They are the ones who are threatening world peace."
Rohrabacher also rejected the premise of a question about whether overt U.S. support for terrorist groups opposed to the Iranian government might undermine future U.S.-Iran negotiations.
"Who wants to cooperate with Hitler or the mullahs who are murdering their own people? We don’t want to cooperate with those bums," Rohrabacher responded. "They’re murdering their people. They’re threatening to blow people up with nuclear weapons. We don’t want any — to establish a relationship with the mullahs that’s going to make it more cooperative with them."
Filner and Rohrabacher appeared at the press conference with Soon Sansami, currently the executive director of the Women’s Freedom Forum. Previously she was the spokesperson for the National Council of Resistance, identified by Filner as "the umbrella Iranian internal resistance movement in the United States." The U.S. Treasury Department lists the group as a "Specially Designated Global Terrorist" organization and one of many "aliases of [the] MEK."
Read more by Charles Davis
- Distorting US Intel On Iran: Obama Follows Bush’s Lead, Again – June 19th, 2009





RossArmani
July 3rd, 2009 at 5:22 am
You are defiantly wrong ME K was added to list of F T O as a good will gesture to the terrorist regime of Mullah's .Read LA time 10/9/1997 .I am surprise after seeing so many atrocity from Mullah’s regime, still there are some people out there to support these criminal Hitler still regime. It is the time to move on and stop labeling freedom fighters. You are supporting most criminals on the Earth (Mullah’s). What you are doing is supporting war not antiwar.
bogi666
July 3rd, 2009 at 4:16 pm
Reagan was right in calling them "freedom fighters'" in Afghanistan, and they still are. They want freedom from the USA which is terrorizing their country with indiscriminate killing of Afghans and the weapons testing being used against them by the Pentagon. The Drone Commanders, the Terminators, are being tested in Af-Pak. Arnold didn't know it but he was acting in a prophetic movie at the time, The Terminator.
paulfoote
July 6th, 2009 at 12:50 am
Bob Filner is the son of a communist party candidate for Congress. For years, Filner has been supporting communist terrorists in different countries, including the Iranian Communist MEK (MKO, PMOI, NCRI, Rajavi Cult, or Pol Pot of Iran) terrorists. At Antiwar.com, Justin Raimondo and others have posted a large number of articles exposing the MEK terrorists. Raimondo has been correct also in exposing the neo-conservatives (neo-Trotskyites). He prefers to call them Trotskycons.
YekIrani
July 8th, 2009 at 10:33 pm
US Department of State has always declared that it does not seek or support regime change in Iran.
What USDS does not declare is that it actually wants the current regime to stay in power. This is why MEK is on the FTO list, not the Americans killed in Iran 35 years ago and not what MEK has done during the last three decades.
The Ayatollahs Baseej are NOT in the FTO list, neither is the Islamic Revolutionary Guards.
Any progressive person, must first question USDS on the reason for not having the above mentioned groups in the FTO list. MEK has been the target of Ayatollahs negative propaganda for the last 30 years. The writer of this article has not mentioned anything about MEK which has not already been said by the Mullahs. Thanks, but no thanks.
MajidSaatchi
July 8th, 2009 at 11:28 pm
UN Secretary General and the Security Council to specifically pursue the following measures:
1. Suspend diplomatic relations and impose comprehensive sanctions against the regime, while banning foreign visits by regime officials, for as long as the suppression has not completely ended;
2. Force the regime to annul the sham election results and accept a free election under UN supervision instead, on the basis of the people’s sovereignty and not the absolute rule of clergy;
3. Refer the crimes dossier of the regime to the UN Security Council and bring the officials responsible for suppression and killing of political prisoners, especially Ali Khamenei and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, to trial in an international court.
In the course of the people’s uprising in Iran, at least 200 people were killed, while thousands of others were injured or arrested. Eyewitness reports of those released from the regime’s prisons
MajidSaatchi
July 8th, 2009 at 11:39 pm
Now, let’s get back to the PMOI. The terrorist label does not fit to this group unless one views it from the perspective of the Tehran mullah regime. The UK and EU high courts have spoken and soon enough the PMOI’s case will go to trial before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington . I suspect that by this time next year, the PMOI will no longer be on the State Department’s Foreign Terrorist Organizations list. Does this mean that the PMOI will then be the perfect government for a post-mullah regime in Iran ? Probably not, because no government is capable of perfection; it’s made up of humans who are fallible. But whether or not the PMOI and NCRI should govern Iran is not for us to decide—that’s a question that only the Iranian people have a right to, and should, decide in an open, fair, democratic election. May that day dawn soon, Inshallah!
sandshir
July 9th, 2009 at 1:55 am
The PMOI (MEK) was put on the state departments list of foreign terrorist organizations as a good will gesture to the "moderate" Khatami regime during President Bill Clinton's courtship with Iran policy era, now we see at a critical time when Iranians inside iran are uprising for regime change, the only legitimate and powerful opposition force, the PMOI is being held back by this bogus listing as a terrorist organization. They have been removed from the UK and European Union list of terrorist organizations as there is no evidence to prove the allegations mentioned by the state department. It is time to stop appease the Mullah's in Iran and to allow justice to prevail, by de-listing the PMOI. Enough is Enough.
amir_ottawa
July 9th, 2009 at 3:10 am
You are defiantly wrong.
Listen my friend, it is the time to move on and stop labeling freedom fighters.
Listen my friend, the people of Iran and MEK will bring down Mullah’s regime for sure then you and other labeling will cry some day soon.
Listen my friend open your eyes, open your eyes and open your eyes the money dose not worth it, open your eyes.__
afarzand
July 9th, 2009 at 4:43 am
One of the British law makers whom visited Iran a few years back, when returned home said, he was very surprised by the mulla's persistance and requests to limit the PMOI activities in England.
The dictator regime knows exactly how popular the Iranian resistance is in Iran and abroad. They well know that their regime cannot have any stability unless they destroy the PMOI and the NCRI.
So Mr. Davis lets not play games and do not try something which has been tried for the last 3 deccades,and that is calling PMOI as terrorists, cult, marxist or etc. without any substantial evidence. The mullas tried that with spending billions of dollars to pursuade EU to keep them in the terrorist list and after 7 yrs., the EU high court justly took the PMOI off the EU terrorist list.
Today iranian people's blood is spilled just because they seek freedom and democracy and people like you are bought out by the mulla's to help them and shame on you for doing so!?
RossArmani
July 9th, 2009 at 5:19 am
Thank you congressman Bob filner & Congressman Rohrabcher ,And thanks to MEK for fighting Fundamentalists and trorisem. And shame on supporters of Mulla's whether it is under name of Antiwar or Apesment.
AliAzad
July 9th, 2009 at 7:29 am
Part one
I cannot believe I saw this article on the "ANTI WAR" website. You are either very naive or have an agenda to demonize the MEK. If we assume you are naive and someone handed you a paper and asked you to put it up, you should do more research before you accuse someone or a group with that kind of allegation. It sounded to me like you are saying a state department accusation because they say so it is correct. If this is what are you saying by quoting the state department to prove your point, I believe you should change your site name and I refer you to check the rulings of the UK & EU’s highest courts.
AliAzad
July 9th, 2009 at 7:30 am
Part two
That these kinds of accusations be thrown out and to demand that the MEK to be removed off of the list. You know very well under this kind of accusation, people who are accused will be harassed outside their native country and be subjected to being killed and tortured by their religious, dictatorship, government. Since 1982, over 120,000 of MEK have been executed and countless others as well in the recent days and weeks. If you are an honest person and wrote this as a mistake, you should remove this article . The truth will eventually come out and those who have twisted it shall be put to shame.
jaredjones
July 9th, 2009 at 9:19 am
Mr. Davis,
Can you defend your claims in a court of law? You have mixed up couple of facts and a lot of accusations and presented all of them as facts. Free speech is one issue and accusation without any supporting documents is another issue. I have read such comments in web sites that originate in Tehran. I hope they are not feeding you their propaganda that is mixed with more than 100,000 executions and stoning to death. I hope you don’t share the Islamic Republics views on human life and limb. As you know, it is legal in Islamic Republic to cut one hand and the opposing leg as punishment for theft. It is also legal to gouge ones eye out per Article 85 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic (http://learningpartnership.org/en/resources/legis...
Such punishments are carried out on regular basis in Iran. How would you like to see 5 young bodies hanging from the traffic signal as you drive to work? Who are the real terrorists? Whose side are you on? Are you really Anti-War or are you supporting the war criminals in Iran?
samini
July 9th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
The erroneous and misleading statements regarding the MEK notwithstanding, the article misses the point: Both Congressman Filner and Mr. Rohrabacher are courageous for standing on the side of the Iranian people despite that this stance challenges the status quo. EU courts have already examined all the facts (both classified and open – including some of the allegations included in this article) regarding the alleged terrorism claims against the MEK. Their findings led both the EU and UK to de-list the MEK on grounds that it is not a terrorist organization. Current Iran policy has been seeking to establish a relationship with the Iranian government. Demonstrators in Iran have proven that this regime is not legitimate and must go in its entirety. MEK is a liability for the appeasers because for the past 30 years, it has unyieldingly called for what the Iranian people want: A free, democratic, and secular republic. The author should examine his facts, read articles on this issue written by Mr. Filner for example, and stop making excuses for the barbaric Iranian regime (Don’s enable Iran’s Offenses (http://www.iranfocus.com/en/iran-world-press/dont... All (republican or democrats) who continue to weaken Iranian opposition are empowering the medieval regime in Tehran. They are inviting an unavoidable conflict with that expansionist/fascist government. Let’s write about the atrocities being committed by the terrorist in Tehran so that we could avoid a calamitous war.
samini
July 9th, 2009 at 4:04 pm
The erroneous and misleading statements regarding the MEK notwithstanding, the article misses the point: Both Congressman Filner and Mr. Rohrabacher are courageous for standing on the side of the Iranian people despite that this stance challenges the status quo. EU courts have already examined all the facts (both classified and open – including some of the allegations included in this article) regarding the alleged terrorism claims against the MEK. Their findings led both the EU and UK to de-list the MEK on grounds that it is not a terrorist organization. Current Iran policy has been seeking to establish a relationship with the Iranian government. Demonstrators in Iran have proven that this regime is not legitimate and must go in its entirety. MEK is a liability for the appeasers because for the past 30 years, it has unyieldingly called for what the Iranian people want: A free, democratic, and secular republic. The author should examine his facts, read articles on this issue written by Mr. Filner for example, and stop making excuses for the barbaric Iranian regime (Don’s enable Iran’s Offenses (http://www.iranfocus.com/en/iran-world-press/dont... All (republican or democrats) who continue to weaken Iranian opposition are empowering the medieval regime in Tehran. They are inviting an unavoidable conflict with that expansionist/fascist government. Let’s write about the atrocities being committed by the terrorist in Tehran so that we could avoid a calamitous war.
abbas8642
July 9th, 2009 at 10:44 pm
Mr Davis:
let me tell you, Mullahs in Iran love you, because your article that is a bunch of bald faced lies. in 1997, the Clinton administration black listed the most democratic Iranian resistance(MEK) just to please Mullahs. Today we all are paying for that big mistake by having to confront a regime that seeks nuclear weapons and kills innocent people in Iran. Why you are this much absented mine to forgot that : The Mullahs tooke Americans diplomats hostage in Tehran in 1979, and a truck loaded with explosives blew up in front of American Embassy in Beirut, Iranians do not want the mullahs regime. Only last month 90 thousand of iranians gatherd in France to support Mojahedin (MEK) of Iran and their leader Mrs. Rajavi . Is this enought to wake you up to stop lieing what Mullas are lieing for three decades?
Karim1337
July 10th, 2009 at 6:05 am
Thank you Congressman Bob Filner & Congressman Rohrabcher. The MEK and Mojahedin are freedom fighters, and they are the main democratic opposition against the Mullah's regime. They are the only way to free Iran from the Mullahs without causing a war.
vicpic
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:18 pm
A Question for Mr. Charles Davis,
A writer must be able to prove the points in his article, so my point is Why did you link Womens Freedom Forum to the state department list of terrorists???
The fact is NCRI is on the terrorist list, be it your view or my view why it is a wrong policy or ….
if you believe in the values of journalism, in which you are a writer than you have not right whatsoever to accuse an women's rights organizations, especially at a time when we all see what women is doing inside Iran for freedom and democracy.
vicpic
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:34 pm
do you or do you not want the Iranian people get back their freedom and rights by their protests and uprising inside Iran? Everyone supports the iranian people now, but your comments serve no purpose other than to justify the regime to execute, torture and terrorize its people,
If you really are against terrorists please tell us what you are doing in support of the people against this religious dicator?
hamvatan
July 22nd, 2009 at 11:52 pm
Mr. Davis,
I am not surprised about your article at all because Antiwar and moveon.com was lobbying for Iranian regime during Bush era. At that time Antiwar was financial well off with people donation and mullah’s money as well but now since presidency of Barrack Obama your donation has depleted but mullah’s money increase. I do not blame you to write a false article about POMI because your sponsor has been repeating it for past 30 years. Money talks and you walk with it. Iranian people will hold you up in the court of law one day. You should be shame of yourself.