Will Obama Paint Mitt as Warmonger?
Gen. Sherman’s burning of Atlanta and March to the Sea ensured Abraham Lincoln’s re-election in 1864.
William McKinley, with his triumph over Spain and determination to pacify and hold the Philippines, easily held off William Jennings Bryan in 1900.
Yet Woodrow Wilson won in 1916 on the slogan, “He Kept Us Out of War!” And Dwight Eisenhower won a landslide with his declaration about the stalemate in Harry Truman’s war: “I shall go to Korea.”
Richard Nixon pledged in 1968 that “new leadership will end the war and win the peace.” Vice President Hubert Humphrey, behind by double digits on Oct. 1, promised to halt the bombing of North Vietnam. He united his party and closed the gap to less than a point by Election Day.
George McGovern ran as an antiwar candidate in 1972. By November, almost all U.S. troops were home from Vietnam, however, and in late October Henry Kissinger had announced, “Peace is at hand.” Nixon had expropriated the peace issue. Result: 49 states.
Today, after the longest wars in our history in Afghanistan and Iraq, Americans are sick over the 6,500 dead and 40,000 wounded, fed up with the $2 trillion in costs, and disillusioned with the results that a decade of sacrifice has produced in Baghdad and Kabul.
Aware of this war weariness, especially among women, President Obama and Vice President Biden seem intent on appearing before the nation on Election Day as the sole peace party. This fact leaps out of a close read of Biden’s debate transcript.
Lost in his manic grinning and mocking laughter at Paul Ryan’s points and rude interruptions was a recurring theme: President Obama ended the war in Iraq and is dialing back the war in Afghanistan, but Ryan and Romney seem to be looking to new military interventions in Syria and Iran.
Consider but a few Biden comments nestled in the transcript of his half of that 90-minute debate.
“The last thing we need now is another war.”
“Are you (Ryan) … going to go to war?”
“We will not let them (the Iranians) acquire a nuclear weapon, period, unless he’s (Ryan) talking about going to war.”
“War should always be the absolute last resort.”
“He (Ryan) voted to put two wars on a credit card.”
“We’ve been in this war (Afghanistan) for over a decade. … We are leaving in 2014, period.”
About intervention in Syria, Biden said: “The last thing America needs is to get into another ground war in the Middle East, requiring tens of thousands if not well over a hundred thousand American forces.”
This drumbeat, implying Romney and Ryan are champing at the bit to get into the war in Syria or into a new war with Iran, was deliberate.
Biden’s words almost surely reflect what Democratic focus groups, pollsters, political analysts and pundits are advising the party to say and do: Play the peace card Monday night in Boca Raton, Fla., and tag Romney-Ryan as a trigger-happy ticket of the war party.
The charges Romney is likely to hear from the president and the questions he is likely to face from the moderator, pushing him toward bellicosity, are not that difficult to discern.
“Governor, President Obama has said Iran will not be allowed to get a nuclear weapon. You have said Iran will not be allowed to have a ‘nuclear weapons capability.’ What is the difference? Doesn’t Iran already have the capability to produce a nuclear weapon? What will you do about it?”
“Governor, Paul Ryan said in his debate Iran ‘is racing toward a nuclear weapon.” But 16 U.S. intelligence agencies said in 2007 and reaffirmed in 2011 that Iran has no nuclear weapons program. What is your evidence that Iran is ‘racing toward a nuclear weapon?’”
“Governor, you have said of America and Israel, ‘The world must never see daylight between our two nations.’ Does that mean if Israel attacks Iran, you would take us to war on Israel’s side?”
“Governor, at VMI you said, ‘In Syria, I will work … to identify and organize those members of the opposition who share our values and ensure they obtain the arms they need to defeat Assad’s tanks, helicopters and fighter jets.’ Would you give surface-to-air missiles to the Syrian rebels?”
“Governor, Japan and China are at sword’s point over the Senkaku Islands. If war breaks out, are we obligated by our alliance with Japan to come to her defense?”
The Republican peril in Boca Raton is that headlines the next day will have Romney, consciously or inadvertently, laying down some marker for a new war.
“Peace through strength,” the Eisenhower-Reagan slogan, is the GOP slogan that still resonates with American voters.
Even in 1940, FDR, though plotting war, ran as a peace candidate:
“I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars.”
Hopefully, Gov. Romney will say something like this, and mean it.
Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?” To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM
Read more by Patrick J. Buchanan
- What Should Americans Die For? – May 16th, 2013
- Who Are the War Criminals in Syria? – May 6th, 2013
- Their War, Not Ours – April 29th, 2013
- Is War With North Korea Inevitable? – April 4th, 2013
- Goading Gullible America Into War – March 21st, 2013





Johnny in Wi.
October 18th, 2012 at 9:41 pm
Pat Buchanan hits a home run here. Romney has his last chance to put forth a more peaceful foreign policy in this coming debate. It is his last chance to do so. Otherwise one warmonger Obama will call the other candiate Romney a warmonger. They are both warmongers but Romney is a fool if he lets Obama paint him as one.
Mohammed
October 18th, 2012 at 11:56 pm
I like the answer of this German Scholar when he was asked about terrorism and Islam: He said:
·Who started the First World War, which killed 37 million and injured 22, 379, 053 that includes 7 million civilians?Muslims?
·Who started the Second World War, which killed over 60 million, which was over 2.5% of the world population?Muslims?
·Who killed about 20 million of Aborigines in Australia? Muslims?
·Who drop the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which killed 166,000 people in Hiroshima and 80,000 in Nagasaki? Muslims?
·Who killed more than 100 million Red Indians in North America?Muslims?
·Who killed more than 50 million Indian in South America?Muslims?
·Who took about 180 million African people as slaves and when 88% of them died, threw them into the Atlantic Ocean?Muslims?
NO
They weren’t Muslims! First of all, you have to define terrorism properly…. If a non-Muslim does something bad… it is crime. But if a Muslim commits the same, he is a terrorist. So first remove the double standard… then come to the point.
*** Just for your information ***
Duglarri
October 19th, 2012 at 12:01 am
Does Romney have the guts to run to the left of a democrat? Seems unlikely. He's going to continue to try to flank Obama to the right, because his base would vaporize in fury if he went left. But what room is there to the right? How do you get to the right of six wars, hundreds of drone strikes, assassination of American citizens, including a 16-year-old, indefinite detention, permanent secret prisons, Guantanamo bay kept open forever, unlimited support for Israel, and a completely unjustifiable sanctions regime against Iran to stop them from doing something they're not doing.
The only room the right is completely insane- which is why Biden had such an easy time with Ryan in his debate. The only way to be tougher on Iran, Biden pointed out, is to just attack them right away.
What's Romney going to propose that's more belligerent than Obama is already? Invade Mexico?
There's no more than a knife's-edge of space to the right. But he's going to try and squeeze in there all the same, and Obama will have an opportunity to make him sound like a complete nutcase.
Because the people who put Romney where he is expect no less.
curmudgeonvt
October 19th, 2012 at 5:47 am
Romney is an Alpha-Alpha and won't be outdone, especially by some "career politician"…so, yes, he will portray himself as a bigger warmonger…because, well, he has to be top dog…it's genetic…like schizophrenia.
omop
October 19th, 2012 at 5:59 am
Obama does not need to paint Mitt, the draft dodging missionary to Paris, France during the Vietnam War [ imagine converting the French to Mormonism !] a war monger.
When was the last time a Presidential candidate brazenly travel to a state that has been at war and militarily occupies parts of other countries [Palestinian, Syria] and declares its intentions to "destroy" another state [Iran]?
And lastly when was the last time a Presidential candidate had the Prime Minister of a foreign state do a television ad in support of his candidacy in Florida, USA?
Could it be that Mr.Buchanan's commentary be considered sarcastic satire?
John V. Walsh
October 19th, 2012 at 6:01 am
Pat makes a lot of good points.
But he is a divided mind and he runs into himself when he calls for "peace through strength." That is an opening for a vast standing army and a worldwide empire of bases.
Better to say, peace is ethical and peace is not costly.
JLS
October 19th, 2012 at 7:06 am
"Today, after the longest wars in our history in Afghanistan and Iraq, Americans are sick over the 6,500 dead and 40,000 wounded, fed up with the $2 trillion in costs, and disillusioned with the results that a decade of sacrifice has produced in Baghdad and Kabul."
Just to be clear, what It was supposed to produce was a new puppet state for the CIA and state department. Not anyhing for the American people.
Outsider
October 19th, 2012 at 8:29 am
I've thought for some time that Romney would be winning if it weren't for his hyper aggressive foreign policy. One reason Bush essentially tied Gore in 2000 was because he ran on a humbler foreign policy with no nation building. Of course, 9/11 changed all that as it transformed the Repubs into the current, neocon run, War Party.
As issues of war and peace trumps all else for many voters (the president's real power, after all, is on foreign policy where he is a near-dictator), I can't see many Paulites voting Romney. Don't be surprised if Gary Johnson (who is not even counted by the pollsters) does much better than expected.
Tom Mauel
October 19th, 2012 at 9:48 am
Pat Buchanan is always an informative read, to the point, and leaves a heavy question to ponder.
jospin
October 19th, 2012 at 11:03 am
today's american is a crazy, fanatical, fool.
Sam
October 19th, 2012 at 12:05 pm
The american electorate would be well advised to give Obama a second chance. He inherited a very difficult economy and two wars from Bush II, tried his best and would continue to do so. Romney would outsource his foreign policy to Bibi and the world can not afford a bigger war in the ME. Most people abroad see it this way.
Rich
October 19th, 2012 at 2:50 pm
-If my history is correct, the Ottoman empire(not a very friendly bunch) was deeply involved in WWI
-WWII was started by post-Christian and atheistic Europeans
-20 million aborigines in Australia, you think? Most Aborigines died of disease, few were killed in war
-Japan attacked the US first, committed atrocities on a scale similar to that of the Turks and refused to surrender until after the atom bomb attacks.
-100 million red Indians in North America? Where do you get your numbers? Of the 10 million Indians in North America and the 10 million in South America, the majority died from disease, some died in wars and most were either absorbed or have descendants still living.
-Most African tribes kept slaves, Muslims took slaves and sold them to the Europeans, Americans actually fought a bloody civil war to free their slaves.
That being said we are a fallen people and all nations have blood on their hands. I think it is considered an act of terrorism if the civilian population is targeted by irregular fighters. Don't take any of this to mean I support any army or people killing the innocent, but I also don't go for that "white guilt" thing.
klyde
October 19th, 2012 at 3:58 pm
From what I have seen running as a peace candidate in this armed madhouse is a losing proposition.
Sam
October 19th, 2012 at 4:25 pm
Take the lesser EVIL.
Outsider
October 19th, 2012 at 7:24 pm
I disagree, Sam. Vote your concience. If you are truly anti-war, vote third party, especially since voters in most states do not matter due to the Electoral College. This election is only being contested in a few battleground states.
abe
October 19th, 2012 at 8:45 pm
I couldn't vote for either of these New World Order freaks! I voted for Pat Buchanan years ago and have not voted for a disgusting Dem/Repug since. It has been 3rd party Nader twice and this time Gary Johnson. The sight of Joe Lieberman makes me sick and having this Israel first America last scumbag at Sec.of State or Sec of Defense under Romney makes me shiver, I have not found words powerful enough to discribe the rage I feel when I see that bastards face!!!
masmanz
October 19th, 2012 at 8:48 pm
Which one is the lesser evil? The one who says that I will bring peace and then goes for war, or the one who doesn't say I will bring peace and then goes for war?