Is It Time to Come Home?
Is it not long past time to do a cost-benefit analysis of our involvement in the Middle and Near East?
In this brief century alone, we have fought the two longest wars in our history there, put our full moral authority behind an “Arab Spring” that brought down allies in Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen, and provided the air power that saved Benghazi and brought down Moammar Gadhafi.
Yet this week U.S. embassies were under siege in Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen, and U.S. diplomats were massacred in Benghazi.
The cost of our two wars is 6,500 dead, 40,000 wounded, and $2 trillion piled onto a national debt that is $16 trillion, larger than the entire U.S. economy. And what in heaven’s name do we have to show for it?
We face pandemic hatred of our country from Morocco to Pakistan. The sight of American flags being ripped to shreds and burned by mobs has become so common over there we seem almost to have gotten used to it.
What are the roots of that Arab and Islamic hatred?
Osama bin Laden in his declaration of war against us gave three reasons as his casus belli.
His first reason for war was the presence of U.S. troops on the soil of Saudi Arabia, sacred home to Mecca and Medina. His second was the U.S. sanctions on Iraq then said to be causing the premature deaths of as many as 500,000 Iraqi children.
Third was U.S. support for Israel, seen in the Arab world as a colonial implant to humiliate them and deny to the Palestinian people their right to a nation of their own.
Lately, new causes of Arab and Muslim hatred of us have arisen.
The first is what devout Muslims regard as our immoral and decadent culture, which they see as a threat to their societies and their young.
The second are the Islam haters and baiters in America and the West who deliberately provoke them with insulting and blasphemous portrayals of the Prophet and their faith.
While the U.S. bases in Saudi Arabia have by now largely been closed, and the United States is largely withdrawn from Iraq and the sanctions there have all been lifted, America is not going to change herself to accommodate their world.
Support of Israel is the declared position of both parties. And, though Secretary of State Hillary Clinton rightly called the crude amateur film Innocence of Muslims, which caused the latest anti-American rioting, both disgusting and reprehensible, we are not going to repeal the First Amendment, which protects provocateurs and pornographers.
Yet, worldwide, there are hundreds of millions of Muslims for whom their faith is their most priceless possession. They live it. They will die for it. And not a few will kill for it. Others will seize upon real or imagined insults to that faith to excite the crowds to expel us from their world.
And some Americans will accommodate them by using books, films, and videos to manifest their contempt of Islam.
So we have here an irreconcilable conflict.
The Islamic word, especially across the Arab region, is undergoing a transformation, a Great Awakening. Muslims from Nigeria to Mali to Ethiopia to Sudan to the Maghreb and Middle and Near East are growing more militant and more hostile toward Christianity and other faiths.
And as we are not going to change our position on Israel, or our culture, such as it is, or our First Amendment, clashes between us are inevitable.
Perhaps the best course of action for America is to lower our profile in that region, bring most of our diplomats and troops home, and let these people work out their destiny themselves.
Second, given the costs and consequences of our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and intervention in Libya, let the Syrians settle their war themselves. There is no guarantee the fall of Bashar Assad, given the jihadist and al-Qaeda presence in the forces seeking his overthrow, will be an improvement for the United States.
Third, the United States should tell the Egyptian government that its failure to provide security for our embassy was an outrage, that if we cannot see them as a friendly government with common interests, we will not hesitate to cut off aid and warn U.S. citizens not to travel to Egypt.
Without U.S. aid and Western loans and tourists, Egypt’s economy would sink with President Mursi in the wheelhouse. We must make it clear to them that, denied the respect our nation deserves, we are willing to pull the plug on his regime.
The Middle East appears to be undergoing a sectarian and tribal conflict not unlike our Thirty Years’ War from 1618 to 1648. As they stayed out of our Thirty Years’ War, let us get out of theirs.
If they will not protect our embassies from mobs who come to burn our flag, let us lower the flag ourselves and bring Old Glory home.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM
Read more by Patrick J. Buchanan
- What Should Americans Die For? – May 16th, 2013
- Who Are the War Criminals in Syria? – May 6th, 2013
- Their War, Not Ours – April 29th, 2013
- Is War With North Korea Inevitable? – April 4th, 2013
- Goading Gullible America Into War – March 21st, 2013





Bill Lee
September 13th, 2012 at 9:14 pm
You neglected to mention the oil. That figures, mouthpiece for the globalist oligarchic slime.
JJJihad
September 13th, 2012 at 9:26 pm
The "shaking and breaking" of the US's "unshakeable" and "unbreakable" bond with the Zionist menace would solve 99% of the problem.
Peter
September 13th, 2012 at 9:43 pm
Mr Buchanan, your analysis is cynical and typical arrogant and ignorant american posture as I learned it from my stay in your country many years ago. After bringing this whole mess of destruction and sectarian violence on behalft of your oil companies and let alone the israelis to the Mideast, you now really dare to say: leave these people alone, they are all fanatics!?
Take history lessons, ask experts and THEN comment again.
THE US is the CORE of the mess there bringing millions of innocent people death and armageddon with your war machine!
stats79
September 13th, 2012 at 10:25 pm
I don't understand. You would prefer that the American's stay in the Middle East?
Johnny in Wi.
September 13th, 2012 at 10:59 pm
Pat Buchanan has been saying we should leave the Middle East and indeed the whole world and close up our military bases. He has been saying it for over 20 years, including in 3 runs for the American Presidency. He was right then and he is triple right now. Do you suggest we stay there and keep messing it up more? He didn't call them all fanantics. He was respectfull of the religious beliefs and just wants us to leave them alone.
davidgrayling
September 14th, 2012 at 1:52 am
"If they will not protect our embassies from mobs who come to burn our flag, let us lower the flag ourselves and bring Old Glory home."
That's the best idea I've ever heard an American put forward. And please stay at home with your flag. The rest of the world is sick of seeing it!
davidgrayling
September 14th, 2012 at 1:52 am
"If they will not protect our embassies from mobs who come to burn our flag, let us lower the flag ourselves and bring Old Glory home."
That's the best idea I've ever heard an American put forward. And please stay at home with your flag. The rest of the world is sick of seeing it!
sherban
September 14th, 2012 at 2:10 am
Peter is right,the tone of the article is that Arabs are expressing ingratitude for sacrifices US made for them (so think Buchanan usually,America is good ,generously,and is paid back by ingratitude),Will be great if US come back home and leave the world alone but US will not be contented to only observe how ungrateful the people are to America and then America and the "free world" will punish this ingratitude ,first by crippling sanctions and after it by crippling drones and so on until the ingrates will install governs "more benevolent" for US.
Bill the Butcher
September 14th, 2012 at 3:19 am
Some quotes from this article, and my responses:
“The cost of our two wars is 6,500 dead, 40,000 wounded, and $2 trillion piled onto a national debt that is $16 trillion…”
What a statement. Only the cost to the US matters, evidently. The cost to the Afghans and Iraqis, the Yemenis and Libyans, the Pakistanis and Syrians, whose nations have been and are being destroyed on a daily basis apparently does not matter to the author.
“His second was the U.S. sanctions on Iraq then said to be causing the premature deaths of as many as 500,000 Iraqi children.”
“Then said”? Is there any independent data that has proves the figure was wrong? If not, what exactly does this “then said” mean?
“…the United States should tell the Egyptian government that its failure to provide security for our embassy was an outrage, that if we cannot see them as a friendly government with common interests, we will not hesitate to cut off aid and warn U.S. citizens not to travel to Egypt… Without U.S. aid and Western loans and tourists, Egypt’s economy would sink with President Mursi in the wheelhouse.”
More than a smidgen of imperial grandeur there, methinks. Does Mr Buchanan mean that Europeans, for instance, or Canadians or Australians will stop investing in or visiting Egypt if the US does? Does the US have so much control over its “allies” as to be able to guarantee that, or is it an admission that those nations are merely puppets and vassals, as most of us already know?
It also seems to me that the Egyptians, after being at the receiving end of Western benevolence which meant decades of brutal dictatorship, might simply tell the US to take its aid and shove it where the sun don’t shine. After all, Asia is the new global powerhouse, and Indians and Chinese, to say nothing of the Russians, aren’t exactly bothered by what the US says.
“We must make it clear to them that, denied the respect our nation deserves, we are willing to pull the plug on his regime.”
What, precisely, makes Mr Buchanan imagine that the United States “deserves” respect? Respect is an earned attribute, and the US has squandered all it had, and more. As a citizen of the despised “Middle East” (actually, I’m South Asian, but since to Mr Buchanan Afghanistan is a “Middle Eastern” country, India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh are, too), I can certify that the US is merely a bullying imperialist warmonger in our eyes, and nothing short of the end of the Empire will ever change that.
“If they will not protect our embassies from mobs who come to burn our flag, let us lower the flag ourselves and bring Old Glory home.”
Take your embassies, which are basically CIA stations, with you, and don’t bring them back again.
Peter
September 14th, 2012 at 4:02 am
No, I do not want the US to stay in the Mideast. You should leave and let them settle their things and conflicts (which often resulted or were reinforced by US-Interventions or policies) alone, but the US has to take responsibility for the dire devastations caused by the wars and the consequences. For example press Israel to make peace whith its neighbours which it obviously does NOT want. And pay for the destruction and deaths you caused. US-Imperialism to my opinion in his consequences is to some parts of the world as destructive as the German Wehrmacht was to large parts of Europe in WWII. Being at the receiving end of bunker busters and cruise missiles is not that funny I suppose.
I just feel, that the comment of Mr. Buchanan is written from a very one sided point of view (he counts US casualties but totally ignores the million dead iraqis of EVERY faith.
And eventually (maybe I got wrong the article, but I do not think so as my English is not that bad) he says: Well these people are on a developmental level which is centuries from ours away and they simply are in a stage of religious war etc, and they do not appreciate the good intentions of democracy and benefits we give them.
So that I find cynical and kind of ignorant to just ignore the causes of this chaos which shakes now the Mideast.
MoT
September 14th, 2012 at 4:11 am
Pat, in what I've come to regard as his "typical" pattern, swings from justifiable disgust at the American Imperium and clear headed analysis, to jingoism and patriotic chest beating. It never ceases to amaze me and yet I ask myself why should I be amazed because I've seen this for decades.
Smithboy
September 14th, 2012 at 4:29 am
I would vote for Pat for president just to see that mentally deranged warmonger, Netanyahu, have a stroke.
Mark
September 14th, 2012 at 5:25 am
Writing primarily for an Ameican audience and specifically pleading with the "conservative" right that Pat had been associated with it's not inappropriate for Mr. Buchanan to use "American" casualties and costs in his arguement. The Americans that control the debate in this country regarding the Middle East care not a whit about non-Americans so to use Afghan, Iraqi and other deaths and casualties in making is case would only galvanize the deafness of those he is trying to convince of another path.
Yes, respect must be earned and it will be generations before the United States can actually be respected around the globe as opposed to feared.
As far as the CIA goes, the best thing to do in Langley, Virginia would be to level the buildings and salt the fields.
Bruce Richardson
September 14th, 2012 at 5:51 am
Brilliant analysis and articulation. While we use "the war on terror" to justify wars of aggression…the war in Afghanistan, for one example, was a result of failing negotiations for the Trans-Afghan-Pipeline with the Taliban who were favoring Bridas of Argentina who had presented a better deal. This required regime change to put negotiations on a pro-US track. During the Summer of 2001, months prior to 9/11, the US informed Pakistans Secretary Niaz Niak at a conference in Berlin that "we will attack Afghanistan before the snow flies in October." Yet we continue to link Afghanistan and the Taliban to 9/11.
Dahoit
September 14th, 2012 at 6:40 am
Hey Pat,can you fill that moron Mitt in on all of this?He keeps stepping in Ziodoodoo,making Israeli centric idiot statements that will prevent his election as he commits electoral suicide.Unbelievable the tone deafness of our elected official falling over themselves in backing spies,weapon and money thieves and fifth columnist traitors,simply amazing.
MSN blackmail?
Gera Rosy
September 14th, 2012 at 6:47 am
You nailed it MoT! I've read all of Buchanan's books and was astounded by the "jingoism and patriotic chest beating." My first thought was of the authenticity of the piece. Did Pat really write this? If he did then he must be down on all fours howling at the moon.
Toba
September 14th, 2012 at 7:24 am
…..".that denied the respect our nation deserves"…. Wow! That'a kind of like a Mafia Boss insisting that his victims and their families respect his family or else he's not going to have anything to do with them.
Rich
September 14th, 2012 at 7:33 am
Unfortunately, retreating from the mid-east will only embolden the jihadists. I'm against war, too, but does anybody really believe the terrorists will leave us alone if they think they've defeated us, chased us home? There are better ways, in my opinion, to fight the terrorists, but in my experience, running from a bully doesn't get him to leave you alone.
Rightster
September 14th, 2012 at 7:52 am
Of course they would "leave us alone" if we retreated from their countries. Are they attacking Switzerland, France, or Poland?
gmc1987
September 14th, 2012 at 8:12 am
I thnk Pat is on to something. We really need to re-evaluate our foreign policy. If something is not working, fix it. The costs of conflict is in the billions, will perpetual costs to the injured military personnal for their injuries. There is no reason why the U.S. cannot try a different approach. Why Not? Bring all the troops home and lets see what happens. Stop support for that Point Man, ( Israel) and let's see if the world becomes better for us. We can always resort to conflict; right? Why not give peace a chance. Thank you Pat for this article.
gmc1987
September 14th, 2012 at 8:12 am
I thnk Pat is on to something. We really need to re-evaluate our foreign policy. If something is not working, fix it. The costs of conflict is in the billions, with perpetual costs to the injured military personnal for their injuries. There is no reason why the U.S. cannot try a different approach. Why Not? Bring all the troops home and lets see what happens. Stop support for that Point Man, ( Israel) and let's see if the world becomes better for us. We can always resort to conflict; right? Why not give peace a chance. Thank you Pat for this article.
Michael
September 14th, 2012 at 8:50 am
We are ready to have a conversation with Muslim World leadership on behalf of the citizens of our country The United States of America. We can bring about the climate for security and solid strong relations with them based on The Quran, The Sunna of Prophet Mohammed (SAWS) and the fiqa of The Greatest Islamic Leader produce in America Imam W.Deen Mohammed. We have the spokespersons and our translators……now do we as a country have the heart to trust its own to do this.
@shekissesfrogs
September 14th, 2012 at 9:27 am
Have you seen his foreign policy? http://mi.tt/QK1PN9 Elliot Cohen is his go to guy. The whole thing is Israeli centric, hyper militaristic with a bigger boot on Palestinians necks. He's also been friends with Netanyahu for years, and since he's also a Mormon Israelite- Israel or jews can do no wrong. His Darbyite-British Isrealist Religion says so.
After what these jerks did under Bush, they didn't learn anything. (could say the same thing about Dems, at least they pay it tribute with rhetoric- though not in deed.)
And Cofer Black would run his intelligence. He's been using his skills to work for Monsanto and other International corps to spy on and infiltrate groups like farmers orgs.
See the comment about Bhutto here. Super scary spooky. http://bit.ly/QK6iPY
mark
September 14th, 2012 at 9:41 am
Peter stop repeating the lie about oil. And Mr. Buchanan is not arrogant and certainly not ignorant. You are the ignorant one.
The Left trotted out the lie of "No Blood for Oil" as the war in Iraq looked inevitable back in 2002. They made the same false claim before GHW Bush's war in 1991. But oil in the Middle East has not been denied the West since the 70s, the first time being right after when the US supplied emergency aid to Israel during the 1973 war.
But American oil companies never exploited Iraqi oil as predicted. In 2009, Russia and China have won most of the contracts to develop Iraqi oil fields, and among western concerns, it is British Petroleum and Royal Dutch Shill that are second in their access to Iraqi oil. The US wars on Iraq have never been about oil as pretenders like you have claimed. But Zionist fingerprints are all over Washington's mendacious manipulations throughout that region.
bill
September 14th, 2012 at 9:41 am
Wasn't it France and Britain who wanted led the charge in Libya? Yes we should bring all our troops home.
bill
September 14th, 2012 at 9:53 am
Yes, and some of us Americans are sick of International Coalitions, where America takes the blame and foots the bill.
Jaime
September 14th, 2012 at 9:54 am
"We must make it clear to them that, denied the respect our nation deserves, we are willing to pull the plug on his regime." What respect can you, with a straight face, demand when you give none to other nation?. Don't whine at the blowback that you yourselves caused. For decades you have meddled, bribed, assassinated, supported coups,plundered, invaded, and destroyed whole nations, and now you come and want respect? You have precisely the type of attitude the rest of the world so much hates. You create a mess and then blame it onto others. However, the little sympathy your country still had in some quarters has dried up.
bill
September 14th, 2012 at 10:08 am
Let them keep their oil, they can't eat it, they have to sell it to make money for their nation, if their is no one to get it out of the ground then they can't sell it. See how that works.
Generalissimo X
September 14th, 2012 at 10:29 am
"Perhaps the best course of action for America is to lower our profile in that region, bring most of our diplomats and troops home, and let these people work out their destiny themselves."
gee, ya think? should have made that statement in like 1960. no, we had to back israel for some unknown reason? i mean, what good would it have to have some upstart land stealing nation in the region? who'd benefit from 50 years of low level warfare? u.s. corporations that's who. and as long as they are making tons, there will be no peace or anything even approximating it.
Generalissimo X
September 14th, 2012 at 10:35 am
when has the u.s. taken responsibility for anything? when has it even had a moment of reflection where it not only considers the short term effects, but also the long term implications of it's actions? as for forcing israel to make peace, i have no disagreement but it will NEVER happen. ever. the israeli maniacs and their collective persecution complex make them great dupes for our warfare and weaponry. they're more than happy to use it to brutalize and oppress any and all in the region.
your points are all completely valid but buchanan knows his audience. americans by and large have no care or interest in the millions of dead we've murdered in the last decade alone. 5,000 american dead might get someone's attention. 1,000,000 dead iraqis are collateral damage and had it coming in the first place.
Jim Houle
September 14th, 2012 at 11:03 am
Buchanan, you have accumulated a lot of the facts, at least from the inherent myopia of America, but can't see the answer to the question: "Is it time went came home?" Answer: yes – 20 years ago.
jrs
September 14th, 2012 at 11:41 am
^^ GETS IT!
Anyone who thinks Buchanan represents "imperial grandieur" or something has no idea what most U.S. opinion especially of political commentators really is. They have no idea how far out there and radically anti-interventionist Buchanan is compared to the mainstream.
Buchanan writes a good thoughtful piece and this article gets nothing but criticism. Meanwhile the President blabs on about "justice must be done", the mainstream right and Romney try to appear more militant than thou, and all much of the liberal blogosphere does is apologize for Obama. But yea the main outrage is that Pat Buchanan, who has been anti-interventionism for decades, is not Noam Chomsky! AS IF that is where the mainstream of American opinion is, and the starting point!
Selling anti-interventionism on self-interest isn't the only argument for anti-interventionism, sure there is also a moral argument, but it is a good one. There are people in the U.S. at present who can't get jobs, who live on food stamps, who are falling into poverty, who have no hope for the economy. Are they really benefitting from all the money squandered on wars?
james
September 14th, 2012 at 12:16 pm
I agree with you Peter, Puke Canon's position wreaks with arrogance and American so called exeptionalism. I do understand that he wanted out of all entanglements for a long time now but , as the so called civilized world keeps screaming, it is a democracy and the whole nation is responsible for what they broke. You just cannot leave after all that destruction no matter how exceptional you are.
Than again, the Middle East used to do very good without fanaticism during most of last century, until a certain shitty little state was created. When you do such an injustice extremism is the logical outcome, no justice, no peace.
Then again, I would like the author of this article also to hold his blood thirsty, foaming at the mouth Christian zionists country me to the same standard, they are a much more dangerous bunch with nukes.
james
September 14th, 2012 at 12:22 pm
What? Your America is behind everything, there is no coalition in the world today with America in it that is not kept alive by coercion, threats and bribery by America, the rest of the world is really sick of the America of today. one exception, their coalition with a certain shitty little country in the M.E. that is causing all the trouble, they had no hand in it.
So, Please America go back and close your borders until you decide to join the human race again.
Mark
September 14th, 2012 at 2:44 pm
The U.S. is supposed to be a representative republic. It has devolved into a merchantilist oligarchy with a single political machine; one side being labled "D". the other, "R". The entire electoral process is a rigged game with its sole aim to keep the R's & D's maintaining their stranglehold on the levers of government.
Regretably, the American population has been so brainwashed by the government run schools they cannot think outside this paradigm. A woman actually called a local Charlotte, NC talk show and stated that it took less courage for the colonists to take up arms against the British Crown to establish the country that it would to take a gamble at the polls and vote for a third party candidate(assuming they could get over the massive ballot access hurdles set up by the R's & D's). She just couldn't vote outside the 2-Party System because, heaven forbid, the "other guy" would get elected.
Sam
September 14th, 2012 at 3:02 pm
sixty years ago, Europe was on the same way.
Sam
September 14th, 2012 at 3:23 pm
The world is longing for peace. May God help us all and give us a peace epoch.
Backwoodsman
September 14th, 2012 at 3:26 pm
Come to think of it, Gaddafi had a diplomatic Cold War against Switzerland, when they tried to arrest his brat Hannibal for spanking the maid (well, actually it was a good deal worse than a spanking).
Almost miss the old reprobate…
GoPat
September 14th, 2012 at 4:55 pm
Pat, thanks again for making sense. However, America is uninformed and awash in ignorance.
TruthHurts
September 14th, 2012 at 5:18 pm
The only solution is to pull the plug on Israel, and end our Zionist centered foreign policy.
Ready to go down the drain for Israel?
bilejones
September 14th, 2012 at 5:24 pm
"put our full moral authority behind an Arab Spring that brought down allies in Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen"
pendulum
September 14th, 2012 at 5:24 pm
the US does get the respect it deserves
bill
September 14th, 2012 at 5:54 pm
Lot's of us would like nothing more than to close our borders and leave you to the human race to the bottom.
No coalition? Hahahahahaa
Please, move the UN, IMF, World Bank, WTO, WHO, to Europe, oh yeah and the Europeans can take back their Central Bank too.
denk
September 14th, 2012 at 7:07 pm
so why dont u petition the wh to bring back
all them *boys* insead of whinning here ?
go try it n see how does that work out ;-)
im sure the nobel peace laureate will listen to u hahaha
u r supposed to be a democracy aint u kid ?
james
September 15th, 2012 at 12:28 am
In other word Mark, you need an American Spring to take your country back. It is a beautiful place with potentially remarkable people, please change course.
No matter how I look at it, your problems are a logical outcome of the influence wielded by you know who, just look at Germany between WWI & WWII.
james
September 15th, 2012 at 12:43 am
These organizations are there because it was a different America then Bill, now they are there because your Mafia style government can coerce, bully and threaten in their own backyard. Believe me if they tried to locate and I am sure a lot of them want it, your Bosses will prevent it.
Talking about central banks, get your claws and hoofs out of poor countries mouths through your world bank which you control. Your bosses make all those are kept in poverty except for a few traitors for control and dressing purposes. I suggest you read "confessions on an economic hit man" for more details.
Like the rest of the real civilized world agrees with me, please LEAVE US THE F*CK ALONE., and if you like your little friends and staunch allies "sic" in the Middle East, I suggest you save a lot of money and efforts and world hatred for you and take them as
well, you can hug them and kiss them every morning if you really like them so much.
crumudgeion
September 17th, 2012 at 7:48 am
The military is the ultimate force to impose the economic oppression documented by William Blum in KILLING HOPE and confirmed by John Perkins in CONFESSION OF AN ECONOMIC HIT MAN. The empire building by the U.S./CIA is to further the mercantile interests of the CFR./IMF/World Bank and Wall Street. The operating arm of Wall Street is the CIA. The government receives no benefit from empire building.
Stephen Burchett
September 18th, 2012 at 7:13 am
Good article Pat
How ever you must remember Islam is a way of life that has no room for the U.S. as we know it. There is a map of the U.S under Islamic rule..
What Islam needs is religious reformation to bring Islam into the 21 ST century until then they need to be bombed back into the stone age because they are nothing but misled animals. If we pull out of the Middle East they will bring it to our streets.