A Decade of War – for What?
"My fellow Americans, we have traveled through more than a decade under the dark cloud of war," said Barack Obama from Bagram Air Base.
"Here in the predawn darkness, we can see the light of a new day on the horizon. The Iraq War is over. The number of troops in harm’s way has been cut in half, and more will be coming home. … The time of war began in Afghanistan, and this is where it will end."
Interesting comment, that last.
If "the time of war" is at an end, does that rule out U.S. military action in Syria or war on Iran?
Setting aside the 14,000-mile round trip to Afghanistan to do an end zone dance on the anniversary of Seal Team Six’s dispatch of Osama bin Laden, Obama seems to have boxed in his Republican rivals.
His assurance that our wars are ending and our troops are coming home reflects the national will. And his partnership agreement with President Hamid Karzai and pledge that a U.S. force will remain to train the Afghan army and prevent al-Qaeda’s return inoculates him against the charge that he is cutting and running.
Yet The New York Times was disappointed.
Obama had not said how the United States is to train the Afghan army to defeat the Taliban by 2014, nor how we can get Karzai to deal with the pervasive corruption and incompetence of his government.
Nor did Obama say how we can be certain al-Qaeda will not return when we depart.
The Times misses the point.
This speech was not designed to lay out a U.S. strategy for the next 12 years, but to get Barack Obama past the post in November.
And for that objective, the speech works.
No one knows what will happen when 23,000 more U.S. troops come home by Sept. 30, and all combat troops are out in 2014. The odds are that, after a "decent interval," like the one in Vietnam from 1973 to 1975, the Taliban will return to take vengeance on all who abandoned them, and Afghanistan will come again to resemble the land we invaded a decade ago.
Why is this probable?
First, because the Taliban have shown themselves to be, though fewer in number, a superior fighting force to the Afghan army. They have not needed foreigners to motivate, train, advise or lead them.
Nor have they needed foreign money to fight. Yet they have battled the best army in the world for a decade and repeatedly sacrificed their lives in suicide attacks.
How many Afghans on our side have launched suicide attacks?
Second, the Taliban are rooted in the Pashtun, the largest tribal group in Afghanistan, which constitutes half the population and is concentrated in the crucial south and east.
Third, they have a secure sanctuary in Pakistan.
Fourth, because, as we saw with the hysterical reaction to what U.S. troops thought was the routine burning of desecrated Qurans, Islam is the most powerful cultural and social force in the country. And the Taliban are the most deeply rooted in that faith.
Fifth, because nationalism is the most potent political current roiling nations from the Maghreb to Middle East to South Asia. And the Taliban have the causalities and credentials to prove they will fight forever to free their country of foreign influence.
A majority of Afghans surely wish the Taliban would not return, given the savagery of their previous rule and the desire of the Afghan people to be free to live their own lives according to their own interpretation of their faith.
Yet the Taliban have shown themselves willing to persist against huge odds, to fight and die in considerable numbers for the kind of country they wish to live in — and the kind of regime they wish to live under.
Our allies have not remotely matched their zeal.
"A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history," said Mohandas Gandhi.
So, after a decade of war in Afghanistan, what have we accomplished, and at what cost? Some 2,000 U.S. dead, 16,000 wounded, hundreds of billions sunk, scores of thousands of Afghan dead. Al-Qaeda was driven out a decade ago but is now in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, North Africa and Iraq.
The Taliban are gone from Kabul but may be coming back. And our hope of preserving what success we have had rests with Hamid Karzai.
"America has no designs beyond an end to al-Qaeda safe havens," said Obama in Bagram. "Our goal is not to build a country in America’s image, or to eradicate every vestige of the Taliban."
But if those are our goals, had we not achieved them all by early 2002? What, then, were we fighting for — these 10 years?
If we had to do it all over again, would we?
The nation now seems not to think so. And the nation is right.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM
Read more by Patrick J. Buchanan
- What Should Americans Die For? – May 16th, 2013
- Who Are the War Criminals in Syria? – May 6th, 2013
- Their War, Not Ours – April 29th, 2013
- Is War With North Korea Inevitable? – April 4th, 2013
- Goading Gullible America Into War – March 21st, 2013





RickR30
May 3rd, 2012 at 10:15 pm
Ah yes, baruch obama, the shapeshifter, the neocon uberpuppet who turned out more bloodthirsty than the dickster cheney much to the hails of the neocon infected media, now remorphs into the peace candidate in time for elections. Wars are over. Our psychologically devastated troops come back home with no help or support in sight. Wonderful. What's next, he'll offer to restore the Constitution? To undo the countless illegal and unconstitutional laws that the negligent congress has passed granting him powers no president can have? Only to morph back into the greatest enemy of the Constitution and the American people once he wins?
Missing in Pat's article is the real reason for the decade of aggression- the massive global plan of redistribution of wealth: from the Middle class to the lazy upper class of inbred retards, from the 99% to the 1%, from the Working class to the parasitic weapons mobsters.
Walter Cole
May 4th, 2012 at 1:00 am
Pat says that the Taliban have won, but only the war in Afghanistan, but what about the continuing war on terror? Osama bin Laden has won the war on terror and continues to destroy America, one peace at a time.
No Rick, the war on terror isn´t over yet, in fact it´s spread all over the world, even back to the homeland. And how did this all happen? According to the official US government´s story, everything was carefully planned and executed by Osama bin Laden and his band of Al Qaida terrorists, from the very caves of Afghanistan. Remember, they never numbered more than one hundred and would be quickly rounded up with our attack on and invasion of Afghanistan. It´s all bin Laden´s fault – he is responsible for 9-11 and every other hostility in the world. Homeland Security is arming our police departments with drones and tanks in order to protect us from al Qaeda. My God, who was this bin Laden fellow? What will the history books say about him?
According to the US Government version, Osama bin Laden is the greatest military strategist and leader the world has ever known, by far. Nowhere in history has one man accomplished so much, against a force thousands of times its numbers.
He and his merry band of men, armed with handguns and dynamite, have come very close to the total destruction of the largest mega power in history of the world. He began by very successfully attacking the largest city and capital (indeed the military headquarters itself) of the US, using its own commercial aircraft as weapons, at the same time standing down the country´s air defense system. He planned and executed all of this from caves across the world in rural Afghanistan. What a guy! The government also tried to credit him with the Anthrax attacks, but that turned out to be a crazy American scientist acting on his own.
He enticed America to respond with all its power and might resulting in the invasion of two of the poorest nations in the world, causing America to almost destroy its economy, lose thousands of troops in battles, lose face and respect all over the world, etc. Osama did all of this without much of a budget while America spends trillions. What a guy!
He turns his enemy´s leaders into paranoid hysterics, to the point where they see Muslim terrorist behind every corner, trying to change America´s legal system to(Sharia Law, forcing them to create new dictatorial laws, taking more and more rights from its citizens, turning its population into frightened sheep, adapting the tools of the devil himself, causing America´s statistics on everything good to drop and drop. What a guy!
He created the War on Terror from his hideaways across the world. What an absolutely amazing guy. How should history write about Osama? According to the official US story, he is responsible for everything bad that has happened to the US and the world over the past decade. Why aren´t books being written on this guy and his team, in accordance with the US version of the al Qaeda conspiracy,? What an honor the US Government bestows on Osama through their al Qaeda conspiracy theory, an honor that should be reflected in history books all over the world. Don´t forget the fact that Osama was the indirect cause for Superman to renounce his US Citizenship and look for another country to live in. What a guy! Except for the fact that Obama was the bad guy, he is the most amazing warrior in the history of the world, and such a peaceful looking guy, observed taking midday walks through the mountainside, having talks with his followers, reading…who would ever imagine…? What a guy!
Our middle class is being wiped out, our infrastructure is crumbling, we officially condone and execute renditions, torture, assassinations, etc., our economy is so poor that we must borrow from China, we have become more and more hated and despised by more and more people in the world, all thanks to the actions of on one Osama bin Laden. What a guy!
Personally, I do not believe the official government version of what is happening and therefore do not believe anything I´ve written above, but we can´t have it both ways, and this a version of the government´s truth. If you believe the government, then Osama bin Laden´s legacy grows and grows, beyond his grave.
klyde
May 4th, 2012 at 2:36 am
For profit and power Buchanon. The warprofiteers have nearly bankrupted the US while lining thier pockets with uncounted billions of US taxpayer dollars. And we the impoverished citizens, we have seen our precious freedoms whittled away to the point that when the POTUS signed a bill making it legal to hold US citizens indefinately without charge or trial you heard not a peep from the masses. If you believe the official narrative then OBL and his allies have been successful beyond thier wildest dreams. They managed to do what the Soviet Union couldn't: turn the USA into a budding facist state.
Bruce Richardson
May 4th, 2012 at 5:37 am
While Mr. Buchannan correctly illustrates that the Taliban have their warts, America's allies, the Northern Alliance make them to appear as Girl Scouts. Made up of arms smugglers, narco-traffickers, war criminals and Soviet collaborators, this minority (Tajik and Uzbek and Hazara gang of thugs has no future for rule in Afghanistan. Under previous Rabbani/Massoud rule, this gang smuggled arms to Somalia which were deployed against US forces as but one example. In yet another, the Taliban succeeded in eradicating narcotics growth and proliferation in Afghanistan. The Northern Alliance brought it back in abundance. Essentially, the demonization of the Taliban is to justify an unjustifiable war.
carroll price
May 4th, 2012 at 6:28 am
Sorta reminds you of the Vietcong fighters who endured 20 years of gunship assaults, carpet bombing and chemical warfare to emerge victorious at the end.
Bob D
May 4th, 2012 at 8:20 am
I guess with everybody taking victory laps Pat is entitled to take his. Only thing is, George W and Obama take victory laps when they are trying to convince us of a lie. Pat is taking a victory lap when he is trying to rub in the fact that it is working out exactly as he predicted. Pat, you are out of step with the regiment. That's why you got fired.
J Harlan
May 4th, 2012 at 2:35 pm
"Yet they have battled the best army in the world for a decade"
The best army? Certainly the most expensive but if the US has/is being slowing ejected from Iraq and Afghanistan by people armed with 1960's era Soviet small arms and some demolitions what would have been the situation if the enemy had an upgrade with anti-tank and aircraft missiles? A technologically fairer fight, not even a fair fight, would result in catastrophe. A lesson for those wishing to attack Iran.
Strider55
May 4th, 2012 at 2:51 pm
Even 35+ years on a loud cadre of Vietnam vets still cling to the old Nazi "stab in the back" mantra. "If they'd just let us stay and kill more gooks, we'd have won," they whine. I wonder how many gung-ho Iraqistan vets will be making the same whine about the "towelheads" in the coming years.
Strider55
May 4th, 2012 at 2:56 pm
LRC columnist Fred Reed agreed with you in an essay a couple of years ago (and so do I). Hell, the Soviets reportedly used chemical weapons against the Afghans, and they still lost. Another shining example of TYA (Typical Yankee Arrogance).
Jaime
May 4th, 2012 at 7:57 pm
"…because the Taliban have shown themselves to be, though fewer in number, a superior fighting force to the Afghan army." Really? That's not the right comparison. In fact, the Taliban are kicking America's little ass. These fine warriors are only living to their own fame, and when the US invaded Afghanistan, they did it at their own peril.
Bill the Butcher
May 4th, 2012 at 8:52 pm
Sir, I take my hat off to you. You have written what I've thought, but so much better that I have no desire to try and improve on it.
james
May 5th, 2012 at 10:03 am
What a rant Walter, a pulitzer in the making.
james
May 5th, 2012 at 10:11 am
This is funny from Buchanan, although I agree on the thrust of his article he does not mention the very important fact that the US is currently in negotiations with the Taliban. This will further strengthen his argument, America has already lost.
Talking about the Afghan fighters, just worth to note that unlike the US pussies there, they fight on empty stomachs. The American will throw a fit if he did not get his KitKat or Mars bar.
Sam
May 5th, 2012 at 3:02 pm
Militarism and wars could not be the answer. The world needs more cooperation , fairness and justice
consentient
June 7th, 2012 at 4:35 am
There is no nation to be right or wrong – only individual people choosing whether they want to face the truth or not – that their government initiated this violence upon the people in Afghanistan, and that this is immoral, and done mainly for the profit of some rich and powerful men, and would not have occurred if there was no government with the capacity to do this.
Can you face the truth?
http://consentient.wordpress.com/2012/06/07/not-i…
Which are you?