Who Wants War With Iran?
On Sept. 21, 1976, as his car rounded Sheridan Circle on Embassy Row, former Chilean ambassador Orlando Letelier was assassinated by car bomb. Ronni Moffitt, a 25-year-old American woman who worked with Letelier at the leftist Institute for Policy Studies, died with him.
Michael Townley, an ex-CIA asset in the hire of Chile’s intelligence agency, confessed to using anti-Castro Cubans to murder Letelier, in what was regarded as an act of terrorism on U.S. soil.
Which raises a question: Are not the murders of four Iranian scientists associated with that nation’s nuclear program, by the attachment of bombs to their cars in Tehran, also acts of terrorism?
Had the Stalin- or Khrushchev-era Soviets done this to four U.S. scientists in Washington, would we not have regarded it as acts of terrorism and war?
Iran has accused the United States and Israel of murder. But Hillary Clinton emphatically denied any U.S. complicity: "I want to categorically deny any United States involvement in any kind of act of violence inside Iran."
"The United States had absolutely nothing to do with this," added National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor, "We strongly condemn all acts of violence, including acts of violence like this."
Victoria Nuland, Clinton’s spokeswoman at State, denounced "any assassination or attack on an innocent person, and we express our sympathies to the family."
The assassinated scientist was a supervisor at the Natanz uranium enrichment facility that hosts regular inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency. If Iran is building a bomb, it is not at Natanz.
U.S. denial of involvement leaves Mossad as the prime suspect. Israel has not denied it, and this comes at a sensitive time in U.S.-Israeli relations.
In Foreign Policy magazine, author and historian Mark Perry, claiming CIA documentation, alleges that Mossad agents in London posed as CIA agents and contacted Jundallah, a terrorist group, to bribe and recruit them to engage in acts of terror inside Iran.
Jundallah has conducted attacks in Sistan-Baluchistan province, killing government officials, soldiers, and women and children.
According to Perry, when George W. Bush learned of the Mossad agents posing as CIA while recruiting terrorists, he "went totally ballistic."
Yet Meir Dagan, head of Mossad at the time, denies it, and, ironically, has called any Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities "the stupidest thing I have ever heard."
Who is telling the truth? We do not know for sure.
What we do know is that "Bibi" Netanyahu is desperate to have the United States launch air and missile strikes to stop Tehran from becoming the world’s ninth nuclear power. And he is echoed not only by U.S. neocons, but GOP candidates save Ron Paul.
Nor should we be surprised.
To bring America into its war with Germany, Winston Churchill set up William Stephenson, "A Man Called Intrepid," with hundreds of agents in New York to engage in everything from bribery to blackmail of U.S. senators to get the United States to enter the war and pull England’s chestnuts out of the fire.
This is what desperate countries do.
And while America First kept us out of the European war until Adolf Hitler invaded Russia, ensuring that Russians, not Americans, died in the millions to defeat him, eventually America was maneuvered into war.
Whoever is assassinating these Iranian scientists, be it homegrown Iranian terrorists, Jundallah at the instigation of Israel, or Mossad, the objective is clear: Enrage the Iranians so they strike out at America, provoking a U.S.-Iranian war.
Is such a war in America’s interests? Consider.
While U.S. air and naval power would prevail, Iranian civilians would die, as some of their nuclear facilities are in populated areas. Moreover, we cannot kill the nuclear knowledge Iran has gained. Thus we would only set back their nuclear program by several years. And a bloodied and beaten Iran would then go all-out for a bomb.
The regime, behind which its people would rally, would emerge even more entrenched. U.S. bombing did not cause Germans to remove Hitler or Japanese to depose their emperor. And we lack the ground troops to invade and occupy a country three times the size of Iraq.
All U.S. ships, including carriers in that bathtub the Persian Gulf, would be at risk from shore-based anti-ship missiles and the hundreds of missile boats in Iran’s navy. Any sea battle would send oil prices to $200 and $300 a barrel. There goes the eurozone.
Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Shia of the Saudi oil fields and Bahrain, home port to the Fifth Fleet, and Iranian agents in Afghanistan and Iraq could set the region aflame.
As America started up the road to Baghdad in 2003, Gen. David Petraeus is said to have asked, "Tell me how this ends."
Before some agent provocateur pushes us into war with Iran, Congress should debate the wisdom of authorizing President Obama, or anyone else, to take America into her fifth war in a generation in the Middle and Near East.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM
Read more by Patrick J. Buchanan
- What Should Americans Die For? – May 16th, 2013
- Who Are the War Criminals in Syria? – May 6th, 2013
- Their War, Not Ours – April 29th, 2013
- Is War With North Korea Inevitable? – April 4th, 2013
- Goading Gullible America Into War – March 21st, 2013





John V. Walsh
January 20th, 2012 at 12:16 am
Clearly Israel is willing to throw the global economy into a tailspin by manipulating the US into a war on Iran rather than make peace with its neighbors or allow the Middle East to become a nuke free zone.
WhichWaldenPond
January 20th, 2012 at 1:22 am
Thank you, John V. Walsh, for saying the obvious. War is a very, very expensive and unpredictable way to solve simple problems. For the problem of 5 million Jewish Israelis wanting to take the land of 5 million Palestinians, the US has been willing to pay trillions of dollars in wars and war preparations, to suffer the loss of thousands of US soldiers, to see the corruption of the US government, including the destruction of the US Constitution and the loss of our civil rights and freedoms. No price is too high for the US to pay so that 5 million Israelis can have exclusive control of Palestinian lands. It is crazy. Ron Paul is the only US politician to say that this is crazy. And now we are going to start blowing up nuclear reactors and nuclear refineries in the very region we and our allies depend on for our oil supplies. The nuclear reactors at Chernobyl and Fukushima merely leaked, and it is a catastrophe, requiring the permanent evacuation of all humans from the region. We are planning actions that will require the evacuation of all humans from the Persian Gulf. Why? Because we think it will help 5 million Israelis take the land of 5 million Palestinians. And what if the nuclear fallout we create happens to blow over Israel? When the royal families of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia all take holiday trips to South Africa, New Zealand, and Chile, then we know we are about to enter a new Dark Ages. The USA has been killing itself for decades, and an attack on Iran will be a final fatal act of national suicide.
the lion
January 20th, 2012 at 5:47 am
The problem with America is the congress IS Crazy, they are paid and lobbied by another country just to do that. They have been told that a Nuclear Iean is an Existential problem for Israel yet former Mossad bosses say otherwise. The IAEA says there no proof, EVERY US Intelligence agency says they are not building a bomb and yet the majority of congress would tellyou all tomorrow that that is not the truth someone else has told them different, just as it tells the media something different. There is a huge problem in America and it is that their Politicians are working for the welfare of a country other than the United States.
Smithboy
January 20th, 2012 at 9:20 am
Notice that no opposing voice is allowed to make an arguement against bombing Iran. Pat was sacked from MSNBC because of trumped up racial charges. The chickenhawk warmongers who control network policy will not allow contrary views.
charles caruso
January 20th, 2012 at 9:56 am
'Chickenhawk warmongers'?
Can't you be more specific? Or are you chicken too?
Rob
January 20th, 2012 at 11:02 am
Not a bad piece, but it doesn't really answer the question posed in the headline. Who really DOES want the US to go to war in Iran? It appears to me that the same debate going on in the US is going on in Israel. Israeli politicians (bought and paid for by whom?) are demanding war with Iran, but the intelligence services and the military are arguing against it.
Since our own intelligence agency is saying that Iran is not working on nuclear weapon, what is feeding the frenzy for an attack? It isn't likely to be any true "Israel lobby." The Israel lobby seems to be working just as actively within Israel to promote their policies independently of any Israeli government position. In other words, the Israel lobby is promoting an agenda that goes beyond any narrow Israeli interests. It is serving the interests of someone, but the Israeli government doesn't appear to be that someone since it seems to be actively engaged in their politics as well.
Whoever it is, they seem to be well-placed because they have allies in the media, in politics, and in business. I would suggest a conglomeration of interests. Whatever gets done in Washington without multiple interests supporting it? Wall Street, worried about the reserve status of the dollar, the military industrial complex wanting more business, oil company entrepreneurs wanting access to oil and oil contracts are the best guess I could put forward at the moment.
One thing seems clear. American foreign policy is dominated by special interests in exactly the same way that domestic policy is determined, but the potential consequences of such influence are even more dangerous than our incoherent domestic programs.
bill
January 20th, 2012 at 1:11 pm
the answer is! its not about nukes at all, that's just the lever, its all about hezbullah, and hamas, Iran is helping them fight back a israel.
John_Muhammad
January 20th, 2012 at 8:39 pm
Clearly it is the work of the Bavarian Illuminati, using Skull and Bones and the Trilateral Council as front organizations. The HAARP array is being used to activate the insidious chemtrails for mind-control purposes as directed by the Men In Black and the Grays. From a bunker in Cheyenne Mountain, Tesla's brain is working around the clock to make Project Rainbow operational again. And, at this very moment, old-school hard-line Red Communists are flouridating our water system- our children's water!- to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids and thus cause a loss of our essence.
Does anyone NOT see this?
/end sarcasm
/points finger at Washington and Tel Aviv
Augustbrhm
February 3rd, 2012 at 5:30 pm
Not only will the eurozone go under but so will america/israel and good riddance.
MvGuy
February 3rd, 2012 at 8:03 pm
One should not ask someone to elucidate, and insult them in the next sentence like an a$$hol may…
Warmonger
February 17th, 2012 at 4:40 am
Israel did not steal Palestinian land. It's not Palestinians' land; it's never been their land; it will never be their land. This grand daddy of all fabrications makes great copy for the media and is excellent for denigrators of Israel, but it lacks any basis in historical fact. There is no Palestinian land, plain and simple. If there were, when would it have been founded, and by whom?
At no time in history has there ever been a nation called Palestine. During the Ottoman Empire, which lasted from 1299-1922 CE, the land dubbed by the Romans as Palestine was controlled by the Turks; there was never an outcry for a Palestinian State then. During the illegal annexation of Judea and Samaria by the Hashemite kingdom of Jordan subsequent to the 1949 Armistice and prior to 1967, there was never talk of "occupied territory" or a Palestinian State.