Is the War Coming Home?
Faisal Shahzad sought to massacre scores of fellow Americans in Times Square with a bomb made of M-88 firecrackers, non-explosive fertilizer, gasoline, and alarm clocks.
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab tried to blow up a U.S. airliner over Detroit with a firebomb concealed in his underpants. Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan shot dead 13 fellow soldiers at Fort Hood and wounded 29.
Why did these men attempt the mass murder of Americans who did no harm to them? What impelled them to seek martyrdom amid a pile of American corpses?
Though all were Muslims, none seems to have been a longtime America-hater or natural-born killer. Hasan was proud to wear Army fatigues to mosque. Shahzad had become a U.S. citizen. Abdulmutallab was the privileged son of a prominent Nigerian banker.
The New York Times ties all three to the Internet sermons of Anwar al-Awlaki, a Yemen-based imam born and educated in the United States who inspires Muslims worldwide to jihad against America. But, following Sept. 11, al-Awlaki had been seen as a bridge between Islam and the West.
Now President Obama has authorized his assassination.
What do the four have in common?
All were converted in manhood into haters of America willing to kill and die in a jihad against America. And the probability is high that there are many more like them living amongst us who wish to bring the war in the Af-Pak here to America.
But what radicalized them? And why do they hate us?
Taking a cue from George W. Bush, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said of the Times Square bomber, “We will not be intimidated by those who hate the freedoms that make … this country so great.”
This was the mantra after Sept. 11. We are hated not because of what we do in the Middle East, but because of who we are: people who love freedom and stand for women’s rights.
And that is why they hate us – and why they come to kill us.
In a way this is a comforting thought, because it absolves us of the need to think. For no patriotic American is going to demand we surrender our freedom to prevent fanatics from attacking us.
The Wall Street Journal‘s Bret Stephens advances a parallel view. We are hated, he says, because of our popular culture.
We are loathed in the Islamic world, Stephens writes, because of “Lady Gaga – or, if you prefer, Madonna, Farrah Fawcett, Marilyn Monroe, Josephine Baker, or any other American woman who has … personified what the Egyptian Islamist writer Sayyid Qutb once called ‘the American Temptress.’”
This hatred is at least 60 years old, says Stephens, for Qutb wrote even before “Elvis, Playboy, the pill, women’s lib, acid tabs, gay rights, Studio 54, Jersey Shore, and … Lady Gaga.”
Qutb’s revulsion at American degeneracy is why his legion of Islamic followers hate us.
Again, a comforting thought. For, if Lady Gaga is the problem, there is nothing we Americans can do about it.
Yet, this is as self-delusional as saying the FLN set off bombs in movie theaters and cafes in Algiers to kill the French because of what Brigitte Bardot was doing on screen in And God Created Woman.
American’s toxic culture may be a reason devout Muslims detest us. It is not why they come here to kill us. Mohammed Atta’s friends did not target Hollywood, but centers and symbols of U.S. military and political power.
U.S. Marines were not attacked by Hezbollah until we inserted those Marines into Lebanon’s civil war. No Iraqi committed an act of terror against us before we invaded Iraq. And if the Sept. 11 killers were motivated by hatred of the immorality of our society, what were they doing getting lap dances in Delray Beach?
Osama bin Laden declared war on us, first and foremost, to end the massive U.S. presence on sacred Saudi soil that is home to Mecca and Medina.
Some may insist this was not his real motive. But, apparently, the Saudis believed him, for they quickly kicked us out of Prince Sultan Air Base.
As for the Taliban, they would surely make short work of Lady Gaga. But their stated grievance is the same as Gen. Washington’s in our war with the British: If you want this war to end, get out of our country.
By Occam’s razor, the simplest explanation is usually the right one. Looking at America’s wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, Maj. Hasan, Abdulmutallab, and Shahzad decided that what we call the war on terror was in reality a war on Islam.
All decided to use their access to exact retribution for our killing of their fellow Muslims.
We are being attacked over here because we are over there.
Nor is it a good sign that U.S. intelligence is reporting that rising numbers of U.S. Muslims are making Internet inquiries about how and where to get training to bring the war home to America.
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM
Read more by Patrick J. Buchanan
- What Should Americans Die For? – May 16th, 2013
- Who Are the War Criminals in Syria? – May 6th, 2013
- Their War, Not Ours – April 29th, 2013
- Is War With North Korea Inevitable? – April 4th, 2013
- Goading Gullible America Into War – March 21st, 2013





Stephen
May 11th, 2010 at 4:16 am
People should realize that being over there will inevitably bring the war here. The problem is that the US government is totally corrupt and led by the nose by lobbyists to act against the best interests of the american people. The state we are in is the result to 220+ years of voting. The few times we have been presented a half decent candidate, people don't vote for him because they "think it's impossible to win" People need to get rid of the two party mindset and start using their heads for uses other than hatracks.
marko
May 11th, 2010 at 8:00 am
"Nor is it a good sign that U.S. intelligence is reporting that rising numbers of U.S. Muslims are making Internet inquiries about how and where to get training to bring the war home to America." Not a good sign indeed. Now how in the world does "U.S. intelligence" know about the internet queries of U.S Muslims? How did they get such information? How much other information does "U.S. intelligence" have about the rest of us and the internet queries we make? Now, which of these two entities would you suppose present the greater risk? I'm not so sure it's the U.S. Muslims we should be concerned about here.
bogi666
May 11th, 2010 at 12:06 pm
To quote what so called U.S. intelligence, an oxymoron, claims to be the case is highly suspect. It falls in the same category as WMD's in Iraq. AS far as the propaganda that "they hate us because of our freedom's was neutralized when the criminal Bush gang decided to take "our" freedoms instead therefore making that moot as a reason for the Muslims.The freedoms I'm talking about are the Constitutional freedoms that protect Americans from the USG. REmember, when Bush used the word "our" he was talking about his rich buddies not the people of the U.S. In any event all attacks succeed whether there are fatalities or not. The fear factor is why these attacks happen, it scares an already frightened American public which is perpetuated by the USG, MSM propaganda a tactic borrowed fom the NAZI's.It's a win, win for the perpetrators of any attack which means they will continue because it's a no lose tactic. It is also what the USG and MSM want and it is profitable and cheap for the MSM.
Dminor7th
May 11th, 2010 at 12:40 pm
Sure 'ting, Paddy.. teh towelheads did it. Teh NAZI towelheads I guess (as per Mr. Bogi above). But just in time for Holder and that idiot Lieberman to bring in another law stripping American citizens of their right to life and happiness. Listen, me boy, if teh towelies were behind this, dat bomb woulda went off, dig? Ask any grunt in 'Stan. Dem towliebums know from bombs, alright? But Mil-intel stooges.. well, they been told to minimize the internal (ie. taxpayer) losses so conveniently for them, all their latest efforts fizzle out without actually going off.. ie., shoe bombs, gaunchie bombs, firecracker bombs.. etc. But nonetheless these efforts have the desired effect: legitimizing the junta's evil stooge lawmakers (-breakers?) in their endless attempts to turn Americans into hapless commie serfs.. slaves more or less.
omop
May 11th, 2010 at 12:45 pm
Mr. Buchanan again and again makes the rational case fot America's failures in foreign policies especially in the Middle East. But then like many of us Americans Mr. Buchanan's loyalty is ONLY to the USA>
His and Mr. Giraldi's op-ed pieces are examplary of Antiwar's principles.
jojoos
May 11th, 2010 at 12:55 pm
These supposed terrorist arrested and jailed and never to be seen in public again
"Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab tried to blow up a U.S. airliner over Detroit with a firebomb concealed in his underpants. Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan shot dead 13 fellow soldiers at Fort Hood and wounded 29"
Why no speedy trials or at least open court system.
Even you are arrested it is normal to have a day in court the next business day and asked guility or not by a Judge. Notice not a single video has been made available from court hearings.Yaah! hide'um, torture them and after severial years dump them off to a foriegn country inside a plastic body bag.
America is sick and no better than the }sraelies
Bruce Richardson
May 11th, 2010 at 1:14 pm
Right on Mr. Buchanan! Professor Robert Pape of the University of Chicago, has written in his recent book "Dying to Win, the Logic of Suicide Bombers" compiled over several years with hundreds of interviews of suicide bombers families, suicide bombers themselves who had a change of heart and others whom have studied this phenomenom that in 97% of cases the motive was the presence of foreign troops in what they considered the homeland.
So, terror attacks are not generated by our consuming french fries or reading playboy, they are in essence a response to our interventionism and unbridled support of Israel's Apartheid government.
lincon
May 11th, 2010 at 1:44 pm
WAs n't Lady Gaga found and nurtured and promoted by a Moroccan Muslim?
Truth will hurt Wall Street (Bret Stephens ) below the belt.
5 dancing shlomos
May 11th, 2010 at 3:43 pm
i despise our toxic, pointless, degraded and degrading culture.
how many wedding parties, pregnant women, babies, the elderly, has the usa, to eliminate israel's hated, slaughtered?
a nation should reap what it has sown. a nation should receive as it gives.
how many of these no-nothing-about-bombs incompetent bombers are part of a psyops, blackops? and not by muslims.
Peaceful_Idiot
May 11th, 2010 at 3:48 pm
We've killed over a million people in Iraq and displaced millions more. We have at least two generations of retaliation fun to look forward to. Throw in the continuing global economic meltdown and the coming global war, when what is happening in Greece happens throughout Europe, the US, and Asia, and things look pretty bleak. Folks can whistle past the graveyard if they'd like, and can tryy their best to prevent it, but preparing for the worst seems to be your best bet. The course can't be altered, our furture can't be changed. All you can do is prepare for the sustainable worst.
charles caruso
May 11th, 2010 at 5:29 pm
Come on, Pat. Cut to the chase
The Muslims hate us mainly because of our support for the blood-drenched white settler Zionist state known as 'Israel'
To leave Zionism out of your piece is probably an oversight.
I hope it's not because of all your lucrative TV appearances (gotta pay the rent, you know)
Say it aint so, Pat
Andy
May 11th, 2010 at 9:20 pm
We invade the world and then we invite the world to our country. Little wonder we have so much trouble. The first sentence of Buchanan's is wrong. He wasn't trying to massacre "fellow Americans", since he was a Pakistani immigrant and foreigner. We should also stop supporting Israel. Lets end immigration, bring home our troops, fix our broken borders and begin the long-overdue digestion of the many people we now have here.
pons seclorum
May 12th, 2010 at 1:05 am
“Osama bin Laden declared war on us, first and foremost, to end the massive U.S. presence on sacred Saudi soil that is home to Mecca and Medina. Some may insist this was not his real motive. But, apparently, the Saudis believed him, for they quickly kicked us out of Prince Sultan Air Base. As for the Taliban, they would surely make short work of Lady Gaga. But their stated grievance is the same as Gen. Washington’s in our war with the British: If you want this war to end, get out of our country.”
An American non-interventionist foreign policy would definitely dampen the drive to jihad among all the Shahzad-types who would never be impelled to terrorism through Koranic injunctions alone. A Paulite/Buchananite policy would reduce the present flood of jihadist recruits to a trickle and the groups would then become so marginalized as to constitute no threat. Remaining, however, are a couple more grievances that Bin Laden could still hype up and will have to be addressed. One is that America deserves to be attacked is that we prop up dictators and support corrupt regimes in the Islamic world.
This charge can only be countered by pointing out that corrupt despots in the Middle East is nothing new nor was it the upshot of Western intervention. As Jon Basil Utley explains, it was not “”considered ‘corrupt’ to use government power to profit one’s family, clan, or tribe. Everybody did it! Look at Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, or Afghanistan today. Profiting oneself, one’s clan, and one’s tribe is a tradition stretching back thousands of years. What America calls “corruption” has been the world’s way of life until relatively recently.” Anyone serious in undermining the aims of the Islamists would do well to maintain that corruption and kleptocracy would prevail regardless. Looks like Bin Laden and Al Qaeda have their work cut out for them.
Seth
May 12th, 2010 at 3:59 am
Actually the injustice in Palestine was Bin Laden's and his lieutenants' principal grievance. The US occupation of Saudi Arabia and the killing sanctions on Iraq were named as additional grievances, but they weren't the primary one.
Is Buchanan scared to utter the word "Israel"?
eber hart
May 16th, 2010 at 2:07 am
While we might heartily agree with -some- of Buchanan's 'stated' positions
–it's become glaringly obvious that he, like our entire PC franchise slum film industry,
and media, is very much playing frontman, blindside and apologist for our decades long
sellout, enmeshment and suck-up to history's –MOST– awesomely genocidal
regime -bar none! —ACROSS the Pacific.
-He's forever tut-tutting the ghastly status quo of the region —pooh-poohing the
tensions on the Korean penninsula –even as millions continue to suffer and die
–and just last month a South Korean ship was torpedoed killing 46 -which was
quickly marginalized and buried by our suck-up press.
And, of course, he chuckles away the staggering legacy of PRC genocide,
now reckoned to have exceeded 70 million —decades AFTER WWII
–n 'peacetime'. ALL of this unoutted, unmentioned, unanswered for
—on this the once again 'mysteriously overlooked' 60th Anniversary
of the epically, eerily relevant —STILL unfolding –KOREAN WAR…
–
eber hart
May 16th, 2010 at 2:16 am
FURTHER —
Buchanan's recent 'pacifist / revisionist' WWII thesis, when seen in this light,
is also revealed to be a transparent attempt to undercut ANY American or
free world moral indignation in the face of the ascendancy of the utterly
unrepentant PRC regime.
Spielberg, Hanks, Cameron, who've made BILLIONS upon BILLIONS
catering to the franchise slum denial needs of the their 'fave' captive
oversaeas mass market for years —are doing very much the same
–but from a differrent angle. —WHO says America's divided on the 'important' matters?!
"The Americans came just like a whore, all dressed up and knocking
at our back door –"
-Chou En Lai
The Nixon/ MAO Summit
1972
–Buchanan WAS there! —need we say more?
-AMEN-