Did Bibi Box Obama In?
On Sept. 20, 2002, as the War Party was beating the drum for preventive war on Iraq, lest we wake up to “a mushroom cloud over an American city,” the Wall Street Journal introduced an eminent voice to confirm that, yes, Saddam was driving straight for an atomic bomb.
“This is a dictator who is … feverishly trying to acquire nuclear weapons,” wrote Bibi Netanyahu, former prime minister of Israel.
“Saddam’s nuclear program has changed. He no longer needs one large reactor to produce the deadly material necessary for atomic bombs. He can produce it in centrifuges the size of washing machines that can be hidden throughout the country – and Iraq is a very big country. Even free and unfettered inspections will not uncover these portable manufacturing sites of mass death. …
“[I]f action is not taken now, we will all be threatened by a much greater peril … (for) no gas mask and no vaccine can protect against nuclear weapons.”
This was horse manure of a high grade, as high as that which Richard Perle deposited on the podium of the Foreign Policy Research Institute a year earlier, when he informed a stunned audience that Saddam “is busily at work on a nuclear weapon.”
Perle had it straight from Saddam’s “Bomb Maker,” “a man named Kadir Hamza.” Hamza, said Perle, told him that after the Osirak reactor was destroyed by Israel in 1981, Saddam “began to build uranium enrichment facilities, many facilities, and we built 400 of them, and they’re all over the country. Some of them look like farmhouses, some of them look like classrooms, some of them look like warehouses. You’ll never find them. They don’t turn out much, but every day they turn out a little bit of nuclear materials.”
“So,” Perle warned his riveted audience, “it’s simply a matter of time before he acquires nuclear weapons.”
Washing-machine centrifuges in uranium enrichment facilities disguised as barns and chicken coops! And Americans believed it. And so we were stampeded into war against a nation that did not threaten or attack us, to strip it of weapons it did not even have.
That war has cost 4,500 American dead and 35,000 wounded. It has brought death to perhaps a hundred thousand Iraqis. Four million people have been driven from their homes, 2 million, including half the Christians, into exile. Hundreds of thousands of fatherless Iraqi children are being raised by women widowed by that war.
Undaunted, the War Party has a new war planned for us.
Target: Tehran. And Obama may just have boxed himself in.
In return for Bibi’s willingness to talk to the Palestinians, Obama agreed to a December deadline for progress in talks with Iran. If the talks are not fruitful by then, America will step on the escalator.
“I’ve been very clear that I don’t take any options off the table with respect to Iran,” said the president.
Bibi got what he came for.
By setting a six-month deadline, Obama has given an incentive to Israel, AIPAC, the neocons, and even al-Qaeda, which wants Shia Iran bombed back to the Stone Age, to provoke collisions with Iran, until December, then demand that Obama keep his word, suspend talks, impose severe sanctions, and start us on the escalator to war.
And, already, the incidents are multiplying.
Iran’s supreme leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei, has charged the United States with complicity in cross-border attacks from Kurdistan. Israel threatens Iran almost daily and practices bombing runs to Greece and Gibraltar. Iran says it can destroy Israel and tests a missile that can hit that nation.
Israel claims Iran is trucking weapons into Gaza via Sudan. But how the trucks get through Egypt, cross the Red Sea and Sinai, then pass through Israeli and Egyptian checkpoints is unexplained.
Hillary Clinton yesterday called an Iranian nuclear capability an “extraordinary threat” and said the U.S. goal is “to persuade the Iranian regime that they will actually be less secure if they proceed with their nuclear weapons program.”
Query: What nuclear weapons program?
According to the National Intelligence Estimate of 2007 [.pdf], Iran halted its weapons program in 2003. Nor are there any reports of the diversion of Iran’s industrial-grade uranium from Natanz or evidence of any secret centrifuge cascade to enrich it to weapons grade.
According to the Los Angeles Times, the EastWest Institute of Russian and U.S. scientists says Tehran is “at least six years away from building a deliverable nuclear weapon,” and a RAND Corp. study says that Iran’s “ability to wreak havoc in the Middle East through surrogates is exaggerated.”
Iran represents no threat to the United States to justify a war.
And as Korea finished Harry Truman, Vietnam finished LBJ, and Iraq finished the Bush Republicans, war with Iran would make Barack – with the situations in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq all deteriorating – a one-term president.
Barack had best understand. The crowd manipulating him into war with Iran has in mind, first, obliterating Iran; second, getting rid of him.
COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.
Read more by Patrick J. Buchanan
- The American Way of Abandonment – November 2nd, 2009
- The Fruits of Intervention – October 29th, 2009
- Generals Open New Front in Washington – October 5th, 2009
- Bitter Fruits of Mideast Wars – October 1st, 2009
- Is Iran Nearing a Bomb? – September 28th, 2009





R London
May 23rd, 2009 at 12:10 am
I hope the Obamaites understand this. Ideally Obama just lies through his teeth to our friend Bibi….tell them what they want to hear then do whatever it is u planned to begin with.
Israel at the end of the day, sadly, is a colonial outpost for American oil….and that’s all.
Geo1671
May 23rd, 2009 at 11:25 am
Re: "That war has cost 4,500 American dead and 35,000 wounded. It has brought death to perhaps a hundred thousand Iraqis. Hundreds of thousands of fatherless Iraqi children are being raised by women widowed by that war."
For Americans–rounded actual figures–no question marks. For the Arabs,perhaps 100 thousand dead and for the fatherless kids 100s of 1000s.
Sorry Pattie Cake–the number of dead Iraqies are over 1,200,000 and counting.How about being a up front, Arab Kids-fatherless and motherless and in Clinton's term over 500,0000 kids died?
Geberstriker
May 23rd, 2009 at 2:32 pm
"Barack had best understand. The crowd manipulating him into war with Iran has in mind, first, obliterating Iran; second, getting rid of him." Well doesn't that just say it all?
Duncan__Idaho
May 23rd, 2009 at 3:53 pm
Why is it whenever someone uses the word "*ionist" the "comment must be approved by the site admins before it will appear publicly"?
Duncan__Idaho
May 23rd, 2009 at 3:54 pm
Duncan__Idaho 0p · 1 minute ago
Your comment must be approved by the site admins before it will appear publicly.
Edit Delete
Reply
0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
Loading…
+1 Vote up Vote down
Duncan__Idaho's avatar – Go to profile
Duncan__Idaho 0p · less than 1 minute ago
Why is it whenever someone uses the word "*ionist" the "comment must be approved by the site admins before it will appear publicly"?
Proof.
Did Bibi Box Obama In? « EZ Digest
May 24th, 2009 at 12:14 am
[...] American conservative as opposed to the Likudnik neoconservatives, warns Barack Obama in a recent article that Benjamin Netanyahu is no friend of America and is not to be trusted on Iran. Buchanan reminds [...]
MvGuy
May 24th, 2009 at 1:52 am
For a supposedly Anti-war publicly supported entity, this board seems to be somewhat grudgingly
parsimonious with comment form and content, but they do deliver, it's not like the British news sites,
comments usually DO appear……….eventually…….. and with the "WAY" things are, antiwar.com does
need to guard against being dismissed as "antisemitic" …therefor certain words like *ew, *ionist~~ are or could be flags…..Pat Buchanan..is considered anti-semitic in way many circles of thinking…..
Is NeoCon O.K.??? Antiwar.com is my homepage!! It is the ONLY site I support financially…….
Did Obama get boxed in ??……. NO!!! He has the wrong type of mind to be "Boxed In" One persons box is another persons wide open wilderness……. Box?? What box?? I don"t see no stinkin boxes !
Which brings us to ……Who..IS……Obama?? I don't know who he is….. and I believe that you also do not know who this man IS or what HE stands for……BECAUSE it is my firm belief that HE…..HIMSELF does not KNOW who he is..or who he will become..or MUST become…on this voyage that he has set himself upon…to reach safe port….
so…….. Stay tuned as we all learn which way ship of state will
steer, and what ports will it visit…….One thing is sure, Obama is curious……
Duncan__Idaho
May 24th, 2009 at 10:54 am
You know what's truly perverse?
Obamabot came into office with more political "capital" than any modern US president – more than Shrub after the 9/11 false flag, more than Klingon ever had, more than Raygun ever had, more than JFK ever had. The dumbocrats hold both houses, Obamabot has the unswerving blind allegiance of his party, even the left are drooling at his kneecaps. He could have done pretty much Anything he pleased and not have to answer to Anyone, not AIPAC, not Wall Street, not the neo-lunatic (Z)ionist fringe, not any one.
He could have pulled out of Iraq in WEEKS, he could have ended Afghan in WEEKS, he could have chosen to NOT accelerate the United Snakes' invasion of Africa, he could have cut Israel off at the knees and FORCED them into retreating to pre 67' borders and accepting a Palestinian state, he could have chosen to NOT bail out the Financial Vultures, he could have simply signed an executive order ending torture and illegal spying and CIA kidnapping, he could have renounced US meddling in the domestic affairs of other nations…and he would have had near complete support across the board.
All of that WAS possible.
So there is NO excuse for his actions other than he is doing what he WANTS to do. I.E. the imperialist policies of a sick empire will continue unabated – cloaked behind absurd, arrogantly plagiarized, empty rhetoric and euphemisms, delivered with all the pompousness one would expect from an oily used car salesman. It's sickening to watch.
At least with Bush The Lesser you knew he was a fool, with Klingon you knew he was a degenerate who would sell his mother for a blowjob, with Raygun you knew he was borderline insane and clearly senile, but this clown? Just an empty suit with an empty head.
Peacegeek
May 24th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
Patrick J. Buchanan is as provincial as most of the commentators to his article. Buchanan reads the Times, the Post and watches CNN — his paymaster. The press in Israel — frequently linked to antiwar.com — reveals another story altogether. While Buchanan wants to sell the line that Obama is as stupid and amoral as Bush and Cheney, the Israeli press is awash with stories that he is pressurizing them like no one since Eisenhower who ordered them to vacate the Sinai after Suez and make it snappy. Hillary Clinton is now taking up where Obama left off and yelling at Bibi and Ya'alon to get out of the settlements and stay out. Mitchell is giving Israel deadlines and pushing them toward a settlement based on the Arab Peace Plan. Biden is promising hundreds of millions in arms to Lebanon regardless of who wins the elections. Israel is going through the political version of ECT — and all because her psychiatrist-in-chief, Dr. Barack Hussein Obama, has convinced her American relatives that she is in dire need of shock therapy. Buchanan is wrong again, like his AIPAC pals at CNN. Read the Israeli press linked to antiwar.com and weep for Bibi, Avigdor, Moshe, and those radical rabbis who charged off to war in Gaza invoking the Torah and its exhortations to genocide. And, this is just the beginning. Obama is in office for 4 more years, and he will be re-elected for another 4 (the opposition is in swirling disarray with Cheney rising from his grave to lead his legions of politically-undead-in-name-only). Bibi will bend to Obama's will or be blown away into the sands of history, another corpse of another dictator who was brought down by the force of destiny.
MvGuy
May 24th, 2009 at 3:52 pm
Hard to reconcile the views of Ducan_Idaho with Peacegeek….. Interesting to see they BOTH find Buchanan clueless…and…Duncan_ thinks Obama could have done anything…… I don't buy the anything analysis….. If 911 was a false flag op ["- more than Shrub after the 9/11 false flag, "] as Duncan_ not so subtly posits, then there must be TREMENDIOUS pressure to keep it quiet that the boys [over at NSA?] ….did it…… Did he miss the "Dead Monkey cartoon"?? & Chainey out there rallying the troops to STOP any inquiry into lawbreaking and or what happened to Bruce Ivans??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inyCkCvqRO0 "Find a way" "Find a way"
Maybe the REAL question is: What was the quid pro quo for letting the Israeli spies slither away??
That can of worms could have had the potential of derailing the gravy train of money the U.S. sends
to Israel which they use to buy politicians who send MORE & MORE MONEY……hey…No politician
Democrat or Republican wants to lose that! but I'm getting off track…the track that leads to WHOM??
Who is it that is the moving force behind killing a million Iraqis to help Exon get a leg up on Asian Oil
is…it..really..Darth Chainey? or is he steppin and fetchin for some other FACE of Imperial Acquisition?
one HIGHER up the food chain??… Whatever the case, I don"y buy the Obama could do anything he wanted. scenario & what about Rahm Emmanuel?? If not Israel then WHAT??
It appears Obama is loath to provide "them" with a casis belli ala JFK, bay of PIGS….careful with Pigs… & dual citizens too….. Really, it's a dangerous world…..
Lusien
May 24th, 2009 at 4:10 pm
aggregation aforeyour car. This willthey arebulk of befitting
anniversary affairthe bulk coveredaltered companies.cost, you may wish
[url=http://acceptingautoinsurance.com/47-your-auto-insurer-knows-plenty-about-you]auto insurer[/url]apperception thatthe parts,it costs to alter
Smarter Iran Policy Begins With New Attitude | Iran News
May 27th, 2009 at 12:33 am
[...] the world from other American plans. Although the game of getting people excited about an imaginary danger can easily backfire, politicians have tried it before and will do so again. Or it may be that [...]