Real Patriots Uphold Our Values
Impugning the patriotism of others is the favorite sport of flag-wrapped conservatives who have a cribbed view of love of country. These folks become apoplectic when liberals criticize war-making and are fond of telling people on the left: America, love it or leave it. That is, until the commander in chief is not one whom they voted for. Then they join Tea Parties or found organizations to throw verbal stink bombs in the direction of the president. The hypocrisy eludes them.
Keep America Safe is a conservative advocacy organization run by Liz Cheney, daughter of the former vice president. Its reason for being is to push out a drumbeat of material that traduces the Obama administration’s approach to fighting terrorism. The organization wants Americans to believe that President Barack Obama’s decisions to return the nation to the rule of law endangers national security.
It’s like a little PR firm devoted to the promotion of torture and other Dick Cheney delights.
As VP, Cheney believed in the unitary executive, which included the lawless notion that Congress could not constrain the president’s powers on national defense. It is interesting that under the current president, the Cheney family is taking the opposite tack, trying to convince Congress to stand in the way of Obama’s stated intentions to close Guantánamo and use the criminal justice system to try terror suspects.
In the Cheney family’s world, trashing the Constitution and disregarding the Geneva Conventions are all solely within the province of the president. But that sweeping authority is apparently not available in reverse, to resurrect the law of the land.
The latest venture of Keep America Safe implies that America should dump its ethic of lawyers representing even reprehensible clients. The group put together a video attacking Attorney General Eric Holder for hiring nine attorneys who at one time had worked to defend terror suspects or advocate for changes in detainee policies. The video talks about seven of the nine attorneys, whom Holder refused to name (their identities have since been revealed), calling them the "Al-Qaeda Seven." Ominously, the video asks "Whose values do they share?" with an image of Osama bin Laden waving in the background.
This was even too much for Kenneth Starr. He joined a group of former Republican administration officials, many of whom had worked in the Bush administration, to condemn the attacks leveled on these Justice Department attorneys.
In a letter, the group said that the maligning of the attorneys’ patriotism undermines the entire justice system. It went on to remind Keep America Safe that "the American tradition of zealous representation of unpopular clients is at least as old as John Adams’s representation of the British soldiers charged in the Boston massacre."
There is another American tradition about that old, which is that our nation doesn’t torture prisoners. Gen. George Washington famously insisted on humane treatment of Hessian captives despite the brutality that American soldiers faced as prisoners.
In Washington’s Crossing, the humanitarian ethos of the founders during the Revolutionary War was described by historian David Hackett Fischer: "American leaders believed it was not enough to win the war. They also had to win in a way that was consistent with the values of their society and the principles of their cause."
If patriotism for conservatives means loving the country as it was founded and intended to be, then Keep America Safe is way off script. Even as a virulent critic of the British, Adams called his representation of the British soldiers "one of the best pieces of service I ever rendered my country," because it upheld the ideals of the nascent nation.
Lawyers who represent clients charged as our enemies contribute to making our legal system an honorable one. That, along with providing fair trials, not holding anyone indefinitely without charge, and treating prisoners in a way we would want Americans to be treated by a foreign power, makes up the ideals of our founders and nation. Keep America Safe is opposed to all that, raising the obvious question: Who is the real patriot?
Read more by Robyn Blumner
- A Failure to Protect Civil Liberties – August 5th, 2010
- Guantánamo Deaths Deserve a Closer Look – February 25th, 2010
- Obama Undeserving of Civil Liberties Accolades – December 27th, 2009
- Uighurs Deserve Legal Remedy – October 26th, 2009
- A Golden Opportunity to Declaw PATRIOT Act – October 6th, 2009





john
March 13th, 2010 at 12:10 pm
The only diagreement I have with this article is the author's equating Republicans with conservatives. Republicans seem to speak against government only when the government does not enforce the Republican agenda, whereas true conservatives unhold the principle of limited government at all times. That is why the tea baggers were so silent with the Bush/Cheney dictatorship. Furhtermore, to the dismay of many, Obama has not reversed many of the Bush/Cheney policies so I can only belive that the tea-baggers true motives lie in their inability to reconcile themseves to a Black man being President.
Jaime
March 13th, 2010 at 8:58 pm
Probably nobody in modern history has been more negative to values such as respect of law, integrity and decency than Dick Cheney. This man is a modern version of Rasputin, an evil behind-the-throne force who deserves to be tried and condemned both legally and morally. But then Barack Obama gives him a call to concern himself about this man's health. Why doesn't he call the thousands of families who have lost members in America's wars of choice. Or even better, why doesn't he call the millions of families who have lost children, mothers, fathers, husbands, wives, relatives in the Empire's wars of conquest?
fedupandsick
March 13th, 2010 at 10:24 pm
So what is the difference between obama and liz cheney? A few degrees? Why the uproar?
RockyRococo
March 14th, 2010 at 3:01 am
The one part of this column I don't agree with is this:
"President Barack Obama’s decisions to return the nation to the rule of law"
What when and where, praytell, are those decisions?
Other than that, good column and very much on point.
epppie
March 14th, 2010 at 7:46 am
Exactly. Obama has again and again and again turned the tyrannies of George Bush from anomaly into precedent. That is a huge step that he is responsible for, a much more crucial authoritarian move than anything Bush did.