Don’t Forget, Israel Is a Democracy
How lucky we are to have the extreme Right standing guard over our democracy.
This week, the Knesset voted by a large majority (47 to 34) for a law that threatens imprisonment for anyone who dares to deny that Israel is a Jewish and democratic state.
The private member’s bill, proposed by MK Zevulun Orlev of the "Jewish Home" Party, which sailed through its preliminary hearing, promises one year in prison to anyone who publishes "a call that negates the existence of the state of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state," if the contents of the call might cause "actions of hate, contempt, or disloyalty against the state or the institutions of government or the courts."
One can foresee the next steps. A million and a half Arab citizens cannot be expected to recognize Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. They want it to be "a state of all its citizens" – Jews, Arabs, and others. They also claim with reason that Israel discriminates against them, and therefore is not really democratic. And, in addition, there are also Jews who do not want Israel to be defined as a Jewish state in which non-Jews have the status, at best, of tolerated outsiders.
The consequences are inevitable. The prisons will not be able to hold all those convicted of this crime. There will be a need for concentration camps all over the country to house all the deniers of Israeli democracy.
The police will be unable to deal with so many criminals. It will be necessary to set up a new unit. This may be called "Special Security," or, in short, SS.
Hopefully, these measures will suffice to preserve our democracy. If not, more stringent steps will have to be taken, such as revoking the citizenship of the democracy-deniers and deporting them from the country, together with the Jewish leftists and all the other enemies of the Jewish democracy.
After the preliminary reading of the bill, it now goes to the Legal Committee of the Knesset, which will prepare it for the first, and soon thereafter for the second and third, readings. Within a few weeks or months, it will be the law of the land.
By the way, the bill does not single out Arabs explicitly – even if this is its clear intention, and all those who voted for it understood this. It also prohibits Jews from advocating a change in the state’s definition, or the creation of a bi-national state in all of historic Palestine or spreading any other such unconventional ideas. One can only imagine what would happen in the U.S. if a senator proposed a law to imprison anyone who suggests an amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.
The bill does not stand out at all in our new political landscape.
This government has already adopted a bill to imprison for three years anyone who mourns the Palestinian Nakba – the 1948 uprooting of more than half the Palestinian people from their homes and lands.
The sponsors expect Arab citizens to be happy about that event. True, the Palestinians were caused a certain unpleasantness, but that was only a byproduct of the foundation of our state. The Independence Day of the Jewish and democratic state must fill us all with joy. Anyone who does not express this joy should be locked up, and three years may not be enough.
This bill has been confirmed by the Ministerial Commission for Legal Matters, prior to being submitted to the Knesset. Since the rightist government commands a majority in the Knesset, it will be adopted almost automatically. (In the meantime, a slight delay has been caused by one minister, who appealed the decision, so the Ministerial Commission will have to confirm it again.)
The sponsors of the law hope, perhaps, that on Nakba Day the Arabs will dance in the streets, plant Israeli flags on the ruins of some 600 Arab villages that were wiped off the map, and offer up their thanks to Allah in the mosques for the miraculous good fortune that was bestowed on them.
This takes me back to the ’60s, when the weekly magazine I edited, Haolam Hazeh, published an Arabic edition. One of its employees was a young man called Rashed Hussein from the village of Musmus. Already as a youth he was a gifted poet with a promising future.
He told me that some years earlier the military governor of his area had summoned him to his office. At the time, all the Arabs in Israel were subject to a military government which controlled their lives in all matters big and small. Without a permit, an Arab citizen could not leave his village or town even for a few hours, nor get a job as a teacher, nor acquire a tractor or dig a well.
The governor received Rashed cordially, offered him coffee and paid lavish compliments to his poetry. Then he came to the point: in a month’s time, Independence Day was due, and the governor was going to hold a big reception for the Arab "notables"; he asked Rashed to write a special poem for the occasion.
Rashed was a proud youngster, nationalist to the core, and not lacking in courage. He explained to the governor that Independence Day was no joyful day for him, since his relatives had been driven from their homes and most of the Musmus village’s land had also been expropriated.
When Rashed arrived back at his village some hours later, he could not help noticing that his neighbors were looking at him in a peculiar way. When he entered his home, he was shocked. All the members of his family were sitting on the floor, the women lamenting at the top of their voices, the children huddling fearfully in a corner. His first thought was that somebody had died.
"What have you done to us!" one of the women cried. "What did we do to you?"
"You have destroyed the family," another shouted. "You have finished us!"
It appeared that the governor had called the family and told them that Rashed had refused to fulfill his duty to the state. The threat was clear: from now on, the extended family, one of the largest in the village, would be on the black list of the military government. The consequences were clear to everyone.
Rashed could not stand up against the lamentation of his family. He gave in and wrote the poem, as requested. But something inside him was broken. Some years later he emigrated to the U.S., got a job there at the PLO office and died tragically: he was burned alive in his bed after going to sleep, it appears, while smoking a cigarette.
These days are gone forever. We took part in many stormy demonstrations against the military government until it was finally abolished in 1966. As a newly elected member of parliament, I had the privilege of voting for its abolition.
The fearful and subservient Arab minority, then amounting to some 200,000 souls, has recovered its self-esteem. A second and third generation has grown up, its downtrodden national pride has raised its head again, and today they are a large and self-confident community of 1.5 million. But the attitude of the Jewish Right has not changed for the better. On the contrary.
In the Knesset bakery (the Hebrew word for bakery is mafia), some new pastries are being baked. One of them is a bill that stipulates that anyone applying for Israeli citizenship must declare their loyalty to "the Jewish, Zionist, and democratic state," and also undertake to serve in the army or its civilian alternative. Its sponsor is MK David Rotem of the "Israel Is Our Home" Party, who also happens to be the chairman of the Knesset Law Committee.
A declaration of loyalty to the state and its laws – a framework designed to safeguard the well-being and the rights of its citizens – is reasonable. But loyalty to the "Zionist" state? Zionism is an ideology, and in a democratic state the ideology can change from time to time. It would be like declaring loyalty to a "capitalist" USA, a "rightist Italy," a "leftist" Spain, a "Catholic Poland," or a "nationalist" Russia.
This would not be a problem for the tens of thousands of Orthodox Jews in Israel who reject Zionism, since Jews will not be touched by this law. They obtain citizenship automatically the moment they arrive in Israel.
Another bill waiting for its turn before the Ministerial Committee proposes changing the declaration that every new Knesset member has to make before assuming office. Instead of loyalty "to the state of Israel and its laws," as now, he or she will be required to declare their loyalty "to the Jewish, Zionist, and democratic state of Israel, its symbols, and its values." That would exclude almost automatically all the elected Arabs, since declaring loyalty to the "Zionist" state would mean that no Arab would ever vote for them again.
It would also be a problem for the Orthodox members of the Knesset, who cannot declare loyalty to Zionism. According to Orthodox doctrine, the Zionists are depraved sinners and the Zionist flag is unclean. God exiled the Jews from this country because of their wickedness, and only God can permit them to return. Zionism, by preempting the job of the Messiah, has committed an unpardonable sin, and many Orthodox Rabbis chose to remain in Europe and be murdered by the Nazis rather than committing the Zionist sin of going to Palestine.
The factory of racist laws with a distinct fascist odor is now working at full steam. That is built into the new coalition.
At its center is the Likud Party, a good part of which is pure racist (sorry for the oxymoron). To its right there is the ultra-racist Shas Party, to the right of which is Lieberman’s ultra-ultra racist "Israel Is Our Home" Party, the ultra-ultra-ultra racist "Jewish Home" Party, and to its right the even more racist "National Union" Party, which includes outright Kahanists and stands with one foot in the coalition and the other on the moon.
All these factions are trying to outdo each other. When one proposes a crazy bill, the next is compelled to propose an even crazier one, and so on.
All this is possible because Israel has no constitution. The ability of the Supreme Court to annul laws that contradict the "basic laws" is not anchored anywhere, and the rightist parties are trying to abolish it. Not for nothing did Avigdor Lieberman demand – and get – the justice and police ministries.
Just now, when the governments of the U.S. and Israel are clearly on a collision course over the settlements, this racist fever may infect all parts of the coalition.
If one goes to sleep with a dog, one should not be surprised to wake up with fleas (may the dogs among my readers pardon me). Those who elected such a government, and even more so those who joined it, should not be surprised by its laws, which ostensibly safeguard Jewish democracy.
The most appropriate name for these holy warriors would be "Racists for Democracy."
Read more by Uri Avnery
- A Scoundrel With Permission – November 15th, 2009
- A Line in the Sand – November 8th, 2009
- Remembering Yitzhak Rabin – November 1st, 2009
- Fool’s Goldstone – October 26th, 2009
- The Betrayal of Gilad Shalit – October 4th, 2009





C4SA
June 1st, 2009 at 8:46 am
"Racists for Democracy"? Your article doesn't even make sense and is poorly written. What race are you talking about in this conceived "racism"?
ABlue8
June 1st, 2009 at 5:05 pm
The article is very well written. You must be totally dense not to fully comprehend it. The race is the Jewish race. Most of us Jews regard ourselves as a race or separate ethnic group, not per se as
a religion. My only beef with Avnery is his failure to condemn the vicious "holocaust denial" laws in
Israel and elsewhere. That stand undermines his thesis here.
markdavid
June 1st, 2009 at 5:15 pm
I think all Palestinians should convert to Judaism and get full rights as Israeli's. Then over the years they can work their way into the government and change the laws to reflect an actual democracy decreeing equal rights for all. Final step, convert back to Islam, or what ever religion they so desire after they make religion a non-issue within the government's framework. Something to the effect of equal rights for all protected by a constitution. Although, that seems to be a thing of the past here in the U.S.
ABlue8
June 1st, 2009 at 6:39 pm
Hey, guys, what's going on here ????? I posted an intelligent, perceptive comment in contrast to the two moronic comments above almost two hours ago.
ABlue8
June 1st, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Avnery would be on sturdier grounds if he had condemned instead of endorsing the so-called "holocaust denial" laws in Israel and elsewhere. His comments are well written
and perceptive as far as he goes but he doesn't go far enough in his advocacy of free
speech.
Duncan__Idaho
June 1st, 2009 at 6:56 pm
I will bet anything that you used the word (J)ew, (J)ewish, or (Z)ionist. They are practicing pro-"chosen people" censorship here.
In other words: this site is slowly but surely becoming another asswipe DU, DKos, HuffPo, RawStory, Firedoglake, MoveON, etc, shithole.
Duncan__Idaho
June 1st, 2009 at 7:01 pm
Avnery is another mouthpiece who has gained some progressive "street creds" cuz' he dares to "criticize" Israhell – while simultaneously supporting the Squatter State.
In the world of intelligence they call such people "moles" or "double agents".
www.benwhite.org.uk: the blog » Blog Archive » Life as a minority in the Middle East’s Only Democracy
June 1st, 2009 at 12:30 pm
[...] strategy was to crush any resistance among the shattered and largely leaderless Palestinians. Read this account of what happened to Rashed [...]
paulBass
June 1st, 2009 at 10:16 pm
i also posted with out it showin up
paulBass
June 1st, 2009 at 10:19 pm
but the gist of it was if you don't want to call it racist you can try myopic ethnocentric Judaio fascist ultra nationalist
ABlue8
June 1st, 2009 at 11:15 pm
You are right, Duncan. I mentioned that we Jews are a race, not a religion per se.
Thanks.
Alan MacDonald
June 2nd, 2009 at 2:09 am
This new law would seem to quite explicitly have Israel admitting that it is overtly a 'Vichy' state, by its requirement that all call it a democracy, when, in fact, it is an Empire (expansionist, elitist, militarist, and all that normal empire stuff).
What is ironic is that Israel essentially admits being a 'Vichy' state controlled by a thinly disguised Empire —- while the U.S., which is the headquarters of the global ruling-elite 'corporate financial Empire' hidng behind the facade of its two-party 'Vichy' sham of democracy doesn't feel compelled to enact the same type of 'must call us a democracy' law.
markdavid
June 2nd, 2009 at 3:06 am
My previous comment was meant to be moronic to highlight how moronic the Israel law of loyalty oaths would be. It was meant to be satirical, so get off your "I'm special" cloud because I don't see you solving any of the conflict's problems here. I just read your whiny-bitchy little posts.
This Is A Set & Forget For Affiliates! | 7Wins.eu
June 9th, 2009 at 8:02 am
[...] [...]
Uri Avenery on Israeli Racism | America at War
June 9th, 2009 at 12:14 pm
[...] Uri Avenery writes of the present coalition government of Israel: [...]
FREE SPEECH … WITHIN LIMITS OF COURSE « Desertpeace
August 25th, 2009 at 3:43 am
[...] How often have we heard Israel referred to as the “only democracy in the Middle East?” More importantly, how many of those who accept that claim have actually subjected their belief to in depth scrutiny? Scrutiny like that which is found in Professor Neve Gordon’s 2004 piece in Counterpunch, or Uri Avnery’s “Don’t Forget, Israel Is a Democracy.” [...]