US Military Spending Far Outpaces Rest of the World
The United States continues to lead the world in defense spending, according to a new report released Thursday by the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, a U.S.-based non-partisan research organization.
In fact, the U.S. outspends Russia, the next highest spender, by more than 800 percent.
In 2008, the most recent year for which figures are available, the U.S. expenditure was 696.3 billion dollars, followed by Russia’s 86 billion and China’s 83.5 billion.
The U.S. defense budget is 15 times that of Japan, 47 times that of Israel, and nearly 73 times that of Iran.
Not only does U.S. spending dwarf that of other nations, but it has also grown in recent years.
The budget for fiscal year 2011 is 720 billion dollars, up 67 percent from 2001′s 432 billion, accounting for inflation.
In a recent speech to the U.S. Navy League, U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates pointed out examples of the effects of his country’s disproportionate spending.
The U.S. Navy can carry twice as many aircrafts at sea as the rest of the world put together, he said, and the navy’s overall power is estimated to exceed that of the next 13 most powerful navies combined.
This extreme dominance exists in all branches of the armed forces.
It is notable in the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation’s report that, while China and Russia are big spenders, defense spending comes overwhelmingly from the Western industrialized world.
The United States itself accounts for 44.32 percent of the global total spending of 1.57 trillion dollars, with the rest of NATO and non-NATO Europe accounting for another 22.43 percent.
The Middle East and North Africa, on the other hand, account for 7.03 percent, Latin America and the Caribbean for 3.69 percent, and Sub-Saharan Africa a mere 0.77 percent.
China and Russia account for 5.31 percent and 5.47 percent, respectively.
A study released in April by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) showed that Western industrialized countries strongly dominate arms manufacture, as well.
British Aerospace Systems is the largest arms manufacturer in the world, followed by four U.S.-based contractors.
Of the world’s top-20 manufacturers, only one, Russia’s Almaz-Antei, comes from a non-Western nation.
SIPRI’s Susan Jackson told IPS that companies in Western countries have a competitive advantage because of the higher level of technology available to them.
One non-Western country is missing from the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation’s report: North Korea, which does not make reliable figures publicly available.
The U.S. State Department estimates that North Korea — a country in which up to 20 percent of men ages 17-54 are currently serving in the armed forces — spends up to one quarter of its Gross National Product on defense.
Another notable case is the Gulf Region in the Mideast.
While Middle Eastern countries account for a small percentage of worldwide defense spending, Gulf Cooperation Council countries — Bahrain, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman, and especially Saudi Arabia — have ramped up spending in recent years as fears grow about Iranian nuclear weapons development.
These fears are a major factor in Israel’s high defense spending as well, SIPRI’s Pieter Wezeman told IPS.
Defense spending remains high worldwide despite the global economic crisis. There is reason to believe that the recession’s effects may halt this growth, however.
The U.S. Congressional Budget Office has warned that increased debt will have to mean decreased spending across the board, with defense spending no exception.
With the United States by far the dominant spender, decreased U.S. spending would greatly affect total global spending.
"Swimming in its own tide of debt, the U.S., too, may soon be forced to restrain baseline Pentagon spending to just above the rate of inflation in the coming years," Dan Darling, Europe and Middle East Military Markets Analyst at Forecast International Inc., told IPS.
U.S. Secretary of Defense Gates concurs. "It is not a great mystery what needs to change," he said in his recent speech. "What it takes it the political will and willingness, as Eisenhower possessed, to make hard choices."
Thus far, however, as the new report shows, the economic crisis has not dampened outsized U.S. spending.
(Inter Press Service)
Read more by Amanda Bransford
- Israeli Documentary Probes Death of a Peace Activist – October 8th, 2010





Amir Goy
May 29th, 2010 at 6:58 am
One wonders if Gates can fathom the supreme irony in referencing Eisenhower, who warned us long ago about the very same monster that now has Gates himself by the balls…..
just nuts
May 29th, 2010 at 8:03 am
Amir Goy ,
I think that's what Gates was saying, that in a sense , he agreed with Eisenhower. Not sure if I buy it, gates isn't the type to seriously consider cutting the military budget or operations. I say we need to be the strongest kid on the block. It's better to be the toughest, even maybe a bully to get what we NEED, then to be the one getting bossed or run over.
If your not the lead dog, the view never changes
emsnews
May 29th, 2010 at 11:35 am
Meanwhile, all of our Presidents since Reagan have been curiously lax about protecting our native borders. There seems to be no money, no staff, no interest in securing the most important borders on earth: our own. And even feeble attempts at doing this is attacked by our own government as 'racist'.
Willy Nilly
May 29th, 2010 at 3:21 pm
That is so funny. You are getting your ass whupped by a few guys armed with AK47s.
Steve Hogan
May 29th, 2010 at 5:02 pm
It's convenient to blame excessive spending on US presidents, when it is Congress that has the power of the purse. Americans continue to elect representatives that spend without restraint, then wonder why we have deficits shooting through the roof.
A word of advice to voters: stop electing these blockheads!
Good luck
May 30th, 2010 at 4:26 am
How much of that is pension and benefits? Other countries would pay those in a different department. As Ireland illustrates, just because you don't have a military doesn't mean your government can't blow the money on something else.
"I say we need to be the strongest kid on the block." – We could do that with 500,000 men. Canada and Mexico aren't that tuff. All kidding aside the US is becoming irrelevant. N Korea does not care if the US is on the block or not. Saddam Hussein did care, but showing respect did not help him. Somebody explain why throwing Jamaica into chaos was a good idea?