The Agony of Iraq, the Country of My Birth
As a 17-year-old in 1962, I was one of a group of about 10 Iraqi students doing A-levels in a college in the UK. The group included three Christians and one Kurd; the rest were Muslims. Please do not ask me how many of the Muslims were Shia and how many were Sunni. I had no idea and neither had anyone else. I only knew of the religion and ethnicity of the others through casual conversations. That is not how we defined ourselves. The only label that mattered was that we were all Iraqis.
Not long ago I was sent a list of Iraqi politicians and members of the Iraqi parliament, and against each name were written the labels Shia, Sunni, Kurdish, Christian, and other designations defining ethnicity or sect. I wrote back decrying the fact that if intellectuals and opinion-shapers were defining people with these labels, how could we blame the rest of Iraqi society for doing the same?
The illegal Iraq War has melted the glue that bound Iraqi society together. Paul Bremer, the American viceroy in charge of Iraq after the war, headed the Coalition Provisional Authority, whose members were based on quotas representing the mosaic of Iraqi society. It thus deliberately employed the maxim of divide and rule. But why should the Iraqis expect otherwise? The American aim, supported by Britain, was to occupy Iraq and control its oil, and this is the tried and tested way of all occupiers and colonizers.
Iraqi society is now divided on ethnic and sectarian lines; it has become the theater where Iraq’s neighboring countries fight their petty squabbles through gangs and terror groups, with ordinary people paying with their lives. Of course foreign powers and neighbors will meddle in a weak, divided country to protect their interests as they see them — not necessarily the interests of the ordinary people in those countries, but the interests of the elite who are in charge behind the scenes, regardless of the politicians forming their governments.
Iraq has suffered a colossal loss of life as well as injury, dislocation, and destruction; the misery visited on its people is beyond comprehension. The one positive thing is that the tyrant Saddam has been removed. The yearning of people for their basic right to live and their need for the necessities of life such as clean water and electricity are making large numbers of Iraqis nostalgic for a Saddam-like figure able to deal with the violence and provide the essentials of a normal life.
What an irony it is that at the very moment when the revolutionary youth of the Arab world are making the ultimate sacrifice to wrest control from the tyrannical dinosaurs who ruled them for so long, Iraq seems to be heading in the opposite direction.
Will Iraqi intellectuals and politicians be able to lift their gaze from contemplating their navels long enough to see the catastrophe engulfing the nation? Will it be possible for the Iraqi intelligentsia to think beyond their sect and look at themselves as Iraqis? Not that long ago, we could do that. We can do it again.
Many Iraqis I talk to tell me the situation is hopeless. They blame foreign powers, corrupt politicians, and meddling by neighboring countries. Yes, the injustice and the suffering have been immense. Yes, there is meddling and corruption. But it is time for the Iraqis to take charge of their destiny. Intellectuals and opinion-shapers, please direct your energy to the worthy aim of uniting the people. The sheer will of a united people can force reluctant politicians to change or go. The people of Egypt and Tunisia have shown us the way.





Editorial: US must act to avoid Iraqi civil war – Vancouver Sun | Israel En - iWooho.com
December 30th, 2011 at 3:07 am
[...] Iraqi PM Allawi: U.S. should Intervene to Avert Iraq Civil WarInternational Business Times AUThe Agony of Iraq, the Country of My BirthAntiwar.comPeace in Iraq was fragile all alongOneonta Daily StarAlaska Dispatch -Voice of [...]
liveload
December 30th, 2011 at 6:36 am
On behalf of every American who can look at themselves HONESTLY, I offer you my sincere apologies. I know that doesn't mean a damn thing when your nation is being torn apart by our Fascist Banksters. Your country is descending down the same path every organic democracy has taken when it concerns a resource rich nation. It's going to be impossible to have a democracy as long as The Fed controls the world. When money is no object, they WILL find someone that can be bought and the rest is history. Doing things like igniting internecine strife are tricks as old as colonizers themselves. When people are killing themselves, they're not killing the colonizer's costumed terrorists (or Army, or whatever you wish to call them for your own personal edification).
Until we take the world back from the Fascist Banksters AND take away their money printing ability this will NEVER end.
Adnan Al-Daini
December 30th, 2011 at 4:00 pm
I am grateful for your apology and regret as it shows an understanding and empathy with the suffering of millions of Iraqis. I fully appreciate that the war was pushed by powerful lobbyists and the military-industrial complex, where the business of death and destruction produces vast profits for the 1%ers to the detriment of the 99%ers.
Augustbrhm
December 30th, 2011 at 4:44 pm
My mind cannot contemplate the atrocities that was thrust upon the people of Iraq which started in the late 80s culminating in the illegal invasion destruction,murder,mahem rape,buggerytortureThe murder of one million citizens including children and babies pregnant mothers.Those war criminals walk free."GOD ~BLESS AMERICA".
Michael Hamrin
December 30th, 2011 at 6:24 pm
Adnan, my condolences for what has been done to your country, Iraq. It is deplorable and inexcusable. The one point of difference I have is that every critic of the act of naked aggression seems to feel the need to say that the lynching of Saddam Hussein was a blessing for the nation. In legal terms Saddam was railroaded on pitiful evidence. That shreds the rule of law. Saddam had a Christian as his right-hand man (Tariq Aziz) and presided over an extraordinary period of growth in infrastructure, health care and opportunity for women. Bush I destroyed the infrastructure and sanctions finished the job. The unfortunate truth is that sometimes a given situation demands a "strongman". Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez are of the same mode. Not "teddy bears", but useful to their constituents in many ways.
Adnan Al-Daini
December 31st, 2011 at 2:56 pm
Michael, it is a great injustice to compare Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro to Saddam. The Baath party came to power in 1963 with a CIA inspired coup, culminating in Saddam becoming president in 1979. The Coup removed a great nationalist leader, general Qasim, whose land ownership reforms were a great achievement. Additionally, Qasim also passed oil law no. 80, and with it wrested control of Iraq’s oil from British Petroleum. Saddam was a cruel thug who eliminated his opponents with incredible viciousness. His security apparatus, (Mukhabarat), were ubiquitous in creating terror among the population, with family members afraid of criticizing his rule even to each other for fear of being reported to the authorities (George Orwell’s 1984 novel comes to mind). [please read next comment for continuation]
Adnan Al-Daini
December 31st, 2011 at 3:03 pm
Saddam was extremely violent against the people of Iraq culminating in his chemical weapons attack on the Kurdish town of Halabja that caused thousands of civilian deaths. You are right, though, to point out many of the good things that happened under Saddam (education, infrastructure projects and healthcare) but surely, that does not mean that these things could not have been done under a regime less cruel and moderately democratic. He foolishly squandered many of these gains with his Iran war and then his invasion of Kuwait. Of course, I agree with you his trial was a farce; He was not, for example, indicted for his use of chemical weapons on Halabja because that would have shown the world who supplied him with these weapons (you guessed it, the western powers). His execution in that manner was barbaric. The disaster that is today’s Iraq was the result of an extremely violent illegal war that destroyed the state as well as the regime. I am sure had the war not happened, Iraq would have been part of the Arab spring battling to remove him and would have eventually succeeded without the colossal human cost of the war that has also pushed Iraq back to the Stone Age.
Adnan Al-Daini
January 2nd, 2012 at 7:13 am
I have been asked about the religion of the Kurdish student mentioned in the first paragraph of the article. Yes, he was a Muslim too