Behind the Arab Revolt is a Word We Dare Not Speak
Shortly after the invasion of Iraq in 2003, I interviewed Ray McGovern, one of an elite group of CIA officers who prepared the President’s daily intelligence brief. McGovern was at the apex of the "national security" monolith that is American power and had retired with presidential plaudits. On the eve of the invasion, he and 45 other senior officers of the CIA and other intelligence agencies wrote to President George W. Bush that the "drumbeat for war" was based not on intelligence, but lies.
"It was 95 per cent charade," McGovern told me.
"How did they get away with it?"
"The press allowed the crazies to get away with it."
"Who are the crazies?"
"The people running the [Bush] administration have a set of beliefs a lot like those expressed in Mein Kampf … these are the same people who were referred to in the circles in which I moved, at the top, as ‘the crazies.’"
I said, "Norman Mailer has written that that he believes America has entered a pre-fascist state. What’s your view of that?"
"Well … I hope he’s right, because there are others saying we are already in a fascist mode."
On 22 January, Ray McGovern emailed me to express his disgust at the Obama administration’s barbaric treatment of the alleged whistleblower Bradley Manning and its pursuit of WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange. "Way back when George and Tony decided it might be fun to attack Iraq," he wrote, "I said something to the effect that fascism had already begun here. I have to admit I did not think it would get this bad this quickly."
On 16 February, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a speech at George Washington University in which she condemned governments that arrested protestors and crushed free expression. She lauded the liberating power of the internet while failing to mention that her government was planning to close down those parts of the internet that encouraged dissent and truth-telling. It was a speech of spectacular hypocrisy, and Ray McGovern was in the audience. Outraged, he rose from his chair and silently turned his back on Clinton. He was immediately seized by police and a security goon and beaten to the floor, dragged out and thrown into jail, bleeding. He has sent me photographs of his injuries. He is 71. During the assault, which was clearly visible to Clinton, she did not pause in her remarks.
Fascism is a difficult word, because it comes with an iconography that touches the Nazi nerve and is abused as propaganda against America’s official enemies and to promote the West’s foreign adventures with a moral vocabulary written in the struggle against Hitler. And yet fascism and imperialism are twins. In the aftermath of World War Two, those in the imperial states who had made respectable the racial and cultural superiority of "Western civilisation," found that Hitler and fascism had claimed the same, employing strikingly similar methods. Thereafter, the very notion of American imperialism was swept from the textbooks and popular culture of an imperial nation forged on the genocidal conquest of its native people. And a war on social justice and democracy became "US foreign policy."
As the Washington historian William Blum has documented, since 1945, the US has destroyed or subverted more than 50 governments, many of them democracies, and used mass murderers like Suharto, Mobutu, and Pinochet to dominate by proxy. In the Middle East, every dictatorship and pseudo-monarchy has been sustained by America. In "Operation Cyclone," the CIA and MI6 secretly fostered and bank-rolled Islamic extremism. The object was to smash or deter nationalism and democracy. The victims of this Western state terrorism have been mostly Muslims. The courageous people gunned down last week in Bahrain and Libya, the latter a "priority UK market," according to Britain’s official arms "procurers," join those children blown to bits in Gaza by the latest American F-16 aircraft.
The revolt in the Arab world is not merely against a resident dictator but a worldwide economic tyranny designed by the US Treasury and imposed by the US Agency for International Development, the IMF and World Bank, which have ensured that rich countries like Egypt are reduced to vast sweatshops, with half the population earning less than $2 a day. The people’s triumph in Cairo was the first blow against what Benito Mussolini called corporatism, a word that appears in his definition of fascism.
How did such extremism take hold in the liberal West? "It is necessary to destroy hope, idealism, solidarity, and concern for the poor and oppressed," observed Noam Chomsky a generation ago, "[and] to replace these dangerous feelings with self-centred egoism, a pervasive cynicism that holds that [an order of] inequities and oppression is the best that can be achieved. In fact, a great international propaganda campaign is under way to convince people – particularly young people – that this not only is what they should feel but that it’s what they do feel."
Like the European revolutions of 1848 and the uprising against Stalinism in 1989, the Arab revolt has rejected fear. An insurrection of suppressed ideas, hope and solidarity has begun. In the United States, where 45 per cent of young African-Americans have no jobs and the top hedge fund managers are paid, on average, a billion dollars a year, mass protests against cuts in services and jobs have spread to heartland states like Wisconsin. In Britain, the fastest-growing modern protest movement, UK Uncut, is about to take direct action against tax avoiders and rapacious banks. Something has changed that cannot be unchanged. The enemy has a name now.
Read more by John Pilger
- The New Propaganda Is Liberal – March 14th, 2013
- WikiLeaks is a rare truth-teller. Smearing Julian Assange is shameful – February 17th, 2013
- The Real Invasion of Africa Is Not News, and a License To Lie Is Hollywood’s Gift – January 31st, 2013
- As Sanctions Hit Iran’s Most Vulnerable, the Man Who Dared to Feed Sanction-Starved Iraq Remains in Prison – November 9th, 2012
- The Life and Death of an Australian Hero, Whose Skin Was the Wrong Colour – October 4th, 2012





tommauel
February 24th, 2011 at 11:16 pm
Excellent article. Fifty countries subverted by the US and transformed into dictatorship since 1945. That is an amazing indictment of US foreign policy.
HWH
February 24th, 2011 at 11:41 pm
Since 1945??…..What happen just before that?? And who was behind THAT??!!….. .http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7rcs0a5OQA
bogi666
February 25th, 2011 at 1:59 am
Why does Haiti come to mind. Why is the USGE, United States Government Empire afraid of twice democratically elected Aristide, a priest who must not weigh more than 125 lbs and has the USGE shaking in it boots despite its nuclear arsenal. Haiti,been invaded several times by the USGE and has been sabotaged from being a functional government. It just got too "uppity" when it won, paid for really, its independence in 1803. As one Southern gentleman Senator put it, "niggers speaking French". Might have been Strom Thurmond, well wasn't even that old and I suspect he used the "n"word despite having a daughter born of a 15 year old black woman he raped when he was 25.
mickperry
February 25th, 2011 at 2:03 am
The names of the enemies of WikiLeaks turned out to be Amazon, Pay Pal, Mastercard, and Visa, among others. These are the same corporations which have traditionally been happy to trade in every commodity from books by Western dissident authors to tee shirts of Che Guerva: because they have always ultimately been in control. Karl Rove is attributed with once explaining to the author Ron Suskind that he should catch up, because he was still living in the “reality-based community”, and elaborating on this, said: "That's not the way the world really works any more. We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do." Rove's world view largely explains the fact that so long as the corporations have enjoyed the monopoly on setting the narrative, and also the perimeters of debate, dissent has been mostly tolerated, and in many instances co opted. This is what is changing. To paraphrase Hisham Matar, speaking on Democracy Now this week about Gaddafi, he said “…he's been the victim of his own contradictions, of his own reality, surrounding himself with people who are always telling him he's right.” Listening to him, you couldn't help but reflect that he might have been speaking about the entire edifice of empire itself.
andy
February 25th, 2011 at 2:54 am
gotta chase up those tax evaders John, their money could help finance the next war!.
andy
February 25th, 2011 at 2:58 am
I bet the UK government is quaking in it's boots about a protest group that stands outside clothes shops and mobile phones outlets demanding businessmen hand over more money to the war and torture party!.
lame http://www.ukuncut.org.uk/blog/press-release-uk-u…
Dan
February 25th, 2011 at 3:56 am
While I do not believe that the Arab and Middle Eastern world are monolithic, and that Islamic influence will only be a portion of the rise of freedom in the region, there is an interesting possibility if the pro-Western governments are set aside for more normal governments reflecting the peoples' will. In at least some Islamic teaching, the Gold Dinar is held up as the true currency for the whole world. Suppose that a new Middle East sets forth a Gold Dinar as the currency to be used in the purchase of oil. Suppose that China announces that it will support the Middle East's move to gold as money. What would happen to American and Western European financial power across the world?
oneselbow
February 25th, 2011 at 5:08 am
And that enemy should unite liberals and libertarians. When will it happen?
tomofsnj
February 25th, 2011 at 5:58 am
tyranny designed by the US Treasury and imposed by the US Agency for International Development, the IMF and World Bank,'
I believe it is clear that the central bankers or money men are the real problem. Their greed has been the root of all the problems. The bankers include the influence that they have over corporate finance. I think government finance and the massive debt has been allowed by the central bankers. One of hte greatest thief in the history of mankind was in 1986 when alan greenspan convinced the government to double the social security taxes and then allow congress to loot the funds for personal pork projects. Peter Seller played a great Alan Greenspan in the movie being there.
Andrewp111
February 25th, 2011 at 6:10 am
They are very likely to do something like this if these revolutions have the intended effect – the creation of an Islamic Caliphate. This is the real reason that the USA can not accept real "democracy" in the mideast, as the will of the Islamic People is unity under a single Caliph. Democracy provides a mechanism for that unification to occur. With all the oil under the control of one or two (Iranian and Sunni) Islamic empires , the vermin will be able to demand payment in gold for oil. This will set the stage for World War III, which will start quickly thereafter.
scott
February 25th, 2011 at 7:00 am
LEE HARVEY was one of history's actors.
scott
February 25th, 2011 at 7:04 am
There won't be a gold Dinar, but there might be a black gold dinar. Oil bucks. The BRICT (don't forget Turkey) are actively working to come up with a basket of currencies. There won't be a WW3, we can't afford to fight it. This is how the Empire collapses, not with a bang, but a whimper.
MvGuy
February 25th, 2011 at 7:11 am
Nice insight tomofsnj……… I wonder if any of that money was with, in the $2,3OO,OOO,OOO,OOO.OO that Rumzfeld reported missing on 09/10/01 …???? Just another one of thoze weird co-incidences like BBC announcing Bld, 7 was down, when you could see it standing behind the presenter…!!! But the ruble of the WTCs did a great job of covering all traces of that missing [stolen??] 2.3 trillion dollars….. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlnQTcLHaMM
MvGuy
February 25th, 2011 at 7:18 am
Or one of it's DUPES……. http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&source=img…
MvGuy
February 25th, 2011 at 7:29 am
How would the the U.S. & E.U. print those Gold Dinars…??????
Brian
February 25th, 2011 at 8:19 am
Are you familiar with the principle of Occam's razor? Basically, in logic, it mandates that you cut away anything which is not necessary to explain something. The simpler of two theories is likeliest to be correct. So. There are two possilbe reasons why that building appeared to be standing while the pressenter spoke. Yours, which is harder to believe because it requires so much unsupportable extra theories, is that some co-conspirator was so eager to get the word out, they jumped the gun and let the BBC in on it before any other news organization (why should they have bothered to do this? and a host of other questions come to mind). Why is it so hard for you to believe that the BBC had a stock photo of New York City behind the presenter? They are based in London, not New York. They didn't have a live feed of Building Seven or anything else at that particular moment. Don't get me wrong: I will believe the evildoers capable of anything and everything. But Occam's razor applies here and everwhere.
curmudgeonvt
February 25th, 2011 at 8:56 am
We can't afford to fight the piddly-ass little wars we're engaged in now!!! Why do you think they'll back down from the final confrontation? They've committed themselves (as well as convinced themselves) that the only way for the US to survive is to dominate – something about American Exceptionalism, I think – have to check with Batshit-crazy Bachmann on that one.
Pshr
February 25th, 2011 at 10:07 am
The true vermin are people like you, and bush, blair, netanyahu, and countless more.
Fr3qu3nter
February 25th, 2011 at 10:23 am
So what Georgie Boy tried to accomplish in March 2003 took seven years. The freedom & democracy part. Im perplexed as to why it took so long.
Roger Lafontaine
February 25th, 2011 at 10:23 am
We don't need dollars, we don't need gold, we need to get rid of all currencies. As long as we have currencies we will have wars because some people have to have more and will fight to get it from you and me and fool us into fighting their wars for them. Look up 'thezeigeistmovement.com' for a real solution that would work for everybody instead of pitting everybody against everybody else.
MvGuy
February 25th, 2011 at 10:41 am
23 minutes ago
Yaa, Brian Dude……..!!! You asked:
"Why is it so hard for you to believe that the BBC had a stock photo of New York City behind the presenter?" …………. Hey, it's not hard for me to believe..!! But if that IS the explanation Brian, how do you, they… or Ocams razor explain the WTC down and the moving plume of smoke rising from the collapse of Bld. 1 & 2…… It would seem to me that if the netwerk had… ["stock photo of New York City behind the presenter?" with the buildings 1 & 2 GONE and smoke rising where those buildings had been...... it would be far more suspicious [incriminating] than reporting the collapse early, though BOTH scenarios indicate foreknowledge and complicity…. How else to explain it…… You probably did NOT view the VIDEO(s)….. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KBO-7Q_A4s http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVURcsa5BS0
MvGuy
February 25th, 2011 at 10:52 am
"Yours, which is harder to believe because it requires so much unsupportable extra theories, is that some co-conspirator was so eager to get the word out, they jumped the gun and let the BBC in on it before any other news organization" ??????? My explanation is very simple, Murphy's Law…… In trying to orchestrate this strike into what we saw, mistakes were made… Some events, and reportage got [Tellingly!!] out of sync… Tellingly!!!
Hacklheber
February 25th, 2011 at 10:53 am
"In the United States, where 45 per cent of young African-Americans have no jobs and the top hedge fund managers are paid, on average, a billion dollars a year, mass protests against cuts in services and jobs have spread to heartland states like Wisconsin. In Britain, the fastest-growing modern protest movement, UK Uncut, is about to take direct action against tax avoiders and rapacious banks. Something has changed that cannot be unchanged. The enemy has a name now."
Jews? Just joking…
But – gimme a break. Unionized state "workers" and self-styled UK vigilantes against "tax avoiders" are the new movement of solidarity and hope? [Especially Britain, which is just now starting to recover or wake up from a decade or so of Labor 'solidarity and hope' policy. The stupid excuse being 'but that wasn't _really_ Labor policy'. Gimme a fracking break!]
Sure, forceful nationalization and expropriation will create jobs and save us all — as opposed to feed the trough of well-connected fat cats and cause you be badly served, not to mention groped, by public service employees looking forward to an early high-payout retirement scheme on your taxes. Yep, that's sure to be the ticket.
Notice how that last paragraph is indistinguishable from any call to action contained in a socialist or national-socialist party program? The circle is indeed closing.
Wildey Moore
February 25th, 2011 at 11:31 am
When I hear the word Democracy, I'm reminded what John Adams said. Democracies are as short in there lives as they are violent in there deaths. I think of Karl Marx as well, "We must win the battle of Democracy." Democracies aren't about majority rule, there about holds the majority of power. They are amoral ( function outside of God's rules for action and interaction) if the proponents want them to be. Today, all of them are amoral, especially America's. We're seeing thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis in action. We're at the anti-thesis (turmoil) stage.
In America, unless we get back to the "One Nation Under God " stage, we will end up like a giant wave hitting the beach. We're trying to do what every despotic Emperor had tried, and failed. There's a war of powers, good against evil, going on but we're concentrating on the battles.
Bodkin
February 25th, 2011 at 12:32 pm
You weren’t “joking”, prick. You were revealing the ugly truth underlying almost all the commentary around here. And you knew when you wrote it that it would find a warm reception among your brotherhood of bigots.
Thanks for unwittingly revealing that your crowd’s bias isn’t limited to Zionism or Israel. It’s the J word. That’s the way it is, and the way it’s always been. I’m glad that you for one dropped the mask. Let’s see if your fellow bigots follow your lead, or hide behind their usual lies.
But first this post has to get through hours and hours of scrutiny by the cowardly moderators. Such are the hoops that some of us “J word” people have to go through to get anything posted around here.
[Moderator's Note: You write: "But first this post has to get through hours and hours of scrutiny by the cowardly moderators." No, it just has to wait for a moderator to get around to it. I don't sit here all day waiting on the off-chance that you'll happen to post. I tried to email you to ask you to register so that I could white-list you, but you hide behind a fake email address. OK, you can go back to your slanderfest/pity part now - Thomas L. Knapp]
mickperry
February 25th, 2011 at 2:34 pm
Best watched on audio when you're doing the washing up. The pictures are better. http://www.openfilm.com/videos/psywar
jack
February 25th, 2011 at 2:37 pm
warmer,warmer,warm,cold,colder,ice cold ,warm,warmer,warmest,red hot,don't ya just love capitalist style democracy,,,,k now is it bigger than a bread basket,,cold, ice cold,etc,etc
JJSalas
February 25th, 2011 at 10:01 pm
Neo-liberalism is a cancer.
alphamorph
February 26th, 2011 at 11:44 am
You're dead wrong about that. From the depths of the recession, the world was able to come up with the money necessary to build several war machines. Fact is, there is never enough money to feed the masses but there's always enough to kill them
Bodkin
February 28th, 2011 at 4:20 am
“I tried to email you to ask you to register”
Why do I need to register in order to post a message?
“you hide behind a fake email address”
If you don’t tell me WHY you want me to register, you’re giving me grounds to “hide”, aren’t you?
Why do you want my email address? Will you answer the question, or will you continue to *HIDE* from it?
[moderator's response: You don't need to register in order to post a message. But, if you register (with WordPress or IntenseDebate), I can "whitelist" you so that your messages don't trip Antiwar.com's moderation filters, which are there to keep the Stormfront types, not you, out - TLK]
Bodkin
February 28th, 2011 at 12:45 pm
That still doesn’t explain why I’m on a list to begin with. It’s doubtful I ever write anything that would trip your filters anyway.
Unless all unregistered participants are on the same list, I’ll assume I’m on it because I’ve shown hostility to your columnists and talkbackers.
I was able to post freely for a very long time, and then one day I was put on a list. Were all the other unregistered talkbackers put on the same list on the same day? I doubt it. I’m probably being singled out.
How about I just agree to tone things down a little, and you allow me to post freely as before? If I become too much of a nuisance, then I’ll go back on the list and register if I so choose.
[moderator's note: You've got it backward. You're not on a list -- you write stuff that trips our automatic moderation filters. I'm asking you to GET on a list -- a list of people whose stuff should be allowed through even when it does trip those filters, because it isn't what those filters are treating it as - TLK]
Jack Farrell
March 20th, 2011 at 4:08 pm
This is truly a thought-provoking column. I've become increasingly concerned about the government's acting without constitutional authority across the entire range of American life. I'm sorry to say that I was one who supported Bush's war in the early 2000s, but even from the beginning, I didn't like many things he did. The TSA, for example, is in essence, a fascist agency that should be scraped yesterday. I knew his stated objective of creating a democracy in Iraq was either a pipe dream or a lie. I have read widely on Islam and the Middle East, and I know that it will take a miracle to bring any kind of modern government to the area, even if we stay out of it completely, which the Northeast elite who own Washington don't want. There's no doubt in my my that Obama is indeed a fascist. He meets every criterion. His only problem is that he's a coward, and he will not act if there's any threat to himself. I was somewhat cheered by the rise of the Tea Party movement, but it will have to increase its size by at least a factor of 10 to have any real effect. The Republicans are slightly less than useless with their "great big takeover". The best they've proposed is approximately $70 billion in budget cuts, less than a band-aid when we're hemorrhaging from our aorta. I believe a very bad day is coming and probably civil war. Even if it's a revolution, however, be prepared for the worst. Revolutions rarely end well.
Finally, I'd just like to disagree strongly with the authors' apparent sympathy for the public unions. Having been forced to pay dues to one of the biggest (CTA) though I never joined, I have nothing but contempt for them. First, public unions should not be allowed to strike, and second, there should be no public unions in the first place. Union members are paid (not counting their many benefits) a good one-third more then private sector Americans, and they do a far worse job, especially in education. All a union wants is power which it gets through a perpetual public relations campaign carried by their toadies in the media that constantly need more money to fix what they've screwed up. With non-discretionary entitlement spending robbing the public purse of over 60% of the budget, how can a financial web site — or at least one that is promoted by many such — oppose genuine cuts in entitlements? Are you willing to suffer the fate of Weimer Germany, or are you unaware of the horror that happened to Germany's economy during the 30s?
Uncle B
April 18th, 2011 at 11:52 am
Black cultural center of America, birthplace of Motown, industrial giant in America, Automotive giant to the world, destroyed in decades, now a ruin often derisively compared to Third World Johannesburg. Who did this? Black folk? Look again!
Remember the Oldsmobiles, Packards, Studebakers, Pontiacs, Nash, all American, all American parts, all Union built, all affordable by the general working folk?
Google, torrent, the documentary, "Who Stole The Electric Car" for a lesson on corporate power in America. Look closely now at American infrastructure as it crumbles. Examine the horrendous cost of the "Super-Prisons" in spite of scientists attesting to their social uselessness. Watch closely as Asians invade our colleges, universities, with far superior intelligence. Be made aware, that America suffered a brutal beating then a clear loss on the economic battle field of the world, to China, who now hold America ransom, threaten to liquidate American securities and crash the American dollar on whim by a communist central planning committee, at any time they choose, unaffected by the American Military and nuclear threat, a threat they can match or even supersede, if the American propagandists were muzzled, and the truth were told.
Are we witnessing the latter days of the last, the greatest, Caucasian empire the world will ever know? Will the fumes of Fuckoshima render the final pay-back , wreak vengeance for poorly designed reactors, first on California, where folks rapidly assemble Geiger counters, seek to calibrate them properly, and GPS hot spots, then across America, as we speak?
can the corporatists justify the moving of entrusted Capital to Asia, to build huge modern factories there? American arm-pit earned capital? Is Capitalism still the best answer for the proletariat, the newly growing precariat, in America? Will it reach out to the now, disenfranchised masses in the streets? Remember the big churches, the community centers, the neighborhoods of Detroit?