Calls Mount to Investigate Bush Officials for Torture
Senior officials under the former George W. Bush administration knowingly authorized the torture of terrorism suspects held under United States custody, a Human Right Watch (HRW) report released Tuesday revealed.
Titled “Getting Away With Torture,” the 107-page report presents a plethora of evidence that HRW says warrants criminal investigations against former Vice President Dick Cheney, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfield, former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director George Tenet, and Bush himself, among others.
Newly declassified memos, transcriptions of congressional hearings, and other sources indicate that Bush officials authorized the use of interrogation techniques almost universally considered torture — such as waterboarding — as well as the operation of covert CIA prisons abroad and the rendition of detainees to countries where they were subsequently tortured.
HRW also criticized the United States under the current Barack Obama administration for failing to meets it obligations under the United Nations Convention Against Torture to investigate acts of torture and other inhumane treatment.
“President Obama has defended the decision not to prosecute officials in his predecessor’s administration by arguing that the country needs ‘to look forward, not backward,’” said HRW executive director Kenneth Roth. “[He] has treated torture as an unfortunate policy choice rather than a crime.”
To date, both the Bush and Obama administrations have successfully prevented courts from reviewing the merits of torture allegations in civil lawsuits by arguing that the cases involve sensitive information, which, if revealed, might endanger national security.
Last year, Bush defended the use of waterboarding on the grounds that the Justice Department deemed it legal. In 2002, lawyers in the Office of Legal Counsel had drafted memos approving the legality of a list of abusive interrogation techniques, including waterboarding. However, HRW documents evidence that shows senior administration officials pressured the politically appointed lawyers to write these legal justifications.
“Senior Bush officials shouldn’t be allowed to shape and hand-pick legal advice and then hide behind it as if were autonomously delivered,” Roth said.
HRW further recommends that Congress establish an independent, nonpartisan commission to examine the mistreatment of detainees in U.S. custody since the Sep. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and compensate victims of torture, as required by the U.N. Convention Against Torture.
“Without [a commission], torture very much remains within the toolbox of accepted policies. People are not going to back away from it until there is accountability,” Karen Greenberg, executive director of New York University’s Center on Law and Security and author of The Least Worst Place: Guantanamo’s First 100 Days, told IPS.
In 2009, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder appointed a special prosecutor to investigate detainee abuse, but limited the mandate to only “unauthorized” acts, which effectively excluded violations like waterboarding and forcing prisoners to maintain stress positions that were approved by the Bush administration.
But on June 30 of this year, the Justice Department announced that it would continue probing only two of nearly 100 allegations of torture. The open cases involve the deaths of two men — Manadel al-Jamadi, an Iraqi, and Gul Rahman, an Afghan — in CIA custody.
Human and civil rights group criticized the narrow scope of the torture investigations, while HRW said they failed to address the systematic character of the abuses.
“The U.S. government’s pattern of abuse across several countries did not result from acts of individuals who broke the rules,” Roth said. “It resulted from decisions made by senior U.S. officials to bend, ignore, or cast aside the rules.” If the U.S. does not pursue criminal investigations, HRW is urging other countries to exercise universal jurisdiction under international law and prosecute the aforementioned officials.
A number of former detainees have already taken this step by filing criminal complaints in courts outside of the U.S.
In February 2011, alleged victims of torture living in Switzerland planned to file a suit against Bush, causing him to cancel his trip there.
Another investigation is underway in Spain, where the Center for Constitutional Rights and the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights requested a subpoena for a former commander of the Abu Ghraib prison to explain his role in the alleged torture of four detainees.
Washington’s failure to investigate its own citizens for abuses such as torture ultimately undercuts its efforts to hold other governments accountable for human rights violations, according to HRW.
“The U.S. is right to call for justice when serious international crimes are committed in places like Darfur, Libya, and Sri Lanka, but there should be no double standards,” Roth said.
“When the U.S. government shields its own officials from investigation and prosecution, it makes it easier for others to dismiss global efforts to bring violators of serious crimes to justice,” he added.
Failing to prosecute ultimately sends the message that “if you are
powerful, you can get away with even torture,” Greenberg said.
(Inter Press Service)
Read more by Naseema Noor
- Study Rebuts US Claims of ‘No Civilian Deaths’ in Pakistan Drone Strikes – July 22nd, 2011





Jamal
July 12th, 2011 at 10:24 pm
For the world to know that there is a democracy.., if such thing exist.., then US, EU and ICC needs to prosecute the elements who were involved in Iraq war and tortures of Iraqis so as people of Afghanistan.., otherwise as we have said before.., US and EU needs to prove to the world that their politics is based on democracy.., otherwise is a falsified and a personal democracy from Tony Blair to Bill Clinton and Obama administrations.
DougBuchanan.com
July 13th, 2011 at 12:38 am
There is a process to "initiate due process of law", that inescapably causes government officials to meet their known legal duty, the evasion of which is a crime, to initiate and carry out full due process of law, against fellow government officials, precisely as Human Rights Watch. Anyone can learn the process, like the process to promptly end wars. It is just knowledge. But if you learn the process, try to suggest even its existence to the Human Rights Watch folks, and you would be wiser to go fishing. They have no interest in asking even the first question. Without the ongoing problem, they cannot get donations to "work on the problem".
Enjoy the show, and have to good sense to send no money to any organization that has not achieved its stated goal within six months.
Respectfully, DougBuchanan.com
danton
July 13th, 2011 at 2:16 am
Good article. It's time to push back the tyrranny..no more torture, war, or oppressing working people.
Hadley
July 13th, 2011 at 4:05 am
I am not sure I understand how this "comments" section works on Antiwar.com
It seems that the times I have posted a comment, I am always told that someone has to first approve it before its allowed to appear. Oddly enough, my comments are never controversial and merely voice a reasoned opinion on the article I am commenting on. Yet, by the time the comment is "approved" the article has already been removed and my comments are never shown.
Is there freedom of speech on this sight or not? Why is management afraid of what it's readers have to say that they need to sensor them? Ergo, this is not freedom of speech. Very strange indeed!
I would like very much to have someone explain this to me and how it works.
Hadley
July 13th, 2011 at 4:31 am
OK.. Now I think I get it as to why comments have to be approved; The word "Israel" or "Jew" triggers the "hold till approved" situation. Obviously, you need to protect both from undue criticism. Would "Germany" England" "Russia" "China" illicit the same response? I doubt it. Israel obviously is unique in the world. The only nation in the world that can get away with murder and needs to be protected by all means from answering to their crimes. Oh my. Now I understand.
saggiadonna
July 13th, 2011 at 5:39 am
Don't let Bush and the rest of his junta have one day of peace–they do not deserve to live quiet leves while those who suffered irreparable damage and death are not avenged.
curmudgeonvt
July 13th, 2011 at 5:51 am
Take the time to register. It's free and easy and you might find that as a registered commenter you rise above the level of a drive-by. Consider it a perk.
And whining is really unbecoming – if you want an answer send this tear-jerker thru the "Letter to the editor" link above.
Drake
July 13th, 2011 at 9:21 am
The fact that tortue is unlawful and immoral doesn't bother sociopaths like Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld. But they should have thought of the practical considerations; like what would happen to our soldiers captured by the Taliban, after our leaders gave the green light to torture.
Brian
July 13th, 2011 at 10:18 am
If that' what you really think, you haven't spent much time on this site or read much of its contents, never mind comments.
I wish I had time to register. But anyway, my comments seem to make it through.
Roger Lafontaine
July 13th, 2011 at 1:37 pm
Okay Hadley, settle down, take a breath and clear your head for a minute. You definitely got the wrong impression. Nobody has criticized Israel more strongly than I have -anywhere and I get on this site almost every day, and yes I even use the dreaded word 'Jew' occasionally – very cautiously – when I think it is relevant. This is definitely not a pro-Israel zone, at least not until they recover their humanity and start treating their Semitic brothers with more fairness and make the peace that's been waiting for them for decades now. The truth is that sometimes you have to wait and sometimes comments get on right away,and I don't know why. So try again, and welcome.
Roger Lafontaine
July 13th, 2011 at 1:42 pm
Respectfully,I actually think that this report already is more than anyone else has done. If the process you describe is so simple why hasn't it been done, or why haven't you done it yourself ?
jeff_davis
July 13th, 2011 at 9:34 pm
When I had this problem, I contacted Antiwar.com and worked it out with the contact person. When it happened again — by an unseen and anonymous "moderator" — I used the "Report" function to "call out" the moderator from behind his veil of anonymity.
Sometimes it's a software glitch, sometimes censorship. Stay calm. Solve the problem.
jeff_davis
July 13th, 2011 at 9:42 pm
When I had this problem, it was definitely J*w and Zion*st that triggered the censorship. I know because I posted just those words, singly, and then the "stealth" versions you see above. The full words triggered the filters that divert a comment to the moderator, the "stealth" versions did not.
I don't know whether they changed the filters on those words or added my IP address to some list that — after my stink — "immunized" my IP address from moderation.