CNN’s Objectivity Questioned in Sacking of Mideast Reporter
CNN’s firing of Octavia Nasr, the editor responsible for the network’s Middle East coverage, over a Twitter post in which she expressed her sadness over the death of a Lebanese cleric has set off a firestorm of debate about what the decision says about CNN’s fairness in reporting on the region.
On Sunday, Nasr wrote, "Sad to hear of the passing of Sayyed Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah… One of Hezbollah’s giants I respect a lot," on her Twitter account, which is followed by over 7,000 readers.
Fadlallah was an inspirational figure for Lebanese Shiites and an early supporter of Hezbollah.
Fadlallah, who initially supported the use of suicide bombings as a means of resistance against the occupation of Lebanon and Palestine, later criticized Hezbollah for its close ties to Iran, as well as Ayatollah Khomeini’s velayet- e faqih "rule of the clerics." which Khomeini imposed in Iran in 1979.
Critics of Fadlallah have charged that he was staunchly anti-U.S., and had been linked to bombings that killed more than 260 U.S. citizens, but others have pointed to the cleric’s support for women’s rights and fatwas against female circumcision and honor killings as evidence of his comparatively progressive position.
After the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and a number of right-wing news outlets and blogs took issue with her expression of regret over Fadlallah’s death, on Tuesday, Nasr wrote another Twitter post in which she attempted to clarify her earlier comment and emphasized her admiration of Fadlallah’s defense of women’s rights.
"Fadlallah, designated by the U.S. Department of Treasury as a specially designated terrorist, disseminated numerous fatawa’ supporting terrorist operations and was a vocal supporter of terrorism against Israeli targets," read a statement from the ADL on Tuesday.
"It is clearly an impropriety for a CNN journalist/editor to express such a partisan viewpoint as Ms. Nasr did in her tweet," the statement continued.
"How did CNN senior editor of Middle East affairs Octavia Nasr celebrate July 4? By mourning the passing of Hezbollah’s Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah," blogged Daniel Halper at the neoconservative Weekly Standard.
But other journalists and watchdog groups expressed concern over the speed with which CNN fired Nasr and the emergence of a double-standard when reporting on Middle Eastern affairs.
"The network — which has employed a former AIPAC official, Wolf Blitzer, as its primary news anchor for the last 15 years — justified its actions by claiming that Nasr’s ‘credibility’ had been ‘compromised,’" wrote Salon‘s Glenn Greenwald in an article in which he went on to argue that Nasr was fired for offending the "neocon Right" by expressing regret over the death of a "profoundly complex figure, with some legitimate grievances, some entrenched hatreds and ugly viewpoints, and a substantial capacity for good."
Peter Hart, activism director at Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), a media watchdog group, told IPS that, "If there was some suggestion that she had been producing questionable journalism over all these years you’d think this would have been an issue before this, but it doesn’t seem to be the case. So it’s a decision which is disconnected from any sensible policy. The real problem is that she said something which offended very powerful people and that was her mistake."
Nasr had worked for the Atlanta-based CNN for 20 years and rarely appeared on-air except for occasional appearances as an analyst in discussions on Middle East news. She had no history of an anti-Israel or pro-Palestinian bias and, according to Greenwald, "blended perfectly into the American corporate media woodwork."
"Octavia Nasr got fired for the one smart thing she ever said," quipped journalist Nir Rosen, a fellow at the New York University Center on Law and Security, in a Twitter post.
"[P]lenty of American journalists and politicians have shown ‘respect’ (and in some cases, fawning admiration) for various world figures with hands far bloodier than Ayatollah Fadlallah — including Mao Zedong, Ariel Sharon, the Shah of Iran, or even Kim il Sung — but it didn’t cost them their jobs," wrote Stephen Walt, a professor of international relations at Harvard University.
Questions have been raised over why Nasr, known as an uncontroversial reporter of Middle East affairs, was fired so quickly for an off-the-cuff Twitter post.
According to some observers, her unwillingness to conform to the narrative depicted by a number of right-wing news outlets and U.S. Jewish groups that Fadlallah was a terrorist, anti-US and anti-Semitic resulted in CNN receiving pressure to fire her.
"Nasr’s comment was enough to spark fierce outrage from the various precincts of the neocon blog/twittersphere, who went after Nasr for her egregious failure to reduce Fadlallah to an anti-Israel, anti-American terrorist bogeyman," blogged Matt Duss, a National Security Researcher at the liberal Center For American Progress.
While right-wing news outlets, such as the Weekly Standard and the conservative WorldNetDaily gleefully reported on Nasr’s departure from CNN, others expressed concern for the double standard which has emerged when discussing Middle East affairs in the US mainstream media.
"The standard here is based on nothing that Nasr reported for CNN. [Her Twitter post] was barely a one sentence expression of sympathy. Firing her was a decision that was completely disconnected from her work so it’s a decision that’s very troubling. Lou Dobbs’s thoughts about immigrants were on CNN every night and CNN stood by him as the criticism mounted and the factual inaccuracies piled up," said Hart.
"In this case, a stray comment is enough to terminate someone’s role at CNN almost overnight," he said. "The discrepancy is rather revealing and CNN would have a very hard time revealing precisely what their policy is on this. It’s hard to find precedent for this. She has a history of covering the region and that is not easily replaced."
(Inter Press Service)
Read more by Eli Clifton
- J Street Urges Obama to Seize the Moment – March 1st, 2011
- White House Questions Suspension of Military Aid to Lebanon – August 12th, 2010
- Poll: Pakistanis Dislike US, Taliban, and al-Qaeda – July 30th, 2010
- US and South Korea Impose New Sanctions on North – July 22nd, 2010
- White House Low-Key on China-Pakistan Nuke Deal – June 30th, 2010





James
July 9th, 2010 at 6:03 am
The lady desreves her fate for working with CNN, what did she expect? CNN is a propaganda outlet for you know who, I was 100% sure of this after the Iraqi invation of Kuwait.
"She had no history of an anti-Israel or pro-Palestinian bias" this is a funny code sentence meaning she has no history of telling the truth.
theothercanada
July 9th, 2010 at 7:06 am
"News" network run by Pentagon's psy oops objective? Readers of antiwar know what CNN is. Octavia made great deal of money over the 20 years doing the AIPAC's propaganda against Palestinian Patriots. She was very well aware who she was working for. Lou Dobb's racist rants are different, they were approved by CNN in the fight to get raings with redneck America against Fox.
dsmiith
July 9th, 2010 at 10:44 am
What's wrong with being pro-Palestinian?..he asked in jest. You would think Ms. Nasr had asked a question like, "How can you defend banning respirators from reaching the Gaza?"
geo1671
July 9th, 2010 at 1:44 pm
But for all the CNN Kosher HACKs jumping up and down after saddam's hanging and lieing non stop–threat gone–USA and the world is safe now. Not one got fired after found that Saddam had nothing to do with the NOW proven ,not muslim but Sept 11 Ashkenazi attacks.
Just imagine if the chinese bought out all the USA media- and day after day fed us B.S>-would Americans put up with it?
DLCURRELL
July 9th, 2010 at 4:23 pm
Technically speaking, I suppose that Octavia Nasr could be charged with supporting a terrorist organization?
charley caruso
July 9th, 2010 at 4:51 pm
Glad you mentioned that Wolf Blitzer once worked for AIPAC. How many people know that?
And then he went to one of most important jobs in TV News.
Just a coincidence, I guess.
When will this all end and the U.S. be the U.S. again – instead of an appendage of the land of Zion?
Obummer is so in their pocket it's sickening.
Charley caruso
no-body
July 9th, 2010 at 10:47 am
CNN is a Nazi station, why
in the 1930′s the nazi’s told all jewish people anyone working for government will be fired, step 2, the nazi’s told the German people to boycott all own jewish stores, step 3, the nazi’s told all jewish teachers will be fired, etc etc.
CNN is a Nazi machine to what they did to this lady, CNN is a Zionist run organization, they are doing to the Arab people what the Nazi’s did to the jewish people
there is no difference, today Zionism is a Nazi like machine, and the US is becoming a Nazi state, not to mention Canada, Europe etc.
and don’t forget the Germans had 1000′s of Zionists fighting for the German army also,
Zionism = Nazi
Israel is a apartheid state, just like the white South Africa.
San Fernando Curt
July 9th, 2010 at 12:30 pm
Since most of her two-decade career was off-camera and in an editorial capacity, how do we know she was such a mediocrity? The comparison of her case to that of Lou Dobbs is apt: Support structures (and there are many) providing politically correct narrative for illegal immigration lack the heft of Israel-Firsters in this country. The Israel Lobby waves a powerful truncheon over not only America's political sector, but its media, as well. CNN has proven itself gutless and disturbingly irresponsible as information purveyor to the AMERICAN public. This seemingly trifling story occurred the same week as President Obama rolled over and played doggie for Binyamin Netanyahu, humiliating America before the world but keeping the Lobby's attack hounds off Democrats this election year. It's time to start putting this intolerable situation to the population sectors which keep The Lobby swollen with funds. I hope Nasr writes a book trashing this crap.
San Fernando Curt
July 9th, 2010 at 7:42 pm
P.S. – Can anyone calling themselves American not be OUTRAGED by the chortling thought police at the ADL? Greenwald's designation of them is as apt as is despising their praise both of Nasr's fear-driven groveling AND her firing. This confirms my suspicion that the ADL has all the moral authority of salesmen in pinkie rings at Horsetrader Ed's used-car lot.
pendulum
July 9th, 2010 at 10:45 pm
the Crazy Nut Network never had any objectivity
Advocat4Liberty
July 9th, 2010 at 5:45 pm
Yes, geo1671, Amerikans would put up with it. Know why? Because 90% of my fellow "citizens" (translate 'slaves/serfs') are morons who wear their shackles with joy.
Heathcliff_Maw
July 10th, 2010 at 4:07 am
Of course when the Zionists say Fadlallah supported suicide bombings against Israeli targets, they always neglect to say that the bombings targeted military forces occupying Lebanon.
Supporting aggressive warfare and occupation is okay, even though those actions kill far more people than do suicide bombers.
1todd_sheen
July 21st, 2010 at 2:47 pm
CNN’s Objectivity Questioned in Sacking of Mideast Reporter, is really an informative article.
Todd