There Is Unity in Oppression; There Must Be Unity in Response
Julian Assange's speech outside Ecuador's London embassy
I am here today because I cannot be there with you today. But thank you for coming. Thank you for your resolve and your generosity of spirit.
On Wednesday night, after a threat was sent to this embassy and the police descended on this building, you came out in the middle of the night to watch over it, and you brought the world’s eyes with you.
Inside this embassy, after dark, I could hear teams of police swarming up into the building through its internal fire escape. But I knew there would be witnesses. And that is because of you.
If the U.K. did not throw away the Vienna conventions the other night, it is because the world was watching. And the world was watching because you were watching.
So, the next time somebody tells you that it is pointless to defend those rights that we hold dear, remind them of your vigil in the dark before the embassy of Ecuador.
Remind them how, in the morning, the sun came up on a different world and a courageous Latin America nation took a stand for justice.
And so, to those brave people: I thank President Correa for the courage he has shown in considering and in granting me political asylum.
And I also thank the government, and in particular Foreign Minister Ricardo Patiño, who upheld the Ecuadorian constitution and its notion of universal rights in their consideration of my asylum. And to the Ecuadorian people for supporting and defending this constitution.
And I also have a debt of gratitude to the staff of this embassy, whose families live in London and who have shown me hospitality and kindness despite the threats we all received.
This Friday, there will be an emergency meeting of the foreign ministers of Latin America in Washington, D.C., to address this very situation.
And so, I am grateful to those people and governments of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Columbia, El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Argentina, Peru, Venezuela, and to all other Latin American countries who have come out to defend the right to asylum.
And to the people of the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Australia who have supported me in strength, even when their governments have not. And to those wiser heads in government who are still fighting for justice. Your day will come.
To the staff, supporters, and sources of WikiLeaks, whose courage and commitment and loyalty has seen no equal.
To my family and to my children, who have been denied their father. Forgive me, we will be reunited soon.
As WikiLeaks stands under threat, so does the freedom of expression and the health of all our societies. We must use this moment to articulate the choice that is before the government of the United States of America.
Will it return to and reaffirm the values, the revolutionary values it was founded on, or will it lurch off the precipice, dragging us all into a dangerous and oppressive world, in which journalists fall silent under the fear of prosecution and citizens must whisper in the dark?
I say it must turn back. I ask President Obama to do the right thing. The United States must renounce its witch hunts against WikiLeaks. The United States must dissolve its FBI investigation.
The United States must vow that it will not seek to prosecute our staff or our supporters. The United States must pledge before the world that it will not pursue journalists for shining a light on the secret crimes of the powerful.
There must be no more foolish talk about prosecuting any media organization, be it WikiLeaks or be it The New York Times.
The U.S. administration’s war on whistleblowers must end.
Thomas Drake, William Binney, and John Kiriakou and the other heroic whistleblowers must — they must — be pardoned or compensated for the hardships they have endured as servants of the public record.
And to the Army private who remains in a military prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, who was found by the United Nations to have endured months of torturous detention in Quantico, Virginia, and who has yet — after two years in prison — to see a trial: he must be released.
Bradley Manning must be released.
And if Bradley Manning did as he is accused, he is a hero and an example to us all and one of the world’s foremost political prisoners.
Bradley Manning must be released.
On Wednesday, Bradley Manning spent his 815th day of detention without trial. The legal maximum is 120 days.
On Thursday, my friend Nabeel Rajab, president of the Bahrain Human Rights Center, was sentenced to three years in prison for a tweet. On Friday, a Russian band were sentenced to two years in jail for a political performance.
There is unity in the oppression. There must be absolute unity and determination in the response.
Thank you.





R.C.
August 19th, 2012 at 11:25 pm
Someone most certainly worth defending. Forget about "that" Russian punk band being used in a geo-political propaganda campaign, Julian Assange is the one that the elites the world over fear and want to destroy. They want to destroy him to set an example to others who might decide to pick up the mantle and learn from his example. I find it strange that I've run into Huff-Po Obama supporting liberals blowing wind over that band in Russia, but they don't support Julian Assange, in fact, some of them downright loathe him! Does this make any sense?
R.C.
August 19th, 2012 at 11:25 pm
Someone most certainly worth defending. Forget about "that" Russian punk band being used in a geo-political propaganda campaign, Julian Assange is the one that the elites the world over fear and want to destroy. They want to destroy him to set an example to others who might decide to pick up the mantle and learn from his example. I find it strange that I've run into Huff-Po Obama supporting liberals blowing wind over that band in Russia, but they don't support Julian Assange, in fact, some of them downright loathe him! Does this make any sense?
R.C.
August 19th, 2012 at 11:25 pm
cont'd……………..
Hopefully, Julian won't have to spend the remainder of his life in that embassy. I was asked by a relative today how come the Brits can give asylum to a murderous dictator like Pinochet, but Julian Assange is somehow such a threat that they're willing to violate the Vienna convention and raid the embassy. I explained that because Pinichet was on the payroll of the elites and was brought to power by them in Chile and supported by them while he raped, looted and tortured. The reality is that people like Assange and many of the writer's linked here at antiwar.com ARE THE REAL THREATS TO THEM. There's no partisan hackery going on with Assange or at antiwar.com, which is why they're such a threat and why they have my respect.
David Kennedy
August 20th, 2012 at 1:14 am
Julian Assange's noble speech rings out to the world.
STOP THE WITCH-HUNT OF THOSE WHO STRIVE FOR TRUTH.
STOP PERSECUTING THOSE GUILTY OF NO CRIME, BUT WHO SEEK ONLY FOR TRUTH.
BRADLEY MANNING is a PEOPLE'S HERO.
HE is the one who should be awarded the PEACE PRIZE, but that is too much to expect of the craven cowards in Norway.
They prefer to honour the likes of Kissinger, Menachem Benin, Shimon Perez, and Barack Obama, to name but a few of the warmongers carefully chosen for this honour.
The government and courts of Britain have brought shame to the people of Britain in servilely following the wishes and dictates of its vengeful ally across the Atlantic. The US government has shown itself to the world by its vile and cowardly actions just how despicable it is, devoid of justice, compassion, humility, and without a shred of human decency.
It is left to Manning and Assange to show that honour and decency still exists in the world.
Our thanks to them, to Ecuador, and to all the brave people who have supported them.
My sincerest thanks to them all.
Humayun Sheikh
August 20th, 2012 at 1:49 am
Bravo Mr. Assange, keep serving humanity. All the honourable people of conscious who love serving humanity in the whole world, with best wishes and for your long life are your supporters. Only the criminal terrorist mentality ones are against you. May GOD bless you and your associates & supporters. Thanks, again for your service to humanity. And at the end REAL THANKS TO THOUGH SMALL BUT COURAGEOUS LION HEARTED SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRIES, SHAME ON AMERICAN & EUREOPEAN COWARD CRIMINAL TERRORIST MAFIA COUNTRIES, WHO MANIPULATE INTERNATIONAL LAWS TO JUSTIFY THEIR OWN CRIMINAL/TERRORIST ACTIONS & STILL BLAME OTHERS.
Assange Urges US to End ‘War on Whistleblowers’ « Stop Making Sense
August 20th, 2012 at 3:01 am
[...] supporters gathered around the Ecuadorean Embassy in central London today to hear a high-profile speech from WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who has been granted asylum within the embassy, much to the [...]
Reader
August 20th, 2012 at 4:23 am
As much as his cause is worth defending, Mr. Assange has shown (perhaps, understandably) a great deal of pampering to the very same ugly propaganda that he himself fell victim to. I mean, it just plainly distasteful to equate his case (where the freedom of speech and information is at stake ISELF) with the Western government-funded 'cause celebre' of Pussy Riot, entirely fabricated hit-piece involving desperately attention-whoring NED-fueled 'artists' in order to (surprise, surprise) make the Ol' Ruskies look bad. PR's freedom of speech was NOT violated at ANY point whatsoever. They've been doing their thing for YEARS (including the 'political' orgy organized within the university building… let's not even PRETEND that such thing would be even THINKABLE in the US or in WEurope).
Anyway, they were arrested ONLY upon storming the church,forcibly stopping the religious service and staging their dull little performance (if the poor girls could only sing!). I mean, since when the religious freedoms and elementary dignity of church-goers are abolished, so they are left at the Pussy Riot's mercy and good will? What would have happened if ANY church (or whichever place of worship) was stormed that way in England or in the US Bible Belt/some East Coast town with religious majority?
Sad thing is that Mr. Assange has joined the ranks of these wretched old hypocrites from the Western celebrity caste in their propagandist quest to 'free Pussy Riot" (Paul McCartney should really have kept his mouth shut… the guy has been KNIGHTED by THE QUEEN for crying out loud, with religious ceremonies, Anglican ministers and all… how come he didn't find it suitable to interrupt the ceremony, call the Archbishop the pawn of the evil Queen and deliver a 'hippy prayer' in that vein, because THAT's what Pussy Riot has done).
Having said all that, I'm not saying that ALL the shananigans related to the Moscow trial vs. Pussy Riot were just and acceptable (though it's hard not to see the official Russian line as only echoing all-too-predictable demonology from the West)
Reader
August 20th, 2012 at 4:23 am
As much as his cause is worth defending, Mr. Assange has shown (perhaps, understandably) a great deal of pampering to the very same ugly propaganda that he himself fell victim to. I mean, it just plainly distasteful to equate his case (where the freedom of speech and information is at stake ISELF) with the Western government-funded 'cause celebre' of Pussy Riot, entirely fabricated hit-piece involving desperately attention-whoring NED-fueled 'artists' in order to (surprise, surprise) make the Ol' Ruskies look bad. PR's freedom of speech was NOT violated at ANY point whatsoever. They've been doing their thing for YEARS (including the 'political' orgy organized within the university building… let's not even PRETEND that such thing would be even THINKABLE in the US or in WEurope).
Anyway, they were arrested ONLY upon storming the church,forcibly stopping the religious service and staging their dull little performance (if the poor girls could only sing!). I mean, since when the religious freedoms and elementary dignity of church-goers are abolished, so they are left at the Pussy Riot's mercy and good will? What would have happened if ANY church (or whichever place of worship) was stormed that way in England or in the US Bible Belt/some East Coast town with religious majority?
Sad thing is that Mr. Assange has joined the ranks of these wretched old hypocrites from the Western celebrity caste in their propagandist quest to 'free Pussy Riot" (Paul McCartney should really have kept his mouth shut… the guy has been KNIGHTED by THE QUEEN for crying out loud, with religious ceremonies, Anglican ministers and all… how come he didn't find it suitable to interrupt the ceremony, call the Archbishop the pawn of the evil Queen and deliver a 'hippy prayer' in that vein, because THAT's what Pussy Riot has done).
Having said all that, I'm not saying that ALL the shananigans related to the Moscow trial vs. Pussy Riot were just and acceptable (though it's hard not to see the official Russian line as only echoing all-too-predictable demonology from the West)
Stefan Reich
August 20th, 2012 at 6:31 am
What on earth are talking about? That's totally confused. Forcibly stopping the religious service? Come on.
Bllfld
August 20th, 2012 at 6:47 am
Link to Assange Speech
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-19/assange-cal…
Bllfld
August 20th, 2012 at 6:47 am
Link to Assange Speech
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-19/assange-cal…
Reader
August 20th, 2012 at 7:16 am
You're free to check, and I'll stand corrected in case of being mistaken about this (which I am not,having followed this whole ting from both Western and Russian sources). The girls have been pulling their anti-Putin stunts for HALF A DECADE without even a SLAP on the wrist (and why should they be? opposing the govt. and the president is their basic civil right). Their breaking into the church and ruining it for everyone else at presence there at the time, has led to their arrest (while the whole incident was painted as The Evil Putin vs. The Good Freedom Fighters in the western media). The church and state are separated, hence the duty of the state to defend the free religious expression of its citizens INSIDE their houses of worship, right? Whenever the idiots of ANY political affiliation tried to desecrate ANY religious ground, they were promptly arrested by the very same Russian police and convicted for their crimes of hatred, why on Earth would P//sy Riot have it any other way? Besides, such thing would not be tolerated a NANOSECOND in ANY Western country. Not to mention that ANY group of college students engaging in the PUBLIC sex as a form of 'protest' INSIDE ANY university building on Western hemisphere would be INSTANTLY reduced to a perpetual pariah-status within their community & expelled from the college THE VERY same day. In Russia, nobody gave a damn (which surprises me, i must say, given a relatively high standard of public decency there). You must have seen the video of the PR members engaging in the 'protest' banging merrily, it's from 4,5 years ago.
I'm just saying that the whole Western coverage of the recent incident reeks on hypocrisy
ML3
August 20th, 2012 at 12:59 pm
What to make of this??
DARLING OF THE RIGHT, CROWN PRINCE OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER, JULIAN ASSANGE http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/08/19/assange-w…
ML3
August 20th, 2012 at 12:59 pm
What to make of this??
DARLING OF THE RIGHT, CROWN PRINCE OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER, JULIAN ASSANGE http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/08/19/assange-w…
Still Waiting for America to Be Free Again, and Waiting and Waiting… » Scott Lazarowitz's Blog
August 21st, 2012 at 4:22 am
[...] Julian Assange: There Is Unity in Oppression; There Must Be Unity in Response [...]